
India-EU trade talks gained urgency due to US tariffs, Europe's trade deficit with China: EU envoy
With the two sides set to begin the 12th round of negotiations in Brussels on July 7, Delphin said in an interview that five chapters of the proposed FTA on intellectual property, customs and trade facilitation, transparency, good regulatory practices and mutual administrative assistance were closed at the last round in May.
Delphin acknowledged that 'big blocks', such as core market access issues, tariffs, and technical barriers to trade, are yet to be agreed on, though negotiations haven't been blocked by such matters as the two sides are holding talks to 'delineate the parameters of [a] landing zone'.
The yearend deadline set by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen during the EU College of Commissioners visit in February gave focus to the FTA negotiations, which were relaunched in June 2022 after a hiatus of almost a decade.
'Since this pronouncement by the leaders, the geo-economic environment has made this guidance even more compelling. There was a foresight [and] a clear vision that this FTA is needed,' Delphin said, adding the deal will help in derisking and providing stability.
'There are the tariffs by the US, but there is also, as far as the EU is concerned, this trade deficit we have with China. That creates a significant trade distortion…The fact that it's not just tariffs, it's the whole construct of what was the so-called global trade order, which is unravelling,' he said.
India and the EU stand to gain from the deal because of complementarities between the two economies. 'With this context of geopolitical and geoeconomic turbulence, the fact that derisking is increasingly important and Covid-19 showed the importance of diversifying, there are a lot of elements to make the case for the FTA even more compelling,' Delphin said. 'If you put all that together, that has given so much traction and so much focus to get the FTA done by the end of the year.'
Delphin pointed to the frequency and intensity of negotiations, including recent visits to Brussels by commerce minister Piyush Goyal and external affairs minister S Jaishankar, and said the message emerging from these meetings was the same - the determination to get the deal done.
'I think we can be reasonably confident that it's going to be there because in a way, failure, at this point in time, would have a significant cost for both. I think failure is not contemplated. We want to get [the trade deal],' he said.
Besides formal rounds of negotiations, there have been other contacts to push the trade deal, with the EU's chief negotiator travelling to New Delhi to meet his Indian counterpart last Saturday to take stock of the talks.
'If you look at the substance, at the last round, we closed five chapters on intellectual property, customs and trade facilitation, transparency, good regulatory practices, and mutual administrative assistance. We are moving closer to closing chapters on dispute settlement, state-owned enterprises, subsidies and digital trade,' Delphin said.
Delphin acknowledged India's sensitivities about the agricultural sector, noting that red lines had been 'framed from the very beginning', but said wines and spirits continue to be an important element for the EU side. 'We are not going to lose time on those, to be very frank. But there is one element within the agriculture chapter, which is wines and spirits…This is part of the elements that would form meaningful trade. On this, we are quite optimistic of progress,' he said.
Asked if the India-UK FTA finalised in May - which envisages cutting Indian import duty on Scotch whisky and gin from 150% to 75% initially, with a further reduction to 40% over 10 years - can serve as a template for India and the EU, Delphin replied: 'Not a template, but a reference point because it gives a benchmark. The size of the EU economy is 12 or 14 times…bigger than the UK. You want this somehow to be reflected in the agreement,' he said.
India's move to revise the text of the model Bilateral Investment Treaty and a proposed amendment of the Geographical Indications (GI) of Goods Act are positive developments that will have a 'net positive fallout' on India-EU negotiations for agreements on bilateral investments and GI, Delphin said. He sought to address the Indian side's concerns about the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), set to kick in from January 2026, by saying it is 'not a trade instrument'.
The EU has engaged in an outreach to Indian industry through the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) to explain the new CBAM simplification package. 'It's part of our climate agenda…CBAM induces this whole agenda of decarbonisation,' he said.
Also Read: EU to accept Trump's universal 10% tariff, seeks exemptions on key sectors
Delphin said it would be unfair to impose CBAM on European companies while allowing firms from outside to import high carbon content goods. 'We have engaged with partners, listened to partners, and we did several rounds here in India, took back the comments, and we adjusted,' he said.
The EU is India's second-largest trade partner, accounting for trade in goods worth €120 billion in 2024, or 11.5% of India's total trade, while trade in services was worth €59.7 billion in 2023. Though India-EU trade in goods increased by nearly 90% in the past decade, India is the EU's 9th largest trade partner, accounting for 2.4% of the EU's total trade in goods in 2024, behind the US (17.3%), China (14.6%) and the UK (10.1%).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Govt should phase out trade with China in 10 years, says Akhilesh
1 2 Lucknow: Blaming the BJP-led NDA govt for the collapse of India's foreign policy, Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Monday said govt should phase out trade with China over the next 10 years for backing Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. Akhilesh expressed gratitude towards Indian armed forces on behalf of his party and the country but questioned govt's claims on the Pahalgam attack and the subsequent events. "We admire the valour of our forces and congratulate them for the manner in which they bravely executed Operation Sindoor. Had they been given a chance, they could have reclaimed PoK as well," Akhilesh told reporters outside the Parliament House. He said India has received top honours from many nations but during Operation Sindoor none of these countries were seen standing with India and added that this was a failure of the Indian govt's foreign policy. India caters to the economic interests of China by way of trade and so it was understandable that such economic activity cannot be stopped abruptly, he said. "But the central govt should chalk out a blueprint to end all trade ties with China in a phased manner," Akhilesh said. "People of India listen to what the central govt says. Be it the beating of Thaalis during Covid or facing demonetisation, people did what the govt asked them. Now govt should come out with a plan to withdraw trade ties with China and people will abide by it," he said. "The problem is that the rich people are getting everything (from China) but fertilizers for farmers are not coming in," he added. Akhilesh said it was not only about Pahalgam, the Centre was yet to give details to the nation about what had happened with regards to action against the terrorists involved in Pulwama attack. "On Aug 14, 2019, a suicide bomber crashed into a bus carrying CRPF personnel in Pulwama killing at least 40 jawans. The question is why are terror attacks taking place when the BJP-led govts are at the helm. Govt must answer this question," he said.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
France denounces US-European Union trade deal, French PM calls it..., Emmanuel Macron...
(Image: President Donald Trump shakes hands with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry. Pic: Reuters) New Delhi: France has criticized Sunday's, July 28 trade deal between US President Donald Trump and European Union (EU) President Ursula von der Leyen. French Prime Minister François Bayrou called it a dark day for the EU. What did France say over US-EU trade deal? François Bayrou said the EU had bowed to President Trump's increasing tariff pressure. He wrote on X: 'It is sad when a coalition of independent countries, formed to protect their common values and interests, buckles under pressure.' At the same time, French Minister of European Affairs Benjamin Haddad said that this situation is not good and the EU should take countermeasures. French Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin said, 'Trump only understands the language of power. If we should have taken countermeasures earlier, the deal might have been better.' However, French President Emmanuel Macron has remained silent on the matter. What is the response of Italy and Germany? German Chancellor Friedrich Mertz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni welcomed the agreement. European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic called it a 'big step' as it averted a trade war between the USA and Europe. Under the agreement, most goods going from Europe to the US will face a 15% tariff, three times the current 4.8%. However, the 30% tariff was avoided after Trump's threat of August 1. How much of Europe's goods will face 15% tariff? According to the details of the agreement, 70% of goods from Europe will be subject to 15% tariff. This includes cars, medicines and electronics. However, some agricultural products such as aircraft parts, some chemicals, semiconductor equipment and cork will not be subject to tariffs. There will be no tariff on drugs yet, and if there is one in the future, it will not be more than 15%. The EU will buy energy worth 750 billion dollars or about 64 lakh crore rupees from America in the next three years. Along with this, the EU will invest 600 billion dollars i.e. 51 lakh crore rupees in America.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Reaction to the European Unions trade agreement with the Trump administration
FRANKFURT, Germany — The European Union's trade agreement with the Trump administration is getting mixed reviews. EU officials say they warded off a total economic disaster. But French officials in particular say the EU punched below its weight while economists say the deal is dangerously vague. The deal leaves Europe with a 15% tariff on most goods imported into the U.S., with some goods categories tariff-free, but no agreement on rates for key areas such as pharmaceuticals and steel. Here is what they're saying: Failing to reach a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline would have meant a 30% tariff threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump, EU chief trade negotiator Maroš Šefčovič said. The main aim of European officials was a negotiated agreement, rather than a tit-for-tat escalation that could have included retaliatory EU tariffs on 93 billion euros worth of goods, including U.S. agricultural products, steel and chemicals. 'A trade war may seem appealing to some, but it comes with serious consequences, with at least a 30% tariff," Šefčovič said. 'Our trans-Atlantic trade would effectively come to a halt, putting close to 5 million jobs, including those in SMEs in Europe, at grave risk. 'Our businesses have sent us a unanimous message: avoid escalation and work towards a solution that delivers immediate relief,' he said. Major exports to the U.S.: Aircraft, pharmaceuticals, luxury perfumes and leather goods, wine and spirits. Senior French officials on Monday criticized the accord, with Foreign Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin urging a European response in the services sector, and Strategy Commissioner Clément Beaune warning it underplayed the 27-nation bloc's economic strength. 'The good news is that there is an agreement — our companies now have visibility and stability in the trans-Atlantic trade relationship,' Saint-Martin said on France Inter radio. 'But this agreement is not balanced, and we will need to keep working." He pointed to digital services as a key front in the trade imbalance. 'Donald Trump spent months saying he wanted to rebalance a trade relationship that disadvantages the United States, but he was only talking about goods. If we look at services, it's the opposite. So it's up to us now to carry out the work of force and rebalancing,' he said. 'The United States decided to use force to impose a new law of the jungle that no longer respects the rules of international trade that we had for decades,' Saint-Martin said. Beaune, France's high commissioner for strategy and planning, said on franceinfo radio that 'this is an unequal and unbalanced agreement.' He warned that 'Europe did not wield its strength. We are the world's leading trading power.' 'When you look at it, the glass is a quarter full and three-quarters empty,' Beaune said. Prime Minister François Bayrou was even more scathing, posting on X: 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to uphold their values and defend their interests, resigns itself to submission.' Major exports to the U.S.: Motor vehicles, pharmaceuticals and industrial machinery. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that the deal would give companies a more predictable environment to plan and invest — a key EU goal after weeks of back-and-forth threats in tense talks with Trump administration officials. 'It is good that Europe and the USA have agreed and thus avoided an unnecessary escalation in trans-Atlantic trade relations," he said. "We have been able to preserve our core interests, even if I would have very much wished for further relief in trans-Atlantic trade.' Asked about negative reactions to the deal from German business, Merz countered that it was met with relief by some companies and sectors. However, 'it is completely clear to me that the tariffs that now remain — in particular the 15% against 0% for imports to the European Union — constitute a significant burden for the export-oriented economy of the Federal Republic of Germany,' Merz said, noting that he had said repeatedly before the agreement that 'there will be an asymmetric deal, if there is one at all.' Major exports to the U.S.: Industrial machinery, cars and agricultural products. Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, who has positioned herself as a 'bridge' between the Trump administration and Europe, welcomed news of the tariff agreement as a 'positive' outcome that avoided an 'unpredictable and potentially devastating' trade war. But in comments to reporters on the sidelines of a U.N. food security conference in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, she said that details still needed to be worked out and that she's still unclear what exemptions are carved out for particular industries. 'I always thought, I continue to think that a trade escalation between Europe and the United States would have unpredictable, potentially devastating consequences,' she said. Meloni said that she needed to understand what the exemptions might be, including on agricultural products, which are of concern to Italy, given its wine exports in particular. 'So there are a number of elements that are missing as well, as I don't know exactly what we are referring to when we talk about investments, gas purchases." She noted that the deal in its current form is legally nonbinding in principle, 'so there is still, let's say, room to fight.' Major exports to the U.S.: Packaged medicines and batteries. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, an ally of Trump who has gained a following within the MAGA movement, blasted the agreement on Monday as a failure on the part of Europe's leadership. 'Even at first glance, it is obvious to me that this is not an agreement,' Orbán said in a video discussion with his party's spokesman. 'Donald Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast, that's what happened.' Orbán, a frequent EU critic, has been careful not to criticize Trump's administration for its trade policy, instead faulting the bloc for being unable to conclude a comprehensive tariff agreement with Washington. Orbán said that a U.S.-U.K. trade deal, which imposed a blanket 10% tariff on British exports, was more favorable than the one concluded with the EU. 'The American president is a heavyweight negotiator, and is a featherweight,' Orbán said. 'The European agreement is worse than the British one, so portraying it as a success will be difficult.' Jon Harrison at TS Lombard: 'It is no surprise to find that trade deals agreed under duress in weeks rather than the usual years of careful negotiation leave a mass of detail incomplete and open to interpretation.' Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief eurozone economist at Capital Economics: 'We think this will reduce EU GDP by about 0.5%, which is worse than we had previously assumed.' 'While the deal has avoided a much worse outcome for now, it remains to be seen whether it will last.' Julian Hinz, trade expert at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy: 'The deal agreed yesterday is not a good deal — it is appeasement. 'While the EU may avert a trade war in the short term, it is paying a high price in the long term by abandoning the principles of the multilateral, rules-based world trade system of the World Trade Organization.' Justin Spike reported from Budapest, Hungary, Thomas Adamson from Paris, and Nicole Winfield from Rome. Sam McNeil contributed to this report from Brussels. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.