Latest news with #techbillionaire
WIRED
a day ago
- Business
- WIRED
Decoding Palantir, the Most Mysterious Company in Silicon Valley
CEO of Palantir Technologies Alex Karp attends the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit on the campus of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on July 15, 2025. Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Photograph:Cofounded by tech billionaire Peter Thiel, Palantir has worked with ICE, the US Department of Defense, the Israeli military and sparked numerous protests in multiple countries. WIRED staff writer Caroline Haskins joins Uncanny Valley to decode the company for us. Articles mentioned in this episode: Join us live in San Francisco on September 9th: Get your tickets here You can follow Michael Calore on Bluesky at @snackfight, Lauren Goode on Bluesky at @laurengoode, and Caroline Haskins on Bluesky at @carolinehaskins. Write to us at uncannyvalley@ How to Listen You can always listen to this week's podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get every episode, here's how: If you're on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or just tap this link. You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts and search for 'uncanny valley.' We're on Spotify too. Transcript Note: This is an automated transcript, which may contain errors. Michael Calore: Hey, this is Mike. Before we start, I want to share some exciting news with you. We're doing a live show in San Francisco on September 9th in partnership with the local station KQED. Lauren and I will sit down with our editor in chief, Katie Drummond, and we'll have a special guest joining us for a conversation that you will not want to miss. You can use the link in the show notes to grab your ticket and invite a friend. We cannot wait to see you there. Hey, Lauren. How are you doing? Lauren Goode: I'm pretty good, Mike. I'm a little tired because we just published a big story I've been working on for a long time. Michael Calore: Oh. Do tell us. Lauren Goode: Well, now that you've asked, we have a series here at WIRED called The Big Interview. Every so often we get to interview the most interesting people in tech and beyond. And we do this very long Q&A, a lot of research goes into it, original photography. It's a really cool series. And the most recent one I interviewed Lisa Su, the Chair and CEO of AMD. Michael Calore: Lisa Su from AMD? Lauren Goode: That's correct. Michael Calore: Nice. Lauren Goode: Yeah. Michael Calore: Did you fly to Texas? Lauren Goode: Austin, Texas. I was there to spend some time with Lisa Su and tour the labs, their chip testing labs down there. And it was a fascinating conversation. She's a super smart lady, and she has managed a pretty remarkable turnaround of AMD over the past dozen years. Michael Calore: Nice. Lauren Goode: So, we talked a lot about that, we talked about export controls. We talked about competing with Nvidia, run by her cousin. Did you know that Jensen Huang and Lisa Su are distant cousins? Michael Calore: No. Lauren Goode: You really didn't know that? Michael Calore: No. Lauren Goode: Yes, distant. First cousins, once removed. But she prefers not to be. Always asked about him, constantly pitted against him. The cousin thing irritates her. Michael Calore: Right, right. Lauren Goode: Of course, we talked about Nvidia. Anyway, I spent some time in the labs with her, because she's an engineer by trade. She was asking some highly technical questions of her engineers. It was really fascinating to witness. Michael Calore: Nice. Lauren Goode: We took a car ride together, we talked about personal stuff. It was one of my favorite interviews I've ever done at WIRED. So, that's out today. Michael Calore: Everybody should read it. Lauren Goode: Thank you. Michael Calore: And I'm assuming that you conducted this interview before the deal with the US government. Lauren Goode: The 15 percent fee that Nvidia and AMD are now going to be paying to the US government? Michael Calore: That would be the one. Lauren Goode: Yes. I did that interview beforehand. News has constantly been breaking in the semiconductor space since then. So we keep going back to Sandra, one of our editors and saying, "Should we update this? Do we need to update this? You can't keep up." Michael Calore: Yeah, that's the news business. Lauren Goode: Yep. Michael Calore: Sometimes you just got to say, "Ship it." Lauren Goode: That's right. Ship it. I'm sure all the techies listening to this will appreciate that. Let's ship this show. Michael Calore: Let's ship this show. This is WIRED's Uncanny Valley , a show about the people, power and influence of Silicon Valley. Today, we are talking about Palantir, a controversial software company with an ever-growing list of government contracts. The company has received a lot of attention this year because of its close ties with the Trump administration. Palantir's US government revenue has grown by more than $370 million compared to this time last year. But alongside its rising revenue and its rising profile, the company has also received widespread backlash because of its roster of clients, which includes ICE, the US Department of Defense, and the Israeli government. One question that has become hard to answer is what exactly the company does. We know Palantir works with vast amounts of data, but it's not clear what they do with it. WIRED's Caroline Haskins went looking for answers, and she found that even former Palantir employees had trouble closely defining the company's services. So we're going to dive into what Palantir does, what it does not do, and how its cofounders dreams of a techno state, continue to shape the company's goals, and potentially, our future. I'm Michael Calore, Director of Consumer Tech and Culture. Lauren Goode: And I'm Lauren Goode. I'm a senior correspondent. Michael Calore: To break down what Palantir is all about, we had to invite Caroline Haskins onto the show. Caroline is a staff writer at WIRED's Business Desk who has been closely covering the company for years. Welcome to Uncanny Valley . Caroline. Caroline Haskins: Hi. Thanks for having me on. Lauren Goode: Caroline, we're so excited to have you on. And can we give Caroline just a little bit of cred? Which we're going to get to later in the show, but everyone should know to start that Caroline I think is the only one among us who's been kicked out of a Palantir event before. So we're going to have to ask you about that, just in FYI. Michael Calore: Yeah, we'll get to that later. Caroline Haskins: Yeah, happy to share it. Michael Calore: So, I want to start with defining what Palantir isn't. Caroline, what are some of the common misconceptions that you've encountered around the company services? Caroline Haskins: Yeah. It's funny, because it seems like Palantir is kind of having a growing reputation among the public. People know the company Palantir, but they still, just among the general public, have a hard time saying what it actually is. It's often used as kind of a shorthand for just talking about surveillance generally. There are people who think that it's more akin to something like a data broker that's buying and selling data from place to place. Or a data miner that's actively taking information offline and packaging it and selling it in some way. I mean, it actually isn't any of these things, but the misconceptions have been pretty widespread. Palantir has actually had to put out a couple of blogs. I think the titles are literally Palantir Is Not a Data Company, Palantir Is Still Not a Data Company. I think it's a seven-part series on its website. But there's a reason that these misconceptions exist, it's because it's hard to define what Palantir actually is. Lauren Goode: OK. So, Palantir is not buying or selling data, or I guess harboring data in giant databases, but they still work with a lot of data. They sell their services to help other companies gather up a lot of data and structure it. Is that correct? Caroline Haskins: Correct. Palantir does not actually sell any data, but it is providing just the infrastructure and tools that its customers can use to actually work with data. Over the 2010s, I'm sure everybody remembers there was all of this marketing around big data, leveraging your data. And all of these companies were trying to just say how they were really smart. Lauren Goode: Yeah, it was all very nebulous. Caroline Haskins: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. Palantir was founded in the early 2000s, in the couple of years after 9/11, but it's business really didn't start taking off until that decade, and I think that in part that's because it was able to meet the moment, because it sells essentially like a one-size tool that can be customized for different customers, that can replace, say, a dozen or more other tools that a company might buy to try and get better insights, manage its factory lines better, manage orders better, make smarter decisions. Michael Calore: Yeah. In your story, you got all kinds of descriptions from your sources who used to work at Palantir about what the company does. One of them called it a really extravagant plumbing with data. Another called it a collection of different applications that customers can use to operationalize data, which is a fantastic word to have in a quote. Lauren Goode: I mean, that literally sounds like the AI from LinkedIn was let loose. Michael Calore: My favorite is the source who called it a supercharged filing cabinet. But there are specific things that Palantir sells, right? And I think if we can go through some of those, we might be able to get a better idea of what they do. Caroline Haskins: So, Palantir has a couple of different products, but its two main flagship products are these things called Foundry on one hand, and then Gotham on the other. So Foundry is more oriented toward private enterprise corporations, that type of customer. So think like Walmart or something. And then the other one is Gotham, that's more oriented toward law enforcement, government agencies, places that are actually dealing with case information, things about actual people, trying to figure out relationships between people, that kind of work. On the other hand, Foundry is more being used to just make regular everyday business practices more efficient. So, whereas a customer might use Foundry to, say, instead of having to completely redo their IT systems because their company is like 60 years old and they have a combination of really old code and then really new software, and they can't figure out how to just make it all flow together, they don't actually have to go in and fix it. Foundry just sits on top of everything and allows them to get the insights that they need to without actually fixing any of the stuff that's going on underneath. It's like a technical bandaid in that sense. And then Gotham, similarly, it is sitting on top of systems that law enforcement and a government agency might already have. The difference is that it's working with case information, it might work through information from a social media company. So, if a police department asks for everything associated with someone's Facebook profile, it would ingest all of that. And the whole idea is that you can map the relationships between people. So, police departments have used this to try and map out alleged gang affiliations. They can also extract things like whether someone has a tattoo, which is information that police might have if they have a booking record on somebody, whether they have to note things like whether somebody has a tattoo. Gotham is not actually providing any of this information, it's just helping police work through the information that they already have. Lauren Goode: So, it's easy to see where some of the concerns come in around data collection then, because even if Palantir isn't selling new data, or aggregate data to another enterprise or something like that, it's still aggregating and transforming all of this data, and putting it into this powerful tool. And then, there's the specific government contracts. Caroline, you reported earlier this year for WIRED that ICE is paying Palantir $30 million to help the agency select who to deport and to track who was self-deporting. Around the same time, our colleague McKenna Kelly reported that Palantir was working with the IRS to build what sources called a Mega API, which would essentially unify all data across the agency. And then of course, there are military contracts. A lot of the contracts that Palantir works with, there is an expectation of confidentiality going in, which is I think where some of this vibe of mystery and secrecy comes from. And I think it's because a lot of these products are then deployed at a large scale, people start to grow concerned when they just think about there's this entity out there that is just sort of helping to gather all of this data into one space. And it seems like Palantir hasn't always wanted to engage with some of these criticisms, or answer questions about this. Caroline, you had firsthand experience with this. Caroline Haskins: Yeah. There was a conference that was being held in D.C. by the Special Competitive Studies Project, the SCSP, it's the think tank that was founded by Eric Schmidt who, obviously, used to be at Google. They have a ton of booths from all these different companies. And the whole idea is that you walk around and then you sit at one booth and you watch someone do a demo of some kind of software, and then you move on to the next one, and you talk to employees, that kind of thing. And I was watching a couple demos at the Palantir booth, and I wasn't even asking any questions, I was just taking some notes. And then I think at one point I walked to a different booth and then I turned around and went to come back, and then they said that I was not allowed back in the booth, and that if I did come back they would call the police. And I was like, "Wait, why?" And they didn't give me a reason. They also didn't give me one when I asked for comments. Lauren Goode: OK. Did you go back? Caroline Haskins: No. I think I walked out of the booth and I immediately called one of my editors, and yeah, she was just like, "Let's just not do that for now. It's OK." Lauren Goode: Wow. They really took it to 11. Caroline Haskins: Yeah, I don't know. I mean, I talked to event security and I was like, "Was there a rule I wasn't aware of? I mean, I don't see how I could have been breaking any rules." "Or did they flag something about certain participants?" And event security, I mean, they had no idea what I was talking about. Yeah, I'm not really sure. Lauren Goode: I'm sorry that happened to you. I mean, it sounds like Palantir was not putting on the event, it was another entity and Palantir was a part of it? Caroline Haskins: Right, Palantir is one of the main sponsors of the event. So, if you're paying enough money, then you get one of the giant booths at the front of the conference hall. So they had this really fancy setup. Michael Calore: Wow. Lauren Goode: Well, Caroline, if they didn't have data on you before, they do now. Caroline Haskins: Yeah, I think on their radar to some degree, I guess. Michael Calore: One of the great things about your story is that it helps us really understand the types of services that Palantir actually offers, and what those services look like when they interact with real world. But you had to talk with several former staffers and really dig in to put all these pieces together. So for a company that is so intertwined with all kinds of organizations and public government services, Palantir has to be secretive, and they're notoriously secretive, as we just talked about. What are some of the other reasons why they just don't want people poking around in what they're doing? Caroline Haskins: It's interesting. I think probably one of the most insightful conversations I had, a former content strategist at Palantir was talking about how at a traditional tech company that might be marketing products to consumers, or maybe like a social media company, they have to make things legible for just the average member of the public, because those are the people that are buying their products. But Palantir, their products are extremely expensive. They're targeting essentially gigantic corporations and bureaucracies that really need help sorting things out and getting the insights that they need. They don't really need to be talking to consumers in that way. The reason why it's putting out those blogs is that I think it's become a PR problem at this point, that people are making assumptions about the company that are trying to make a criticism, but aren't really putting their finger on what the company is actually doing. So in that sense, it's become a PR problem for them. But to a degree, they don't have to market to the average person. And it does kind of benefit them to cultivate this aura of mystique and power. Like, what we are doing is so important that the public can't know, maybe, exactly the extent of our products. And this is something that appeals to, I mean, if you are a high up person at the company and you know that you need to get some sort of product, let's say you're not super technical, this is exactly the kind of rhetoric, visuals, et cetera, that might appeal to someone. Lauren Goode: It seems like secrecy is also embedded in the origins of the company. One of its early investors was in QTEL, which is the CIA's venture capital arm. And two of Palantir's cofounders are pretty well-known. Peter Thiel, we've talked about a few times on this show, and Alex Karp, seem like they have intentionally wanted to position the company as a government and military partner, which, like we said earlier, inevitably comes with some secrecy. Michael Calore: We need to take a break now, but when we come back, we're going to dive further into those founders that you just talked about, Lauren, and we're going to break down how their vision of a techno state has shaped the company, and what it can mean for our collective future. Welcome back to Uncanny Valley . Before the break, WIRED's Caroline Haskins was telling us all about Palantir services, and how the company actually works with data and the software that it sells to organizations. But it's through looking at two of Palantir's cofounders, particularly Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, that the company's identity starts to come into sharper focus. Peter Thiel almost needs no introduction. We've talked about him on the show before. And besides being one of the cofounders of Palantir, he used to be part of the so-called PayPal Mafia, and has gathered widespread attention for his support of the current administration and other GOP candidates. Alex Karp is the current CEO of Palantir, and he co-founded the company alongside Thiel and a few other people in 2003. So from the start, what vision did they set up for the company? Caroline Haskins: I feel like maybe a useful way into that is to talk about some of the internal jargon that Palantir uses. I mean, even just externally, the name Palantir actually comes from Lord of the Rings. It's this idea of an all-seeing stone that can look across vast expanses of land in the present, or go into the past. So the whole idea of that is to provide a product to that is seemingly extremely powerful and can go wherever you would need it to go. But then I guess internally, I think employees have really adopted this attitude that they are solving the world's most difficult problems and making the world a better place. So, they've kept with the Lord of the Rings language, even just talking amongst each other. Employees call themselves internally, since really the early days of the company, they've called each other hobbits. To the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure how popular this phrase is these days, but a motto that was circulated internally was Save the Shire. So it does get back to this idea of, we're trying to save the world, we're trying to make the world a better place, we're trying to catch terrorists. We're trying to do these really difficult things that make the world a better place- Lauren Goode: And the Shire in this case is what? It's these Western ideals and all-powerful government. Is it our country? What's the Shire? Caroline Haskins: I mean, in one sense, you could understand the Shire as the United States and all of its allies. The term that Alex Karp uses most frequently is the West, or western values. A big thing that the company has tried to stand on is, "We're only going to be doing business with companies that are in the United States or allied with the United States in some sense, militarily." It does get to this idea of security and being aligned with the US military interests. A military mindset has also been something that's pervaded the internal culture at Palantir since the very beginning. Instead of calling people just like software engineers, they call them forward deployed engineers. So, by forward deployed, they're essentially referencing the term for forward deployed troops, which is when in the military use station troops that are somewhere near an adversarial region with the idea being that's going to deter them from making a move against you. They've also used NATO military radio terms as code names for different job titles, like Delta was the one that was associated with fraud deployed engineers. And then they also have a version of a product manager, which instead they call Echo. Those are the words for D and E on the NATO military radio code name list. Another example, something that someone else brought up to me was when they're writing emails to each other, instead of saying FYI, they go FYSA, which means, for your situational awareness. And that's another thing that originated in the military. Lauren Goode: So intense in these San Francisco or Palo Alto offices. They're like, "FYSA, the bevy machine is out of the mint cucumber flavor today." Caroline Haskins: No, exactly, exactly. There's so many examples of this. What was another one? Yeah, "Bottom line up front," that was another one that someone mentioned, it just means you write a two-sentence summary at the start of an email. So instead of saying TLDR, you go BLUF and then give a two-sentence summary. Lauren Goode: Bottom line up front. Michael Calore: I'm going to start doing all of these. Lauren Goode: I could see your eyes light up when Caroline was going through. This is really interesting. Michael Calore: "For your situational awareness, I will be at the dentist today." Lauren Goode: Caroline, when you spoke to these former employees about working there, how did they feel about this culture? Caroline Haskins: They didn't really seem critical of the use of these terms from the most part, but there were people that I spoke with that just felt uncomfortable with military work that was happening in other parts of the company. There was one woman I spoke with who specifically brought this up, and how she essentially had to actively choose to suppress the knowledge of the fact that there were probably products that were being built at other parts of the company that she would be extremely morally opposed to. But on the other hand, I think there were other people I spoke to who just had a functional appreciation for these little habits, like the bottom line up front thing or the FYSA. This didn't make it into the article, but one person said, "I've gone on to other workplaces and I've actively introduced some of these things into my other workplaces." So, some people just have a functional appreciation for, I don't know, I guess that kind of communication style. It's funny. Lauren Goode: That's interesting. And some of this rhetoric has actually made its way into executive communications too. Our producer pulled up a clip from Alex Karp speaking during Palantir's earnings call this past February. And there were a couple lines that really jumped out at me, so we're going to take a quick listen. Alex Karp: We have dedicated our company to the service of the West and the United States of America, and we're super proud of the role we play, especially in places we can't talk about. And we love our success in the US, and globally also, we are doing, in the United Kingdom and many other places, Palantir is here to disrupt and make the institutions we partner with the very best in the world. And when it's necessary to scare enemies, and on occasion kill them. Lauren Goode: Oh, just killed it. So, is he referring to killing business competitors? Are the enemies business competitors? Or is he talking about actual adversaries to the United States? Caroline Haskins: That's the funny thing with that clip, because he used the word disrupt, which obviously disruption is a common thing that people just mentioned in a Silicon Valley business context. Lauren Goode: Right. Very Silicon Valley coded. Caroline Haskins: Right. But then when he talks about killing. I mean, everybody knows that some of Palantir's first clients were members of the US intelligence community, in that it does work across branches of the US military. And these are products that are designed to be lethal. So these are things that are literally talking about killing people, but there's plausible deniability in terms of talking about killing your business competitors or something, or killing the competition. It's just the interesting use of boards. Michael Calore: So, it's obvious that Palantir is eager to embrace this close tie with government work and military work, but this is also part of a larger belief that not only should this be Palantir's mission, but also Silicon Valley's larger mission. To that point, Karp wrote a book recently called The Technological Republic. And in this book he laid out the philosophy of technology being created in service of a state, so a techno state. He kind of reminisces about the times when technology and science and governments all came together to defeat a common enemy instead of, "Building things because they can," which is serious shade at, I don't know, a company that makes food delivery apps. He calls for a renewed unity around this mindset of the techno state. What are your thoughts on Karp's philosophy here? Lauren Goode: I haven't read Alex Karp's book yet. I would like to. I did read the excerpt in The Atlantic. I think what's kind of interesting about both Peter Thiel and Alex Karp, even though sometimes their politics aren't entirely aligned, they both coalesce around this shared vision of the techno state and powering the West to what they call its obvious innate superiority. And they're not alone. There is a group of really influential people in Silicon Valley, this cohort who I sometimes call the War Bois, B-O-I, bois. Michael Calore: I love the name. Lauren Goode: Yeah. And I think that they are shifting the culture a little bit, and having people focus less on the attention economy software and the social media that got a lot of the attention in 2010s, and saying to people like, "You need to build more serious tech here." And some of that happens to be tech for the military. We've also written about Palmer Luckey at WIRED who is a cofounder of Anduril. Anduril is a defense tech company that makes autonomous weapons. He's a part of this cohort as well. Earlier this summer, a bunch of tech CTOs and other executives joined this detachment that's supposed to help make the US armed forces leaner, smarter, more lethal, basically provide tech advice to the military. So for example, Meta CTO, Andrew Bosworth, is now Lieutenant Colonel Bosworth, or Bos. Michael Calore: Oh, boy. Caroline Haskins: Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, some people have pointed out that in some ways it's kind of a return to roots for Silicon Valley, because I mean, in the 20th century it was kind of a place where defense infrastructure was built out. And then it sort of pivoted away from that. I mean, I guess one thing that's maybe worth pointing out about someone like Alex Karp is that for the entirety of the time that Palantir has been around, he's been extremely ideologically consistent. I mean, even through the 2010s when, I mean, no companies were openly embracing working with the military, or doing work in defense tech, which is partially why Anduril, Palantir, they just sort of stood in contrast with a lot of these other companies. But now I think with Trump in office and there just being all of this rhetoric that's centered around patriotism, that's centered around these ideas of strength, especially in the context of war, it's suddenly become, I guess, business-friendly to be embracing these kinds of ideas. Michael Calore: It seems like the time is now for this vision of the techno state that Karp and Thiel have been laying out. So, are we seeing it play out in real time? Lauren Goode: Well, judging by Palantir's current valuation, we might've entered the techno state. It has been pushing into record territory just over the past week since Palantir went public in 2020, their stock has gone up nearly 2500 percent. Michael Calore: Excuse me? Lauren Goode: Yeah. That's just in terms of the numbers though. I'm curious to hear from a cultural perspective, Caroline, what do you think? Caroline Haskins: Yeah. One thing when I think about Peter Thiel and the companies that he's been involved with and the ventures that he's funded, there often isn't a completely consistent through line. I mean, one thing I've been following on the side is the amount of so-called network state projects that he's funded, or essentially trying to make these almost city state like areas that people who work in tech that feel frustrated with working on software that doesn't have visible effects on the real world can just go to and escape the United States, or escape the political friction of a place like Silicon Valley. But then in contrast, I mean, someone like Alex Karp, he's really never doubted the concept of the network state, and having that as a grounding force for your political philosophy and your business philosophy. And I guess the one thing uniting them in the end is this desire for strength for monopoly, I guess, in the business context, and for hegemony in the context of politics and wars between countries. Michael Calore: OK. We're going to take one more break, and then we'll come right back. Lauren, Caroline, thank you for a great conversation about the techno state. Before we go, we want to shift gears a little bit and we're going to share our personal recommendations with the listeners. So, should we have Caroline go first? Lauren Goode: Absolutely. As our guest of honor. Michael Calore: OK. What do you got? Caroline Haskins: I stumbled upon this show recently called The Secret Life of 4, 5 and 6 Year Olds. It's this UK reality TV show where they essentially put mics and cameras on a playground around, again, these four, five, and six-year-olds who, I mean, the four-year-olds, they've never even interacted with other peers their age essentially unsupervised before. And you're seeing literal stages of brain development happening in real time. Like a kid realizing that, "Oh, if I'm fighting over this toy, that means that this other person wants it too, and we might have to work out a compromise." I landed there because I went on a TikTok rabbit hole that started with a New York City public school teacher showing how they set up their classroom, and then a kindergarten teacher setting up their classroom. And then I was like, "Wait, I forget what happens in kindergarten." So then I was looking up, "What do you do in kindergarten?" And then this show came up. And it was so interesting. And obviously, really funny and cute. Even if you're not a huge kid's person, I don't know, I just thought it was really interesting. Michael Calore: Talk about a techno state. Let's put cameras on all the kids. Lauren Goode: Seriously. Michael Calore: When broadcast their brain development. Lauren Goode: Has Palantir sold their software to nursery schools yet? Michael Calore: Sorry, where is this show streaming? Caroline Haskins: It was on Amazon Prime, and then I also think someone uploaded the whole thing onto YouTube. So, either way you can find it. Lauren Goode: OK. Michael Calore: Fantastic. Lauren Goode: I like how Caroline's like, "Even if you're not a kid's person, you might still enjoy this." Michael Calore: She's speaking to her audience, which is- Lauren Goode: No, I like this. Caroline Haskins: I want to capture all ends of the spectrum. Lauren Goode: That's right. That's right. It also sounds like a nice little palate cleanser after reporting on some of the stuff you've been reporting on, Caroline. Caroline Haskins: Honestly, it was. Yeah, yeah. The kids are really funny. Michael Calore: Lauren, what's your recommendation? Lauren Goode: My recommendation is TV series on HBO Max, The Young Pope, which I started watching because I want to watch The New Pope with John Malkovich, but I figured I should watch The Young Pope with Jude Law first. Michael Calore: Yeah, yeah. Lauren Goode: So it's not new. I think it came out in 2019. Michael Calore: Yeah. Lauren Goode: Jude Law is absolutely diabolical as a Pope. I've recommended a lot of Pope stuff on this show before. My longtime listeners will know. Michael Calore: It's those Catholic roots coming out. Lauren Goode: Yeah, I guess so. You can take a girl out of church, but can't take church out of the girl. Is that even a phrase? Michael Calore: Yes. Lauren Goode: Did I just make that up? Michael Calore: No, but you translated into English from the original Italian, I think is what it is. Lauren Goode: Yeah. Mike, what's your recommendation? Michael Calore: I am going to recommend a newsletter. It is from one of our competitors, New York Magazine. It's a subscriber- Lauren Goode: Never heard of them. Michael Calore: They're great. They do good work. It's a subscriber only newsletter from New York. It's called Night School. And it is people who work at New York Magazine and some of the people who are contracted to work with them explaining how they do their jobs, and how you can apply this knowledge into your hobbies or your own jobs. So for example, they have a newsletter about how to take a photo. And it comes out every week, and it's written by the photo editors and the photographers at New York Magazine. They have one about how to write, which is written by the writers and the editors. Again, that one comes out every week. And then there was one that Jerry Saltz, the art critic, just did, how to look at art. And he basically tells you how to go to a gallery, how to experience a museum, what do you do when you go to an artist talk, what are good questions to ask, what sorts of things you look forward to determine whether something is actually good. The photo one really blew my mind though, like how to take a photo. I take a lot of photos, I think I take a pretty good photo, but I read a few of these newsletters and immediately was able to up my game. And I take better portraits now, for sure. Lauren Goode: That's very cool. Michael Calore: Yeah. So, if you are a subscriber to New York Magazine, you can go into their newsletter page, and you can click subscribe to these, and you get these courses, and they come once a week, and they're very digestible and fun. And you will learn something. Lauren Goode: I actually am a subscriber, and I have not subscribed to that. Michael Calore: Well, here you go. Lauren Goode: I'll do that right now. Michael Calore: This is a benefit that you are not yet earning. Lauren Goode: Amazing. Michael Calore: I hope you love it. Lauren Goode: Thanks for that recommendation, Mike. Michael Calore: And Caroline, thank you for being here, and thank you for your recommendation about the Watching Kids Grow Up Show. Caroline Haskins: No, thank you. And I really need to learn how to take a better picture. I feel like people stop me on the street and they're like, "Can you take a picture of me and my friend?" I have to apologize to them at the end. I'm like, "I did the best I could. I'm sorry." Michael Calore: Thank you for listening to Uncanny Valley . If you'd liked what you heard today, please make sure to follow our show and rate it on your podcast app of choice. If you'd like to get in touch with us with any questions, comments, or shows, suggestions, you can write to us at uncannyvalley@ Today's show was produced by Adriana Tapia and Mark Lida. Amar Lal at Macro Sound Mixed this episode. Mark Lida is our SF studio engineer; Pran Bandi is our New York Studio engineer; Sam Spangler fact-checked this episode. Kate Osborne is our executive producer; Katie Drummond is WIRED's Global Editorial Director; and Chris Bannon is Conde Nast's Head of Global Audio.
Daily Mail
23-07-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
A-List buyer acquires $250M land for 'billionaire bunker'
A secretive A-list figure has been quietly spending a staggering $250 million to assemble what appears to be the country's next ultra-exclusive 'billionaire bunker' - just a stone's throw from President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago in South Florida. The identity of the deep-pocketed buyer remains officially under wraps, but the scale, location, and speed of the acquisitions have set off frenzied speculation and no shortage of rumors about who might be behind the massive land grab. According to an explosive a Wall Street Journal investigation, the anonymous buyer - possibly a tech titan, hedge fund magnate, or reclusive billionaire - has scooped up four adjacent properties north of Trump's estate on Palm Beach's ritzy North Ocean Boulevard. The purchases reportedly include two oceanfront parcels formerly owned by cosmetics heir William Lauder, together with two luxury homes across the street. Lauder originally listed the oceanfront lots for a jaw-dropping $200 million, and though the February deal never appeared in public records, sources say the final price came close. One of the properties spans 2.8 acres and offers 360 feet of pristine beach frontage - an amount practically unheard of in such a cramped area of real estate. In early June, the mystery mogul struck again this time paying $18 million in cash for a Mediterranean-style home across the street in an unsolicited offer. That home had last sold for just $4.15 million in 2018. Days later, the buyer snapped up the neighboring house for a dizzying $30 million - nearly six times its 2017 sale price. 'The prices paid… are significantly higher than their market values,' reported WSJ, quoting agents who say the strategy is to build privacy and control the block. The scale and secrecy of the acquisitions have drawn comparisons to hedge fund titan Ken Griffin, who famously spent over $400 million assembling a mega compound in Palm Beach over the past decade. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has similarly gobbled up more than $230 million in property across Indian Creek, often called 'Billionaire Bunker Island.' But this new development may eclipse even them. 'This kind of assemblage, it just signals bigger things for South Florida,' said Peggy Olin, CEO of OneWorld Properties to Fox News. 'We're going to continue seeing these types of high-net-worth individuals just continuing to make South Florida just extremely elite and a safe place for all of them to gather. It's the connectivity. Palm Beach, in general, is becoming one of the few places in the country where you find the billionaire bunker situation or billionaire's row, per se,' Olin told Fox. 'It's just a lot about the caché and the ultra-elite.' The inland properties were purchased through Delaware-based LLCs linked to Seattle attorney Greyson Blue, whose law firm K&L Gates has long-standing ties to Bill Gates's (pictured) late father. Blue also previously worked at the Gates Foundation, fueling speculation that the famously private Microsoft co-founder could be behind the mystery deals. But a source close to the Gates Foundation quickly poured cold water on the stating 'Gates isn't the buyer of the Palm Beach properties.' Other names floated include former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (pictured), now the owner of the LA Clippers, and Charles Simonyi the software architect behind Microsoft Word and Excel - both of whom are known for operating below the radar despite their massive fortunes. Rock legend Jon Bon Jovi owns the property immediately adjacent to these parcels of land and the mystery mogul is said to have tried to buy Bon Jovi's estate off-market, but the singer wouldn't budge. Bon Jovi paid $43 million for the beachfront mansion in 2020 and according to insiders, is not interested in selling - even at a substantial profit. 'They want to remain as private as possible,' Olin said of the mystery buyer. 'They want to make sure that no one else is cramping their style… They want to do everything in private so they can get what they want at the end. Like him or Ken Griffin (pictured) or Jeff Bezos, all of these guys are seeing South Florida as their future,' Olin said. 'To me, it is fantastic… not only in real estate, but all around.' Palm Beach agent Dana Koch of the Corcoran Group said similar noting how the 'two acres directly on the ocean with 360 feet of water frontage, along with the properties across the street, is extremely rare to find in Palm Beach.' 'After buying all of these properties at a mind-boggling number [the buyer] is protecting his investment and affording himself even more privacy,' Koch said. Mar-a-Lago is a private club and was first constructed in 1927, and was bought by Donald Trump in 1985 for $10 million, per The Palm Beach Post. Last year, the president claimed that the resort is worth around $1 billion - with the Trump International Golf Club just minutes away. He has often been seen visiting the sprawling property over the years, but has frequented less often after being elected as the 47th President of the United States last year in November. However, that has not stopped fans and visitors from traveling down to Palm Beach to get a glimpse of the resort - which is not open to the public. According to Bloomberg, those who want to become members at the exclusive resort need to pay an initiation fee of $1 million. Permanent residents in the Palm Beach area near Mar-a-Lago have been left 'aghast' by the amount of Trump supporters who have recently flooded the area. 'I think this town is a little bit aghast at itself,' Palm Beach native Celerie Kemble told The New York Times. Jon Bon Jovi was a public supporter of Kamala Harris and endorsed her last year during the presidential campaign. While promoting a song called The People's House on Instagram at the time, he also explained his endorsement to his followers. The star is known for starting the rock band Bon Jovi in 1983 - which has dropped hits such as Livin' On A Prayer, Blaze Of Glory and Bed Of Roses. The singer has been keeping busy and recently celebrated the one-year anniversary of the band's 2024 album Forever last month. Along with sharing behind-the-scenes of putting the LP together, he also added a message to his fans. '1 year ago we released FOREVER in celebration of our 40th anniversary as a band,' the performer penned. 'Thank you to everyone who's listened and celebrated with us all these years ❤️ FOREVER doesn't stop here…'
Daily Mail
08-07-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Billionaire gay who's one of world's most powerful men makes announcement that will further devastate Dems
A tech billionaire and one of the world's most powerful men made a shocking announcement that is sure to devastate Democrats across the country. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI and co-founder of ChatGPT, made a scathing Fourth of July social media post on X telling the world he has disowned Democrats after claiming his former party 'has lost the plot.' 'The Democratic party seemed reasonably aligned with it when I was 20, losing the plot when I was 30, and completely to have moved somewhere else at this point,' he wrote. 'So now I am politically homeless. But that's fine; I care much, much more about being American than any political party.' Altman - who came out as gay at the age of 16 - also shared his love for America and how 'proud' he is to be a US citizen, but it quickly turned critical of the country's current political climate. 'I'm not big on identities, but I am extremely proud to be American. This is true every day, but especially today—I firmly believe this is the greatest country ever on Earth,' the 40-year-old tech boss, who is worth $1.7 million, wrote. Although Altman himself is not the president of the US, he is nearly just as powerful because artificial intelligence - computer systems that can perform tasks that humans typically could - continues to grow and take over the world everyday. He went on to explain his belief in 'techno-capitalism' and how he thinks there should be a system in place that supports both wealth and innovation, while also attacking the government's role in the economy. Altman - who came out as gay at the age of 16 - made the announcement in a lengthy and scathing post to X on Saturday 'We should encourage people to make tons of money and then also find ways to widely distribute wealth and share the compounding magic of capitalism. One doesn't work without the other; you cannot raise the floor and not also raise the ceiling for very long. He went on to share that he believes the government 'usually does a worse job than markets,' and that education is crucial in 'keeping the American edge.' 'I believed this when I was 20, when I was 30, and now I am 40 and still believe it,' the billionaire continued. Altman's lengthy post didn't stop there, as he took a moment to appear to address the growing claim that billionaires should not exist - something New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani said in a recent interview. While on NBC's Meet the Press on June 29, the 33-year-old Democratic socialist poised to become the Big Apple's next mayor, shared his thoughts on wealthy people. 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality, and ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' Mamdani said. Altman appeared to respond directly to Mamdani's claim, ending his social media post with: 'I'd rather hear from candidates about how they are going to make everyone have the stuff billionaires have instead of how they are going to eliminate billionaires.' He wrapped up his statement, which amassed 2.8 million views, sharing his hope for the country's future. 'The American experiment has always been messy. I am hopeful for another great 250 years. Happy 4th!' In January, Altman hit back at Democrats who criticized him for donating $1 million of his personal cash to Trump's inaugural fund. The CEO received a letter from Senators Elizabeth Warren and Michael Bennet, which accused him of trying to 'cozy up' to the president to avoid federal scrutiny. The senators posed a series of questions ostensibly aimed at discovering his motivations for the cash gift. Altman shared the letter and pushed back at the suggestion, saying: 'Funny, they never sent me one of these for contributing to Democrats.' He then went on to explain that the senator's allegations were unfounded since the money was donated by Altman personally. 'It was a personal contribution as you state; I am confused about the questions given that my company did not make a decision,' he added. Altman was among the tech bosses who were invited to Trump's inauguration. He was pictured chatting to boxer Logan Paul and his brother Jake Paul ahead of the ceremony. Altman wasn't the only tech billionaire to make a statement over the holiday weekend, as Elon Musk decided to launch a new political party. Musk, President Donald Trump's former 'First Buddy,' announced the foundation of the America Party on his X social media platform on Saturday. It came after Musk created an online poll on Independence Day asking his followers whether to establish the new party. The results came back 65.4 percent in favor, leading Musk to make the announcement. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk wrote. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Musk, 54, had been elevated to a prestigious role within the White House acting as a special advisor to the president and overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency. But in recent months a rift has emerged and the two former friends have been embroiled in embarrassing public spats played out over social media.
Gizmodo
27-06-2025
- Business
- Gizmodo
Peter Thiel on Whether He's Ushering in the Antichrist: Um, Uhh, Buh, Um Uhh, th th, Uhhhh
Peter Thiel has been talking about the Devil a lot lately. Over the past few years, the eccentric tech billionaire has made it a habit of showing up at events sponsored by Christian organizations, where he has proceeded to espouse a bizarre brand of New Age-y faith. The tech magnate's preoccupation with God has only become more prominent as time has passed. During a recent appearance on the Hoover Institution's podcast, Thiel went on at length about his views on Apocalypse, Armageddon, and, pivotally, the Antichrist, who he feels could usher in the end of the World. This week, an interview with New York Times columnist Ross Douthat gave Thiel yet another opportunity to wax on about the Evil One, though the conversation ultimately did not go exactly the way the billionaire wanted it to. When questioned by Douthat about what sort of qualities the Antichrist might have, he gave a very odd answer. It was, in part: …perhaps we should also talk about the risk of another type of a bad singularity, which I would describe as the one-world totalitarian state. Because I would say the default political solution people have for all these existential risks is one-world governance. What do you do about nuclear weapons? We have a United Nations with real teeth that controls them, and they're controlled by an international political order. And then something like this is also: What do we do about A.I.? And we need global compute governance. We need a one-world government to control all the computers, log every single keystroke, to make sure people don't program a dangerous A.I. And I've been wondering whether that's going from the frying pan into the fire. Thiel's suggestion seems to be that, if political organizations attempt to regulate the kinds of technology that he is invested in, they may actually be doing the Devil's work. These so-called religious views are obviously interesting for how closely they hew to the billionaire's political and economic interests. In the Palantir founder's eyes, Satan's vicar on Earth will be a loud supporter of stuff like nuclear non-proliferation, international law, and the regulation of AI. Later in the conversation, Thiel also suggested that the Antichrist could very well be someone like Greta Thunberg—in other words, a prominent social activist who cares less about stuff like profit margins and stock value and more about climate change and dead Palestinians. But is Thiel's preoccupation with supernatural evil even real? Frankly, it's unclear whether the billionaire is just a liar or a guy whose head is crammed so far up his ass that day looks like night and a peaceful global order unperturbed by nuclear war looks like the work of the Devil. If we start from the presumption that most people aspire to be the hero of their own story, and that Thiel is one of those people, and that he feels that his creepy technocratic endeavors are actually a force for good in the world instead of an obvious pox on humanity, then it would be safe to assume that he also feels that anything that gets in the way of those endeavors is decidedly not good—or, in his own words, the work of the 'Antichrist.' Anyway, later in Douthat and Thiel's conversation, the subject turned, again, to the Antichrist, and Douthat, to his credit, stuck the billionaire's feet to the fire somewhat. Douthat noted that, given Thiel's own investments and activities, it could very well be that he, himself, was laying the groundwork for his professed enemy. Douthat asks: You're an investor in A.I. You're deeply invested in Palantir, in military technology, in technologies of surveillance and technologies of warfare and so on. And it just seems to me that when you tell me a story about the Antichrist coming to power and using the fear of technological change to impose order on the world, I feel like that Antichrist would maybe be using the tools that you are building. Like, wouldn't the Antichrist be like: Great, we're not going to have any more technological progress, but I really like what Palantir has done so far. Isn't that a concern? Wouldn't that be the irony of history, that the man publicly worrying about the Antichrist accidentally hastens his or her arrival? Thiel's response was typical of his interviews: he stammered and sweated and looked like his face was going to fall off. That awkward moment Peter Thiel realized he might be the very Antichrist he warned about — Mykhaïlo Golub (@golub) June 27, 2025After an uncomfortably long period of time that mixed silence, stammering, and sweat, Thiel responded: 'Look, there are all these different scenarios. I obviously don't think that that's what I'm doing.' Douthat assured the billionaire tycoon that he didn't think that's what was happening, but he was hoping to get a better picture of 'how you get to a world willing to submit to permanent authoritarian rule.' At that point, it's possible that the Holy Spirit took the wheel as Thiel began to incoherently ramble about Thessalonians 5:3, the FDA, nuclear weapons regulations, Argentina, cultural stagnation, and historical predetermination. It's all a bit much. The internet subsequently had fun with the exchange, noting the possibility that Thiel, himself, might actually be a modern-day Damien. 'That awkward moment Peter Thiel realized he might be the very Antichrist he warned about,' one user wrote. Another user, meanwhile, referred to the venture capitalist as 'Satan.' Though he may share more than a passing resemblance to the Dark Lord, it seems pretty clear that Thiel could never be a serious contender for that role. That's because, unlike the honey-tongued underworld spawn that the Bible has long prophesied, Thiel is a complete verbal train wreck. Every interview with him—beset as they are by stammering and monotone intonations—is difficult to listen to. The Antichrist is supposed to be a compelling speaker, with the charm to cut across diverse constituencies. Entirely without rizz, Thiel obviously doesn't fit the profile. Donald Trump, on the other hand…
Daily Mail
14-06-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Inside the glamorous life of Bill Gates' daughter Phoebe… who publicly mocks her dad's tech skills
Phoebe Gates is just like any other college grad - apart from the fact her dad is a tech billionaire, she founded an app with her best friend, and she regularly attends star-studded events wearing designer outfits. The 22-year-old Stanford University grad has lived a seemingly charmed life - growing up with unimaginable wealth as the daughter of Microsoft founder Bill Gates and ex-wife Melinda. The family grew up in a $131 million mansion in Medina, Washington, that came complete with seven bathrooms, 24 bathrooms, and six kitchens, as well as its own man-made beach, at-home movie theater, gym, and trampoline room. The property, worth an estimated $131 million, is nicknamed 'Xanadu 2.0,' a reference to the fictional estate in the movie 'Citizen Kane.' Her parents' wealth has provided a lavish lifestyle - complete with the finest education - and while older siblings Jennifer, 30, and Ryan, 25, have kept their lives more private, Phoebe hasn't shied away from the spotlight. Her Instagram regularly shows her attending glamorous events, including summits, talks and exclusive fashion events, often dressed by designer labels and dripping in expensive jewelry. But despite her Instagram-influencer persona, Phoebe - who previously interned with British Vogue - has been determined to forge her own path. 'Okay, I'm my parents' daughter, that gives me immense privilege, but it's not what I'm defined by,' she previously told WWD. The budding entrepreneur - along with former Stanford roommate Sophia Kianni - launched her own e-commerce startup app called Phia earlier in the year. The platform offers shoppers an easy way to compare the prices of new and used items across more than 40,000 selling sites. Despite her father's wealth, Phoebe raised the capital independently - first getting $100,000 from Soma Capital, then $250,000 from the Stanford social entrepreneurship grant, and finally $500,000 in angel investments, bringing the total to $850,000. Phoebe is the third child of Bill and Melinda Gates, who divorced after 27 years of marriage in 2001. Although her billionaire Microsoft co-founder-father provided her with a very comfortable childhood, she has admitted it has done more harm than good at times. Last year, Phoebe appeared on Netflix's new docuseries What's Next? The Future With Bill Gates. In the series, Bill asked his daughter if she had ever come across conspiracy theories about him - including that the COVID pandemic was a ploy to allow Bill Gates to put microchips in vaccines that would allow him to track people. 'All the time,' Phoebe responded. 'I've even had friends cut me off because of these vaccine rumors,' she said. While Bill is one of the richest people on the planet, ranked seventh in the world by Forbes, Phoebe keeps a close relationship with him. She often speaks about their bond and, despite her father's impressive background, she recently teased him about his lack of tech awareness in an Instagram post. 'Happy birthday, Dad! @thisisbillgates - my favorite person who now texts me to let me know he's going to send me an email,' she jokingly captioned a picture of herself with her dad. Bill has spoken previously about what will happen to his billions when he dies. In 2024, while speaking with fans on a Reddit Ask Me Anything, the Microsoft founder said that he thinks leaving his vast fortune to his three children would be a mistake. Instead, he plans to leave the majority to charity, including his own, The Gates Foundation. The tech mogul is shuttering the Gates Foundation by December 31, 2045, effectively ending a lifelong project to give away his multi-billion fortune. He announced earlier in the year that he plans to distribute 'virtually all' of his wealth, approximately $200 billion, within the next 20 years. The billionaire announced he will give away 99 percent of his immense fortune, leaving one percent for himself and his children. The Gates Foundation, which Gates founded in 2000 along with his ex-wife who left the organization after their divorce, pours billions of dollars every year into health, foreign aid and other public assistance programs. Gates will hold onto just one percent of his wealth - which still equals out to an estimated $1.62 billion. As for her personal life, Phoebe is currently dating Arthur Donald, the grandson of Paul McCartney, as per Nylon.
