
Fed's Bowman in favour of rate cut if inflation is subdued
Treasuries rose after another Federal Reserve official hinted that an interest-rate cut could come as soon as next month, extending gains stoked by haven demand after the US bombed nuclear sites in Iran over the weekend.
US government debt wiped out its early losses on Monday after Fed Governor
Michelle Bowman
said she could support a rate cut in July if inflation remains subdued, echoing comments by Christopher Waller on Friday. That pushed yields lower across maturities, with the benchmark 10-year rate down six basis points to 4.31%, the lowest level in just over a week.
Traders, meantime, boosted their bets that the Fed will lower rates by at least 50 basis points before the end of the year, with a roughly 20% probability of a reduction in July. Markets are pricing in a September move as more likely.
Earlier in the session, Treasuries had fallen alongside other global bonds as the escalating conflict in the Middle East stoked fears of an oil-supply disruption that would fan inflation. Oil, though, has since slipped as fears faded that the conflict with Iran would immediately disrupt supplies from the Middle East. That's helped European government debt to since follow Treasuries higher.
Yields on two-year Treasuries, most sensitive to the Fed's monetary policy, are lower by eight basis points to 3.82%. The dollar also reversed, wiping out early gains to trade little changed.
Live Events
Those moves came as Bowman said in a speech at a conference in Prague that she would support lowering rates at the next meeting as long as "
inflation pressures
remain contained." Confirmed this month to serve as the central bank's vice chair for supervision, she also said the "time has come" to revisit the current approach to leverage ratio requirements amid concerns the rule has constrained lenders' trading in the $29 trillion Treasuries market.
On Friday, Waller said the central bank could cut next month, reiterating his view that any inflation hit from tariffs is likely to be short-lived. Bloomberg Economics puts Bowman among the Fed officials who are considered neither a dove nor a hawk, while Waller is classified as the most dovish policymaker.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
10 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Rupee rises 65 paise to 86.13 against US dollar over hopes of Iran-Israel ceasefire
The rupee rose sharply by 65 paise to 86.13 against the US dollar in early trade on Tuesday as crude oil prices fell following hopes of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel. ADVERTISEMENT A weak greenback and a strong opening in the domestic equity markets further boosted the rupee, according to forex traders. Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, declined 2.73 per cent to USD 69.53 per barrel in futures trade as US President Donald Trump announced that Iran and Israel were close to a ceasefire. At the interbank foreign exchange, the local unit opened at 86.07 against the US dollar before dipping to 86.13, up 65 paise against the greenback from its previous close. The rupee had plunged 23 paise to close at a five-month low of 86.78 against the US dollar on Monday. "Trump said overnight that a ceasefire between Israel and Iran has been done while Iran has not confirmed it as yet. However, the market has taken this into consideration with oil falling below USD 70," Anil Kumar Bhansali, Head of Treasury and Executive Director, Finrex Treasury Advisors LLP, said. ADVERTISEMENT "The USDINR gained to almost 86.00 levels and opened at 86.07 after the ceasefire announcement by Trump. The markets now await FED Chief Powell's testimony on Tuesday and Wednesday in which he may indicate about cutting of rates to the Senate and House," he said. Meanwhile, the dollar index, which gauges the greenback's strength against a basket of six currencies, was trading 0.29 per cent lower at 98.13. ADVERTISEMENT The domestic equity market rebounded from Monday's losses as Sensex jumped 930.7 points to 82,827.49, while Nifty surged 278.95 points to 25,250.85. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) offloaded equities worth Rs 1,874.38 crore on a net basis on Monday, according to exchange data. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)


Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
GIFT Nifty soars as ceasefire lifts global mood
GIFT Nifty: GIFT Nifty July 2025 futures were trading 229 points higher in early trade, suggesting a strong opening for the Nifty 50. U.S. President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that Israel and Iran have agreed to a "Complete and Total CEASEFIRE" following what he dubbed "THE 12 DAY WAR." The truce is set to begin six hours after the announcement, with Iran initiating a 12-hour pause, followed by Israel. Trump claimed the war could have devastated the Middle East but praised both sides for agreeing to peace. His statement followed U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, which he said were "obliterated." While Tehran reportedly accepted the deal, official confirmation from either country is missing, and reports suggest clashes are ongoing. Meanwhile, markets reacted positively, with crude oil prices dropping and U.S. stock futures rising. Institutional Flows: Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) sold shares worth 1,874.38 crore, while domestic institutional investors (DIIs) were net buyers to the tune of Rs 5,591.77 crore in the Indian equity market on 23 June 2025, provisional data showed. According to NSDL data, FPIs have sold shares worth Rs 201.50 crore in the secondary market during June 2025. This follows their purchase of shares worth Rs 18082.82 crore in May 2024. Global Markets: US Dow Jones futures jumped 191 points, pointing to a strong open for Wall Street. Asian indices rallied on Tuesday after President Donald Trump claimed that Iran and Israel had agreed to a ceasefire. However, neither country has officially confirmed accepting the proposed timeline. Overnight in the US, all three major indices closed higher as investor nerves eased following Irans relatively muted response to the US airstrikes over the weekend. The Dow gained 0.89%, the S&P 500 rose 0.96%, and the Nasdaq advanced 0.94%. Tesla shares surged over 8%, leading the Nasdaq's gains, after the company launched its long-awaited Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Sentiment also got a boost from Fed Governor Michelle Bowman, who signaled that a rate cut could be on the table at July's meeting, provided inflation and labor market data remain supportive. Speaking in Prague, Bowman also downplayed the inflationary impact of Trump's proposed tariff wave, calling it temporary. All eyes now turn to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who begins two days of testimony before Congress starting Tuesday. Domestic Market: The domestic equity benchmarks took a hit on Monday as rising tensions in the Middle East spooked investors. The Nifty closed below the 25,000 mark, dragged down by IT, auto, and FMCG stocks. Brent crude prices edged higher on concerns over potential disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, adding to the nervous energy in the markets. The S&P BSE Sensex tanked 511.38 points or 0.62% to 81,896.79. The Nifty 50 index slipped 140.05 points or 0.56% to 24,971.90.

Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's relentless Fed pressure creates lose-lose scenario for Powell
President Trump escalated his long-running public attack on the Federal Reserve, creating a lose-lose situation for the central bank as it navigates the risks of higher prices and weaker growth from tariffs. The assault has little modern precedent and forces the Fed to confront a dreadful choice: It could cut rates sharply as Trump demands and risk fueling inflation that damages its credibility with markets. Or it could maintain its current wait-and-see stance, and face further bullying that would weaken its standing if the economy slows sharply and the administration is validated in its view that inflation shouldn't be a worry. Fed Chair Jerome Powell faces Congress on Tuesday for regularly scheduled testimony on monetary policy. How lawmakers regard the attack on Powell will be a key gauge of support for Fed independence. The central bank has in recent decades operated with a measure of independence to set monetary policy free of direct political control, which Powell has worked assiduously to defend. The stakes extend far beyond current policy debates. Powell's term expires in less than a year. Trump could establish a template for presidential influence that reshapes the central bank, with his relentless criticism serving as both a warning to Powell's successor and a casting call for replacements who signal they will appease him. If future central bank leaders feel more compelled to consider political preferences alongside economic data, decades of credibility that anchor global confidence in U.S. monetary policy could be degraded. On Friday, Trump called on Powell to reduce the central bank's policy rate, currently around 4.3%, to between 1% and 2% to lower rising costs to service the federal debt. Other Trump advisers, including Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, have amplified the president's criticisms of monetary policy by arguing that worries about tariff-driven inflation are being exaggerated. Since meeting with Powell privately in the Oval Office last month, Trump has unleashed a torrent of insults. 'I don't know why the Board doesn't override this Total and Complete Moron!" said Trump in a social-media post on Friday. Trump mused about attempting to fire Powell, an idea he had previously brandished and then abandoned. Powell has said the Fed makes its decisions based on its best analysis of the economy. 'From my standpoint, it's not complicated. What everyone [at the Fed] wants is a good, solid, American economy," he said last week. Trump's call for lower rates could coincide with an unusual divide inside the Fed across party lines. Among Fed officials who have spoken since last week's meeting, the only two to signal any appetite to cut rates at the Fed's next meeting in late July are the two appointed by Trump in his first term. Michelle Bowman said in a speech Monday that she was more worried about risks of weaker employment than higher inflation—a meaningful shift for a policymaker who was previously highly focused on inflation worries. Fed governor Christopher Waller, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, said in a CNBC interview on Friday that he could support a rate cut next month because he worries about allowing too much labor market weakness. In several speeches over the past two months, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh has said the central bank is to blame for attacks on its conduct. 'I read breathlessly in the newspapers how mean these politicians are to the central bank. Well, grow up! Be tough," said Warsh, a leading candidate for Fed chair, during a panel discussion last month. Presidential pressure over Fed chairs isn't new, but it used to happen in private. In the 1960s, President Lyndon Johnson physically intimidated his Fed chair, William McChesney Martin Jr., after summoning him to his Texas ranch; seated together on the porch, they later played down any conflict to reporters. In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon and his advisers planted a false story in the press that then-chair Arthur Burns was seeking a pay raise while arguing for price and wage controls. Burns ultimately yielded to White House pressure. The high inflation that followed in the 1970s was cured by punishing recessions in the early 1980s. Ever since, central bankers in the U.S. and other advanced economies have tried—and largely succeeded—in building support among the government for greater independence, arguing that it leads to better economic outcomes. 'It is normal for presidents to put pressure on the Fed chair, but Trump's feel different. His attacks are more vicious, constant, and public," Mark Spindel, an investment manager who co-wrote a history of Fed independence, said in an interview Sunday. Powell became Fed chair in 2018 after Trump appointed him, and the president frequently bashed Powell for being too slow to support the economy by lowering interest rates. Trump's critiques over the past week have been different. Republicans in Congress and Trump's White House have found it more difficult than expected to cut spending and reduce deficits. That has led the president to demand lower interest rates to bring down growing payments on the federal debt, which this year could exceed what the U.S. spends on the military. Worries about a central bank succumbing to such 'fiscal dominance" was the core tension that led the Fed to seek greater autonomy, often referred to as its independence, from the executive branch in the early 1950s. Cutting rates aggressively without signs of more evident economic weakness risks backfiring because long-term interest rates could go up. The Fed controls short-term interest rates but long-term rates are determined by investor demand for U.S. bonds. Trump acknowledged Friday that 'my strong criticism" of Powell 'makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing." Fed officials have been unnerved by the attacks. If the Fed isn't seen as acting in the country's best interest, it will be harder for the institution to make the at-times difficult but necessary decisions to slow the economy to control inflation. Trump's increasingly sharp attacks on Powell show how the president has few good options to get the monetary policy he wants without making a more persuasive argument about the risks facing the economy. Ousting Powell looks less viable than it did a few weeks ago. The Supreme Court went out of its way to signal that the Fed was off limits when it granted Trump's emergency request last month to fire federal commissioners in the face of a law prohibiting their arbitrary removal. A second option would be to announce Powell's successor unusually early, which Trump hinted at doing earlier this month. A so-called 'shadow chair" would be designed to undercut Powell by getting markets to place less weight on his forward-looking statements about policy. It could put the chair-in-waiting in an awkward spot of publicly criticizing his or her future Fed colleagues—whose support will be needed once the new chair takes office—and being judged by market participants as a presidential toady. Alternatively, the shadow chair might defend the Fed's moves, upsetting Trump and losing the job before even taking office. The lack of attractive options for dislodging Powell explains why a sustained pressure campaign is likely to continue. The Fed is worried about letting inflation become a problem for a second time in five years. But Trump is balancing out that institutional risk by putting officials on notice that they will be blamed if the economy takes a dive. 'Trump's broadsides 'work.' That's why he does them," said Spindel. Write to Nick Timiraos at