'Trusted courier' jailed over Londonderry cannabis haul
A man described in court as a "trusted courier" has been jailed for two years after being found with more than four kilos of cannabis in his car.Ivan Chan, 38, from Creswick Avenue, Essex, pleaded guilty at Londonderry Crown Court on Tuesday.Police discovered eight vacuum bags of cannabis in his car when it was stopped on the Culmore Road in Derry on 4 August 2024.Sentencing, Judge Neil Rafferty said: "It is quite clear he was acting in the role of a trusted courier making deliveries to known people throughout the island of Ireland."
The court was told police also found four handwritten lists of addresses in Northern Ireland and in Galway and Dublin, in the Republic of Ireland.The judge also ordered that £300 found inside the car should be donated to the local branch of Marie Curie.
'No previous convictions'
Judge Rafferty said Chan, who has been in custody since his arrest, had previously lived in Ballymena, County Antrim, and Holywood in County Down.The court was told Chan had previously worked on oil rigs and who opened a shop when he moved to Ballymena.He became involved in supplying drugs after he was forced to close his shop due to the economic downturn.Judge Rafferty said the defendant had become a delivery driver for drugs gangs."He had no drugs issues himself and never used drugs and had no previous convictions until he pleaded guilty to this criminality," the judge added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
36 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
‘Shocking' level of misinformation around Carlow shooting, Taoiseach says
The Taoiseach has criticised 'blatant misinformation, untruths and lies' surrounding a shooting incident at a shopping centre in Co Carlow. It comes after a man died in the incident at Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow town on Sunday. Advertisement Gardaí said the man, named locally as Evan Fitzgerald, in his 20s, from Kiltegan in Co Wicklow, had earlier walked through the retail premises firing a shotgun in the air. A spokeswoman said he then shot himself, after being challenged by armed gardaí. Gardaí said no-one else was injured by any of the shots fired, but a young girl sustained a minor leg injury when she fell while running from the centre. Speaking to reporters on his way to Cabinet on Wednesday, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he had seen incorrect information about the incident online as he defended moves to regulate internet misinformation by saying he believes some people overstate the 'dangers to freedom of speech' posed by such measures. Advertisement Mr Martin said he had seen social media posts that seven people had been killed in the incident, and that 'people had been shot who had not been shot'. He said misinformation can result in a lot of 'public disquiet' and needs to be addressed. 'There is a family in mourning right now. The level of misinformation on Sunday was quite shocking, and we can't just ignore that and say: 'Well, we don't have to do anything about that.'' Asked about whether regulations on misinformation could have an impact on a person's right to free speech, Mr Martin said: 'It's absolutely important that Government focuses on this issue. Advertisement 'Obviously, in any analysis and evaluation of policy, account will be taken in respect of protecting freedom of speech – but it's not freedom of speech, really, when it's just a blatant lie and untruth which can create a lot of public disquiet, as we've seen. 'So these issues do need to be addressed, there are challenging issues. There are very strong protections in our Constitution and in our laws on freedom of speech. 'So I wouldn't overstate the impact on clamping down on blatant lies online as a sort of incursion or an undermining of freedom of speech. 'We believe in freedom of speech in this country, we will always support it and protect it.' Advertisement Pressed on the matter, Mr Martin added: 'I believe some people are overstating the dangers to freedom of speech in efforts to address disinformation and untruths. 'I think we have to do that too. The same focus doesn't seem to apply to be untrue part of this or the misinformation part of this – there needs to be focus on that too.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Noise sensitive' woman who told her sisters she needed their mother's £420,000 home for her emotional support dogs loses inheritance row
A woman who took her sisters to court in a bid to keep their late mother's £420,000 home for herself and her two 'emotional support dogs' has lost her case. Sharon Duggan launched legal proceedings against her sisters Brenda, 55 and Ann, 60, after their mother Agnes died in 2018 to block them from the inheritance. Despite being entitled to a third of the estate, Sharon sued for a larger share under the Inheritance Act, claiming her medical conditions made it impossible for her to live in a flat and that she needed to stay in the family home for life. She cited a wide range of health problems, including PTSD, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and long Covid, and told the court her two rescue dogs 'help with her mental and emotional well-being. The judge accepted that 'hyper-vigilant and sound sensitive' Sharon has 'particular issues,' but ultimately ruled that a flat could not be ruled out as 'suitable' accommodation for her. Although Ann remained neutral in the dispute, therapist Brenda fought back and has now won, after Judge Alan Johns threw out Sharon's claim at Central London County Court. The court heard most of the estate was tied up in the Crawley, Sussex property, where Sharon had cared for Agnes during her final years with dementia. After Agnes died, the three sisters ended up in court when Sharon refused to move out, citing her acute physical and emotional needs and the plight of her two rescue dogs. She insisted that her needs outweighed her sisters' right to get the inheritance they are due, also arguing that it would be hard to find alternative accommodation for both her and her two therapeutic dogs, which 'help with her mental and emotional well-being'. Sharon argued she had 'sacrificed' her career to become a full-time carer and claimed her mother intended to change her will in her favour. She also said she had spent £30,000 of her own money on vet bills for her mother's dog, a Jack Russell/Chihuahua cross, called Lady. In her written arguments to the court, Sharon insisted that 'psychologically she could not cope with living in a flat again'. 'She is anxious that neighbours may cause disturbances and impact upon her ability to sleep. 'She now has two rescue dogs, which help with her mental and emotional well-being, but which make finding a suitable alternative accommodation difficult. 'The claimant maintains that moving from the property would affect her mental health greatly and that having to move into rented or temporary accommodation would further affect her health negatively,' she said. In the witness box, she insisted that downsizing to a flat would be too much for her, telling the court: 'I have two dogs to consider and I am hyper-vigilant and sound-sensitive. 'A flat would not be suitable due to the noise levels. I would be better off living in a car, I couldn't cope with it.' Sharon wanted the house transferred to her outright or the right to a life interest, or alternatively an order allowing her to buy her mother's old property for a small sum to be raised with a mortgage. But Brenda, who formerly ran a bioresonance therapy company and a business providing gluten-free altar bread to food-intolerant Catholics, defended the claim, insisting Sharon and her pets will be fine in a flat. Ruling against Sharon, Judge Johns said: 'It's my judgement that there has been no failure to make reasonable financial provision for her. 'I am not satisfied there was any promise that the property would be Sharon's - and certainly not a promise that Sharon was confident would be carried out.' He said Sharon had moved into her mother's house while in an 'excellent' financial position, although her finances are now badly depleted. She also lived with Agnes rent free and, although she had spent time caring for her mother while in declining health, the court's role wasn't simply to 'reward meritorious conduct'. He said: 'Given the circumstances in which Sharon occupied the property with Agnes, there's no moral claim strong enough to deprive her sisters of their share of this modest estate. 'I don't rule out flats as suitable accommodation,' he added, also noting that Sharon should be able to work once the court case is behind her. 'As to her ability to work I don't accept that she is unable to work at all - or at least she will be after this litigation is dealt with,' he told the court, adding that Sharon herself had accepted in court that she hopes eventually to work again. He also rejected her claim that Brenda was estranged from their mother towards the end of her life. 'Brenda told me that she tried to see her mother and call her, but that that wasn't permitted by Sharon,' he said. 'That evidence included that her telephone calls were blocked and I accept all that evidence.' 'This is a modest estate and Agnes had two other daughters to think of,' he noted, adding that the money Sharon claimed to have spent on Lady's vet bills was an overestimate. 'Essentially, provision was made for Sharon by giving her one third of the estate.' The decision means the three sisters are each due a third of their mother estate, although Sharon's share could be wiped out by the court bills for the trial.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Listen: Can Glasgow shock Leinster in semi-final?
Former Ireland international Bernard Jackman - a European Cup winner with Leinster and now top Irish pundit - joins Tom English and Andy Burke on this week's BBC Scotland Rugby podcast to preview Glasgow's URC semi-final in Dublin on also a look back at Edinburgh's season-ending play-off defeat and analysis of the reconstruction going on in Scottish and subscribe on BBC Sounds
