Latest news with #BR
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Sport
- Yahoo
🎥 Inter v Vasco sees keeper sent off for time-wasting, late drama ensues
Vasco ended a series of four games without victories, including an elimination in the South American tournament. But they saw Internacional secure a 1 x 1 draw this Sunday (27), in front of 13,188 spectators at Beira-Rio. The match, valid for the 17th round of the BR, saw a goalkeeper sent off after two yellow cards for "time wasting" in the referee's under pressure and attempts Fernando Diniz's team was vastly superior for much of the first half. They controlled the actions, had more possession and volume. They just didn't score at 18 minutes thanks to a miracle by Rochet. Inter, on the other hand, couldn't connect their lines. And Vasco's goal - which was deserved by the production came at 29', with Rayan completing a lethal counter-attack. Colorado reorganized better with the ball. And started to attack more. And with quality. Léo Jardim frustrated Gustavo Prado. And still, Clayton Sampaio hit the post and Alan Patrick hit the crossbar before the break. Inter on the attack, goalkeeper sent off and reaction Roger Machado made Inter faster and more aggressive. Carbonero and, later, Bruno Tabata ensured a Colorado increasingly incisive with the ball. Which hit the post again. Already yellow-carded for delaying the game, Léo Jardim saw the second yellow at 40 of the final stage for the same reason according to referee Flávio Rodrigues de Souza (SP). The Vasco goalkeeper wanted treatment while substitutions were being made. Flávio Rodrigues de Souza had already sent off a goalkeeper in the same way in the BR last year. Gustavo, then at Criciúma, received two yellows against Bahia. The final stretch would be cruel for Vasco. After an attack on the left, Vegetti ended up setting up the ball for Carbonero to beat Daniel Fuzato (45'). The Colorado pressure intensified during the nine minutes of added time. With a good save from Fuzato. Inter fought, but the turnaround did not come after a tense final stretch. 📊 Table and schedule 📅 Inter went to 21 points. The one who closes the G-6 is Botafogo, with 26. Vasco reached 15. They are out of the Z-4. See the complete classification here. Both now focus on the round of 16 of the Copa do Brasil. And they will take the field on Wednesday (30). Colorado will host Fluminense starting at 9:30 pm. And Cruz-Matino will be a visitor against CSA at Rei Pelé. Game with ball rolling at 7:30 pm. Photo: Reproduction This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Strength Seen in Broadridge Financial (BR): Can Its 4.3% Jump Turn into More Strength?
Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) shares soared 4.3% in the last trading session to close at $252.99. The move was backed by solid volume with far more shares changing hands than in a normal session. This compares to the stock's 1.9% gain over the past four weeks. The stock is benefiting from the company's recurring revenue model, contributions from acquisitions, growth prospects, and dividend payouts. This technology outsourcing company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $3.51 per share in its upcoming report, which represents a year-over-year change of +0.3%. Revenues are expected to be $2.05 billion, up 5.6% from the year-ago quarter. While earnings and revenue growth expectations are important in evaluating the potential strength in a stock, empirical research shows a strong correlation between trends in earnings estimate revisions and near-term stock price movements. For Broadridge Financial, the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. And a stock's price usually doesn't keep moving higher in the absence of any trend in earnings estimate revisions. So, make sure to keep an eye on BR going forward to see if this recent jump can turn into more strength down the road. The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> Broadridge Financial belongs to the Zacks Internet - Software industry. Another stock from the same industry, Braze, Inc. (BRZE), closed the last trading session 1% higher at $28.73. Over the past month, BRZE has returned 7.3%. Braze's consensus EPS estimate for the upcoming report has remained unchanged over the past month at $0.03. Compared to the company's year-ago EPS, this represents a change of -66.7%. Braze currently boasts a Zacks Rank of #4 (Sell). Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Braze, Inc. (BRZE) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Times
7 days ago
- Automotive
- Times
My garage won't give my car back. What are my rights?
Q. What do I do if the repair garage refuses to hand my car back? When I took it to them they said they would need to strip the brakes to give me an estimate for a seized brake. The estimate was more than £1,000 so I asked for the car back. The garage said I had to pay £355 for the cost of the estimate. It has threatened to sell the car if I don't pay. BR, PortsmouthA. The garage does not have title to your vehicle. It remains your property and cannot be sold without your consent. However, the garage could retain your vehicle under a lien — the right to hold property as security for a debt — until payment is made for authorised work. • Car Clinic: I've seen anti-speed camera covers for number plates. Are they legal? If the bill remains unpaid, they could attempt to obtain a court judgment or follow procedures under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, which would include proper notice and a reasonable attempt to recover the debt. Hence, the legal sale of your vehicle is extremely unlikely. Unfortunately, they did make it clear that to evaluate the cost of the repair, they would need to conduct a diagnostic check. They indicated that this would involve stripping the brakes. You should have inquired how much this would cost and whether these monies would be deducted from the overall cost of the repair. A fee of £355 for stripping the brakes doesn't sound unreasonable (I am a lawyer, not a mechanic) as this would involve approximately two to three hours work. • Car Clinic: Can I make a supermarket share CCTV of my car being damaged? In essence, you now have two choices; Firstly, try to negotiate a lesser price for the preliminary work as this price was not mutually agreed, and then take the vehicle elsewhere. Secondly, negotiate a goodwill price for the overall repair. Having had the fault diagnosed, obtain two legitimate quotes from local reputable garages, and if cheaper than the £1,000, use these to attempt to secure a better deal. • Car Clinic: My notice of intended prosecution was sent to the wrong address. What now? You are now legally committed to the initial repair cost, and the garage could sue you if it remains outstanding. Therefore, you need to make the best of an unsatisfactory situation. Remember, in future, never authorise work unless a price for every stage is agreed. I suspect that some discount will be available if handled correctly, ie being reasonable, calm and fair. Nick Freeman, motoring lawyer aka Mr Loophole Post your motoring questions below or send to carclinic@
Business Recorder
22-07-2025
- Business
- Business Recorder
Index declines on volatile trade
KARACHI: Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) opened the new week on a volatile note. Monday's downturn was largely attributed to investor profit-taking ahead of July-end, as well as cautious sentiment following a record-breaking run. The benchmark KSE-100 Index declined by 379.78 points, or 0.27 percent, to close at 138,217.58 points as compare to the previous session close of 138,597.36 points. The index moved within a narrow range, hitting an intraday high of 139,201 points and a low of 138,150 points. On Monday, BRIndex100 closed at 14,139.60 points which was 59.97 points or 0.42 percent lower than previous close with the total volume was 471.707 million. While BRIndex30 closed at 39,326.96 points which was 184.91 points or 0.47 percent lower than previous close with the total volume remain 203.005 million shares. According to Topline Securities, the market remained range-bound throughout the session as investors adjusted portfolios ahead of futures settlement. Major drag on the index came from Fauji Fertilizer Company (FFC), United Bank Limited (UBL), Oil and Gas Development Company (OGDC), Systems Limited (SYS), and Hub Power Company (HUBC), collectively shaving off 438 points. However, support came from Habib Bank Limited (HBL), Engro Fertilizers (EFERT), and Pakistan Aluminium Beverage Cans (PABC), which together contributed 152 points. Market activity on Monday remained solid but showed a slight retreat from the prior session. The ready market recorded a total trading volume of 608 million shares, marginally down from 609 million previously. However, traded value declined more noticeably to Rs 23.5 billion, compared to Rs 31.6 billion on Friday, reflecting reduced participation in high-value blue-chip counters. Among the volume leaders, Prud Modaraba First topped the chart with 58.7 million shares, closing at Rs. 4.98. It was followed by K-Electric Limited, which traded 53.1 million shares and settled at Rs. 5.43, and Pak International Bulk Terminal (PIBTL) with 51.7 million shares, closing at Rs. 10.06. In terms of price gains, high-end consumer stocks led the board. Unilever Pakistan Foods surged by Rs 988, ending at Rs 25,498, while Nestlé Pakistan climbed Rs 86.97 to close at Rs 7,400. Conversely, some major scrips witnessed steep losses. PIA Holding Company Limited-B plunged by Rs 3,446, closing at Rs 31,015.32, making it the biggest loser of the day. Bata Pakistan also recorded a notable drop, shedding Rs 35.44 to close at Rs 1,650.89. Market capitalization also saw a modest decline, slipping to Rs 16.505 trillion from Rs 16.517 trillion in the previous session. The Rs. 12 billion decrease reflects valuation erosion across key blue-chip stocks and indicates the impact of profit-booking on investor equity wealth. Out of 479 active companies in the ready market, 245 closed lower, 193 advanced, and 41 remained unchanged—highlighting the breadth of the pullback. BR Automobile Assembler Index closed at 22,576.44 points with a net positive change of 195.12 points or a percentage change of 0.87 and a total turnover remains 5.628 million. BR Cement Index ended at 10,685.87 points with a net negative change of 19.41 points or a percentage change of 0.18 and a total turnover of 20.83 million shares. BR Commercial Banks Index saw a dip of 76.76 points or 0.19 percent and finished at 40,594.21 points with a total turnover of 52.65 million shares changing hand. BR Power Generation and Distribution Index also dipped 168.72 or 0.78 percent and closed at 21,433.61 points and a total turnover remains 56.55 million shares. BR Oil and Gas Index closed at 11,892.62 points with a net negative change of 37.42 points or a percentage change of 0.31 percent and a total turnover was 17.08 million shares. BR Technology & Communication Index closed at 2,991.39 points with a net negative change of 29.52 points or a percentage change of 0.98 and a total turnover of 44 million shares. In his post session comments, Ahsan Mehanti of Arif Habib Corporation noted that Stocks closed under pressure amid geo political uncertainty and concerns over surging inflation to impact SBP policy announcement next week. He further noted that Rupee instability, and concerns over external debt repayments due in FY26 played catalyst role in bearish activity at PSX. While JS Global expects that the market will consolidate around current levels, with sentiment largely dependent on upcoming corporate results, macroeconomic indicators, and clarity regarding foreign investment flows. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Time of India
21-07-2025
- Health
- Time of India
Telangana HC denies divorce over impotency claim, cites lack of evidence
Hyderabad: Citing insufficient evidence to prove the alleged erectile dysfunction of a 33-year-old man, the Telangana high court refused to grant divorce to his 38-year-old wife. The woman, a software professional, had alleged that her husband, a govt employee, was sexually impotent and had concealed his medical condition prior to their marriage. She sought a divorce and permanent alimony of Rs 90 lakh. Her initial petition before the family court in Hyderabad was dismissed, prompting her to move the high court in appeal. In her plea, she claimed that their marriage remained unconsummated, both during their honeymoon and while living together in the United States for a couple of years. She cited medical issues, including erectile dysfunction and failed surgeries, as grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, along with cruelty. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The husband, in his defence, produced medical records and testimonies to assert his potency. He maintained that the couple had a consensual sexual relationship both before and after marriage. A govt hospital potency test conducted in 2021 also stated that there was "nothing to suggest" he was incapable of sexual intercourse. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo A division bench of Justices Moushumi Bhattacharya and BR Madhusudhan Rao upheld the family court's decision, ruling that the woman had failed to establish that her husband's alleged condition had rendered the marriage unconsummated. The court also questioned her silence between their marriage in 2013 and the divorce petition filed in 2018. It pointed to inconsistencies in her claims, including her continued cohabitation with her husband from 2015 to 2018 and the absence of corroborative expert evidence. The judges emphasised that unsubstantiated allegations, without medical or factual backing, were not sufficient to annul a marriage. Additionally, the court declined her request to introduce documents related to pending financial disputes involving her husband in the US, calling them irrelevant to the case.
