1724919650-0%2FUntitled-design-(5)1724919650-0.png&w=3840&q=100)
Governor blocks bill over legal concerns
PESHAWAR:
Once again locking horns with the provincial government, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi has declined to sign the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Employees Removal from Service Bill 2025 into law and has sent it back to the Assembly with objections.
The K-P Assembly had passed the bill and forwarded it to the Governor, aiming to remove more than 10,000 employees who were recruited during the caretaker government.
The Governor has raised several objections to the bill, stating that upon reviewing it under Article 115(5) and Article 116 of the Constitution of Pakistan, certain flaws have been identified that could not only undermine its objectives but also negatively impact the rights of citizens.
He pointed out that the bill includes recruitments made through the notification dated January 22, 2023, which were conducted under the instructions of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). The Governor noted that while the ECP had relaxed the ban on recruitment in certain cases, the appointments made during the caretaker government are considered legal if they were transparent and based on merit, as established in the 2008 PLD 446 judgment of the Supreme Court.
To avoid unjustified dismissals, he recommended that the bill include clarification in this regard.
The Governor also objected to sub-clause (4) of Section 1, which makes the bill effective in the future, while sub-clause (2) allows it to be enforced retroactively. Citing the 2024 SCMR 1168 judgment, he argued that a law nullifying past statutory recruitments is unconstitutional and would violate fundamental rights. Similarly, referencing the 2014 PLC (CS) 304 ruling by the Sindh High Court, he noted that withdrawing legally acquired benefits without reasonable justification is a breach of constitutional rights.
Furthermore, the Governor criticized Section 4 of the bill, which deprives dismissed employees of their right to appeal. He asserted that this violates Article 10A of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to a fair and transparent hearing. He recommended that employees should be given the opportunity for legal defense to ensure justice.
Additionally, the Governor suggested taking action against the officers responsible for illegal recruitments to prevent such irregularities in the future. He emphasized that it would be unjust to penalize only the employees while allowing the officials who made the unlawful appointments to go unpunished.
Considering these objections, the Governor recommended that the government review the bill and amend it in accordance with constitutional requirements to protect employees' rights and ensure transparency. He warned that if the government disregards these recommendations, the bill could face legal challenges in court.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Selection of CEC chief, ECP members: PTI nominates members for parliamentary body
ISLAMABAD: The opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Thursday formally nominated its members for the parliamentary committee tasked with selecting the new chief election commissioner (CEC) and two members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP). In a statement on X, the opposition leader in National Assembly Omar Ayub posted a June 2 letter addressed to National Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq, in which PTI nominated four National Assembly members and two senators for the committee. The nominees include MNAs Asad Qaiser, Gohar Ali Khan, Sahibzada Hamid Raza, Latif Khosa, along with senators Shibli Faraz and Allama Raja Nasir. The move comes after Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif invited the opposition leader for consultations on appointing a new CEC, following the expiration of the terms of the current CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja and two ECP members from Sindh and Balochistan on January 26, 2025. The premier's letter highlighted that despite their terms ending, the incumbents have continued to perform duties under Article 215 of the Constitution. According to Article 213 of the Constitution, the prime minister and opposition leader must send three names for each position to the president by mutual consensus. If no consensus is reached, names are submitted to a 12-member parliamentary committee equally representing the treasury and opposition benches, which then recommends a name to the president. The PTI's nominations follow procedural consultations within the party and were announced a day after the prime minister's invitation for dialogue with the opposition. The nominations are part of the constitutionally mandated process under Article 213(2B) for appointing the CEC and members from Sindh and Balochistan. The appointments are pending amid deep political polarisation in the country, with little prior engagement reported between government and opposition leaders on the matter. PTI had earlier filed a petition with the Islamabad High Court (IHC) in March, challenging the delay in appointing a new CEC. The petition named the federal government, Senate chairman, National Assembly speaker, and ECP as respondents, alleging constitutional violations due to the delay. It requested the court to compel relevant authorities to form the parliamentary committee and hold meaningful consultations under Article 213. Meanwhile, two other ECP members from Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa continue their terms until 2027, ensuring partial continuity within the commission. The selection process remains critical as the ECP is responsible for overseeing the transparency and conduct of elections in Pakistan. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Cryptocurrency's future in Pakistan
Legalization of cryptocurrency in Pakistan has evolved into a complex legal and financial dilemma. The Government of Pakistan established Pakistan Crypto Council (PCC) in February 2025 under chairmanship of the Federal Finance Minister, Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb. Appointment of Bilal Saqib as CEO of the PCC and subsequently as Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on blockchain and cryptocurrency has marked a symbolic elevation of digital assets in the national discourse. The PPC's announcement to allocate 2,000 megawatts of energy to crypto mining and formation of the Pakistan Digital Assets Authority are bold steps, but the licencing frameworks are yet to be developed. Although the reported appointment of World Liberty Financial as a key advisory firm has added international optics, domestic procedural clarity is still not available. Despite the passage of four months since the PPC's inception no 'white papers', consultation drafts, or public engagement forums to solicit expert feedback or industry alignment are in the offing. Absence of such foundational discourse tends to create regulatory ambiguity and a vacuum of informed public policy. The industry is operating in an atmosphere of speculation where neither the legal model nor its operational dynamics are known and this opacity frustrates stakeholders, impedes innovation, and delays essential compliance-building measures. Announcement by Bilal Saqib'at the Bitcoin 2025 Conference in Las Vegas declaring Pakistan's intention to establish a government-led Bitcoin Strategic Reserve was a dramatic disclosure and sudden escalation. Reference to the United States as an inspirational model also added geopolitical colour, but the declaration raised significant alarm. The notion of building strategic reserves in a highly volatile asset like Bitcoin without defined risk controls, legal backing, or multilateral support, especially under an active programme of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) creates a scenario fraught with institutional, constitutional, and international tensions. The IMF does not recognize cryptocurrency as reserve assets or legal tender, complicating any alignment with sovereign commitments. The existing legal framework, including the Constitution of Pakistan, the State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956 and the Pakistan Currency Act, 1950, prohibits any parallel currency system or strategic reserves outside officially sanctioned instruments. Concerns intensify when factoring in risks such as foreign exchange reserve mismanagement, cyber security threats, lack of transparency, limited liquidity utilization, reputational exposure, and fragile policy credibility. The subsequent clarification by the CEO of PCC during a televised interview has further complicated the matter. His assertion that Pakistan would build its Bitcoin reserves using seized crypto assets rather than public funds revealed a glaring misunderstanding of international asset forfeiture law. In jurisdictions such as the United States, ownership of seized crypto remains with the accused until judicial forfeiture is finalized. The legal transfer process mandates court orders, after which assets are either returned to victims, retained by agencies, or liquidated into fiat and deposited into the treasury. The US government does not hold seized cryptocurrencies in reserve but auctions them post-forfeiture. The exposure of CEO of PCC, lacking comprehension and accurately communicating these mechanisms, reflects poorly on regulatory preparedness of the country. It has also eroded already fragile credibility of Pakistan on the global stage. Despite its economic fragility, Pakistan remains among the top ten crypto-friendly nations. The projected number of cryptocurrency users in Pakistan is expected to reach 28.9 million by 2026, with projected revenues of $2.4 billion in 2025. Legalization of crypto in such a volatile economic environment poses existential risks to monetary sovereignty and financial sector stability. The unregulated adoption of crypto could erode confidence in the rupee, weaken the ability of State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to manage inflation, and incentivize capital flight. The risk of financial disintermediation grows as users shift to decentralized financial systems, bypassing the regulated banking infrastructure. The situation poses a dual risk of systemic instability and heightened scrutiny from global regulatory bodies, particularly Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the IMF. A more appropriate strategy under these conditions is to recognize crypto strictly as a digital asset class, not as legal tender. The asset treatment model preserves SBP's independence while allowing innovation under strict regulatory conditions. The formation of a regulated ecosystem of licensed Virtual Asset Service Providers must be the cornerstone of Pakistan's digital asset strategy. Exchanges, wallets, and custodians should operate within a tightly regulated framework governed by Security & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) and SBP with mandatory know-your-client (KYC), anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, transaction reporting, and audit mechanisms. The development of a regulatory sandbox environment would enable controlled experimentation under the supervision of regulatory bodies. This approach will support technical learning, policy formulation, and risk detection without national exposure. The cross-border use of crypto must be initially restricted to prevent capital outflows and preserve foreign exchange stability. The government must distance itself from any notion of sovereign crypto reserves and instead focus on integrating blockchain into public services, such as tokenized bonds, digital land registries, welfare programmes, and logistics tracking. The need for dedicated digital asset legislation is critical at this point of time. The legal framework should classify various token types, outline custodial responsibilities, define consumer protection mechanisms, and ensure compliance with global financial regulations. Regulatory capacity must be developed in tandem. Training programmes must be established for regulators, law enforcement, forensic auditors, and judicial officials to develop the institutional fluency required for effective oversight. The international investment narrative around Pakistan's digital future must be repositioned. Pakistan should host a 'Crypto Summit' in Islamabad, followed by regional events in Lahore and Karachi. These summits should not pose as PR campaigns but as policy-shaping forums, connecting global blockchain firms with Pakistani fintechs, banks, academic institutions, and startups. These platforms must also educate and guide the next generation of developers, regulators, and entrepreneurs. The goal must be the formation of a trust-based public-private ecosystem capable of managing, scaling, and governing digital asset innovation securely and sustainably. The broader institutional ecosystem must be evaluated for performance and reform. The PCC, despite bold announcements, lacks transparency. It has also failed to launch consultative processes, technical papers, or stakeholder engagements. Its work remains confined to speeches and symbolic declarations without measurable progress or inclusion. The passive role of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) must also be addressed. The SIFC must assume leadership in developing Pakistan's crypto economy, beginning with the orchestration of global summits enabling the regulatory apparatus to scale in line with international best practices. The strategic vision should prioritize safe integration, regulatory maturity, and private sector participation. The global digital economy presents Pakistan with a unique opportunity to redefine itself as a competitive, secure, and innovation-driven hub. In Pakistan, the future of crypto is bright, anchored in its youthful demographic, entrepreneurial appetite, and capacity to leapfrog institutional bottlenecks through decentralized infrastructure. The right legal architecture, international cooperation, and governance transparency can turn this potential into a powerful national asset. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Petition urges ECP to disqualify Gandapur
A petition has been filed in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) seeking the disqualification of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur over the issuance of a Rs50 million cheque to the Lahore High Court Bar Association. The petition, submitted by Advocate Arsalan Afridi, argues that the chief minister allocated the funds to a bar association outside his own province, which constitutes a misuse of provincial resources and a breach of trust.
