Latest news with #ownership
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Private companies are Heineken N.V.'s (AMS:HEIA) biggest owners and were hit after market cap dropped €3.3b
Key Insights The considerable ownership by private companies in Heineken indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy The largest shareholder of the company is L'Arche Green N.V. with a 52% stake 22% of Heineken is held by Institutions AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. To get a sense of who is truly in control of Heineken N.V. (AMS:HEIA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 7.6%. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Heineken. View our latest analysis for Heineken What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Heineken? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that Heineken does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Heineken's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Heineken. Our data shows that L'Arche Green N.V. is the largest shareholder with 52% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.2% and 2.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. Insider Ownership Of Heineken The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Heineken N.V.. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own €36m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. General Public Ownership The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Heineken. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Private Company Ownership It seems that Private Companies own 52%, of the Heineken stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. Next Steps: While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Heineken that you should be aware of. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Metals X Limited's (ASX:MLX) largest shareholders are retail investors with 47% ownership, public companies own 23%
Key Insights Metals X's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership 19% of Metals X is held by Institutions Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. To get a sense of who is truly in control of Metals X Limited (ASX:MLX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). And public companies on the other hand have a 23% ownership in the company. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Metals X. Check out our latest analysis for Metals X What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Metals X? Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Metals X already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Metals X, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Metals X. APAC Resources Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 23% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.3% and 5.0% of the stock. A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time. Insider Ownership Of Metals X The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. We can see that insiders own shares in Metals X Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$541m, and insiders have AU$18m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Private Company Ownership It seems that Private Companies own 6.6%, of the Metals X stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. Public Company Ownership Public companies currently own 23% of Metals X stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further. Next Steps: While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Metals X is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those makes us a bit uncomfortable... If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Harbour-Link Group Berhad's (KLSE:HARBOUR) largest shareholders are private companies with 53% ownership, insiders own 24%
Key Insights Harbour-Link Group Berhad's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership 24% of Harbour-Link Group Berhad is held by insiders Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Harbour-Link Group Berhad (KLSE:HARBOUR) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Individual insiders, on the other hand, account for 24% of the company's stockholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Harbour-Link Group Berhad. View our latest analysis for Harbour-Link Group Berhad What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Harbour-Link Group Berhad? Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Harbour-Link Group Berhad. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Harbour-Link Group Berhad, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Harbour-Link Group Berhad is not owned by hedge funds. Enricharvest Sdn. Bhd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 32% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 22% and 10.0% of the stock. Piaw Yong, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board. To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held. Insider Ownership Of Harbour-Link Group Berhad The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Harbour-Link Group Berhad. Insiders have a RM124m stake in this RM514m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Harbour-Link Group Berhad. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. Private Company Ownership We can see that Private Companies own 53%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Harbour-Link Group Berhad better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Harbour-Link Group Berhad (including 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) . Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
a day ago
- Business
- Bloomberg
Travel Remains Consistent and Steady: Travel+Leisure CEO
Travel + Leisure Co. is a vacation ownership business. Mike Brown, the company's CEO, tells Open Interest that 90% of its consumers are based in the US, where the consumer economy is strong. (Source: Bloomberg)
New York Times
a day ago
- Business
- New York Times
What I'm hearing about Mario Lemieux's Penguins ownership comeback attempt
PITTSBURGH — And now, we wait. The secret's out that a group led by Mario Lemieux is considering making an offer to Fenway Sports Group. We know that Lemieux, Ron Burkle and David Morehouse are involved and that their group believes Fenway will sell for the right price. Fenway purchased the Penguins from Lemieux and Burkle for $900 million in 2021. Though the Penguins have fallen on difficult times on the ice, Fenway's price will be higher than that. Advertisement We also know that Fenway has stated it isn't interested in selling the team and that it is looking only for a minority investor to join in its ownership of the Penguins. The team's attendance has dropped nearly 10 percent in the past three seasons, so a new minority owner would help offset financial losses. However, sources close to Lemieux have made it clear that Lemieux and Burkle are not interested in becoming minority owners with FSG. It's all or nothing for the two men who owned the Penguins from 1999 through 2021. FSG ultimately has the power here. Still, the sources say the living legend is eager to return to the NHL and have indicated that league commissioner Gary Bettman, who long enjoyed a strong relationship with Lemieux, Burkle and Morehouse while they ran the Penguins, is aware of the trio's interest in reclaiming primary ownership. Lemieux, the Hall of Famer who led the Penguins to two championships as a player and three more as an owner, still owns his home in the Pittsburgh suburb of Sewickley, Pa. He also owns property near Boca Raton, Fla., and spends some of his time in the Sunshine State. However, he's long described himself as a Pittsburgher and spends most of his time in Western Pennsylvania. He also retains a close relationship with Penguins captain Sidney Crosby, who turns 28 on Aug. 7 and has two years remaining on his contract. Lemieux also remains close with the two other members of the Big Three, Evgeni Malkin and Kris Letang. Burkle is the money man in the Lemieux ownership group and would be forking over the majority of the capital if a deal is struck. According to Forbes, Burkle's net worth is approximately $3.3 billion. So, why would Lemieux, Burkle and Morehouse want to buy back the team for more than they sold it for, and so soon after selling it? Advertisement Expansion, for one. The NHL is expected to grow within the next couple of years — it's widely believed that it will expand by two teams, with Houston and Atlanta as commonly cited destinations. Expansion teams, a recent report from Sportico indicated, would likely pay around $2 billion each for the right to enter the league. That money gets spread around to the teams. Do the math. That's $125 million for each of the 32 existing NHL teams' owners if they expand by two franchises. FSG is very aware of that. So, too, are Lemieux, Burkle and Morehouse. When it comes to the Penguins, Lemieux historically gets what he wants. Many people I've spoken to within the organization are stunned that he would want back in, as Lemieux has been enjoying playing golf and spending time with his wife, Nathalie, and their children and grandchildren. And yet, the sources close to Lemieux insist he's very interested in making this happen — the king of the comeback pulling off one more. The Lemieux group has not made an offer or even discussed one with FSG. It's expected that such a conversation will take place soon. The Penguins' forward unit, as currently constituted, is pretty darn good. Consider the top nine they could deploy if the season started today: Rickard Rakell-Sidney Crosby-Bryan Rust Anthony Mantha-Evgeni Malkin-Ville Koivunen Rutger McGroarty-Tommy Novak-Phil Tomasino I wouldn't exactly call it a Stanley Cup-caliber group of forwards, but it's not that kind of group that would give the Penguins the best opportunity to land Gavin McKenna, the top 2026 NHL Draft prospect who will play next season at Penn State. That top line, as we know, is outstanding. Malkin is excited about playing with Novak, who has real talent. Koivunen and McGroarty also have talent, as we saw late last season. Tomasino does, too. Advertisement So, is this really the top nine the Penguins will take into next season? I haven't a clue at this point. Time will tell. Penguins president/general manager Kyle Dubas isn't selling Rakell and Rust for peanuts, nor is he married to the idea of keeping them for the long term. Still, I keep going back to what several team sources have told me: Dubas wants to go young next year. Really young. As July turns into August and training camp is less than seven weeks away, I'd remember those words. Things are quiet at the moment. But as we all know, that can change. A big trade or two feels likely before training camp. Dubas clearly hasn't received offers that are to his liking just yet, but he is fully committed to a rebuild. That means that having 30-somethings such as Rust, Rakell and Mantha in your lineup doesn't make much sense. Again, the goal is to get younger. Rust and Rakell are good enough that they'll not only hurt the Penguins' chances of earning a top-five pick, but they should also fetch a significant return. They could both be on the opening night roster, of course, but I'd be surprised if that happens. There is interest in Erik Karlsson from opposing teams, but the Penguins don't want to give him away for nothing. For the right price, I believe he will be traded. The Penguins are willing to retain some of his salary. They realize he's not part of the future in Pittsburgh and that the experiment hasn't worked. But trading him remains complicated. I don't see him playing out the final two years of his contract in Pittsburgh. Dubas would like to get a good return for the future Hall of Famer, whose value around the NHL varies widely based on whom you ask. (Photo of Mario Lemieux: Minas Panagiotakis / Getty Images)
