logo
I won't take lessons in economics from clueless Labour

I won't take lessons in economics from clueless Labour

Telegraph5 hours ago

Reform believes Britain can once again be a prosperous and powerful country. Unlike the entire political establishment, which has resigned itself to managed decline, we know a remarkable recovery is tough, but possible.
The path to getting there requires halting the unprecedented exodus of the country's biggest taxpayers from the country, and indeed persuading more to come here. To create jobs, wealth and apply their broad shoulders to the tax burden.
It also requires repairing the social contract. For too long those who set their alarm clocks and go to work have been getting a raw deal.
Decades of foolish policy from witless and gutless politicians has resulted in tens of thousands of the wealthiest people in Britain fleeing the country. According to the Adam Smith Institute, this will cost £115 billion of growth over the next decade, and tens of billions in lost tax revenue.
So, we announced a new policy yesterday, introducing the Britannia Card. We will make the UK attractive to the world's wealthiest people. But they must pay a £250,000 landing fee for the privilege of being here. All of those fees will be pooled and distributed directly to the 2.5 million lowest paid full-time workers in the country.
This will make us competitive on the global stage, the entrepreneurs and wealth creators we want will make the UK their home. While they won't pay tax on foreign assets, they will, beyond the landing fee, still pay an average of £120,000 per year in direct taxation on UK earnings, and much more in VAT, Stamp Duty and (via their companies) Corporation Tax.
Based on conservative assumptions of uptake of the card, the lowest paid full-time workers will receive a tax free annual payment of £600 to £1000.
The rest of the country will benefit from the billions more these international job creators will pay in tax, beyond the landing fee.
The economy benefits because those 'Britannia dividends' paid to workers will be spent in local cafes, high streets and cinemas. Those who earn the least have the highest propensity to spend.
Nigel Farage is the first political leader in decades to have the courage and wisdom to say that Britain needs the wealthy to have any chance of getting out of the deep fiscal hole it's in. Non-doms have been vilified, firstly by Tories and now by Labour. According to Bloomberg, they represent 0.1 per cent of the population and pay 1 per cent of the tax. They're literally the last people you'd want to chase away if you cared about our country.
The announcement was met by comical howls from the Tories. The clowns who managed in fourteen years the astonishing feat of hiking the tax burden on working people to the highest level in 70 years, tripling the national debt to £40,000 per person, and leaving public services on the brink of collapse. All at the same time. They have been appropriately rewarded for this with electoral oblivion.
Labour, meanwhile, claim our policy will 'cost the treasury money'. Wrong. Reeves is the genius who hiked the Capital Gains Tax rate in her Budget, and – along with the woeful OBR – claimed it would raise billions in extra taxes. We now know the opposite has happened. It cost the exchequer billions, and she's borrowing that money as a result. She will then soak everyone else with higher taxes to make up for her incompetence. The same thing is happening with the non-dom policy. The OBR said that scrapping it would raise billions, but assumed that just 1.5 per cent of the non-dom population would leave each year. Just 10 months in and 10 per cent have left already. Once that hits 25 per cent (which it will in short order), revenue for the taxpayer will decline. That's why the Treasury are sounding the alarm, and she will almost certainly U-turn.
I started a tech company from scratch, grew it to tens of millions in revenue and sold it for hundreds of millions. I know what it means to take risk, the sacrifice required to create wealth, and I know how people in that situation think. Not a single member of the Labour cabinet has started a business, or had a consequential job in the private sector. That's why they keep announcing policies straight from the student union.
Time is running out. We need competence back in Westminster. It won't be easy, and we will need more than one term to do it. But make no mistake, Reform will restore this country to prosperity.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump responds to NATO head's ‘daddy' remark: ‘I think he likes me'
Trump responds to NATO head's ‘daddy' remark: ‘I think he likes me'

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump responds to NATO head's ‘daddy' remark: ‘I think he likes me'

Donald Trump has responded to being called 'daddy' by Nato chief Mark Rutte during a summit in The Hague on Wednesday (25 June). Mr Rutte defended the US president's expletive outburst against Iran and Israel on Tuesday (24 June), where he said both nations 'don't know what the f*** they're doing'. The secretary general excused the rant, saying: 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language.' Asked by a journalist if he regards his Nato allies as children, Mr Trump laughed and said that Mr Rutte was being 'very affectionate' and thinks that he 'likes him'. He said that his allies 'need a little help at the beginning' but is hopeful that they will be able to defend Europe themselves.

What are the government's planned welfare changes?
What are the government's planned welfare changes?

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

What are the government's planned welfare changes?

A significant number of Labour MPs are threatening to vote against the government's working-age welfare reform plan when it comes before the House of Commons next reforms are designed to reduce the overall working-age welfare bill by about £5bn a year by the end of the rebel MPs have signed an amendment to the legislation that makes a series of objections, including a lack of official consultation and impact Verify explains the detail of the reforms and their possible impact. Which benefits would be cut? The government wants to save money by:making it harder for people to access Personal Independence Payments (Pip)cutting the rate of incapacity benefitIncapacity benefit - which is mainly paid through the health element of Universal Credit - goes to those deemed to be unable to work for health benefit is set to be reduced by 50% in cash terms for new claimants from April 2026. For existing claimants, it is due to be held flat in cash terms until 2029-30 - meaning payments will not rise in line with inflation. The government estimates these two changes will save £3bn a year by the end of the is paid to people with a long-term physical or mental health condition or a disability and who need support. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has acknowledged that almost 20% of recipients are in work. The government plans to make it more difficult for people to claim the "daily living" element of Pip from 2026-27. Under the current assessment system, claimants are scored on a zero to 12 scale by a health professional on everyday tasks such as washing, getting dressed and preparing are the Pip and universal credit changes and who is affected?Under the proposed change, people would need to score at least four on one task, ruling out people with lower scores who would previously have qualified for the benefit. The government estimates this will save an additional £4.5bn a year from the welfare bill by the end of the decade. Why is the government trying to cut welfare spending? It is concerned about the rise in the number of people claiming working-age benefits in recent years and the implications of this trend for the public Autumn, the government projected that the numbers of working-age claimants of Pip in England, Scotland and Wales would rise from 2.7 million in 2023-24 to 4.3 million in 2029-30, an increase of 1.6 that time, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government's official forecaster, projected that the overall cost of the working-age benefit system would rise from £48.5bn in 2024 to £75.7bn by would have represented an increase from 1.7% of the size of the UK economy to 2.2%, roughly the size of current spending on defence. Ministers argue that this rising bill needs to be brought under control and that changes to the welfare system are part of that is worth noting though that - even after factoring in the planned cuts - the OBR still projected this bill to continue to rise in cash terms to £72.3bn by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) still projected the total number of working-age Pip recipients to rise by 1.2 million between 2023-24 and 2029-30 - after the cuts. In this sense, the main effect of the Pip cuts would be to reduce the increase in claimants that would otherwise have occurred. What would the impact of the reforms be? The government's official impact assessment estimates that about 250,000 additional people (including 50,000 children) will be left in "relative poverty" (after housing costs) by 2030 because of the that assessment included the impact of the government deciding not to proceed with welfare reforms planned by the previous Conservative administration, which government analysts had judged would have pushed an additional 150,000 people into charities and research organisations have suggested this means the government's 250,000 estimate understates the impact of its own reforms, since the previous administration's reforms were never actually Porter from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation has suggested the actual poverty impact of the government's changes could therefore be up to 400,000 (adding the 250,000 figure to the 150,000 figure to generate an estimate of the total numbers affected).However, the government's impact assessment cautions against simply adding the two figures together, noting that "some people are affected by more than one [reform] measure", meaning this approach risks double counting account of this, the Resolution Foundation think tank has estimated that the net effect of the government's reforms would mean "at least 300,000" people entering relative poverty by 2030. What about the impact on employment? The government has claimed that its reforms are not just about saving money, but helping people into Rachel Reeves told Sky News in March 2025 that: "I am absolutely certain that our reforms, instead of pushing people into poverty, are going to get people into work. And we know that if you move from welfare into work, you are much less likely to be in poverty."To this end, the government is gradually increasing the standard allowance in Universal Credit - the basic sum paid to cover recipients' living costs - by £5 a week by is projected to be a net benefit to 3.8 million households and the government argues it will also increase the incentives for people to work rather than claim incapacity government is also investing an extra £1bn a year by 2029-30 in additional support to get people out of inactivity and into employment. What are the rebels' objections? The rebel MPs say disabled people have not been consulted on the proposed also say there has been no evaluation of the overall employment impacts by the is true that the government has not consulted disabled people on the specific cuts to Pip and incapacity benefits, though it is now consulting on the broader reform is also the case that the OBR has not yet done a full employment impact assessment, though the forecaster says it will do one before the Autumn the Resolution Foundation has done its own estimate of the employment impact of the overall reform estimates the total increase in employment could be between 60,000 and 105,000, although it stressed that these figures are highly positive employment figure contrasts with the 800,000 people who are projected to lose part of their Pip payments by 2029-30 and the 3 million people families who will see a cut in their incapacity benefits. What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?

EU antitrust regulators to investigate Mars' $36 bln Kellanova deal
EU antitrust regulators to investigate Mars' $36 bln Kellanova deal

Reuters

time32 minutes ago

  • Reuters

EU antitrust regulators to investigate Mars' $36 bln Kellanova deal

BRUSSELS, June 25 (Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators opened on Wednesday a full-scale investigation into candy maker Mars' $36 billion takeover of Pringles maker Kellanova (K.N), opens new tab, saying the deal may hurt competition. The European Commission said the deal announced last August could lead to higher prices for consumers due to Mars' increased negotiating power towards retailers in the European Economic Area. "Mars could increase its bargaining power vis-à-vis retailers. As a result, Mars could be in a position to use this increased leverage to, for example, extract higher prices during negotiations, which in turn would lead to higher prices for consumers," the EU competition enforcer said. Reuters exclusively reported on June 18 that the deal would trigger intensive EU regulatory scrutiny. "The proposed transaction was notified to the Commission on 16 May 2025. The Commission now has 90 working days, until 31 October 2025, to take a decision. The opening of an in-depth inquiry does not prejudge the outcome of the investigation," the Commission said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store