10 of 11 accused in Sassa R260 million fraud case granted bail
The 11 accused in the R260 million South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) fraud case. Picture: X/@KayaNews
Ten of the 11 accused in the R260 million South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) fraud case have been released on bail.
The accused fraudsters returned to the Lenasia Magistrate's Court, south of Johannesburg, on Thursday to continue their bail application.
Bail
National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Phindi Mjonondwane said the bail amounts range between R10 000 and R30 000.
'The fourth accused, Ethiopian national Abenezer Tilahyn, was denied bail after the court ruled, he posed a flight risk. The matter has been postponed to 2 September 2025 for further investigation.
ALSO READ: 11 accused in Sassa R260 million fraud case to remain behind bars
'As part of the bail conditions, the accused are required to surrender their travel documents and are prohibited from interfering with the ongoing investigation or any state witnesses,' Mjonondwane said.
'No flight risks'
Mjonondwane said in considering the bail application, the court reviewed affidavits from the investigating officer, Constable Manana, as well as two affidavits from Mazimela Kubeka, a senior internal investigator at Sassa.
'These documents outlined how the accused were implicated in the alleged crimes. The court found no evidence that the ten accused, excluding Tilahyn, were flight risks or that they would interfere with evidence or the investigation.
ALSO READ: Sassa millions 'heist' in Rosebank underground car park
'Sassa confirmed that the implicated employees have been suspended and no longer have access to its systems,' Mjonondwane said.
Charges
Shumani Khwerana and his ten co-accused, eight of whom are Sassa officials, face multiple charges, including cybercrime, fraud, and theft.
Some of the accused who had been previously arrested include Khwerana, Nkhensani Sharon Maluleke, Tshilidzi Ramaphosa and Tilahyn.
Fraud scheme
The state alleges that the accused are alleged to have orchestrated a sophisticated scheme involving the creation of fake Sassa profiles, from which more than R4 million was allegedly deposited.
These profiles were allegedly used to withdraw large sums of money from various Sassa pay points.
Mjonondwane said the NPA respects the court's ruling, which marks only a stage in the legal process.
'This development does not deter the NPA's commitment to ensuring accountability and transparency within the public sector,' Mjonondwane said.
ALSO READ: 70-year-old Sassa fraudster who stole R100 000 will soon be on trial
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
High Court dismisses R4 million defamation claim
Chevon Booysen | Published 1 hour ago A would-be R4 million defamation of character claim has failed in the High Court of South Africa, at the Mpumalanga Division (Mbombela Main Seat), after a municipality employee could not prove defamatory statements were publicised. Sinenhlanhla Manqele, employed as a technical director at the Thaba Chweu Local Municipality, sought that an attorney and the firm that were mandated to compile a report to investigate the causes of sewer spillage contained 'false and defamatory statements'. Manqele sought that the firm and the attorney each pay him R2 million and interest on the amounts, based on the claim that the contents of the report were intended to tarnish his reputation. Jimmy Baloyi, a lawyer at Baloyi Masango Inc. Attorneys, compiled the report after the local municipality mandated him to investigate a criminal guilty finding of the municipality for the sewage spill. Regarding the sewage spillage, the guilty finding necessitated the municipal manager to sign an admission of guilt, having been found guilty of transgression of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act (NEMWA Act). Baloyi was mandated to investigate whether the municipality could have avoided the transgression; whether there was any sort of negligence by any of the municipal employees; whether there was proper accountability to workflow of the relevant departments that are necessarily in charge of compliance and to reflect on the criminal case brought against the municipality, and demonstrate the complexities and seriousness of the problem surrounding unlawful municipal sewage discharge. Manqele was one of several employees interviewed during the investigation, and when it was concluded, the report was tabled at the municipality council sitting during August 2022. At the time, the privileged document was presented to 28 councillors. An extract from Baloyi's report read: 'There is an emergency in the technical department that has not been recognised as such by the technical services director and technical services management team. There is a lack of knowledge and skills among the people who ought to be managing the department. 'Whether this is a result of a lack of basic approach to employment or not, there is a lack of will when it comes to applying oneself in the position that one is employed in, from the technical director down to the plumber in the command chain. We were unable to interview the technical director, as he had taken a stand against this by involving an attorney, who indicated that we cannot have a conversation with the technical director without the attorney involved. 'This, on its own, indicated that the technical director knows exactly what is happening in the department. The technical director, in this regard, has no skills to occupy the position he is occupying, which is the reason why he does not comprehend the severity of the impact of the pollution of the sewer spillages around and within the municipal boundaries. 'The technical director does not even comprehend the emergency and urgency that this issue had to be addressed in.' In his delictual claim, Manqele rebutted that 'the report intentionally and maliciously makes false, wrongful, unlawful and defamatory statements against him'. He added that the readers of the report understood the above to mean that he is 'incompetent, unethical and unprofessional; that he is unqualified and occupies the position of a technical director through a dubious appointment; that he lacks skills and knowledge in the portfolio of technical director; and that he is corrupt, insolent and engages in unlawful activities in the municipality.' Judge Lindiwe Vukeya said: 'This report was not only about his personal or professional persona, it also involved other employees of his department… From the outset, it is clear that the plaintiff was afforded an opportunity to present his account of events concerning his department, but elected not to do so. The plaintiff had the opportunity to provide an explanation regarding the origin of the problem, its causes, and the circumstances surrounding the expenditure of R9 million, which he declined to offer. 'Furthermore, in his evidence, the plaintiff could not provide any tangible evidence regarding how this privileged report was leaked to other employees. His evidence was that it was shown to him, at his request, by the security manager, who has since passed away. On his own evidence, he is the only person outside of the council meeting who saw the report.' [email protected]
The Herald
2 hours ago
- The Herald
No bail for man accused of assaulting wife
In a strong message during Women's Month, a 56-year-old Gqeberha man charged with contravening a protection order after an alleged domestic violence incident in Parsons Hill, has been denied bail. National Prosecuting Authority regional spokesperson Luxolo Tyali said the man had been served on February 11 with a protection order prohibiting any form of abuse against his wife or their children. However, it is alleged that on July 19 he assaulted his wife. The man is not being named to protect the identities of his family. It is alleged that he entered the woman's bedroom, demanded her cellphone and, when she refused, pinned her down, choked her and threatened to kill her. She managed to alert the police and he was arrested. In her affidavit, the complainant said she feared for her life, citing previous alleged assaults in front of their teenage children. She claimed her husband became excessively violent when intoxicated. Prosecutor Asavela Dweba opposed bail in the Gqeberha magistrate's court, arguing that the accused posed a danger to the woman and their children, and he might attempt to intimidate her should he be released from custody. The court agreed, finding that the interests of justice outweighed his request for release. The man has a previous conviction for driving under the influence. Eastern Cape director of public prosecutions Barry Madolo said: 'The denial of bail in this matter sends a clear message that our courts take allegations of domestic violence seriously. 'Protection orders are not mere pieces of paper — they are legal instruments designed to save lives and any violation will be met with the full might of the law.' The case was postponed to October 7 for further investigation. The Herald
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
High Court dismisses R4 million defamation claim
A municipality high ranking official's defamation of character R4million claim failed in court this week. The employee said the comments made in a report were 'false and defamatory". Image: Pexels A would-be R4 million defamation of character claim has failed in the High Court of South Africa, at the Mpumalanga Division (Mbombela Main Seat), after a municipality employee could not prove defamatory statements were publicised. Sinenhlanhla Manqele, employed as a technical director at the Thaba Chweu Local Municipality, sought that an attorney and the firm that were mandated to compile a report to investigate the causes of sewer spillage contained 'false and defamatory statements'. Manqele sought that the firm and the attorney each pay him R2 million and interest on the amounts, based on the claim that the contents of the report were intended to tarnish his reputation. Jimmy Baloyi, a lawyer at Baloyi Masango Inc. Attorneys, compiled the report after the local municipality mandated him to investigate a criminal guilty finding of the municipality for the sewage spill. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Regarding the sewage spillage, the guilty finding necessitated the municipal manager to sign an admission of guilt, having been found guilty of transgression of the National Environmental Management: Waste Act (NEMWA Act). Baloyi was mandated to investigate whether the municipality could have avoided the transgression; whether there was any sort of negligence by any of the municipal employees; whether there was proper accountability to workflow of the relevant departments that are necessarily in charge of compliance and to reflect on the criminal case brought against the municipality, and demonstrate the complexities and seriousness of the problem surrounding unlawful municipal sewage discharge. Manqele was one of several employees interviewed during the investigation, and when it was concluded, the report was tabled at the municipality council sitting during August 2022. At the time, the privileged document was presented to 28 councillors. An extract from Baloyi's report read: 'There is an emergency in the technical department that has not been recognised as such by the technical services director and technical services management team. There is a lack of knowledge and skills among the people who ought to be managing the department. 'Whether this is a result of a lack of basic approach to employment or not, there is a lack of will when it comes to applying oneself in the position that one is employed in, from the technical director down to the plumber in the command chain. We were unable to interview the technical director, as he had taken a stand against this by involving an attorney, who indicated that we cannot have a conversation with the technical director without the attorney involved. 'This, on its own, indicated that the technical director knows exactly what is happening in the department. The technical director, in this regard, has no skills to occupy the position he is occupying, which is the reason why he does not comprehend the severity of the impact of the pollution of the sewer spillages around and within the municipal boundaries. 'The technical director does not even comprehend the emergency and urgency that this issue had to be addressed in.' In his delictual claim, Manqele rebutted that 'the report intentionally and maliciously makes false, wrongful, unlawful and defamatory statements against him'. He added that the readers of the report understood the above to mean that he is 'incompetent, unethical and unprofessional; that he is unqualified and occupies the position of a technical director through a dubious appointment; that he lacks skills and knowledge in the portfolio of technical director; and that he is corrupt, insolent and engages in unlawful activities in the municipality.'
