logo
#

Latest news with #standards

Standards watchdog opens Nigel Farage probe after peer complaint
Standards watchdog opens Nigel Farage probe after peer complaint

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • Politics
  • The Independent

Standards watchdog opens Nigel Farage probe after peer complaint

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is under investigation by Parliament's standards watchdog. The probe concerns the 'registration of an interest' and stems from a complaint made by a member of the House of Lords. Mr Farage said that the inquiry is not related to any undeclared income. The investigation began on 28 July and falls under paragraph 5 of the code of conduct, which governs the timely registration of financial interests and benefits. This follows a recent case where Chancellor Rachel Reeves was found to have inadvertently breached parliamentary rules by failing to declare gifts on time. Nigel Farage under investigation by parliamentary watchdog

Nigel Farage under investigation by parliamentary watchdog
Nigel Farage under investigation by parliamentary watchdog

The Independent

time5 hours ago

  • Politics
  • The Independent

Nigel Farage under investigation by parliamentary watchdog

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is under investigation by Parliament's standards watchdog, it has emerged. A probe has been opened into the "registration of an interest". Nigel Farage told The Independent the inquiry was opened following a complaint from a member of the House of Lords, but added: "It is not to do with any undeclared income". A spokesman for Nigel Farage added that, following the complaint, 'the Commissioner for Standards is doing his job'. The investigation was opened on July 28, according to the commissioner's official website, and is under paragraph 5 of the code of conduct. This says that 'members must fulfil conscientiously the requirements of the House in respect of the registration of interests in the Register of Members' Financial Interests. New members must register all their current financial interests, and any registrable benefits (other than earnings) received in the 12 months before their election within one month of their election, and members must register any change in those registrable interests within 28 days.' Earlier this month the commissioner found that Rachel Reeves had inadvertently breached parliament's rules by failing to declare gifts on time. The chancellor was probed over free theatre tickets, which she failed to add to her register of interests within 28 days. She blamed 'an oversight' for her initial failure to declare the gifts, which included tickets to an adaptation of the classic children's novel Ballet Shoes at the National Theatre over Christmas

Tory peer apologises for helping set up ministerial meeting for firm he advises
Tory peer apologises for helping set up ministerial meeting for firm he advises

The Guardian

time5 days ago

  • Business
  • The Guardian

Tory peer apologises for helping set up ministerial meeting for firm he advises

A Conservative peer has apologised for breaking the House of Lords rules by helping to secure a meeting with a minister for a Canadian company he advises. Ian Duncan, a deputy speaker of the Lords, was found to have breached the rules by providing a parliamentary service for Terrestrial Energy when he facilitated an introduction between its chief executive and a new energy minister. His conduct had been reported to the House of Lords standards commissioner following the Guardian's months-long investigation examining the commercial interests of peers. As a result of the Lords debate series, four other peers are being investigated to establish whether they breached the house's code of conduct. A fifth peer, Iain McNicol, a former general secretary of the Labour party, was required to apologise in May for breaking the rules by writing to the Treasury to promote a cryptocurrency firm that was paying him. In a report published on Friday, the standards commissioner ruled that Lord Duncan of Springbank had broken the rules which forbid peers from seeking to profit from their membership of the upper chamber. The former junior climate minister has been an adviser to Terrestrial Energy since 2020. When he first joined, he was given share options, which allow him to buy shares in the company at a preferential rate if they become profitable. The Guardian revealed that, in 2023, Duncan forwarded a letter to Andrew Bowie, the nuclear minister at the time, from Simon Irish, the firm's chief executive who wanted a meeting with the minister at short notice. The peer signed off his email 'Lord D of S'. The chief executive of the company, which is developing a new type of nuclear reactor, secured the meeting with Bowie at which he lobbied for Terrestrial Energy to be given easier access to government funding. In his response to the watchdog, Duncan said Bowie was a 'friend of long standing' who had helped him get elected as a member of the European parliament in 2014 and had then worked in his Brussels office. Duncan argued: 'It was this personal relationship, and not my membership of the upper house, nor my government service, which led Mr Irish to ask whether there was a prospect (albeit limited) that a personal request might help land a meeting during his visit.' Margaret Obi, the Lords commissioner, decided that the rule prohibiting peers from providing 'parliamentary services in return for payment or other incentive or reward' was absolute. She added: 'It did not provide an exemption in cases where there was an existing personal relationship.' She ruled: 'Although Lord Duncan stated he was not paid specifically for facilitating this introduction, he received an allocation of share options as consideration for his work for Terrestrial Energy. 'I consider that this can reasonably be understood to have been an incentive or reward for the various tasks he undertook for the company.'

Keir Starmer to replace post-ministerial jobs watchdog with tougher regime
Keir Starmer to replace post-ministerial jobs watchdog with tougher regime

The Guardian

time21-07-2025

  • Politics
  • The Guardian

Keir Starmer to replace post-ministerial jobs watchdog with tougher regime

Keir Starmer is to abolish the independent post-ministerial jobs watchdog, which has long been criticised as 'toothless', and – for the first time – financial penalties will be imposed on those who break the rules after leaving government. As part of a standards overhaul that ministers hope will help improve public faith in the system, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba) will be scrapped and a tougher regime introduced. Under the changes, which come into force from October and which the Guardian first reported last month, former ministers and senior officials found to have seriously breached the rules will be asked to repay any severance payment received. There is currently no obligation for them to follow the guidance issued by Acoba to ensure there are no conflicts of interest or that lobbying does not take place, and the body has no ability to issue punishments. Boris Johnson, the Conservative former prime minister, breached the rules on taking jobs after government on three separate occasions without facing a proper sanction, leading to calls to beef up Acoba's powers. Eligibility for ministerial severance payments will also be restricted, with those who leave office following a serious breach of the ministerial code or having served less than six months forgoing them entirely. A new independent ethics and integrity commission (EIC) will be set up to oversee standards. It will incorporate the existing Committee on Standards in Public Life (CSPL), set up by John Major in 1994 to advise prime ministers, and will be led by former military chief Doug Chalmers. The new body's wider remit will include a new obligation to report annually to the prime minister on the overall health of the standards system, and will engage regularly with public sector bodies to help them develop clear codes of conduct with effective oversight arrangements. It will also be expected to report in a 'reasonable timeframe' on cases after criticism that the CSPL's previous recommendations were often ignored, although there were no details of how long that might be. The EIC will have a role in improving public understanding of the ethics system. It will be responsible for convening and coordinating the different ethics bodies, formalising cooperation and the sharing of best practice. However, the Commons and Lords standards commissioners, the independent complaints and grievance scheme (ICGS), the independent parliamentary standards authority (IPSA) and the Electoral Commission will all remain in place. The EIC was first promised by Labour in 2021, with Starmer suggesting it would help draw a line under an era of 'Tory sleaze', and was included in the party's general election manifesto last year. However, there were concerns the plans had been kicked into the long grass. Pat McFadden, the powerful Cabinet Office minister, said: 'This overhaul will mean there are stronger rules, fewer quangos and clearer lines of accountability. The Committee on Standards in Public Life has played an important role in the past three decades. These changes give it a new mandate for the future. 'But whatever the institutional landscape, the public will in the end judge politicians and government by how they do their jobs and how they fulfil the principles of public service.' Under the plans, Acoba's functions will now be split between the prime minister's adviser on ministerial standards and the civil service commission (CSC), which has also been asked to consider how the rules could be strengthened. The CSC will also undertake regular audits of how individual government departments oversee the application of the rules for former civil servants. Boris Johnson was among several senior Conservative politicians who was found to have breached Acoba rules but faced no sanction. In August 2018, after he had quit as foreign secretary, he returned to his £275,000-a-year Daily Telegraph column despite former cabinet ministers being banned from taking up new jobs for three months after leaving office. He committed a further unambiguous breach of the rules when he failed to get permission from the ministerial appointments watchdog before taking a job as a Daily Mail columnist in June 2023, for which he was reportedly paid a 'very high six-figure sum'. He was sanctioned for a third time in April 2024, for failing to seek permission from the post-ministerial jobs watchdog before taking a role as a consultant to a hedge fund, on whose behalf he met the Venezuelan president. The severance plans are designed to restore public faith in the system after Tory ministers received thousands of pounds in payoffs after serving for just weeks in office under Johnson and Liz Truss. Under the new rules, ministers who serve less than six months will forgo severance payments entirely, and those who return to office within three months of leaving will forgo their salary until the end of that three-month period. Currently, ministers are entitled to a payoff equivalent to three months' salary when they leave office for any reason and regardless of how long they've been in the job – even if it is just a few days. Brandon Lewis was entitled to £16,876 after spending 49 days as justice secretary under Truss's premiership, while Shailesh Vara and Greg Clark were eligible for the same for their own brief stints in office during that period. Ministers have already issued a new ministerial code, given the prime minister's ethics adviser the power to initiate an inquiry without the PM's permission, and required political parties to provide public citations to say why an individual has been nominated to the House of Lords.

IEEE Standards Commitment to Advancing AI Governance Includes Impactful Contributions to New International AI Standards Exchange
IEEE Standards Commitment to Advancing AI Governance Includes Impactful Contributions to New International AI Standards Exchange

Yahoo

time19-07-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

IEEE Standards Commitment to Advancing AI Governance Includes Impactful Contributions to New International AI Standards Exchange

PISCATAWAY, N.J., July 11, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--IEEE, the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for humanity, and its IEEE Standards Association (IEEE SA) announced today that its portfolio of over 100 global AI-related standards is included in the new International AI Standards Exchange. This Exchange is a centralized repository of international AI standards with the aim to foster collaboration and responsible AI development worldwide. IEEE and its AI global standards were recognized in the 2024 United Nations AI Advisory Body's Report, Governing AI for Humanity, which created the impetus for the AI Standards Exchange. Due to its impactful AI standards and related work, IEEE, a major standards body, was included as a partner in the establishment of the Exchange. IEEE President and CEO Kathleen Kramer, who is speaking at the AI for Good Summit this year at the High-Level AI Standards Panel, shares, "IEEE's mission of advancing technology for the benefit of humanity is foundational to our institution and our communities. The work of IEEE SA illustrates how direct, inclusive collaboration throughout the global community can make a substantial impact. By having our standards included in the International AI Standards Exchange, we are reinforcing efforts to make IEEE AI standards and guidance easily discoverable and accessible to policymakers, developers, regulators, and other stakeholders seeking trusted, open, and collaborative processes and high-integrity resources to help advance globally interoperable and trusted AI systems." IEEE SA is a leader in addressing the challenges of AI and autonomous systems. IEEE SA's AI ecosystem includes ongoing groundbreaking work and programs such as: The IEEE 7000™ standards series addresses ethical and societal considerations in AI and autonomous systems, including transparency, privacy, algorithmic bias, and accountability. The Ethically Aligned Design (EAD) Framework, which has inspired global discussions on human rights and ethics in AI, informed various AI principles, including those of the OECD, as well as aspects of the UN Global Digital Compact, and continues to serve as a strong and relevant foundation as AI technologies and use evolve. IEEE CertifAIEd™, a personnel credentialing and product certification program that evaluates AI systems for transparency, accountability, and the reduction of bias, provides organizations with credible evidence of responsible AI practices. It addresses criteria including algorithmic bias, ethical transparency, privacy, and accountability, and is compatible with upcoming regulations such as the EU AI Act. This program was developed to align with global regulations being considered or implemented in the United States, China, the European Union, Canada, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions. The Technology Policy Collaborative (TPC), a program that provides collaborative spaces where government bodies and policy makers can address technology innovation and its impact and develop practically-oriented and adaptive frameworks, solutions and fresh governance approaches that can facilitate benefits of technology. "IEEE SA is a globally recognized and respected standardization body, offering multiple pathways to achieve consensus while adhering to the WTO principles," says Alpesh Shah, IEEE SA Managing Director. "A unique aspect of IEEE SA is that its collective global intelligence can be applied contextually in a national, regional, or international context. We delivered on the requested contribution to the Exchange due to the global nature of the work and its meaningful and ongoing impact, in this case, in the field of AI systems." The work of IEEE communities continues to receive recognition in the AI field. Examples include the JRC Report on AI Standardization, enablement of CertifAIEd(™) assessors to support assessment of client's AI systems, manufacturer certifications, and government and NGO training. These have coalesced to help enable the realization of the request outlined in the UN AI Governance report and offer standardization and implementation options where gaps exist. About the IEEE Standards Association IEEE Standards Association (IEEE SA) is a collaborative organization where innovators raise the world's standards for technology. IEEE SA provides a globally open, consensus-building environment and platform that empowers people to work together in the development of leading-edge, market-relevant technology standards, and industry solutions shaping a better, safer and sustainable world. About the IEEE IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization and is a public charity dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity. Through its highly cited publications, conferences, technology standards, and professional and educational activities, IEEE is the trusted voice in a wide variety of areas ranging from aerospace systems, computers, and telecommunications to biomedical engineering, electric power, and consumer electronics. Learn more at View source version on Contacts Ravi Subramaniam, Senior Director Product, Business Development & Karen McCabe, Senior Director of Technology Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store