Under Trump threat: Columbia University implements restrictive reforms - War on Gaza
Columbia University agreed Friday to put its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department under new supervision and overhaul its rules for student discipline, acquiescing to an extraordinary ultimatum by the Trump administration to implement those and other changes or risk losing billions of dollars in federal funding.
As part of the sweeping reforms, Columbia University will adopt a new definition of antisemitism and expand 'intellectual diversity' by staffing up its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies, according to a letter published Friday by the interim president, Katrina Armstrong.
The announcement drew immediate condemnation from some faculty, students, and free speech groups, who accused the university of caving to President Donald Trump's largely unprecedented intrusion upon the school's academic freedom.
'Columbia's capitulation endangers academic freedom and campus expression nationwide,' Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration pulled $400 million in research grants and other funding over the university's handling of protests against Israel's genocide in Gaza. As a precondition to restoring those funds — along with billions more in future grants — federal officials last week demanded the university immediately enact nine separate reforms to its academic and security policies.
In her response Friday, Armstrong indicated Columbia would implement nearly all of them. As ordered, it will hire new public safety personnel and empower them to make arrests on campus, bar students from protesting in academic buildings, and revamp its long-standing process for student discipline.
Students will no longer be permitted to wear face masks on campus 'for the purposes of concealing one's identity.' An exception would be made for people wearing them for health or religious reasons.
The university will also appoint a new senior provost to review the leadership and curriculum of several international studies departments to 'ensure the educational offerings are comprehensive and balanced.'
The appointment appeared to be a concession to the Trump administration's most contentious demand: that the university places its Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies Department and the Center for Palestine Studies under 'academic receivership for a minimum of five years.'
The Trump administration has repeatedly accused Columbia University of letting antisemitism go unchecked at protests against Israel that began at the university last spring and quickly spread to other campuses — a characterization disputed by those involved in the demonstrations.
In her letter, Armstrong said the university had worked hard to 'address the legitimate concerns raised both from within and without our Columbia community, including by our regulators, with respect to the discrimination, harassment, and antisemitic acts our Jewish community has faced.'
'The way Columbia and Columbians have been portrayed is hard to reckon with,' she added. 'We have challenges, yes, but they do not define us.'
The Trump administration has ratcheted up its attacks on Columbia in recent weeks, thrusting the campus into crisis and sparking fears of additional reprisals at colleges across the country.
On March 8, federal immigration officials arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a prominent Palestinian activist, and legal permanent resident in his university-owned apartment building — the 'first of many' attempted deportations, according to Trump.
Justice Department leaders say they are also investigating whether Columbia hid students sought by the US over their roles in the demonstrations.
While Trump has made Columbia the most visible target of his crackdown on higher education, he has warned other universities that they will face cuts if they do not embrace his agenda.
His administration announced investigations into 52 universities for diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes. And it has suspended approximately $175 million in federal funding for the University of Pennsylvania over a transgender swimmer who last competed for the school in 2022.
On Friday, free speech groups warned Columbia's response to Trump's threat would reverberate far beyond the Manhattan campus.
"Shaking under government pressure, Columbia crumbled," said Tyler Coward, the lead counsel for government affairs at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. 'If Columbia — with its immense resources and influence — can't stand up to government demands that threaten free speech, what are other colleges to do?'
*Ahram Online edited this article.
Follow us on:
Facebook
Instagram
Whatsapp
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
an hour ago
- Egypt Independent
The UK, Germany and Canada have slashed foreign aid this year, deepening damage done by US cuts, analysis shows
London CNN — Western countries have slashed foreign aid budgets this year and reductions will steepen in 2026, with the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Canada cutting the most, according to a new analysis from the Center for Global Development (CGD). The aid cuts will mean 'significant losses' for many developing nations, according to the analysis from the DC-based think tank, shared exclusively with CNN. Ethiopia is projected to lose the most aid in nominal terms, with Jordan, Afghanistan and the Democratic Republic of Congo also hit particularly hard. Smaller nations will also be hammered by the reduction in foreign aid, with Lesotho, Micronesia and Eswatini each losing around 50 percent of their aid. 'It's setting fire to the bold ambitions to solve poverty and transform developing countries,' Lee Crawfurd, one of the authors of the report, told CNN. 'It's some of the poorest, most fragile places in the world that are going to be hardest hit.' The analysis looked at projections of bilateral aid – money provided directly to another country rather than routed through multilateral organizations such as United Nations agencies or the World Bank – for 2025 and 2026. The US is projected to cut the most, with a projected 56 percent reduction compared to levels two years ago. The Trump administration's gutting of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) earlier this year has already left a hole in many international aid budgets, and several other Western nations are following suit rather than filling the void. 'A big, big chunk of overall cuts in the next couple of years are going to be from the US pulling out, rather than other countries. But these other countries are making things worse,' said Crawfurd, a senior research fellow at the CGD. The UK aid cuts are estimated to represent a roughly 39 percent reduction compared to 2023 levels of spending. Meanwhile, Germany is cutting about 27 percent, Canada 25 percent and France 19 percent of their international aid budgets. The true level of aid cuts remains unclear, as the Trump administration's proposed budget and other government proposals are still making their way through legislatures. But some funding cuts are almost guaranteed. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced in February that his government would increase the UK's defense spending by cutting its aid budget to 0.3 percent of gross national income in 2027, its lowest level since 1999. Many organizations and aid workers have raised alarm about European governments pitting aid budgets against defense spending. 'Cutting the already lean aid budget is a false economy and will only increase division and amounts to a betrayal of the world's most vulnerable people,' said Halima Begum, head of Oxfam GB. 'It is a false dichotomy to pit international cooperation to tackle poverty against national security interests in order to avoid tax increases.' A sign for GIZ, Germany's international development agency, is seen in February 2017. Michael Gottschalk/Photothek/Getty Images Crawfurd said that bilateral aid is a 'really small part of government budgets' and the money for defense or security could be found elsewhere. 'It's a choice… it's a political choice,' he added. The think tank wrote in its analysis that 'one striking takeaway is that some countries are projected to lose large amounts of ODA (official development assistance) simply because of who their main donors are – while others are projected to lose very little' – a game of chance, with losses not matching up to the recipient country's needs. Yemen, for example, is projected to experience a 19 percent fall in its bilateral funding compared to 2023, while its 'comparable' neighbor country Somalia is projected to lose about 39 percent. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has also warned that multilateral aid cuts are threatening efforts to tackle 44 of the highest-priority, protracted humanitarian crises. As of April, only 11.9 percent of the funding for UN response plans had been covered. 'Every year, the UN has been helping more than 100 million people in the world as they go through the worst time of their lives in wars and disasters. But let's be clear: we won't reach the level of funding in 2025 that we've seen in previous years,' Anja Nitzsche, OCHA's chief of partnerships and resource mobilization told CNN in a statement. 'Vulnerable families are being left without food, clean water, healthcare, shelter or protection in places such as Sudan, Yemen, Ukraine, Myanmar and Afghanistan.' Minimizing the damage The CGD is urging Western donors to reallocate aid to the poorest countries to try to 'ensure that resources are directed to populations in greatest need.' Western countries also need to improve coordination to mitigate further damage, especially as they are withdrawing from countries receiving aid, the think tank said. In some countries, the cuts will change who the largest donor is, which 'can lead to major shifts in what gets funded and how,' according to the CGD. For example, Portugal will likely overtake the US in aid to Angola, and Japan is projected to overtake France in Egypt. 'A new lead donor may not continue the same programs' or may take time to get up and running, according to the analysis. Giving a larger share of aid to multilateral organizations can also help improve international cooperation and cut down on duplication of aid efforts. 'Coordination is an ongoing challenge,' Crawfurd told CNN. 'The easiest way to do that is just to fund big multilateral funds like the World Bank.'
Egypt Independent
2 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
A weakened Iran has few options for striking back after Israel's devastating blows
CNN — In the face of In the face of Israel's far-reaching strikes Friday, it's not clear that Iran – its longtime foe – has the capacity to muster the furious response that might be expected. Israel has once again demonstrated it is the pre-eminent military and intelligence power in the Middle East, heedless to civilian casualties and the diplomatic impact of its actions on its allies. As with their remarkable operation to decapitate their northern opponent – the Iranian proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah – the overnight operation has the hallmarks of months or even years of preparation. And Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may have been faced with using this capability now, or losing it, as diplomacy kicked in during a sixth round of nuclear talks scheduled for this weekend between the United States and Iran in Oman. Iran is now left counting its far-reaching wounds. Images from across Tehran show apartment blocks hit, it seems, in specific rooms – suggesting the pinpoint targeting of individuals, likely through tracking cellphones. Iran has lost its top three active-duty commanders, as well as a leading voice in nuclear talks, overnight, but as the dust clears it may emerge more have been hit, and the survivors will likely be concerned they, too, could still be targeted. This will slow and complicate any Iranian response. As will the damage the Iranians continue to sustain. A raid by Israel in October took out a large tranche of Iran's air defenses. Israel's military said Friday that it had destroyed dozens of radars and surface-to-air missile launchers in strikes by fighter jets on aerial defense arrays in western Iran. The Iranian atomic energy agency confirmed that the nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz had also been damaged, but it's not yet clear to what extent. In the days ahead, Israel's superior intelligence apparatus will search for targets of opportunity – commanders and equipment changing location, or the movement of materiel to facilitate a response – and continue to strike. Such a wide-ranging assault was possible only because Hezbollah – Iran's second-strike capability if their nuclear apparatus was hit – had been dismantled over a ruthless but effective months-long campaign last summer. This is beginning to look like a months-long Israeli plan to remove a regional threat. The risks remain high. Iran could now try to race for the nuclear bomb. But its faltering defenses and clear, humiliating infiltration by Israel's intelligence, make that a long shot. Rushing to build a nuclear weapon is no simple task, especially under fire, with your key leadership at risk of pinpoint strikes. Netanyahu may have calculated that the risk of an Iranian nuclear breakout was depleted, and manageable with yet more military might. There is another victim of the overnight barrage: the Trump administration's standing as a geopolitical power. There may be suggestions from Trump advocates in the hours ahead that the Israeli assault was part of a wider masterplan to weaken Iran ahead of more diplomacy. But, in reality, a simpler truth is revealed: Israel had no trust in the United States to implement a deal with Iran that would remove its nuclear ambitions. Despite public pleading by US President Donald Trump for it to hold off, Israel went ahead with the most significant attack on Iran since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Israel neither cared for or feared Trump's response, and is apparently prepared to risk fighting on without US support. That is perhaps another indictment of Iran's ability to respond now. Israel is less bothered by what it can do. Israel's operation against Hezbollah provides reason for it to be confident (but also should stir anxieties about hubris and overreach). Israel has likely hit the vast majority of its key targets already, to maximize the advantage of surprise, and the extent of that damage will take days to be revealed. What of proliferation now? There is a lot that we do not know about Iran's nuclear program. Israel may have known a lot more. But we are now in a binary moment where the strikes on the Natanz facility may either herald its end, or its race to completion – in the form of a nuclear weapon. Iran has always insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, but the United Nations' nuclear watchdog on Thursday declared it in breach of its non-proliferation obligations, prompting Tehran to promise escalatory action. In the moment of its greatest weakness, the Islamic Republic will struggle to project the regional swagger it has maintained for decades. It may feel it is unable to grasp diplomacy with the US as its way out, without looking even weaker. It appears unable to hit Israel back proportionately, so may look to strike asymmetrically, if possible. In the immediate confusion, one basic fact is clear: Israel is acting in the Middle East now unimpeded by allies, unafraid of wider risks, and – at times brutally – seeking to alter regional dynamics for decades to come.
Middle East
18 hours ago
- Middle East
OPEN// Illusion of stability through excessive use of force not to bring security to Israel
CAIRO, June 13 (MENA) - Minister of Foreign Affairs, Emigration, and Egyptian Expatriates Badr Abdelatty warned on Friday that 'the illusion of achieving security and stability through the excessive use of force is fundamentally flawed and will not bring security and stability to Israel.' His remarks came during a joint press conference with German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul at the Foreign Ministry headquarters in Cairo following high-level talks between the two officials. In response to a question about the recent Israeli strikes on Iran and efforts to contain the fallout, Abdelatty reiterated Egypt's firm stance against escalation. 'Egypt has condemned the unjustified Israeli aggression on Iran, which only adds fuel to the fire in an already volatile region,' he said. He stressed Egypt's rejection of military solutions, reaffirming support for the ongoing US-Iranian negotiation track, in which Egypt is directly engaged through active channels with Washington, Tehran, and Muscat. Abdelatty noted that Cairo is conducting intense diplomatic engagements to prevent the region from sliding into full-scale war. The minister also revealed recent communications with the foreign ministers of Jordan and Qatar, and the vice president of Palestine, all aimed at coordinating regional de-escalation efforts. 'The region already faces enough challenges. There is no benefit in a cycle of action and reaction,' he warned. Abdelatty emphasized Egypt's commitment to fostering a stable and attractive investment climate. He highlighted recent legislative reforms that have removed bureaucratic barriers and created comprehensive guarantees for foreign investors, particularly German businesses. 'There is a favorable environment for German companies to expand their footprint in Egypt. We invite more German firms to take advantage of Egypt's strategic position as a gateway to African and Middle Eastern markets,' Abdelatty said. He also pointed out broad agreement among regional and international partners on upholding the sovereignty of states and preventing nuclear proliferation. Egypt, he stressed, rejects nuclear armament by any country, including both Israel and Iran, and urges full compliance with the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Addressing the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza, the minister denounced Israel's policies of deliberate starvation and medical blockade as 'inhumane and beyond the bounds of reason.' He called on countries with close ties to Israel, including Germany, to use their influence to push for an end to such policies. 'The current double standards undermine faith in international law and the UN system,' he said, urging Germany to align more visibly with international humanitarian and legal norms. For his part, Wadephul acknowledged the escalating military situation and announced changes to his regional visit plans, including skipping Jordan due to developments. He expressed hope for a ceasefire agreement in Gaza, encouraging Hamas to release hostages and commending Egypt's efforts in this regard. Wadephul reiterated Germany's commitment to the two-state solution as the only path toward sustainable peace. "Germany remains ready to play an active role in building a viable Palestinian state, as it has in the past.' Abdelatty asserted that regional peace hinges on resolving the Palestinian issue and recognizing a sovereign Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital. 'No party should have veto power over the rights of the Palestinian people. Without justice for Palestine, there will be no security or stability in the region,' he stressed. Egypt, he added, continues to mobilize international support for recognition of Palestinian statehood and to restore hope amid despair. (MENA) M S H/R G E
