Abortions increased in Ohio but legal battle continues
Why it matters: The increase shows the impact from the amendment enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution in November 2023.
Yet the battle of Ohio abortion rights continues.
By the numbers: Ohio clinicians performed close to 30,000 abortions last year, per estimates by Guttmacher, nearly 3,500 more than in 2023.
That includes 4,010 abortions performed on people who travel from out of state compared to 3,120 in 2023.
Catch up quick: The U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, effectively ending all federal protections on abortion.
That September, an Ohio court blocked a six-week abortion ban known as the "heartbeat bill" enacted after Roe v. Wade was overturned.
State of abortion: Ohioans voted a year later for the constitutional amendment that guarantees a right to an abortion.
The state constitution now allows abortions up to fetal viability, which is defined as "the point in a pregnancy when, in the professional judgment of the pregnant patient's treating physician, the fetus has a significant likelihood of survival outside the uterus with reasonable measures. This is determined on a case-by-case basis."
Yes, but: Organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood have still had to challenge restrictions in the Ohio Revised Code, including a 24-hour waiting period for abortion services as well as a ban on telehealth medication abortion services.
Judges have since issued preliminary injunctions suspending several of those restrictions.
The other side: Last November, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed an appeal of a Hamilton County judge's decision a month earlier to strike down the " heartbeat bill."
"The state respects the will of the people regarding the six-week abortion ban, but the state is also obligated to protect provisions in (the bill), as passed by the General Assembly and signed by the governor, that the constitutional amendment does not address," Yost's office said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Oklahoma governor takes aim at Tulsa mayor's decision to prosecute crimes in tribal courts
Monroe Nichols, a former state representative, on Nov. 5, 2024, became the first Black candidate elected as Tulsa mayor. (Photo provided) OKLAHOMA CITY – Gov. Kevin Stitt has asked the Oklahoma Supreme Court to toss out an agreement between the City of Tulsa and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. Tulsa Mayor Monroe Nichols and the tribe agreed that the city would not prosecute municipal violations against tribal citizens, but would still enforce those laws. Prosecution would take place in a tribal court. Stitt said Nichols has made Tulsa a sanctuary city with two systems of justice, one for those with tribal membership and the other for everyone else. The agreement was entered as part of a resolution to a federal court case. 'If left unchecked, Tulsa's actions would undermine the uniform application of law, create uncertainty in criminal enforcement, endanger public safety, and encourage other municipalities to follow suit unilaterally ceding jurisdiction without lawful authority,' Stitt's filing said. The lawsuit argues the issue is of statewide concern and challenges state's supremacy in criminal law enforcement. In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued the landmark McGirt decision, holding that the several reservations had never been dissolved, including that of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. It found that the state lacked criminal jurisdiction over Indians committing crimes governed by the federal Major Crimes Act in Indian Country. Stitt's brief said the agreement between Tulsa and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation was not approved by the Tulsa City Council, him or the legislative Joint Committee on State-Tribal Relations, which represents lawmakers during the compacting process with tribes. The agreement creates an intolerable conflict between the state and one of its political subdivisions, the lawsuit said. 'Tulsa has ceased investigating and prosecuting certain criminal offenses based solely on the racial and political status of the offender and whether the person qualifies as Indian,' the suit said. 'That policy impacts not only criminal defendants but also victims, witnesses, and the broader public that depends on equal enforcement of the law.' Some of the statements by Stitt and in the filing are inaccurate and 'riddled with just lies,' Nichols said Thursday. 'The notion that there has been any time where we have not enforced the law in this city is false,' Nichols said. 'It is incorrect. It is an outright lie. The governor knows that. The governor does not care about that.' Stitt has not come to him about the issue, Nichols said, adding that the governor is trying to get in the way of progress. The question at hand is who prosecutes who based on the crime they committed, Nichols said. The latest action is one of a number of disputes between Stitt and Oklahoma's federally recognized tribes. Stitt unsuccessfully sought to renegotiate voter-approved gaming compacts. He's also pushed back against tribal tag owners who use turnpikes but don't pay tolls. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
James Dobson, Focus on the Family founder and key leader on the Christian right, dies at 89
James Dobson, a child psychologist who founded the conservative Christian ministry Focus on the Family and was a politically influential campaigner against abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, died on Thursday. He was 89. Born in 1936 in Shreveport, Louisiana, Dobson launched a radio show counseling Christians on how to be good parents and started Focus on the Family in 1977. He became a force in the 1980s for pushing conservative Christian ideals in mainstream American politics alongside fundamentalist giants like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. At its peak, Focus on the Family had more than 1,000 employees and gave Dobson a platform to weigh in on legislation and serve as an adviser to five presidents. His death was confirmed by the Dr. James Dobson Family Institute. He is survived by his wife of 64 years, Shirley, as well as their two children, a daughter-in-law and two grandchildren. 'Mount Rushmore' of conservatives Dobson interviewed President Ronald Reagan in the Oval Office in 1985, and Falwell called him a rising star in 1989. Decades later, he was among the evangelical leaders tapped to advise President Donald Trump. in 2016. In 2022, he praised Donald Trump for appointing conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices who allowed states to ban abortion. 'Whether you like Donald Trump or not, whether you supported or voted for him or not, if you are supportive of this Dobbs decision that struck down Roe v. Wade, you have to mention in the same breath the man who made it possible,' he said in a ministry broadcast. Focus on the Family moved from California to Colorado Springs, Colorado, in the 1990s, establishing the city as a hub for evangelicals, sometimes going by the nickname 'Vatican of the West.' Dobson belongs on the 'Mount Rushmore' of Christian conservatives, said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, another group Dobson founded. He promoted ideas from 'a biblical standpoint' that pushed back against progressive parenting of the 1960s, Perkins said. Weighing Dobson's legacy In his 1970 parenting book 'Dare to Discipline,' updated in 1992, Dobson said parents should spank their kids to discipline them and enforce boundaries. Children should not be struck in anger, but he advised that 'the spanking should be of sufficient magnitude to cause genuine tears.' 'I know that some of my readers could argue,' he wrote, 'that the deliberate premeditated application of minor pain to a small child is a harsh and unloving thing to do. To others, it will seem like pure barbarism. I obviously disagree.' John Fea, an American History professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, has been critical of Dobson's politics and ideas. However, he recounted how his own father — a tough Marine — was a better parent after becoming an evangelical Christian and listening to Dobson's radio program. 'Even as a self-identified evangelical Christian that I am, I have no use in my own life for Dobson's politics or his child-rearing," he said. "But as a historian what do you do with these stories? About a dad who becomes a better dad?' Possible presidential run After developing a following of millions, Dobson considered running for president in the 2000 election, following in the footsteps of former television minister Pat Robertson's surprise success in 1988. 'He had a big audience. He was not afraid to speak out,' said Ralph Reed, a Christian conservative political organizer and lobbyist who founded the Faith and Freedom Coalition. 'If Jim had decided to run, he would have been a major force.' Despite their close association later in life, Reed's enduring memory is of Dobson's voice as his sole companion while traveling through rural America as a younger political organizer. 'I'd be out there somewhere, and I could go to the AM dial and there was never a time, day or night when I couldn't find that guy,' Reed said. 'There will probably never be another one like him.' A political juggernaut for decades James Bopp, a lawyer who has represented Focus on the Family, said Dobson was able to rally public support like few other social conservatives. Records compiled by the watchdog group Open Secrets show that Focus on the Family and Family Research Council, have combined to spend more than $4 million on political ads and close to $2 million lobbying Congress since the late 1990s. Dobson helped create a constellation of Family Policy Councils in around 40 states that work in tandem with his organization to push a socially conservative agenda and lobby lawmakers, said Peter Wolfgang, executive director of one such group in Connecticut. 'If there is one man above all whom I would credit with being the builder — not just the thinker — who gave us the institutions that created the space for President Trump to help us turn the tide in the culture war, it would be Dr. James Dobson,' Wolfgang wrote in an online column last month. Opposition to abortion and LGBTQ+ rights Dobson left Focus on the Family in 2010 and founded the institute that bears his name. He continued with the Family Talk radio show, which is nationally syndicated and is carried by 1,500 radio outlets with more than half a million listeners weekly, according to the institute. His radio program featured guests talking about the importance of embracing religion and promoting the idea that people could change their sexuality. 'The homosexual community will tell us that transformations never occur. That you cannot change,' he said in a 2021 video posted on his institute's site that promoted 'success stories' of people who 'no longer struggle with homosexuality' after attending a ministry. He said there is typically a 'pain and agitation' associated with homosexuality. Conversion therapy is the scientifically discredited practice of using therapy to 'convert' LGBTQ+ people to heterosexuality or traditional gender expectations. The practice has been banned in 23 states and the District of Columbia, according to the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ+ rights think tank. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed in March to hear a Colorado case about whether state and local governments can enforce laws banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ+ children. ___ Catalini reported from Trenton, New Jersey, and Meyer from Nashville, Tennessee. Associated Press writers Tom Beaumont in Des Moines, Iowa, Tiffany Stanley in Washington, Geoff Mulvihill in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, and Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut, contributed to this report.
Boston Globe
7 hours ago
- Boston Globe
California is set to act fast after Texas advances congressional maps to boost Republicans
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The added complexity is because California has a voter-approved independent commission that Newsom himself backed before Trump's latest redistricting maneuver. Only the state's voters can override the map that commission approved in 2021. But Newsom said extraordinary steps are required to counter Texas and other Republican-led states that Trump is pushing to revise maps. Advertisement 'This is a new Democratic Party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said Wednesday on a call with reporters. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' Texas Democratic lawmakers, vastly outnumbered in that state's legislature, delayed approval of the new map by 15 days by fleeing Texas earlier this month in protest. They were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring upon their return to ensure they attended Wednesday's session. Advertisement That session ended with an 88-52 party-line vote approving the map after more than eight hours of debate. Democrats have also vowed to challenge the new Texas map in court and complained that Republicans made the political power move before passing legislation responding to deadly floods that swept the state last month. A battle for the US House control waged via redistricting In a sign of Democrats' stiffening redistricting resolve, former President Barack Obama on Tuesday night backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterm election. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Trump is going beyond Texas in his push to remake the map. He's pushed Republican leaders in conservative states like Indiana and Missouri to also try to create new Republican seats. Ohio Republicans were already revising their map before Texas moved. Democrats, meanwhile, are mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps as well. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. The struggle for — and against — Texas redistricting Texas Republicans openly said they were acting in their party's interest. State Rep. Todd Hunter, who wrote the legislation formally creating the new map, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. Advertisement There was little that outnumbered Democrats could do other than fume and threaten a lawsuit to block the map. Because the Supreme Court has blessed purely partisan gerrymandering, the only way opponents can stop the new Texas map would be by arguing it violates the Voting Rights Act requirement to keep minority communities together so they can select representatives of their choice. House Republicans' frustration at the Democrats' flight and ability to delay the vote was palpable during the Wednesday vote. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced as debate started that doors to the chamber were locked and any member leaving was required to have a permission slip. The doors were only unlocked after final passage more than eight hours later. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back after they left the state Aug. 3, and Abbott asked the state Supreme Court to oust several Democrats from office. The lawmakers also face a fine of $500 for every day they were absent. Associated Press journalists John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, and Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this report.
