logo
Man jailed for driving into fellow private-hire driver after causing taxi stand collision

Man jailed for driving into fellow private-hire driver after causing taxi stand collision

CNA07-07-2025
SINGAPORE: After causing a collision at a taxi stand because he forgot to engage his handbrake, a private-hire driver accelerated matters by suddenly driving off, hitting the other driver as a result.
Aiden Ang Wee Hao, 33, was jailed for two weeks on Monday (Jul 7) and banned from driving for a year.
The Singaporean pleaded guilty to one count of causing hurt by a rash act endangering personal safety.
The court heard that Ang was working part-time as a private-hire driver in December 2023.
At about 9.20pm on Dec 8, 2023, he dropped off four passengers at the taxi stand of The Centrepoint in Orchard Road.
After the passengers had alighted, Ang stepped out of his seat to check on the car, but forgot to change his gear to "park" or engage his handbrake.
The grey Mazda moved forward and collided with the back of a black Toyota Sienta, driven by Mr Yap Chee Hian, a 61-year-old full-time private-hire driver.
Mr Yap was picking up passengers from the same taxi stand.
After the collision, Mr Yap got out of his vehicle and both men discussed insurance claims and compensation for the accident.
There were no threats, vulgarities or insults made, nor any shouting, the court heard.
About three-and-a-half minutes into their conversation, Ang went back into his car and closed the door while Mr Yap continued talking to him.
Mr Yap then made a call on his phone mid-conversation.
Both men had not exchanged contacts. Mr Yap tried to talk to Ang while on the phone, but Ang started to reverse his car.
Mr Yap responded by tapping on Ang's windscreen to get his attention. Ang paused briefly to talk to Mr Yap, but suddenly accelerated and turned his vehicle left to the adjacent lane to exit the taxi stand.
Mr Yap dashed forward along Ang's car and slapped his bonnet once, but Ang continued moving for several metres until Mr Yap ran directly in front of his car.
Even after Mr Yap had positioned himself in front of Ang's car, Ang continued to inch his car forward, such that Mr Yap ended up with his torso leaning over the bonnet.
Mr Yap kept trying to communicate with Ang, slapping the bonnet again to get the car to stop.
Ang briefly stopped his car and Mr Yap moved several steps backwards while using his phone.
He then immediately drove forward, stopping only when his car made contact with Mr Yap's knee.
Ang then reversed before lurching forward and braking just before contact with Mr Yap. Mr Yap flinched in anticipation, and Ang reversed his vehicle again until it was behind Mr Yap's car.
This time, he turned right to rejoin the main road.
Mr Yap tried to move in front of Ang's car again to stop him from leaving, but Ang continued accelerating even after driving into Mr Yap's right leg.
The collision caused Mr Yap's leg to buckle, with Mr Yap's upper body sprawled over Ang's bonnet.
Ang continued accelerating away and Mr Yap fell to the ground just beside Ang's front wheel.
Ang then cut across the flow of traffic to make a U-turn before speeding off from the scene.
The victim was taken to hospital with slight pain in his hip and buttock areas, with likely bruises. He was discharged that same day and given four days of outpatient sick leave.
HIGH DEGREE OF RASHNESS: PROSECUTOR
The prosecutor sought the sentence that was eventually meted out, noting that Ang had no previous convictions and had pleaded guilty as early as he could.
He noted the "high degree of rashness" Ang demonstrated, whose actions "bordered on being intentional".
"The accused showed a sustained pattern of driving aggressively by inching his car forward multiple times even when the victim was positioned directly in front of him," said Deputy Public Prosecutor Timothy Ong.
"During the last collision with the victim, the accused accelerated into the victim despite the victim's position in front of the accused's car being clearly visible to the accused in the driver's seat," he added.
Mr Ong said Ang's rash driving and attempt to leave the scene must be seen "against the backdrop of his refusal to provide his particulars to the victim", after his "careless failure to secure the handbrake had caused a collision between two vehicles".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man arrested for allegedly shoplifting twice at Changi Airport
Man arrested for allegedly shoplifting twice at Changi Airport

Straits Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Man arrested for allegedly shoplifting twice at Changi Airport

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The man was arrested on July 24 when he was in Changi Airport while in transit for another flight. SINGAPORE - An 82-year-old Australian man was arrested for allegedly stealing two boxes of perfumes at Changi Airport Terminal 1 . In a statement on Aug 1 , the police said they were alerted to a case of shop theft at about 9.30am on M arch 18 in the airport terminal's transit area. A box of perfume valued at $149 was found to be missing from a display shelf at The Shilla Cosmetics and Perfumes o utlet. Officers from the Airport Police Division were able to identify the man through closed-circuit television footage. He was seen allegedly leaving the store with the unpaid item earlier on March 18, though he had already left Singapore. Investigations found that that the man had also allegedly taken an other box of the same perfume from the same outlet , without paying for it, on March 13 . He had also left Singapore on that occasion. The man was arrested on July 24 when he was in Changi Airport while in transit for another flight. He is slated to be charged on Aug 4 . Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Tech Reporting suspected advanced cyber attacks will provide a defence framework: Shanmugam Business Singapore's US tariff rate stays at 10%, but the Republic is not out of the woods yet Asia Asia-Pacific economies welcome new US tariff rates, but concerns over extent of full impact remain Business ST explains: How Trump tariffs could affect Singapore SMEs, jobs and markets Asia Indonesia's Mount Lewotobi Laki-laki erupts Singapore Thundery showers expected on most days in first half of August Singapore Synapxe chief executive, MND deputy secretary to become new perm secs on Sept 1 Singapore 5 women face capital charges after they were allegedly found with nearly 27kg of cocaine in S'pore If found guilty of theft in dwelling , he faces a jail term of up to seven years, a fine, or both. In their statement, the police said that they take a serious view of shop theft cases, and offenders should not think that they can evade capture by quickly boarding an outbound flight.

Billion-dollar money laundering case: 4 law firms linked to seized properties named, 2 more identified and reprimanded
Billion-dollar money laundering case: 4 law firms linked to seized properties named, 2 more identified and reprimanded

CNA

time38 minutes ago

  • CNA

Billion-dollar money laundering case: 4 law firms linked to seized properties named, 2 more identified and reprimanded

SINGAPORE: Four law firms that breached their anti-money laundering obligations over the purchase of properties in the S$3 billion (US$2.2 billion) money laundering case have been named, following the conclusion of investigations into their cases. In an update on Friday (Aug 1), the Ministry of Law (MinLaw) said it had completed the regulatory action related to the four law firms - Anthony Law Corporation, Fortis Law Corporation, Legal Solutions LLC and Malkin & Maxwell LLP. As such, MinLaw added it was now able to furnish more details on their conveyancing of the real estate properties seized as part of the anti-money laundering operation in August 2023. Conveyancing refers to the legal process of transferring the ownership of a property from one person to another. Their penalties were previously made known on Jul 15, but MinLaw then did not name the four firms. It then said 24 law practices were involved in investigations by Singapore's director of legal services (DLS) Sarala Kumari Subramaniam, supported by MinLaw, and 11 of the probes had been concluded. As of Jul 31, 13 of the 24 law practices had been dealt with, the ministry said on Friday. Two more law firms - William Poh & Louis Lim, now known as Louis Lim & Partners, and Templars Law LLC were also named, as inquiries and regulatory action had concluded, it added. With 13 of the probes having concluded, MinLaw also identified five lawyers involved in the conveyancing of the seized real estate properties. They are: Mr Tan Chau Chuang, Mr Andrew Wong Wei Kiat, Mr Tan Tse Chia Patrick, Mr Ee Tian Huat Patrick and Mr Poh Tian Hock William. All have been referred to the Law Society to "consider if there are grounds for further professional disciplinary action against these lawyers". MinLaw previously said on Jul 15 that one lawyer had been referred to the Law Society for disciplinary action, without naming the individual. While a Law Society spokesperson then confirmed that the lawyer had been referred to it for disciplinary action, it was unable to reveal the identities of those involved. "As the referral relates to disciplinary matters, such proceedings are confidential," it then said. ENFORCEMENT ACTION TAKEN All law practices and lawyers are subject to anti-money laundering obligations under the Legal Profession Act 1966. These include performing an adequate analysis of the risks of money laundering in relation to each client and performing customer due diligence measures that are in line with a client's risk profile. Lawyers and law firms also have to file a suspicious transaction report with the police if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a client might be engaged in money laundering. Expanding on the enforcement action taken, the ministry said Anthony Law Corporation had acted for nine clients to convey 25 properties valued at around S$135 million in total. According to MinLaw, its breaches included inadequate scrutiny of the transactions, which was not commensurate with the clients' and transactions' money laundering risks. "Anthony Law Corporation did not corroborate or verify the clients' explanations for why the transactions were being funded by seemingly unrelated third parties, even though these were red flags," it said. The firm also failed to comply with documentation requirements. If a law practice or lawyer decides to continue to act for the client despite suspicions of money laundering, they must substantiate and document the reasons for this and adopt commensurate risk mitigation measures, including enhanced customer due diligence and monitoring measures. However, while Anthony Law retained and continued to undertake transactions for some of these clients despite filing suspicious transaction reports against them, it did not substantiate or document its reasons for why it had considered it appropriate to do so, said MinLaw. The firm was ordered to pay a financial penalty of S$100,000. One of its lawyers, Mr Tan Chau Chuang, has since been referred to the Law Society. Fortis Law Corporation acted for 16 clients to convey 55 properties valued at around S$398.7 million in total. The firm did not conduct checks to verify the clients' claims that the payments for the transactions were indeed from legitimate remittance companies, said MinLaw. As a result, it was handed a financial penalty of S$30,000 and two lawyers - Mr Wong and Mr Tan Tse Chia Patrick - were referred to the Law Society. Mr Wong is no longer practising with Fortis Law. Both Anthony Law and Fortis Law have paid the financial penalty, MinLaw noted. Legal Solutions LLC, the third firm to receive a financial penalty, acted for two clients to convey 20 properties valued at around S$117 million in total. 'It did not adequately document the details of its analysis of the clients' money-laundering risks,' said the ministry. "It also did not perform all the required enhanced customer due diligence measures after it filed a suspicious transaction report, such as documenting its internal discussions on, and reasons for, retaining the clients despite filing the suspicious transaction report." Legal Solutions has been ordered by Ms Subramaniam to pay a financial penalty of S$70,000, while a lawyer, Mr Ee, has been referred to the Law Society. He no longer practices at the firm. Meanwhile, Malkin & Maxwell LLP has been reprimanded to remind it to be mindful of its anti-money laundering obligations and responsibilities. MinLaw said it was taken into consideration that the firm had acted for one client to convey one property valued at around S$40 million. Inquiries revealed that while Malkin & Maxwell conducted checks into the client's source of funds, its independent checks were "not sufficiently in-depth". Instead, it relied unduly on checks that it assumed third parties would have done on its client. William Poh & Louis Lim and Templars Law LLC were also reprimanded by Ms Subramaniam to remind them to be mindful of their anti-money laundering obligations and responsibilities. Mr Poh, a lawyer who previously worked at William Poh & Louis Lim before joining Templars Law, has been referred to the Law Society. According to MinLaw, Mr Poh was the managing partner and sole partner-in-charge of conveyancing matters at William Poh & Louis Lim until around May 2023. During his time at the firm, he commenced transactions for six clients to convey 32 properties valued at around S$246.7 million in total. Twenty-six of those property transactions concluded while Mr Poh was practising with William Poh & Louis Lim, said MinLaw. The lawyer later left the firm in or around May 2023 to join Templars Law, and his previous firm amended its name to Louis Lim & Partners after his departure. Mr Poh brought the remaining six property transactions to Templars Law and concluded the transactions soon after in June 2023, said MinLaw. Some of the breaches observed by Ms Subramaniam included not obtaining certain documents as part of customer due diligence, not adequately scrutinising the clients' and transactions' money-laundering risks and not applying commensurate risk mitigation measures. HOW REFERRALS TO THE LAW SOCIETY ARE HANDLED A lawyer who breaches his or her anti-money laundering obligations is liable, among other things, to face disciplinary proceedings. 'Lawyers whom the director of legal services has referred to the Law Society will be subject to the disciplinary proceedings process and framework in the Legal Profession Act,' said MinLaw. Under this framework, each lawyer's case will undergo further fact-finding by the relevant committee or tribunal to assess if there have been breaches, and if so, the lawyer's individual culpability and any appropriate disciplinary action and penalties against him or her. This disciplinary process is separate from the director of legal services' inquiries and enforcement actions against the law practices. 'We urge the public to refrain from speculating or sharing unverified information while the process is ongoing,' said MinLaw. The billion-dollar money-laundering case involved millions of dollars earned over the years from an illicit gambling ring with Southeast Asian bases, and that was aimed at punters in China. Investigations into the transnational case date back to 2021 and culminated in islandwide police raids in August 2023. Singapore police seized luxury cars, watches, jewellery, designer goods, cryptocurrency and cash. More than 150 properties were also seized, including homes in Singapore's most upmarket neighbourhoods. The fees that Anthony Law, Fortis Law, Legal Solutions, Malkin & Maxwell, William Poh & Louis Lim and Templars Law collected in total from acting for their clients for these property transactions ranged from S$15,000 to around S$170,000, said MinLaw. "In imposing the financial penalties, alongside other regulatory measures that include following up with these law practices on their remedial measures to strengthen compliance with anti-money laundering obligations, the DLS aims to ensure that law practices in Singapore observe their anti-money laundering obligations and keep Singapore a clean and money-laundering-free business- and financial-hub," it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store