Anita Dunn defends Biden's mental fitness in GOP House committee grilling
Dunn told investigators that while she observed a "physical" decline in Biden during his four years in office, she maintained the belief that he was calling the shots and mentally engaged in decision-making at the White House.
"From what I experienced and observed in the White House, President Biden made all of the important decisions expected of someone serving as the president of the United States," she told the committee, according to her prepared remarks obtained by ABC News.
Dunn refused to answer any questions from reporters as she arrived and later left the deposition.
But her statement indicates she believes Biden was fit to serve and West Wing staff did not usurp his power.
"I did not observe White House staff making key decisions or exercising the powers of the presidency without President Biden's knowledge or consent," Dunn testified, according to the prepared remarks. "The President made it clear that decisions rested with him, and White House staff brought issues to him for him to decide."
Her remarks continued, "Before scheduling a press interview or releasing statements under his name, we sought his approval, and he was an active participant in the preparation of his speeches and public statements. While I observed that President Biden aged physically during his time in office, which is something that happens to every President, he remained throughout my interactions with him fully engaged and clear in his directions and supervision. His ability to probe, to find the weakness in an argument, and to make well-informed decisions, did not change during my time in the White House."
MORE: Former Biden adviser Mike Donilon testifies in House committee probe into Biden mental fitness
House Republicans reacted to Dunn's closed-door interview, saying Dunn "revealed" that Biden's "inner circle" decided against a cognitive test, concluding it would offer no political benefit, a source familiar with her account told ABC News.
Dunn confirmed that President Biden's team decided against doing a 2024 Super Bowl interview due to information contained in the special counsel Robert Hur's report that probed Biden's handing of sensitive documents and questioned his mental fitness.
She is the latest Biden official to answer questions after several former senior officials invoked their Fifth Amendment right to not answer questions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Media Awarded CEO Devin Nunes $5.9 Million in Stock, Despite $20 Million Loss
Trump Media, which lost $20 million last quarter while expanding into new products, including crypto, awarded CEO Devin Nunes $5.9 million in stock on Wednesday, with the shares set to vest over three years, according to an SEC filing. President Donald Trump talks with Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes at the Republican National Convention in July 2024. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images) CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ: DJT)—the parent company of Truth Social and the Truth+ streaming platform and holder of about $2 billion worth of bitcoin—awarded Nunes 348,000 restricted stock units on Wednesday under its 2024 equity incentive plan. The stock will vest in equal annual installments through May 2028, contingent on Nunes remaining with the company. Based on Friday's closing price of $17, Nunes' new stock is worth about $5.9 million, bringing the value of his total stake in Trump Media—1.4 million shares and restricted stock units—to approximately $24.4 million. Last week, Trump Media disclosed a second-quarter net loss of $20 million on $883,300 in revenue—about what a mall-based Chick-fil-A typically brings in—though the company highlighted recent achievements including holding $3.1 billion in financial assets (mostly bitcoin it purchased with the proceeds of a private placement), launching a subscription service for Truth+ and filing registration statements with the SEC to launch a crypto-focused ETF. The company also issued 142,000 restricted stock units each—worth $2.4 million—to CFO Phillip Juhan, CTO Vladimir Novachki and General Counsel Scott Glabe. Company spokesperson Shannon Devine declined to specify what criteria Nunes met to receive the restricted stock units, but touted the firm's 'uncancellable social media platform,' bitcoin holdings and first quarter of positive operating cash flow. The company didn't say, and its SEC filings and press releases do not appear to offer a clear rationale. Under Trump Media's 2024 equity incentive plan, a board committee has broad discretion to grant bonuses based on 33 possible criteria, including financial performance, stock price targets and corporate transactions. Key Background Before joining Trump Media, Nunes was a 10-term Republican congressman and chair of the House Intelligence Committee from rural California, earning $174,000 annually. Trump tapped him to be CEO and a director of the company in December 2021. While his business experience appears to be limited to his family's dairy farm, Trump Media pitched Nunes to investors as a leader with 'familiarity with public scrutiny and media savvy.' In recent months, the company has launched an iPad app for Truth Social, entered public beta for an AI search engine, raised $2.3 billion from a private placement to fund a bitcoin treasury, filed to launch a crypto ETF and rolled out its Truth+ streaming platform globally. $47 million: That's the total compensation Trump Media awarded to Nunes in 2024—including salary, bonuses and stock—though much of the equity won't vest until 2027. News Peg On Monday, a new special-purpose acquisition company—New America Acquisition I Corp., which is targeting firms with a role in domestic manufacturing—named Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump to its advisory board. According to SEC filings, Don Jr. received 2 million founder shares in the company, while Eric received 3 million. Trump Media, where Don Jr. serves on the board and acts as trustee for his father's 115 million shares, also went public via a SPAC—a merger with Digital World Acquisition Corp. that took 29 months to consummate. Separately, Nunes and Eric Swider, another Trump Media board member who led Digital World, launched another SPAC in March, aiming to acquire a firm in the cryptocurrency and blockchain, data security, and dual-use technology sectors. Tangent Last week, a federal judge dismissed a defamation lawsuit Nunes filed against NBCUniversal over a 2021 comment by MSNBC host Rachel Maddow about his communications with a suspected Russian agent. Forbes Valuation Forbes estimates Donald Trump's net worth at $5.1 billion. In November 2023, Trump Media sued 20 media outlets, including Forbes, for reporting that included calculations of its financial results while still a private company. The defendants have moved to dismiss the claims, but the case is ongoing. Further Viewing Trump Media Board Member Who Led SPAC Merger Sells Nearly All His Shares (Forbes) Truth Social Hosted Party At Trump's Mar-A-Lago (Forbes) When It Comes To Truth Social, Republicans In Congress Aren't Buying What Trump's Selling (Forbes) The Tech Mogul Behind Trump's Truth Social Used To Own Porn Domains (Forbes) 'We'd Call That Corruption': How Trump Used The Presidency To Expand His Global Empire (Forbes)
Forbes
4 minutes ago
- Forbes
Alaska Cong. Begich Seeks More Balanced Protections For Marine Mammals
The House Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Subcommittee held a July 22 hearing on a draft bill sponsored by Rep. Nick Begich (R-AK) which would amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Begich and other supporters of reform of the MMPA believe the law needs to be modernized to better reflect current science, eliminate conflicts and duplication of bureaucratic processes, and provide for more consistent and certain application of the law. The effort to amend the MMPA is in line with the Trump administration's goal of streamlining federal permitting processes to speed development of domestic energy resources needed to meet rising demand. 'The MMPA has been in place for over 50 years and during that time, it's served an important role in conserving marine mammals and protecting our oceans,' Begich said. 'As the decades have passed, we've seen how its implementation, particularly in the use of vague or overly precautionary standards, has led to confusion, delay and unintended harm.' He also stated: 'My goal is simple. I want a bill that protects marine mammals and also works for the people who live and work alongside them, especially in Alaska.' An Array Of Competing Stakeholders As will always be the case with an effort to amend one of the major federal statutes related to environmental or wildlife protections, the proposed bill has attracted strong views both pro and con. Wyoming Republican Harriet Hageman, who Chairs the subcommittee, said the discussion draft 'will make vital reforms to the MMPA,' and would advance 'the goals of House Republicans and the Trump Administration to streamline the permitting process and provide clear direction to federal regulatory agencies.' But the bill's opponents had different views, often becoming emotional in their statements. Kathleen Collins, Senior Marine Campaign Manager, International Fund for Animal Welfare, said the notion of the proposed reforms making their way into law 'is heartbreaking.' She went onto warn members that, if the bill is ultimately passed and signed by President Trump, 'The blood of thousands of marine mammals will be on the hands of Congress, and the entire well-being of the ocean ecosystem could very well be altered.' Along the same lines, Alaska Director at the Center for Biological Diversity Cooper Freeman warned, "If Begich's bill passes, it would needlessly make our marine mammal species far more vulnerable to injury and death than they already are and could change Alaska's oceans forever. We can't let his bill become law." EnerGeo Wants To Eliminate Redundancies Certainly, it is not in any stakeholder's or policymaker's best long-term interests to amend the MMPA in a way that would produce the fright scenario outcomes laid out by the bill's opponents. Any short-term gains which might be made would quickly be washed away by an inevitable backlash should changes to the law be tied to major harms to protected species. By the same token, it is not in the public's best interest to allow identified inefficiencies and duplications of bureaucratic processes to needlessly impede commercial fishing, energy, and other offshore industrial activities. The bill's proponents believe there is a middle ground to be struck to properly balance all the competing stakeholder interests. One such proponent, Forrest Burkholder, President and CEO of SAExploration, who testified on behalf of EnerGeo Alliance, told the hearing that fixing these issues would 'increase permitting efficiency, decrease uncertainty, and ultimately benefit all stakeholders, the implementing agencies, and most importantly, marine mammals.' EnerGeo Alliance is a trade association representing the geoscience industry which conducts most geological and seismic surveys for wind, oil and gas, and other industries seeking to mount offshore developments. In a recent interview, Dustin Van Liew, senior vice president, global policy & government affairs, told me that EnerGeo's main goal for legislation is reforms that promote 'the objective application of the best available scientific and commercially available data and information.' A lack of objectivity and an inconsistent application of the law is a common complaint from the business world, since uncertainty in the regulatory process only serves to make project planning and execution more difficult and costly. Van Liew says that, too often, permitting decisions are based on non-objective assumptions and computer models that are loaded up with findings from non-peer-reviewed study drafts rather than sound science. EnerGeo has also compiled a list of examples of time-wasting duplications of efforts stemming from competing requirements between the MMPA and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). One of the main drivers of this longstanding problem is that the two laws are, generally, administered by different agencies: The MMPA by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) inside the Department of Commerce, and the ESA by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) at the Interior Department – with additional overlaps depending on the species being managed. 'There are varying layers of requirements that the two different departments and the agencies within those departments are all trying to analyze,' Van Liew says, adding, 'And then of course NEPA overlays all of this as well,' a reference to time-consuming environmental impact statements required under the National Environmental Policy Act. One Piece Of A Much Larger Energy Permitting Puzzle Last month's hearing on Begich's discussion draft is an early step in the long, complicated process of turning a bill into law. But the testimony taken serves to highlight tensions between the myriad stakeholder interests at play. It also helps to highlight the larger drama that makes getting to a bigger, comprehensive approach to streamlining federal permitting processes such a gargantuan goal to attain. When one realizes that modernizing the MMPA to allow human offshore activities while preserving marine mammal protections is just one piece in a puzzle made up of a thousand equally challenging parts, the task seems overwhelming. Yet, if America is to be able to meet its future energy demands, getting there is less a goal than it is an imperative.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House Hype Reel On Trump's 'Wins' Has 1 Really Ironic Twist
The White House celebrated President Donald Trump's 200th day in office in a peculiar way this week. On Thursday, the official White House X account marked the milestone with what is described as a string of victories, boldly claiming that all Trump does is 'win' — though many would say quite the contrary. 'We don't sleep — we win,' the post said. After the administration's humblebrag came a video montage, featuring clips from a variety of television shows and films spanning decades. The twist? The compilation featured several celebrities who have been publicly, and at times vehemently, opposed to Trump — most notably Will Ferrell and Leonardo DiCaprio. In October of last year, Ferrell endorsed Kamala Harris in her bid for the White House. In the video entitled 'Loud White Men For Kamala Harris,' the 'Elf' actor was joined by Billy Eichner and ran through the streets of New York City urging Americans to the polls. He also appeared in a separate campaign video supporting Harris. As for DiCaprio? His heart indeed did not go on for Trump during last year's election. In an Instagram video posted to his account last year, the 'Titanic' actor stated that Trump 'continues to deny the facts.' 'We need leaders who are equipped to enact climate policies that will help save the planet, and that's why I'm casting my vote for @KamalaHarris on November 5,' he captioned the video. Other figures featured in snippets in the White House montage for Trump were Tiger Woods, Nick Offerman, Jenna Fischer, Keanu Reeves and Jeremy Allen White. Related... OOPS! Trump Calls Top Official By Wrong Name While She's Standing Right There Trump Flips Out At Yet Another TV Star: 'No Talent, No Ratings, No Strength!!!' Jake Tapper Roasts Trump's War On Numbers With Taunting New Tagline
