Latest news with #workplaceinjuries
The Independent
a day ago
- Business
- The Independent
Exclusive: SpaceX employee claims he was fired for flagging ‘despicable' safety practices that put lives at risk
A former SpaceX supervisor is accusing the company of 'despicable conduct' regarding its safety practices, claiming, among other things, that chronic understaffing was resulting in serious injuries where overworked employees were 'too fearful to report.' In a scathing civil lawsuit filed initially in state court and removed to Los Angeles federal court last Friday, Robert Markert describes raising 'strong concerns' about revising a technical process that could 'easily cause serious injury or death.' However, Markert's complaint contends, SpaceX opted to keep things as-is because it was 'more economical.' Markert, who spent nearly 14 years at SpaceX before he was fired, oversaw a team of 16 technicians responsible for retrieving the company's rockets upon their return to Earth and preparing them for reuse. His complaint claims SpaceX refused to dial back a dangerously jam-packed launch schedule, forced people to work up to three weeks in a row without a break and skimped on vital instructional programs in an attempt to save money. When Markert, 37, voiced his concerns to management, he claims he was told that 'the schedule comes first,' according to his complaint. When he tried to schedule days off for his crew, Markert was 'chastised [by] his leadership team,' the complaint alleges. And when Markert flagged a crucial manpower shortage on the ships SpaceX uses to fetch spacecraft at sea, he says he was told he 'needed to bring solutions, not problems.' In one instance, Markert suggested to higher-ups that SpaceX 'needed to prioritize' more training sessions for workers to get properly certified in certain areas, according to the complaint. But, it maintains, he was told that 'there is no time for that and the company would not spend the money on it.' The privately-held commercial launch services company founded and controlled by Elon Musk, the world's richest person, expects to book revenues this year of more than $15 billion. Markert was let go this spring by SpaceX, which has seen four of its rockets explode so far in 2025. His complaint argues his termination was due in part to his criticisms of the company's safety shortcomings. Reached by phone, Markert referred The Independent to his attorney, who was traveling Monday and unable to comment. SpaceX officials, along with the outside lawyers defending SpaceX against Markert's claims, did not respond to requests for comment. Last year, Musk moved the 13,000-strong firm's headquarters from California to Texas, amid a feud with 'woke' Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. Markert worked at a SpaceX facility in Hawthorne, California, about 20 miles south of Los Angeles. SpaceX has faced other recent lawsuits filed by ex-employees who felt they, too, had been wronged on the job. Earlier this month, a Black materials inspector at the same plant as Markert sued SpaceX after being fired for tardiness, which he alleged was overlooked if the offender happened to be white. In May, a SpaceX worker in Washington State who suffered from Crohn's disease filed a lawsuit against the company, claiming his supervisors timed his bathroom breaks and wrote him up if he spent more than 10 minutes on the toilet. (Crohn's can cause urgent, often uncontrollable, bowel movements.) Markert's complaint says he was 'well liked by his peers, and consistently received positive performance reviews.' At the same time, Markert 'frequently brought up safety and labor concerns,' according to the complaint. Concerned about the unforced errors that fatigued employees tend to make, Markert informed his bosses that 'several technicians were being required to work sometimes 15 to 20 days in a row without a day off,' and that others were denied rest periods during their shifts, the complaint states. According to the complaint, SpaceX management told Markert that 'the schedule comes first.' If he tried to schedule a day off for an exhausted underling, Markert would be 'chastised' by his supervisors. And when Markert tried to persuade SpaceX to add more bodies to his team, the complaint says he was 'shut down.' '[Markert] informed his senior leadership that many of the technicians were being overworked as they were not staffing enough technicians on ships,' the complaint goes on. 'This resulted in technicians doing multiple duties simultaneously in a high stress and extremely dangerous environment which resulted in injuries that technicians were too fearful to report. After voicing concerns to leadership, [Markert] was frequently told he needed to bring solutions, not problems. However, when [Markert] suggested more technicians, he was denied.' If SpaceX wouldn't hire more technicians, Markert 'suggested they dial back on the mission manifest,' but was 'told the Vice President of Launch would never allow that,' according to the complaint. In early 2025, it says Markert raised 'strong concerns' about a process involving the recovery of rocket fairings he considered extremely unsafe, and one he believed could seriously injure, or even kill, somebody. He recommended the company create a new system to reduce the risk, the complaint states. 'The company decided not to act on the issue and kept the… process as it was because it was the more economical solution,' according to the complaint. Markert's tenure at SpaceX came to an end in April 2025, which he claims was retaliation for consistently flagging safety problems, as well as an apparently confounding issue with one of his subordinates. In early 2024, Markert agreed to hire a SpaceX employee from the East Coast, who had filed a discrimination complaint against her previous team and was looking for a 'fresh start,' the complaint explains. It says the transfer employee complained frequently to Markert about coworkers underperforming or misbehaving. He took her grievances seriously, and duly brought them to human resources, but they often turned out to be exaggerated or even fabricated, according to the complaint. A year later, on the transfer employee's last day with SpaceX, she filed a discrimination report against someone on Markert's team, his complaint says. An investigation substantiated the claims, which are not laid out in the complaint, and on April 2, 2025, Markert was fired. When he asked what he had done wrong, the SpaceX HR reps told Markert they 'could not share any details,' according to the complaint. Markert was informed he was eligible for rehire elsewhere at SpaceX, but claims HR quietly made sure there were no takers. Adding insult to injury, Markert – whose complaint describes him as a 'lifer' who hoped to retire from SpaceX – forfeited more than $3.5 million in as-yet unvested SpaceX equity that would have become his over the next six years. Additionally, Markert says he lost out on at least $1,219,457 in lost salary and benefits, and at least $1,172,287 in future lost equity. Markert's complaint argues that he 'engaged in the protected activities of raising safety and labor concerns and reporting discrimination on behalf of a subordinate and participating in the subsequent investigation,' yet 'suffered the adverse employment actions of retaliatory termination.' He is now seeking compensatory damages, special damages, and general damages totaling $5,966,214, plus punitive damages to be determined by a jury. In a response filed prior to moving the case from state to federal court, SpaceX argued that Markert was an 'at-will employee' and claimed he was 'terminated for legitimate, non-discriminatory and non-retaliatory reasons.' The company further says it has made 'a good faith effort to comply with all applicable anti-discrimination and retaliation laws,' and that it does not owe punitive damages because it has 'not engaged in any alleged conduct with malice or reckless indifference to the protected rights of any aggrieved individual.' SpaceX does not owe Markert any other damages, its response argues, claiming 'such damages, if any, are too speculative to be recoverable at law.'
Malay Mail
19-07-2025
- Health
- Malay Mail
What migrant worker deaths reveal about Malaysia's fragile Socso system
KUALA LUMPUR, July 19 — Two foreign workers were injured on the job in Malaysia but their stories couldn't have been more different. One – Jebaraj Kumar (not his real name) from India – died alone, with his hospital bills unpaid. His body remained in the morgue for nearly two months and was only flown back to India in a closed casket after the outstanding bills were settled. The other – Sri Handayani or Riyanie, a 49-year-old maid from Indonesia – was hit by a car while heading to the grocery store. She was treated and discharged within hours, received a month of physiotherapy, and has since returned to work. The incidents happened about a year apart. The Malaysian government-backed insurance scheme for workers, the Social Security Organisation (Perkeso), paid for both medical bills. All workers, foreign and local, are required by law to be enrolled in Perkeso, which not only pays for medical bills for injuries and illnesses sustained at work, but also disability and death benefits. But Jebaraj did not receive any help from Perkeso until almost two months after his death, while Riyanie received assistance almost immediately. Their stories expose the stark difference in outcome on a system that arguably relies too much on employers and luck for workers with little support system here. 'For migrants, it is essential to be covered by (Perkeso) as migrants work in 3D (dirty, dangerous, difficult) sectors where injuries can happen anytime,' said Sumitha Shaanthinni Kishna, founder and director of the migrant labour rights group Our Journey. 'Perkeso has a very strong system when it works as intended.' Foreign workers working,Semenyih 12 May 2023—Picture by Raymond Manuel Without Perkeso The case of Jebaraj illustrates what could happen to a worker if the unthinkable happened without Perkeso's assistance. On March 6, 2024, the 48-year old man from Tamil Nadu, India was working in the kitchen of a restaurant in Bangsar, when a gas tank exploded. He sustained severe burns on 80 per cent of his body and was the only one injured, according to news reports on the incident. He was brought to Kuala Lumpur Hospital (HKL) for treatment. No one had notified his family. His 25-year-old daughter, who asked to be identified only as Suba, told Bernama via an interpreter that they only knew something was wrong when her father failed to call them at 6.30 pm as scheduled. She called her father's employer, who informed her that Jebaraj had been injured at work and was in the hospital. 'He told me my father was ok, he was awake and talking,' she said via Google Meet. 'We didn't fly to see him because we thought he was going to be ok.' She said in reality, her father was in a coma. She and her mother asked to talk to Jebaraj, or see photos of him recovering in the hospital, but the employer said HKL did not allow any phones on its premises. Things got worse from there. Jebaraj passed away on June 2, 2024. But Suba and her mother would not be able to bury him until almost two months later. She claimed that Jebaraj's employer tried to persuade the family to bury him in Malaysia, citing the extensive paperwork involved in repatriating the body. She then asked her father's friend to check on her father's case and found out that the body had not been released because of unpaid hospital bills. Suba is unsure whether her father's employer reported the case to Perkeso, as required by law. In any case, it appears Perkeso was not involved in Rebaraj's case until Sumitha-whose NGO is representing Suba and her mother-petitioned the organisation to cover the hospital bill and provide the entitlements owed to them. When contacted, Jebaraj's employers said he had Perkeso coverage at the time of the incident but did not explain why the hospital bills were left unpaid. Perkeso confirmed to Bernama via WhatsApp that Jebaraj was covered. 'Perkeso has investigated this case and confirmed that the case is covered under the Employment Injury Scheme (Act 4) and eligible to receive benefits from Perkeso,' the group said. Suba confirmed her mother has begun receiving dependent's benefits through the scheme. Malaysia made Perkeso coverage mandatory for foreign workers in 2019, and expanded its Invalidity Scheme to foreign workers in July 2024 to provide disability pension, funeral and death benefits, as well as survivors' benefits. Failure to comply could result in a RM10,000 fine or two-years' imprisonment or both. Perkeso has covered Malaysian workers' since 1971 via the Employees' Social Security Act 1969 (Act 4), Self-Employment Social Security Act 2017 (Act 789) and Employment Insurance System Act 2017 (Act 800). With Perkeso Riyanie vividly recalls the terrifying moment the car struck her-her body and purse flying into the air. Just moments earlier, she had been waiting for the light to turn green so she could cross. Now, she lay sprawled in the middle of the road in Puchong like a rag doll, blood covering her face and body, the contents of her purse scattered around her. 'I could tell it was bad because there was so much blood. My hand was covered in blood,' said the Indonesian domestic worker to Bernama. Pedestrians and the remorseful driver helped her contact her employer and took her to the nearest clinic and then to Putrajaya Hospital. Her employer met her there, stayed by her side during the X-rays, helped her through treatment for a scalp gash, and arranged her physiotherapy sessions. She also assisted Ryanie fill out the necessary forms. Not once during that time did she worry about accessing medical care, including the physical rehabilitation for muscle damage on her right side. 'I received physiotherapy from Perkeso too-they covered everything,' she said, adding that her employer had enrolled her in the programme as required by law, and also provided coverage under the Indonesian government's workers' insurance scheme. The accident took place on May 6 this year. Today, Riyanie is fully healed, healthy and moving without any aches or pains. She described the entire process as smooth and mostly hassle-free. All she had to do was provide her Perkeso number to the hospital staff, and if she didn't have it, her employer would do it for her. For Riyanie, the system worked as intended. Differences in response Both are foreign workers who met with an accident at work. Both have Perkeso coverage. Yet, the paths diverged sharply. Experts said the difference came down to how helpful the employers are. For foreign workers, who are often alone and lack a support network here, this reliance on the employer is compounded. Malaysian workers who are recent transplants may be in a similar situation. Bar Council Migrants and Refugees Committee Co-Chair Datuk Seri Ramachelvam told Bernama the onus was mostly on employers contacting Perkeso when accidents happen. 'There's also nothing barring an employee from reporting, but employees are less likely to report it in the sense of the lack of knowledge,' he told Bernama via Zoom. Media reports of serious or deadly incidents are not enough to trigger Perkeso action either as there is no way to know who the workers involved were or whether they were contributors to Perkeso. Under Malaysian law, not all workers are covered. Workers who earn more than RM6,000 are not required to have Perkeso coverage, a ceiling increase from RM 4,000 to RM5,000 on Sept 1, 2022, and another to RM6,000 on Oct 1, 2024. National Association of Human Resources Malaysia (PUSMA) president Zarina Ismail said the way Perkeso is set up, employers have an outsized role in looking after their employees. 'As employers, that is their responsibility. Whether it's a big or small company, once we hire workers-whether foreign or local-it is our duty to ensure their welfare,' she said. Nevertheless, labour experts said most employers are compliant and provide Perkeso and other coverage for their workers as required by law. socso Filling in gaps That employers should be responsible for their employees' well-being is a given. But a system that hinges on them to activate benefits leaves too much room for failure. Labour experts say to prevent cases such as Jebaraj's, there needs to be changes at the systemic and administrative level. All said better communication between governmental agencies would help plug the gap in reporting and service. Attorney Michael Cheah, who deals with labour issues among others at AmerBON Advocates, blamed government agencies' tendency to work in siloes. 'The system is built in such a way that everyone operates in siloes so there's no integration between the agencies,' he said. Ramachelvam agreed. He said having a standard operating procedure (SOP) in place where one department receiving a report triggers action from another agency would prevent cases from slipping through the cracks. For instance, the law mandates reporting of industrial accidents to the Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH). Should any worker die or be injured, DOSH can take note and inform Perkeso. 'I don't see why, when an accident is reported to the department (DOSH), there should (not) be an SOP for it to notify Perkeso as well-so that Perkeso can follow up,' he said. 'That future may not be long way off. Even now, the government is in the process of digitalisation and possibly digitally linking their services between agencies, as part of the five-year digitalisation plan, overseen by Jabatan Digital Negara (JDN). In the meantime, Riyanie – who still cares for her employer's elderly mother – considers herself fortunate to be working for a family that follows the rules. A mother of three grown children, she feels assured they will be taken care of should anything happen to her while she's away from home. 'I'm not worried because I have insurance,' she said, smiling. For Suba, her father's passing, alone and unconscious in a strange land, is still a source of pain. She last saw him in 2019 when he was in India for a vacation. 'He was supposed to come back last year to arrange my marriage,' she said. Instead, the next time Jebaraj was back on Indian soil, it was in a closed casket, buried hurriedly at 2 am without a priest attending the burial. 'I'm still heartbroken that I couldn't talk to him before he died.' — Bernama
