Latest news with #stateownership
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
While individual investors own 32% of Swisscom AG (VTX:SCMN), state or government are its largest shareholders with 51% ownership
Swisscom's significant state or government ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public 51% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Switzerland) Institutions own 17% of Swisscom AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. Every investor in Swisscom AG (VTX:SCMN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is state or government. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Individual investors, on the other hand, account for 32% of the company's stockholders. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Swisscom. See our latest analysis for Swisscom Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Swisscom already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Swisscom's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Swisscom is not owned by hedge funds. Switzerland is currently the largest shareholder, with 51% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.5% and 2.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Swisscom AG. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own CHF8.6m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 32% stake in Swisscom. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Swisscom that you should be aware of. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
4 days ago
- Business
- Bloomberg
Czech Election Frontrunners Prepare State Buyout of CEZ Utility
The Czech Republic's most popular political party pledged to seek full state ownership in power producer CEZ AS to boost energy security if it returns to government after elections due in October. The ANO group, headed by billionaire former Prime Minister Andrej Babis, is weighing three different paths to raise the government's ownership to 100% from 70%, the party's deputy leader Karel Havlicek said in an interview.
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
State or government among Banque Cantonale Vaudoise's (VTX:BCVN) largest shareholders, saw gain in holdings value after stock jumped 4.0% last week
The considerable ownership by state or government in Banque Cantonale Vaudoise indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy State of Vaud owns 67% of the company Institutional ownership in Banque Cantonale Vaudoise is 11% We check all companies for important risks. See what we found for Banque Cantonale Vaudoise in our free report. If you want to know who really controls Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (VTX:BCVN), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 67% stake, state or government possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Clearly, state or government benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CHF322m last week. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Banque Cantonale Vaudoise. Check out our latest analysis for Banque Cantonale Vaudoise Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that Banque Cantonale Vaudoise does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Banque Cantonale Vaudoise's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Banque Cantonale Vaudoise is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is State of Vaud, with ownership of 67%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.1% and 1.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Banque Cantonale Vaudoise in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own CHF17m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
The Guardian
16-05-2025
- Business
- The Guardian
UAE delegation visited No 10 before law change that paves way for stake in Telegraph
A delegation from the United Arab Emirates met Downing Street officials weeks before ministers announced a law change that allows the state to take a 15% stake in the Telegraph titles, the Guardian understands. Ministers disclosed the cap this week as part of a long-awaited clarification on the rules around state ownership of British newspapers. It is higher than the 5-10% ceiling envisaged by the previous Conservative government. It has now emerged that a few weeks earlier in March, a senior Emirati delegation held a meeting in No 10 with officials including Varun Chandra, the business adviser to Keir Starmer. While details of the meeting are unknown, it is understood the delegation sought clarity on the state ownership law. Downing Street and IMI declined to comment. The UAE government has been approached for comment. The move effectively paves the way for the United Arab Emirates to take a 15% stake in the Telegraph, most likely through the IMI investment vehicle backed by Abu Dhabi. The law change ends a lengthy consultation involving intensive lobbying by newspaper owners. It is also a sign of Downing Street's desperate search for economic growth and determination to make the UK an attractive place for overseas investment. However, the decision has come under attack from MPs and industry figures for opening up the British media to more state ownership. Fraser Nelson, a former editor of the Spectator and current Times columnist, described the decision as an 'indefensible sellout, in defiance of parliament's vote to protect press freedom'. Andrew Neil, a former Sunday Times editor, said Lisa Nandy should lose her job over the decision. The Liberal Democrats are also opposing the new law and will launch an attempt to block it in the House of Lords with a so-called 'fatal motion'. The tactic is likely to split the Conservative party. Max Wilkinson, the Lib Dem culture spokesperson, said the plan put editorial independence 'at risk'. 'It's a plan we wholeheartedly reject,' he said. 'No 10 must come clean on their meeting with UAE delegates, and clarify whether they were lobbied to roll back on what parliament agreed last year.' Should the law change go through as expected, it marks the beginning of the end for the Telegraph's ownership saga, which has rumbled on for two years. The Telegraph titles were originally bought by RedBird IMI, a UAE-backed venture that was blocked from taking control by the last government. Under the new law, RedBird Capital, a US private equity firm, is expected to buy the Telegraph, with 15% of the money coming from IMI, which is linked to Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the Emirati royal. RedBird is also said to be talking to other possible British investors in the deal. A mooted attempt to buy the Telegraph by the Chelsea FC owner and chair Todd Boehly and the Fleet Street veteran David Montgomery has not materialised. While there has been significant interest in the Telegraph from other groups, the asking price of £500m has proved too high for most. In 2023, Lord Rothermere's Daily Mail and General Trust had been involved in talks with Qatari investors over a potential bid, but subsequently pulled out. However, the peer still has contacts in the region. This week, Rothermere was among the high-profile media figures spotted in Doha meeting president Trump and the Qatari emir, Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. His group's events business is understood to be prominent in the region. Others in the party included Piers Morgan, who now owns and runs his own YouTube channel, and Patrick Soon-Shiong, the medical investor and Los Angeles Times owner. Industry sources said that the UAE delegation was not the only group to have been seeking clarity on the laws around media ownership by foreign states. Other media groups were also said to have concerns over a ban on state ownership, or a very low ceiling on such ownership. It is a sign of the financial strains the media world is under, as print sales decline and the digital revolution has brought huge change, with previously different kinds of media groups now competing with each other online. The development of AI is also seen as an opportunity as well as a threat by media executives, and the Gulf states have significant money to invest.
Yahoo
12-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Liechtensteinische Landesbank Aktiengesellschaft's (VTX:LLBN) biggest owners are state or government who got richer after stock soared 3.3% last week
Liechtensteinische Landesbank's significant state or government ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Liechtenstein) Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company We've discovered 1 warning sign about Liechtensteinische Landesbank. View them for free. Every investor in Liechtensteinische Landesbank Aktiengesellschaft (VTX:LLBN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 57% stake, state or government possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. As a result, state or government collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CHF2.4b market cap following a 3.3% gain in the stock. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Liechtensteinische Landesbank. Check out our latest analysis for Liechtensteinische Landesbank Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Liechtensteinische Landesbank. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Liechtensteinische Landesbank, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Liechtensteinische Landesbank. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Liechtenstein with 57% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 3.4% and 3.0% of the stock. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Liechtensteinische Landesbank Aktiengesellschaft in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CHF8.8m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. It seems that Private Companies own 5.9%, of the Liechtensteinische Landesbank stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Liechtensteinische Landesbank has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
