3 days ago
- Business
- South China Morning Post
Why China's problem of cutthroat competition demands the world's attention
When Joseph Schumpeter coined the term 'creative destruction', he might not have realised just how destructive unrestrained competition could be. That is the paradox at the heart of China's recent economic success.
Advertisement
On Monday, People's Daily
ran an editorial , calling for neijuan or involution – a self-defeating
cycle of excessive competition – to be nipped in the bud. For China's Communist Party mouthpiece to publicly acknowledge the issue signals its severity. Involution has become an economic undercurrent shaping what we are seeing, from industrial strategy to global trade dynamics.
For example, around the time the People's Daily article was published,
BYD slashed prices on 22 vehicle models by up to 34 per cent, with its Seagull model now selling for just 55,800 yuan (US$7,750). Other competitors are likely to follow suit shortly.
Headlines largely focused on the stock price of carmakers. However, the real story is that BYD could have just priced
an entire cohort of Japanese, Korean and European cars out of relevance. Let's not forget the knock-on effects: foreign carmakers facing shrinking margins and slowing innovation budgets could end up withdrawing from electric vehicle (EV) battles they cannot win.
Then there are
Meituan and , both stepping up subsidies, fighting for user growth in an already saturated food delivery market. This is not because demand has collapsed but because competition has become pathological. Businesses are stuck in a race to the bottom.
Advertisement
Classical economic theory suggests profits will converge to a normal level in the long run, but such intense competition means supernormal profit plunges quickly while subnormal profit takes much longer to converge upwards. Margins get relentlessly compressed. Incentives trigger an excessive response. Everyone
chases the same opportunity – often recklessly.
