logo
The straw that broke Modi's back

The straw that broke Modi's back

India's sudden capitulation by agreeing to a ceasefire in the four-day intense conflict ignited by Hindutva's boisterous pursuit of its dream of Akhand Bharat (greater India) astounded the world. The blatantly jingoistic Modi – beating his 56-inch chest like Goliath – was floored by David's 'slingshot'.
Modi's Waterloo did not come just through the massive fireworks caused by the retaliatory physical attack by Pakistan against seemingly impregnable and heavily defended military targets, which New Delhi may have considered an 'inconvenience and embarrassment'.
The straw that broke the camel's back on May 10, 2025 was a nightmare, which so far, the world has been watching only in Star Wars movies, Marvel and Pixar video games. The knockout blow that Pakistan landed was through its 'Cyber Force' targeting 'Indian government institutions, infrastructure, and essential services'.
The assault crippled 70% of India's electricity grid, causing widespread power outages, plunging Northern India and Kashmir into darkness; disrupting ministries, railways, waterworks, airlines, and other critical systems.
Modi's Don Quixotic tilting to the windmills on May 6 and 10 triggered Pakistan's most sophisticated cyber offensives in the region's history, crippling key elements of India's digital infrastructure, affecting key Indian institutions like the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company; Indian Air Force data systems; Hindustan Aeronautics Limited; Border Security Forces; Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), Railway and airline operations among others. New Delhi's deepest secrets lay bare.
Modi had no option but to acquiesce and was granted a face-saving surrender by Donald Trump, accepting an ignominous ceasefire. Little wonder that Indian authorities were dumbstruck. It was Trump who announced the ceasefire with an ashen faced Indian External Affairs Secretary Vikram Misri, who confirmed the ceasefire in a hurriedly called Press Briefing, refusing to field questions from an equally perplexed media.
A friend and fellow columnist has opined that 'The doctrinal shortcoming of Pakistan has been in allowing the Indian strategy of keeping the air and missile battles limited to the latter's north-western states…At the very outset of hostilities, or even when the Indian attack appeared imminent on the night of 6-7 May, Pakistan should have taken the war to the economic heart of India… Surat, Bombay, Pune, Bengaluru, Chennai, Visakhapatnam and Calcutta.'
Sorry sir, I beg to differ.
Pakistan, which had been urging restraint from the outset, was constrained to give a glimpse of what is to come. Without firing a single bullet, Islamabad paralysed New Delhi's war making capability in the twinkling of an eye; imagine what it is capable of if push comes to shove. It did not even need to mate the nuclear warheads on the Submarine Launched Babur 3 Cruise Missile.
To save his face and stop his own countrymen from lynching him and forcing him out of power, the self-confessed activist of the terrorist organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), is putting on a brave face, playing to the gallery with slogans like: 'Sindoor runs in my veins; playing with blood of Indians will cost Pakistan dearly.' Modi's spin doctors are working overtime to spin webs of lies of destroying Pakistani F-16s, JF-17 Thunders and downing PL-15 Missiles.
Some gullible Indians who otherwise live in a dreamworld of Bollywood and other things, may believe the lies but saner elements have started questioning the insanities albeit at the peril of their lives. The world and his inner sanctum know the truth.
It is ironic but on record that India lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations, accusing Pakistan of state-sponsored cyber warfare. Indian officials engaged with allies, including the U.S. and European cybersecurity agencies, to strengthen digital defences. India's Ministry of External Affairs condemned the attack, calling it an act of aggression that violated international cyber norms.
Pakistan has been expanding its cyber warfare capabilities, because it was cognizant of the developments suggesting that future cyber offensives could be more intense due to advancements in AI-driven cyber attacks and quantum computing. Analysts suggest that China assisted Pakistan in recalibrating its cyber defence systems, allowing for a more precise and coordinated offensive, tracking vulnerabilities in India's digital infrastructure and evolving a deep strategic alliance, including cyber warfare cooperation.
It is pitiable that unable to match Pakistan in war strategy or cyber-offensive, a desperate Modi has again turned to Chanakyan guile and deceit, employing a barrage of terror attacks reportedly carried out by his National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval's minions from Afghanistan and within Balochistan targeting innocent children of servicemen.
It is the most abhorrent crime of which only Modi's partner in crime – Benyamin Netanyahu is guilty of –shedding the blood of innocent children of Gaza and Palestine. Taking a leaf from Netanyahu's book of repugnant crimes, Modi had been targeting young Kashmiri children with pellet guns, permanently blinding 3,600 innocent souls. There is ample evidence of Ajit Doval masterminding the 2014 ghastly attack on Army Public School Peshawar killing 134 children. Alas the world is silent at these abominable and despicable crimes against humanity.
Hindutva and RSS protagonist Modi may continue to play to the gallery declaring that he has Pakistan reeling under pressure but it is for Indians themselves to realize whether they want to be remembered by posterity as child-killers or rise to their true potential and free themselves of a demagogue Modi – feeding them fake illusions of grandeur – leading them to the path of venom, vengeance and self-destruction.
His own countrymen should realize the truth and tell Modi how their emperor has no clothes.
The article does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Business Recorder or its owners

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senator Mushahid meets Russian FM, lauds Moscow's 'positive neutrality'
Senator Mushahid meets Russian FM, lauds Moscow's 'positive neutrality'

Express Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Senator Mushahid meets Russian FM, lauds Moscow's 'positive neutrality'

Listen to article Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed met Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow on Saturday, thanking Russia for its 'positive neutrality' during the recent tensions between India and Pakistan. The 40-minute meeting, held before the start of the high-level forum, was part of a broader interaction with five prominent Asian leaders from China, Turkiye, South Korea, and Cambodia. Senator Mushahid was the only guest from Pakistan, specially invited by the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the ruling United Russia party to deliver a keynote address at the forum. Lavrov reaffirmed Russia's foreign policy stance of promoting regional peace, security, and stability. Senator Mushahid appreciated Russia's approach, particularly its balanced response during Indo-Pak tensions, and praised President Putin's Eurasian Security Initiative, describing it as rooted in the principle of 'indivisible security'—a concept also echoed in China's Global Security Initiative. Speaking to Russian media, Senator Mushahid commended the warmth of Russian-Pakistani ties and reiterated Islamabad's support for a multipolar regional order. 'Russia and China, led by President Putin and President Xi Jinping, are building a peaceful and prosperous Eurasia—and Pakistan stands ready to be an equal partner in that journey,' he said. At the Eurasian Forum, attended by over 100 delegates from 25 countries, Foreign Minister Lavrov delivered a hard-hitting policy speech critical of Western alliances in Asia. He directly addressed concerns over India's participation in US-led groupings. Lavrov denounced the Indo-Pacific Strategy, saying, 'This Indo-Pacific had never existed—NATO made up this term to drag India into their anti-China schemes.' His remarks were seen as a rebuke to India's growing role in the QUAD alliance, which includes the United States, Japan, and Australia. Lavrov added that while Indian officials claimed their role in QUAD was purely economic, joint military drills among QUAD nations told a different story. 'In practice, however, QUAD nations are already endeavouring—with notable persistence—to organise joint naval exercises,' he said. The comment drew an uncomfortable silence from the 12-member Indian delegation, including three BJP parliamentarians, present at the forum. Lavrov accused NATO of attempting a return to Afghanistan, warning, 'Four years after their ignominious retreat, NATO is once again seeking new points of entry into Afghanistan.' Senator Mushahid, during his media interactions, voiced full support for Eurasian cooperation and denounced military blocs like the QUAD and the so-called 'Asian NATO' as destabilising ventures. He emphasised Pakistan's commitment to diplomacy, the UN Charter, and regional trust-building. The forum concluded with a strong call from Asian and Eurasian representatives to move away from military containment and towards inclusive, rules-based regional cooperation.

Indian Navy will lead New Delhi's response to any future Pakistani aggression: Singh
Indian Navy will lead New Delhi's response to any future Pakistani aggression: Singh

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Indian Navy will lead New Delhi's response to any future Pakistani aggression: Singh

NEW DELHI: India will use the firepower of its navy in response to any future aggression by Pakistan, India's defence minister said on Friday, weeks after the fiercest fighting in decades between the two nuclear-armed neighbours. Relations between India and Pakistan are tense after four days of fighting this month, which involved fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery before a ceasefire was announced. 'If Pakistan resorts to anything evil or unethical, it will, this time, face the firepower and ire of the Indian Navy,' Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said on the aircraft carrier INS Vikrant off the coast of the western Indian state of Goa. A spokesperson for Pakistan's military referred Reuters to a May 12 statement, which said there would be a 'comprehensive and decisive' response whenever Pakistan's sovereignty was 'threatened and territorial integrity violated'. The latest fighting erupted after 26 people, mostly Indian tourists, were killed in an April 22 attack in Kashmir, a disputed Himalayan territory claimed by both nations. New Delhi blamed the attack on 'terrorists' backed by Pakistan, which denied the charge. A ceasefire took effect on May 10 and a top Pakistani military official told Reuters on Friday that both countries were close to reducing their troop build-up along their border to pre-conflict levels. The Indian Navy has said it deployed its carrier battle group, submarines and other aviation assets in the northern Arabian Sea within 96 hours of the April 22 attack. Defence Minister Singh said 'Operation Sindoor', under which India launched the strikes on Pakistan, was paused, but not yet over. 'We stopped our military actions on our own terms. Our forces had not even started showing their might,' he said.

Indian defence chief admits fighter jet losses to Pakistan
Indian defence chief admits fighter jet losses to Pakistan

Express Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Indian defence chief admits fighter jet losses to Pakistan

Listen to article India's military has officially confirmed the loss its fighter jets during the May clashes with Pakistan, marking the first official acknowledgment of air losses in the ongoing conflict. General Anil Chauhan, Chief of Defence Staff of the Indian Armed Forces, disclosed the information in an interview with Bloomberg Television on Saturday, during the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. However, he denied Pakistan's tally of six Indian jets being shot down, choosing not to specify the exact number of aircraft lost. "What is important is not the jet being down, but why they were being down," Chauhan said. "Numbers are not important." His comments followed confirmation from Pakistan, including a statement by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who confirmed that the Pakistan Air Force had downed a sixth Indian aircraft, a Mirage 2000, near Srinagar on the night of May 6-7. Chauhan further discussed tactical mistakes made during the conflict, noting that the Indian military had resumed air operations just two days later and carried out long-range precision strikes. "The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistakes, remedy them, and implement them again," he added. While General Chauhan did not specify the number of jets lost, a senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader, Subramanian Swamy, had earlier acknowledged the loss of at least five Indian aircraft during the clash against Pakistan. READ MORE: French intelligence official confirms downing of Rafale by Pakistan Speaking on a podcast, Swamy confirmed that Pakistan had downed five Indian fighter jets, including Rafale aircraft, during the military exchange. He further commented on the performance of Indian and Pakistani jets, stating, 'Pakistan shot down five of our aircraft using Chinese fighter jets." He admitted that 'the Chinese jets had outperformed the French Rafales.' Earlier, reports from Pakistan indicated that Indian forces had suffered significant losses during the clashes, including the downing of three Rafale jets, a critical asset for the Indian Air Force. In the wake of these losses, both nations engaged in heavy air strikes, with Pakistan had declaring to have neutralised Israeli-made drones launched by India. READ MORE: US officials confirm Pakistan downed at least two Indian jets, including Rafale On the potential for nuclear escalation, General Chauhan dismissed such concerns, labelling them as "far-fetched". He emphasised that there was a significant gap between conventional operations and the nuclear threshold. Additionally, Chauhan pointed out that communication channels between India and Pakistan remained open throughout the fighting, which helped in managing the situation. "There are more sub-ladders which can be exploited for settling our issues," he said. The conflict between India and Pakistan initially escalated on April 22, after an attack in Pahalgam area of Indian-Ilegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) killed 26 people. India blamed Pakistan for the incident without providing any evidence. Islamabad denied India's claims and called for an independent probe. India then suspended the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty, cancelled visas, and closing border crossings leading to tit-for-tat measures by Pakistan. READ: India approves stealth jet plan amid tensions with Pakistan The military engagement further intensified with missile strikes on May 7 targeting several cities in Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, followed by Pakistan downing Indian warplanes. As hostilities increased, both countries launched military strikes, with India hitting Pakistani airbases and Pakistan retaliating by damaging Indian missile storage sites and other strategic targets. By May 10, US-led diplomatic efforts resulted in a ceasefire agreement, though both countries continue to engage in a war of narratives.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store