logo
#

Latest news with #terrorlaws

Balancing risk with overreach in our terror laws
Balancing risk with overreach in our terror laws

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • Politics
  • RNZ News

Balancing risk with overreach in our terror laws

Photo: Sanka Vidanagama / NurPhoto via AFP The government wants to tighten our terror laws, but critics fear it will mean a corresponding trampling of advocacy groups and free speech. The government is eyeing an overhaul of the country's terrorism legislation, which is necessary, it says, to keep New Zealanders safe in a rapidly evolving world and keep pace with modern threats. However, critics are warning that the move could come at a steep price, specifically a loss of civil liberties. The proposed changes, still in the closed-door consultation phase with a handpicked selection of groups and experts, would give police and intelligence agencies broader powers to intervene earlier, redefine what constitutes a "terrorist act" and expand preventative detention powers, all in the name of public safety. Today, The Detail spoke with Newsroom national affairs editor Sam Sachdeva and University of Waikato terrorism and firearms expert Alexander Gillespie about the potential changes to the Terrorism Suppression Act and how the government will balance risk without resorting to overreach. "What this is really about is are our current terror laws fit for purpose, and where do we draw the line between dealing with the very real threat that is posed by terrorist groups and terrorists, while still preserving the fundamental political freedoms and rights and liberties that all New Zealanders hold dear," Sachdeva told The Detail . He said critics, worried that those freedoms and rights are now at risk, are fired up. "Look, they are. We have seen the Council for Civil Liberties, [and] the Free Speech Union has now come out as well, expressing some concern about this. "So, it's early stages, but it seems like it's something that could quite easily animate or light a fire under a lot of these rights groups who are concerned." The terror law, enacted in 2002 following the 11 September terror attacks, allows governments to formally designate people or groups as terrorist entities, freezing their assets and making it illegal to financially support, recruit for, or participate in a designated terrorist entity. Minor changes were made after the 15 March terror attack in 2019 and the New Lynn Countdown Supermarket attack in 2021. Sachdeva said among the new potential changes are making membership of a terrorist entity a criminal offence, creating new offences to capture public expressions of support for a terrorist act or designated entities - including showing insignia - and modernising definitions for terms like "material support" to capture new online forms of support. Extending the renewal period for terrorist designations to five years, from three at present, is also being considered. The government said there will be safeguards and judicial oversight. The proposed changes are expected to go before Parliament later this year. Gillespie, speaking to The Detail from Vienna, where he is working on gun reforms, said the threat of a terror attack has long lingered in New Zealand, and while the likelihood of another attack will never be zero, the risk can be lowered. "Part of reducing that risk is making sure the law is as good as it can be. That the balance between civil liberties and risk is correct. And that we have proportionate penalties for those who are willing to advocate the use of violence against civilians to change policy. "I support looking at it... I think it's foreseeable that the tensions in our society are going to be around for the foreseeable future. And to make sure they are fit for purpose, because when I look back at recent times, our laws weren't fit for purpose, and now we need to be thinking, 'what more can we do?'." While the debate on security versus liberty and protection versus principle will undoubtedly continue, one thing is certain -in the fight against terror, New Zealand is searching for a line, but it will not be easy to draw. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Met police drops probe into man accused of wearing 'Hamas' parachute at pro-Palestine protest
Met police drops probe into man accused of wearing 'Hamas' parachute at pro-Palestine protest

Daily Mail​

time13-07-2025

  • Politics
  • Daily Mail​

Met police drops probe into man accused of wearing 'Hamas' parachute at pro-Palestine protest

Police have dropped an investigation into a pro-Palestine protester accused of wearing a parachute in support of Hamas, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. Furious campaigners have branded Scotland Yard's decision not to charge the suspect in line with terror laws as 'remarkable'. The Metropolitan Police had warned 'anyone displaying symbols, wording or otherwise indicating their support for a proscribed organisation risks arrest' ahead of a central London protest on October 5 last year commemorating one year since the start of the conflict following the 2023 October 7 massacre. Yet the Met closed its investigation into the unnamed man accused of wearing the parachute – interpreted as support for terrorists who used paragliders to enter Israel from Gaza in the attack – despite the force even publicising his arrest on social media. It said on its X account the suspect was 'wearing what appeared to be a parachute' and shared a clip showing him being taken away by officers in Whitehall during the protest. The force said he was 'arrested on suspicion of wearing or displaying an article indicating support for a proscribed organisation', but the case was quietly dropped earlier this summer due to 'evidential difficulties'. A Campaign Against Antisemitism spokesman told the Mail: 'This kind of imagery glorifies a proscribed terrorist organisation and its lethal antisemitism. 'The reported decision to drop the investigation is remarkable and the public is entitled to an explanation.' A Met spokesman said: 'The findings from our investigation did not meet the evidential threshold for any charges to be brought against the individual.' On Saturday police arrested more than 70 protesters for supporting newly banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action. A vicar was among at least 42 people detained by Scotland Yard officers as activists gathered for a second week in a row beside a statue of Gandhi in London's Parliament Square, holding placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another 16 arrests were made in Manchester and 13 people were also held in Cardiff at other related demonstrations the same day.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store