logo
Government sees off backbench rebellion as welfare reforms clear Commons

Government sees off backbench rebellion as welfare reforms clear Commons

Independent09-07-2025
A proposed benefit cut for future out-of-work claimants has cleared the Commons after Labour ministers saw off a backbench rebellion.
The Universal Credit Bill cleared the Commons at third reading, after it received MPs' backing by 336 votes to 242, majority 94.
'If you can work, you should,' social security minister Sir Stephen Timms told MPs before they voted on the welfare reforms.
'If you need help into work, the Government should provide it, and those who can't work must be able to live with dignity.
'Those are the principles underpinning what we're doing.'
Work and pensions ministers faced calls to walk away from their universal credit (UC) proposals at the 11th hour, after they shelved plans to reform the separate personal independence payment (Pip) benefit and vowed to only bring in changes following a review.
'When this Bill started its life, the Government was advocating for cuts to Pip claimants and UC health claimants now and in the future. They conceded that now wasn't right, and it was only the future,' Labour MP for Hartlepool Jonathan Brash said.
'Then they conceded it shouldn't be Pip claimants in the future, leaving only UC health claimants in the future. Does (Sir Stephen) understand the anxiety and confusion this has caused people in the disabled community, and would it not be better to pause and wait for the review and do it properly?'
Sir Stephen replied: 'No, because reform is urgently needed. We were elected to deliver change and that is what we must do.
'And it's particularly scandalous that the system gives up on young people in such enormous numbers – nearly a million not in employment, education or training.'
The minister said the Government wanted to 'get on and tackle the disability employment gap' and added the Bill 'addresses the severe work disincentives in universal credit, it protects those we don't ever expect to work from universal credit reassessment'.
As part of the Bill, the basic universal credit standard allowance will rise at least in line with inflation until 2029/30.
But the Government has proposed freezing the 'limited capability for work' (LCW) part of the benefit until 2030, which a group of 37 Labour rebels including Mr Brash opposed in a vote.
The move was ultimately approved by 335 votes to 135, majority 200.
New claimants who sign up for the 'limited capability for work and work-related activity' payment would receive a lower rate than existing claimants after April 2026, unless they meet a set of severe conditions criteria or are terminally ill, which the same rebels also opposed.
Rachael Maskell, the Labour MP for York Central who was among them, had earlier said: 'No matter what spin, to pass the Bill tonight, this will leave such a stain on our great party, founded on values of equality and justice.'
She warned that making changes to universal credit before a wider look at reform was putting 'the cart before the horse, the vote before the review', and branded the Government's decision-making an 'omnishambles'.
Ms Maskell pressed her own amendment to a division, which she lost by 334 votes to 149, majority 185.
It would have demanded that out-of-work benefit claimants with a 'fluctuating medical condition' who slip out of and then back into their eligibility criteria either side of the changes would receive their existing – not the lower – rate.
Marie Tidball said that during the review of Pip, which Sir Stephen was tasked with leading, 'the voices of disabled people must be front and centre'.
She proposed putting a series of legal conditions on the so-called Timms review, including that disabled people should be actively involved in the process.
The Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge did not move her amendment to a vote, on the basis Sir Stephen could offer 'further assurances that there will be sufficient link between the Timms review recommendations and subsequent legislation on Pip to ensure accountability and that the voices of disabled people are heard'.
The minister said he could give her that assurance, and added that 'the outcome of the review will be central to the legislation that follows'.
A total 47 Labour MPs voted against the Bill at third reading including Mr Brash, Ms Maskell, Mother of the House and Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP Diane Abbott, and former minister Dawn Butler.
The Bill will undergo further scrutiny in the Lords at a later date.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Plans announced for defences at flood-hit Derby museum
Plans announced for defences at flood-hit Derby museum

BBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Plans announced for defences at flood-hit Derby museum

A museum in Derby which was flooded two years ago has applied to install new Museum of Making, next to the River Derwent, was closed for three months after Storm Babet in October 2023 left it with about 70cm of flood water the time, officials said a "six-figure" sum had been mostly paid by the building's insurance cover to help get it back up and running.A planning application has now been submitted to Derby City Council for localised flood barriers across three internal and one external door. According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the museum has told the council that the flooding disrupted "commercial activity", with the kitchens the worst application stated: "Most of the ground floor fixtures and fittings are moveable, should a flood alert be received. "The workshop area is the exception to this. It houses fixed equipment of high value, including a crucible, forge, lathes and a CNC machine."Installing flood barriers to the east and west doors of the workshop, and to the two external doors, will protect the equipment and ensure it can be offered to the public as quickly as possible after a flood event."Major flood prevention work is starting on the land surrounding the museum, with a new flood wall, floodgates and a riverside green area to give flood waters an escape route.

JD Vance has met Jenrick on Cotswolds visit but not expected to see Badenoch
JD Vance has met Jenrick on Cotswolds visit but not expected to see Badenoch

The Guardian

time8 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

JD Vance has met Jenrick on Cotswolds visit but not expected to see Badenoch

JD Vance has met Robert Jenrick during his holiday in the Cotswolds but is not expected to see the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch. Jenrick held an hour-long one-on-one meeting with the US vice-president on Tuesday evening, according to a source close to the shadow justice secretary. A Conservative spokesperson said that Badenoch was also speaking to Vance this week but that scheduling time for them to meet in person had proved difficult. Both Vance and Badenoch's teams played down the idea of a snub, but Vance's decision to hold a meeting with Jenrick will raise eyebrows. Jenrick was defeated by Badenoch in the Conservative leadership contest last year and is widely perceived to harbour continued ambitions for the top job. He has strayed well beyond his justice brief and repeatedly caused controversy with his incendiary language on migration. There are reports that Vance will also meet Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, on Wednesday. Farage's spokesperson did not reply to a request for comment. A Conservative source said that Jenrick was attending a drinks event with Vance on Tuesday evening alongside others, including the former chancellor George Osborne. They said Badenoch had been in contact with Vance but that they had been unable to find time for a meeting due to diary clashes. The US vice-president spent last weekend with David Lammy, the foreign secretary, while Badenoch has been in Epping and the Isle of Wight this week. Both Vance and Jenrick have expressed staunch opposition to equality, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and voiced concerns about the erosion of freedom of speech. In February, the vice-president claimed that a 'backslide away from conscience rights has placed the basic liberties of religious Britons' under threat, and he attacked the use of laws to enforce buffer zones around abortion clinics. Asked about his remarks before meeting Lammy last Friday, Vance claimed that his concerns related more widely to 'the entire collective west'. Vance is on holiday in the Cotswolds with his family and has been pictured visiting the Daylesford farm shop near Chipping Norton. Responding to reports that Farage was due to meet Vance, the Liberal Democrat leader, Ed Davey, called on Farage to 'tell the White House that in Europe we stand together against Putin's aggression'. He added: 'But Farage won't do that because he's much more interested in pleasing Trump than in standing up for British values and European security.'

Pious Palestine Action activists are nothing like the suffragettes
Pious Palestine Action activists are nothing like the suffragettes

Telegraph

time12 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Pious Palestine Action activists are nothing like the suffragettes

Now I know why Palestine Action and its cheerleaders always look so smugly satisfied with themselves – they think they're the new Suffragettes. Yes, these bourgeois brats in their red boiler suits and keffiyehs fancy themselves as a 21st-century incarnation of the women who rose up for the right to vote. They really do think their violent, childish rage against the Jewish State puts them on a par with those valiant ladies who fought for the franchise for their sex. They are drunk on self-delusion. They have a serious case of bloated ego. Someone needs to tell them – where those women were the great expanders of democracy, you are its enemies. All across the radical Left, they're making this criminally ahistorical comparison. When Home Secretary Yvette Cooper ordered the proscription of Palestine Action, loopy Corbyn-bot Zarah Sultana was fuming. How hypocritical, she said, for the likes of Cooper to celebrate the 'Suffragette legacy of civil disobedience' while damning this 'non-violent [sic] direction action group' as 'terrorists'. Owen Jones, with even more teenage spleen than usual, assured his readers that just as history has decreed that the Suffragettes were the good guys of the early 20th century, so it will smile equally generously on the Palestine preeners of today. 'History will praise those who did what they could to fight one of the great crimes of our age', he wrote. Even quite sensible voices now madly speak of Palestine Action in the same breath as the Suffragettes. Labour bigwig Lord Hain says Palestine Action's stunts are 'positively moderate' in comparison with the direct action carried out by Suffagettes. And yet PA is criminalised while those radical ladies enjoy 'iconic status'. Everyone needs to stop with this nonsense. It is a grotesque insult to the Pankhursts and all the other women who helped to make Britain a freer, fairer nation to liken them with the irritants and narcissists of Palestine Action. The difference between these two movements is so glaring it shouldn't even need stating. The Suffragettes took direct action because they were brutally locked out of the democratic realm. In contrast, the plummy grads of Palestine Action and their noisy cheerleaders in the leafy suburbs enjoy every democratic right. The right to vote, to speak, to march. And yet still they choose, to the vexation of decent Brits, to carry out their dumb stunts. The Suffragettes' direct action was an agonised cry for more democracy. Palestine Action's temper tantrums are a cry of *contempt* for democracy. The Suffragettes wanted in on the democratic process. Palestine Action is so consumed by a weary, haughty disdain for the democratic process – and for us plebs who are its subjects – that they prefer wrecking RAF planes or splashing red paint on 'evil' businesses to the far harder task of free, civil engagement. Their activism is profoundly anti-democratic. It's positively imperious. It is designed precisely to circumvent the democratic realm because these snobs in keffiyehs look upon the electorate as a thicko lost cause. The Israelophobic mania of the middle-class left is not a demand for democracy – it's a demand for admiration. Witness the pro-Palestine Action gathering in Parliament Square yesterday. What an orgy of sanctimony that was. It was essentially the upper middle classes forswearing Saturday brunch to descend on London and show us oiks what perfect moral beings they are. Rarely have we seen such a brilliant snapshot of the depthless levels of middle-class entitlement that fuel the cult of Palestinianism. It was a look-at-me stunt by the bored virtue-seekers of the professional managerial classes. The aim was less to 'raise awareness' of Gaza than to raise awareness of their own ethical brilliance. The Suffragettes took direct action because they wanted a real say in the nation's law-making. Palestine Action and its fawners take action because they want the world to know how special and caring they are. Let's boil it down. The Suffragettes hit the streets to make their own country a better place. Palestine Action and the rest of the radical left obsess like crazy over a tiny country 3,000 miles which they are convinced is the embodiment of evil.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store