Taylor Swift, Blake Lively and why the internet is obsessed with 'girl feuds'
The internet wants to see two best friends fight. Especially if they're women.
Rumors are swirling this week about famous besties Blake Lively and Taylor Swift, who have been dragged into conversations involving Lively's legal battle with "It Ends With Us" co-star Justin Baldoni. While the ins and outs of the legal case appear to get messier by the day, the latest twist has entangled America's favorite pop star and longtime companion of Lively.
The short of it: New claims indicate Lively pressured the pop star to get involved in the legal matter. Per Baldoni's lawyers', Lively's attorney Michael Gottlieb demanded a statement in support of Lively from Swift. This demand included the threat that private text messages between the women would be released if Swift did not comply. A spokesperson for Swift has emphasized the singer's minimal involvement with the film.
The rumor mill is convinced the suit has caused the pair's yearslong friendship to sour.
"This is crazy, Taylor and Blake have been friends for so many years," reacted one TikToker as they scoured legal documents for insight into an apparent feud. Another alleged the fight was a conspiracy between Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, to gain footing by leveraging the pop star's high-profile. Some even dissected Swift's outfits as evidence of a fall-out.
To be clear: Any evidence of a break-up between Lively and Swift is not confirmed. But the very suggestion these two women are foes rather than friends shows just how much the internet loves to see two women fight. Look no further than fan speculation of a years-long battle between Selena Gomez and Hailey Bieber or supposed pop-princess grievances between Sabrina Carpenter and Olivia Rodrigo.
That we crave crisis from notable women says more about us, though, according to Elizabeth Cohen, professor of communication studies at West Virginia University. This is because we have have a parasocial relationship with celebrities like Swift and Lively, Cohen said. We feel like we known them personally, so that makes the thought of their demise extra dramatic for us.
"We might feel like we're friends with them, so if they're breaking up, it might have real emotional impacts on us," she said, adding "it would be weirder if we didn't."
If you're a Swiftie, holding hands with Swift through hardship is part of the job description. To fans, it's almost an expectation, not an exception, to feel pain with her.
"The reason we keep opening and clicking on updates is ... because we can all identify with it," said Robert Thompson, director of the Bleier Center for Television and Popular Culture at Syracuse University. "Very few of us can identify with being as rich as Taylor Swift, or as powerful as she is. But all of us can understand a friendship breaking up ... It's the portion of the fabulous lifestyle that we can actually enter into."
There's also a less empathetic explanation, Cohen said. We get a kind of twisted joy by seeing greatness fall apart, Cohen said. This is because of something called schadenfreude, the feeling of pleasure derived from witnessing another's pain, Cohen said. It can be as benign as laughing when a TV character trips and falls or as dark as finding glee in a coworker's failure.
Celebrity misfortunes only accentuate schadenfreude dynamics because they have seemingly have so much farther to fall. And for women, because their elevation in male-dominated Hollywood is already precarious, the way down is even further.
"This isn't the noble part of the human spirit, but I think it is part of human nature," said Thompson.
The design of social media platforms permits our passion for pain to "grow and thrive" like never before, Thompson said, as every individual is afforded a venue to weigh in, adding to the potential reward we get from stoking the story.
More from USA TODAY Wellness: Mormon college student interviews on sex, alcohol are going viral. Why?
The gossip feels so startling to us right now because stands in direct contradiction to the girl's girl image both Lively and Swift have strived to publicly exhibit, Cohen said.
"They've branded themselves as 'women who are pro women' so the suggestion that's not the case could be symbolically devastating," Cohen said. "Girl's girls" pick each other over the drama, rather than let the noise come between them.
Fans know the pair for public displays of this bond. Lively has joined Swift in her box to support boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs' tight end, Travis Kelce. Just this time last year, Lively was adorably singing "Betty" at The Eras Tour with her kids (Swift's god children). Swift's "Folklore" song "My Tears Ricochet" illuminated a pivotal moment in Lively's "It Ends With Us" film, and the pair are known to hold hands on enviable, cool friend dates.
"The speculation in general is kind of exciting because there's a disconnect between what we're used to seeing and what's being suggested by this situation," she said.
More celeb news: Kris Jenner and why everyone's asking about deep plane facelifts
Plus, when powerful women's ties grow tenuous, it backs up a belief in some circles that life works better when men are in charge, she added.
If you're feeling caught up in the conversation, Cohen said to remember that to gossip is normal – to an extent. But it can help deflate the drama in our heads by reminding ourselves that celebrity image is often more crafted than we realize, whether it's good or bad, and our participation is part of the storytelling.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Taylor Swift, Blake Lively and our obsession with girl feuds
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift Turns Heads With Fan Interaction During Travis Kelce Date Night
Taylor Swift Turns Heads With Fan Interaction During Travis Kelce Date Night originally appeared on Athlon Sports. After a few months of staying hidden, pop star Taylor Swift and boyfriend, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce, ended their public hiatus together and hit the town in Palm Beach, Florida, for a date night last week. The couple was seen out on the town in Palm Beach again just a few days ago, this time at upscale café Buccan, and there Swift had an eyebrow-raising interaction with one of her fans. In an exclusive interview with Page Six, noted Swiftie Pamela Goodman revealed that she was also at the restaurant and actually spoke to the 'Love Story' singer, who was seated right next to her with her bodyguard also sitting close by. Goodman revealed that Buccan's owner approached her and her friend to make sure they didn't make any sort of scene sitting next to high-profile couple. But that didn't stop Goodman from taking the opportunity to speak with one of her heroes. 'I stood up and said, 'Excuse me, I don't mean to interrupt, but I'm probably one of your oldest and biggest Swifties on the planet' and she laughed,' Goodman stated. 'I said, 'I just had to stop and congratulate you on the re-ownership of your masters. I'm so, so happy for you. Congratulations.'' Swift replied: 'I noticed you. You are so beautiful. Thank you so much,' before shaking hands. Fans took to social media to react to Swift's heartfelt interaction with one of her biggest fans, many of whom applauded Goodman for not only having the nerve to approach the biggest pop star on the planet but also sharing the story with a new outlet given all the negative publicity Swift has had in recent months. 'Need to queen out with miss Pamela so bad,' one fan wrote. 'Pamela spoke to Page Six and she continues to be one of the sweetest Senior Swifties! This article is so cute 🥰' another added. 'Total respect for Pamela,' a third fan noted. 'Pamela is a queen....' one user replied. 'I want to be Pam when I grow up,' remarked another user. 'Miss Pamela we love you queen,' another fan commented. Goodman admitted she also had to let Kelce know she had been a Chiefs fans for many years and was rooting for him to win his fourth Super Bowl championship. 'I lived in Kansas City for seven years before you were even born but I'm a longtime Chiefs fan and I just wish you the best success in the season this year,' Goodman recalled of what she told Kelce. 'You're going to go back and I just know you're going to do it and I can't wait to watch it happen.'This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit in jeopardy after reporter admits texting mistake
Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and publicist Leslie Sloane may be in jeopardy because of a journalist's text message using the wrong choice of words. Baldoni's filing largely centered on a text sent by a reporter claiming that Sloane said Lively was 'sexually assaulted' by Baldoni. His legal team cited the 'unsubstantiated accusation' as evidence that Sloane pushed a 'false narrative' to 'destroy Baldoni and his reputation.' The journalist who sent the text in question, identified as Daily Mail reporter James Vituscka, has since come forward and clarified the message, admitting that he used those words in error. 'In those text messages, my use of the phrase 'sexually assaulted' was a mistake. I meant to say, 'sexually harassed.' I regret this error,' Vituscka says, according to a signed declaration shared with the Daily News on Friday by law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, which is representing Sloane. 'Ms. Sloane never told me that Ms. Lively was sexually harassed or sexually assaulted by Justin Baldoni or anyone else,' Vituscka says. 'I regret that private text messages were made public.' What's more, Vituscka's text — which he claims he did not authorize to be used in Baldoni's filing — was 'not in reference to any conversation that I had with Leslie Sloane' but to the allegations made in the complaint Lively filed against Baldoni in mid-December, he says. In the initial complaint filed with the California Civil Rights Department, the 'Gossip Girl' star, 37, accused her 41-year-old 'It Ends With Us' director of sexual harassment on the film's set and a retaliatory smear campaign. She formally sued Baldoni at the end of the year. Two weeks later, Baldoni filed his countersuit, accusing Lively, Reynolds and Sloane of defamation and civil extortion. In part using that message from Vituscka, his lawyers claimed Baldoni was targeted in a 'character assassination plot' orchestrated by Sloane at 'Lively's direction.' Sloane has maintained that said she never used the phrase 'sexually assaulted,' and has sought to be dismissed from the case. 'After being wrongfully dragged into this litigation, Leslie Sloane has repeatedly stated that she never used the phrase 'sexually assaulted' which formed the basis of Baldoni's meritless defamation claim against her and today she is fully vindicated by the declaration of James Vituscka that admits she never said those words,' attorney Sigrid McCawley said in a statement sent to The New York Daily News. 'The Wayfarer Parties never even bothered to attempt to confirm whether the outrageous allegations they were launching at Ms. Sloane were true, and they were not.' Legal teams for Lively and Baldoni did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justin Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit in jeopardy after reporter admits texting mistake
Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and publicist Leslie Sloane may be in jeopardy because of a journalist's text message using the wrong choice of words. Baldoni's filing largely centered on a text sent by a reporter claiming that Sloane said Lively was 'sexually assaulted' by Baldoni. His legal team cited the 'unsubstantiated accusation' as evidence that Sloane pushed a 'false narrative' to 'destroy Baldoni and his reputation.' The journalist who sent the text in question, identified as Daily Mail reporter James Vituscka, has since come forward and clarified the message, admitting that he used those words in error. 'In those text messages, my use of the phrase 'sexually assaulted' was a mistake. I meant to say, 'sexually harassed.' I regret this error,' Vituscka says, according to a signed declaration shared with the Daily News on Friday by law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, which is representing Sloane. 'Ms. Sloane never told me that Ms. Lively was sexually harassed or sexually assaulted by Justin Baldoni or anyone else,' Vituscka says. 'I regret that private text messages were made public.' What's more, Vituscka's text — which he claims he did not authorize to be used in Baldoni's filing — was 'not in reference to any conversation that I had with Leslie Sloane' but to the allegations made in the complaint Lively filed against Baldoni in mid-December, he says. In the initial complaint filed with the California Civil Rights Department, the 'Gossip Girl' star, 37, accused her 41-year-old 'It Ends With Us' director of sexual harassment on the film's set and a retaliatory smear campaign. She formally sued Baldoni at the end of the year. Two weeks later, Baldoni filed his countersuit, accusing Lively, Reynolds and Sloane of defamation and civil extortion. In part using that message from Vituscka, his lawyers claimed Baldoni was targeted in a 'character assassination plot' orchestrated by Sloane at 'Lively's direction.' Sloane has maintained that said she never used the phrase 'sexually assaulted,' and has sought to be dismissed from the case. 'After being wrongfully dragged into this litigation, Leslie Sloane has repeatedly stated that she never used the phrase 'sexually assaulted' which formed the basis of Baldoni's meritless defamation claim against her and today she is fully vindicated by the declaration of James Vituscka that admits she never said those words,' attorney Sigrid McCawley said in a statement sent to The New York Daily News. 'The Wayfarer Parties never even bothered to attempt to confirm whether the outrageous allegations they were launching at Ms. Sloane were true, and they were not.' Legal teams for Lively and Baldoni did not immediately respond to a request for comment.