Latest news with #privateCompanies
TechCrunch
4 days ago
- Business
- TechCrunch
Yes, your DNA can be up for sale — we just saw it happen
As the recent $256M acquisition of 23andMe shows, yes, your DNA can be bought and sold. What private companies can do with biometric data may surprise you, and we've only seen the tip of the iceberg so far.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
ForFarmers N.V. (AMS:FFARM) stock most popular amongst private companies who own 49%, while individual investors hold 33%
The considerable ownership by private companies in ForFarmers indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 58% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. A look at the shareholders of ForFarmers N.V. (AMS:FFARM) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 49% to be precise, is private companies. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Meanwhile, individual investors make up 33% of the company's shareholders. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ForFarmers, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for ForFarmers Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Institutions have a very small stake in ForFarmers. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most. ForFarmers is not owned by hedge funds. Coöperatie FromFarmers U.A. is currently the largest shareholder, with 49% of shares outstanding. Stichting Beheer- En Administratiekantoor, Endowment Arm is the second largest shareholder owning 9.1% of common stock, and Dirk Lindenbergh holds about 5.4% of the company stock. A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 58% stake. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. We can report that insiders do own shares in ForFarmers N.V.. It has a market capitalization of just €373m, and insiders have €22m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in ForFarmers. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 49%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for ForFarmers you should be aware of. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Genting Berhad's (KLSE:GENTING) top owners are private companies with 45% stake, while 43% is held by individual investors
The considerable ownership by private companies in Genting Berhad indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company 12% of Genting Berhad is held by Institutions We've discovered 1 warning sign about Genting Berhad. View them for free. Every investor in Genting Berhad (KLSE:GENTING) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And individual investors on the other hand have a 43% ownership in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Genting Berhad, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for Genting Berhad Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Genting Berhad. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Genting Berhad's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Genting Berhad is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Parkview Management Sdn Bhd, with ownership of 45%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 1.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 1.5% by the third-largest shareholder. We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Genting Berhad in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own RM9.2m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling. With a 43% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Genting Berhad. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. It seems that Private Companies own 45%, of the Genting Berhad stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Genting Berhad , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Purple Group Limited's (JSE:PPE) largest shareholders are individual investors with 49% ownership, private companies own 25%
Significant control over Purple Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions The top 10 shareholders own 50% of the company Recent purchases by insiders We check all companies for important risks. See what we found for Purple Group in our free report. If you want to know who really controls Purple Group Limited (JSE:PPE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 49% to be precise, is individual investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Private companies, on the other hand, account for 25% of the company's stockholders. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Purple Group, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Purple Group Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. Purple Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Purple Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Purple Group. Our data shows that Base Spv Partnership A is the largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch & Cie Asset Management is the second largest shareholder owning 7.5% of common stock, and Mark Barnes holds about 7.0% of the company stock. Mark Barnes, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the company's CEO Charles Savage directly holds 3.0% of the total shares outstanding. We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Purple Group Limited. Insiders own R248m worth of shares in the R1.8b company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently. With a 49% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Purple Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. It seems that Private Companies own 25%, of the Purple Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow. Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
The National
10-05-2025
- Business
- The National
White House denies claim US is militarising Gaza aid
Washington has reportedly proposed a system under which humanitarian assistance is provided by private companies under the protection of Israeli forces
