Latest news with #investorlawsuit
Globe and Mail
7 days ago
- Business
- Globe and Mail
Deadline Approaching: RxSight, Inc. (RXST) Investors Who Lost Money Urged to Contact Law Offices of Howard G. Smith
Law Offices of Howard G. Smith reminds investors of the upcoming September 22, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the case filed on behalf of investors who purchased RxSight, Inc. ('RxSight' or the 'Company') (NASDAQ: RXST) securities between November 7, 2024 and July 8, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). IF YOU ARE AN INVESTOR WHO SUFFERED A LOSS IN RXSIGHT, INC. (RXST), CONTACT THE LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD G. SMITH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ONGOING SECURITIES FRAUD LAWSUIT. Contact the Law Offices of Howard G. Smith to discuss your legal rights by email at howardsmith@ by telephone at (215) 638-4847 or visit our website at What Happened? On July 8, 2025, after the market closed, RxSight reported preliminary second quarter 2025 financial results, revealing significant declines in LDD sales, LAL utilization, and overall revenue. The Company also lowered its full year 2025 guidance by approximately $42.5 million at the midpoint. The Company's Chief Executive Officer, Ronald Kurtz, disclosed that '[a]doption challenges over the last few quarters have been a primary reason for the LDD stall.' On this news, RxSight's stock price fell $4.84, or 37.8%, to close at $7.95 per share on July 9, 2025, on unusually heavy trading volume. What Is The Lawsuit About? The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) the Company was experiencing 'adoption challenges' and/or structural issues resulting in declines in sales and utilization; (2) Defendants had overstated the demand for RxSight's products; (3) as a result, RxSight was unlikely to meet its own previously issued financial guidance for fiscal year 2025; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants' positive statements about the Company's business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis. If you purchased or otherwise acquired RxSight securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than September 22, 2025 to ask the Court to appoint you as lead plaintiff if you meet certain legal requirements. Contact Us to Participate or Learn More: If you wish to learn more about this class action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us: Law Offices of Howard G. Smith 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112 Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020 Telephone: (215) 638-4847 Email: howardsmith@ Visit our website at: To be a member of the class action you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the class action. This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.
Globe and Mail
21-07-2025
- Business
- Globe and Mail
NEOG INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that Neogen Corporation Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Neogen Corporation (NASDAQ: NEOG) common stock between January 5, 2023 and June 3, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until September 16, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Neogen class action lawsuit. Captioned Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. Neogen Corporation, No. 25-cv-00802 (W.D. Mich.), the Neogen class action lawsuit charges Neogen and certain of Neogen's top executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Neogen class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at info@ CASE ALLEGATIONS: Neogen, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the development, manufacture, and marketing of various products and services dedicated to food and animal safety. According to the complaint, in December 2021, it was announced that Neogen would merge with the Food Safety Division of the 3M Company, with the deal closing in September 2022. The Neogen class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) defendants led investors to believe that Neogen's integration with 3M was progressing much better than it actually was; and (ii) even when Neogen was forced to reveal that certain 'inefficiencies' arose as a result of the integration, defendants downplayed them and assured investors that they were fully aware and committed to resolving them quickly. The Neogen class action lawsuit further alleges that on January 10, 2025, Neogen announced its preliminary second quarter of 2025 financial results, revealing, among other things, that: (i) GAAP net income in the quarter was significantly negative due to a $461 million non-cash goodwill impairment charge related to the 3M acquisition; (ii) Neogen cut its fiscal year 2025 revenue and EBITDA guidance; and (iii) Neogen concluded that, as of November 30, 2024, Neogen had material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. On this news, the price of Neogen common stock fell more than 5%, according to the complaint. Then, on April 9, 2025, the Neogen class action lawsuit alleges that Neogen announced its third quarter of 2025 financial results, reporting a loss of $11 million, or $0.05 per share, compared with a loss of $2 million, or $0.01 per share, a year earlier. Neogen further announced that revenue fell 3.4% to $221 million which had been negatively impacted by integration issues, Neogen was cutting its fiscal year 2025 revenue and EBITDA outlook, capital expenditures were expected to be $100 million as a result of lowered adjusted EBITDA and a 'pull-forward of . . . integration capex into fiscal 2025,' and that CEO, defendant John Adent, would be stepping down. On this news, the price of Neogen common stock fell 28%, according to the complaint. Finally, on June 4, 2025, Neogen revealed that it expected 'EBITDA margin to probably be around the high-teens' which represented a considerable drop from the previous quarter's profit margin of 22%, blaming the expected shortfall on 'elevated . . . inventory write-offs,' according to the complaint. The Neogen class action lawsuit alleges that on this news, the price of Neogen common stock fell more than 17%. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Neogen common stock during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Neogen class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Neogen class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Neogen class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Neogen class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information:
Associated Press
14-07-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
XPLR INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Announces that XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit
SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jul 14, 2025-- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP (NYSE: XIFR) securities between September 27, 2023 and January 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), have until September 8, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the XPLR class action lawsuit. Captioned Alvrus v. XPLR Infrastructure, LP f/k/a NextEra Energy Partners, LP, No. 25-cv-01755 (S.D. Cal.), the XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit charges XPLR Infrastructure, NextEra Energy, Inc., as well as certain of XPLR Infrastructure's top former executives with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: You can also contact attorneysJ.C. SanchezorJennifer N. Caringalof Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at[email protected]. CASE ALLEGATIONS: XPLR Infrastructure acquires, owns, and manages contracted clean energy projects in the United States, including a portfolio of contracted wind and solar power projects, as well as a natural gas pipeline. Throughout the Class Period, XPLR Infrastructure operated as a 'yieldco' – that is, a business that owns and operates fully-built and operational power generating projects, focused on delivering large cash distributions to investors. The XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit alleges that defendants throughout the Class Period made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) XPLR Infrastructure was struggling to maintain its operations as a yieldco; (ii) defendants temporarily relieved this issue by entering into certain financing arrangements while downplaying the attendant risks; (iii) XPLR Infrastructure could not resolve those financings before their maturity date without risking significant unitholder dilution; (iv) as a result, defendants planned to halt cash distributions to investors and instead redirect those funds to, among other things, resolve those financings; and (v) consequently, XPLR Infrastructure's yieldco business model and distribution growth rate was unsustainable. The XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit further alleges that on January 28, 2025, XPLR Infrastructure announced that it would suspend entirely cash distributions to common unitholders and essentially abandon its yieldco model. On this news, the price of XPLR Infrastructure common units fell by nearly 35%, the complaint alleges. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired XPLR Infrastructure securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the XPLR Infrastructure class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices. View source version on CONTACT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP J.C. Sanchez, Jennifer N. Caringal 655 W. Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101 800-449-4900 [email protected] KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SOURCE: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 07/14/2025 05:45 AM/DISC: 07/14/2025 05:45 AM
