Give back taxpayers' cash for failed ‘fun factory', Hastings MP tells Tory donor
Helena Dollimore, the Labour MP for Hastings and Rye, said the town now 'wants its money back' after the venture known as Owens failed, leaving a depressing boarded-up shopfront dominating the high street.
She said Chernukhin, who recently donated £70,000 to the shadow foreign secretary, Priti Patel, should refund the money now that the project was in administration. Dollimore called on Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, not to accept any more donations from Chernukhin unless the grant were returned.
Chernukhin, a businesswoman who has given more than £2m to the Conservatives since 2014 and is married to a former Russian finance minister, co-founded the Owens entertainment centre in the East Sussex seaside town in October 2022.
The centre received £150,000 from Boris Johnson's town deal funds after a tender process. At its launch, Chernukhin claimed the venture would help rejuvenate the town by bringing more than 45 jobs and lots of visitors to Hastings. It included several restaurants, a bowling alley, immersive experiences, virtual reality rides, an oddity museum and amusement arcade.
Despite this and her £4m investment, the centre abruptly shut its doors in September 2023.
Dollimore told the Commons on Monday that Hastings council was trying to recover the £150,000 grant given to Chernukhin's venture but that it had not so far been successful, and the company behind it was now in administration.
'The reason I am here speaking about this is that Owens has come to symbolise for our community much more than a mere eyesore,' she said.
'Did Ms Chernukhin, a millionaire owner, really need a top-up from the taxpayer to fund such a venture? Was that truly the best use of the money given to Hastings to improve our town? None of that makes any sense to my constituents.
'Owens closed shortly after opening, and the deserted, boarded-up building now dominates our town centre in Hastings. The staff were laid off with no notice, and many people who supplied the business and helped with the building work have said that they have not been paid for their work. The closure of Owens, which is now covered in wooden boarding, leaves a stain on our community.'
Dollimore said that in the time the project had been closed, Chernukhin had donated more than £150,000 to the Conservatives.
She added: 'Ms Chernukhin should donate the money she received from the taxpayer back to the people of Hastings. Used well, it could go a very long way to fixing our broken paving stones and bus shelters. Lubov Chernukhin, we want our money back. Until that money is repaid in full to our community, the Conservative party should not take a penny in donations from her.'
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
A spokesperson for Chernukhin said: 'Mrs Chernukhin was not involved in the application process for the towns fund grant. Lubov was not a director at the time – she was appointed in February 2023 – and she was only informed of the grant just before the opening of the centre in October 2022.
'As a British citizen, Mrs Chernukhin is entitled to make donations to political parties as she sees fit. All her donations have been declared in accordance with the rules of the Electoral Commission, and derive from her own private wealth.'
A Conservative party spokesperson said government policy was 'in no way dictated by party donations'.
They added: 'Ms Lubov Chernukhin has lived in Britain for many years and is a British citizen, which gives her the democratic and legal right to donate to a political party.
'All donations to the Conservative party are received in good faith, after appropriate due diligence, from permissible sources.
'Donations are properly and transparently declared to the Electoral Commission, published by them, and comply fully with the law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Russia is desperate to capture eastern Ukraine's industrial heartland
The future of Ukraine's industrial heartland in the east of the country is uncertain, after Vladimir Putin reportedly demanded it be handed to Russia during his meeting with Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday. The Russian leader demanded that Ukrainian forces withdraw from Donetsk as part of any ceasefire deal, and said he would be prepared to stop fighting on the rest of the frontline if Kyiv gave in to the demand and addressed the 'root causes of the conflict'. The Ukrainian president has said that Putin wants to take the remaining 30 per cent of the eastern region, which has been the location of some of the fiercest battles in the three-and-a-half-year war. But losing Donetsk would give Russia control of almost all of the Donbas, the collective name for Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland, which has been long coveted by Putin. Earlier this week, Zelensky vowed that Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned that Putin could use it as a springboard for a future invasion. However, sources close to the meeting told The Independent that the dramatic move appears to have been endorsed by Mr Trump as a means to bring an end to the war. As Kyiv fights to keep the Donbas from Trump's so-called 'land swap' deal, here's all you need to know about the region. Where is the Donbas? Situated along Ukraine's eastern border, the Donbas takes its portmanteau name from 'Donets Basin', a further abbreviation of 'Donets Coal Basin', in reference to the coal basin along the Donets Ridge and River. The Donbas stretches across the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, two large regions of Ukraine that have been on the front line of the war that followed Russia's invasion. How long has it been occupied? The Donbas has been partially occupied by Russia since 2014, around the same time that Putin annexed the Crimean peninsula. Russian-backed separatists broke away from the Ukrainian government to proclaim the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk independent 'people's republics' and, as a result, Moscow captured more than a third of Ukraine's eastern territory. Russia classes inhabitants of the Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Luhansk People's Republic, the Donetsk People's Republic, and the regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson as subjects of the Russian Federation. Ukraine insists these territories are part of Ukraine. It is believed that around 88 per cent of the Donbas is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region, according to Reuters. Approximately 6,600 sq km is still controlled by Ukraine, but Russia has been focusing most of its energy along the front in Donetsk, pushing towards the last remaining major cities such as Pokrovsk. A key strategic region in the war The hyper-industrialised Donbas economy is dominated by coal mining and metallurgy. The region has one of the largest coal reserves in Ukraine. When conflict broke out in 2014, Ukraine's coal-mining enterprises saw a 22.4 per cent decline in the production of raw coal compared with 2013, according to the Kyiv Post, showing the country's reliance on Donbas as an energy powerhouse. But as well as its economic significance, Donbas has been described as a 'fortress belt' by the Institute for the Study of War in terms of its strategic value. Donetsk forms the main fortified defensive line across the front line, stretching through Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, and Kostiantynivka. 'Ukraine is holding a key defensive line across Donetsk,' says Elina Beketova, a fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, describing a 'fortified zone buildup over years because the war began 11 years ago'. She adds that Russia hasn't been able to break through since 2014, and has lost many people there. The entire region is heavily mined, and Ukrainian troops have been preparing it for years. 'It's not just trenches, it's a deep, layered defence with bunkers, anti-tank ditches, minefields, and industrial areas built into the terrain. The area includes dominant heights, rivers, and urban zones that make it extremely hard to capture,' explains Beketova. She says that losing this fortified line would have 'catastrophic consequences' for Ukraine, as it holds back Russia's advancement into central and western parts of the country. 'The front would shift approximately 80km west, and Russia would gain open ground – flat steppe with no natural barriers – giving it a direct path towards Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipro.' What Zelensky has said about the Donbas Zelensky has repeatedly rejected calls from Russia to give up the Donbas. In response to Putin's request that Ukraine withdraw from eastern Donetsk, Zelensky vowed that his people would 'never leave' the Donbas, and warned that Putin's troops could use it as a springboard for a future invasion. 'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part – our territories are illegally occupied. Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive,' he said.
Scotsman
9 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Readers' letters: Vladimir Putin got everything he wanted from Alaska summit
A reader says Vladimir Putin was the clear winner in the Alaska summit on the fate of Ukraine Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Vladimir Putin got everything he wanted from the Alaska summit while Donald Trump came away with nothing; no ceasefire, no future talks with Putin and Zelensky and no prospect of peace. There was also no mention of energy sanctions which Trump said he would impose on major Russian oil importer India if his demands for a ceasefire were not met, instead he seemed set on getting a peace deal out of the way so that he could make a trade deal with Russia and carve up Arctic resources. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Peace, however, appears illusive and while a naive Trump later declared that he still felt it was 'within reach' his slumped body language contrasted with a cunning and confident Putin who had not only avoided more sanctions but was back on the world stage. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands after their arrival for summit in Alaska (Picture: Gavriil Grigoriv/Pool/AFP via Getty Images) While thousands die on the front line, the way forward remains Trump further sanctioning the Russian economy. Meanwhile, European governments should use seized Russian assets to fund the Ukrainian war effort. Peace is not 'closer than ever' as Keir Starmer maintains and an emboldened Putin has to be made to face economic ruin. Putin is still tapping Trump along, as Trump himself previously put it, to delay peace and intensify the war. Like fellow war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu, he needs to feel the heat to climb down. Instead, he too has been pacified and remains as cold as an Alaskan winter. No pain means no peace. Neil Anderson, Edinburgh What a carve-up Of course Presidents Trump and Putin have nothing to say about their Alaskan meeting. They were talking about who will get what in the world carve-up they are planning for their own countries. Russia wants to be the USSR again, and America wants to colonise. Surely that is obvious. Malcolm Parkin, Kinnesswood, Perth & Kinross 'Greater' Israel Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Behjamin Netanyahu brazenly claims that he is on a historic and spiritual mission to achieve the vision of a greater Israel which includes Jordan. Such incendiary comments are bound to stir regional strife and ensure perpetual hate and terrorism. Jordan has played a pivotal role in regional and global stability and in delivering humanitarian aid to besieged Gaza. Netanyahu is a war criminal and cannot be allowed to bully other nations. Dr Munjed Farid Al Qutob, London Just the tickets The removal of peak rail fares in Scotland from September is a welcome and overdue step towards making public transport more affordable and encouraging people out of their cars. However, I am concerned by how this policy has been presented to the public. ScotRail's messaging claims that passengers will now pay 'the same fare no matter what time they travel.' In reality, this risks being misleading by omission: on some routes, split-ticketing or advance fares can still be cheaper than the new 'any time' price. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad For many passengers, particularly those in vulnerable circumstances who cannot easily shop around, such omissions can make the difference between travel being affordable or not. Consumer Scotland has published clear guidance that public bodies should communicate transparently and avoid creating barriers to informed choices. I fear that, in this case, the marketing of a positive policy risks undermining public trust. Especially as Transport Scotland's own analysis suggested a hit for those who rely on the cheapest ticket types soon to be removed. If Scotland is serious about achieving net zero, we need more people to choose rail. But behaviour change depends on trust. Public bodies must be scrupulous in how they communicate, not over-simplifying at the expense of accuracy. I urge Transport Scotland, Scottish Rail Holdings and ScotRail to update their messaging to include clear caveats and worked examples, so that passengers can have full confidence in the value of their ticket. George Eckton, Glasgow Yobs on buses Giving free bus travel to under-23s was bound to be a recipe for trouble (Scotsman, 16 August), including taxpayer-funded shoplifting sprees. Its architects are clearly divorced from reality in their bourgeois SNP-socialist bubble. The good news; right now the South East of Scotland Transport Partnership is conducting a survey on the future of bus services. If readers don't have time to plough through the survey (which ends with impertinent questions about ethnicity and sexual orientation!), they can write to SEStran's Strategy Manager Rachel Murphy using the form (before 25 August), stating their views on free travel. George Morton, Rosyth, Fife Dying faith Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Rodney Pinder writes about the sale of church buildings (Letters, 14 August). In this 21st century many people here and in Europe simply no longer believe in God. A poll a couple of years ago suggested that around 70 per cent of young people had no religious beliefs at all. Resignations amongst the clergy, whose income is now derisory compared to jobs in the outside world, outnumber recruits. That the Church of of Scotland is one of the wealthiest landowners in the country says everything. In business terms ministers are the salespersons; religion is the product. The product is no longer selling. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad I apologise if I offend believers, but when churches are being closed with monotonous regularity and the salespersons are leaving in droves to earn a living wage, the existence and future of both churches and and Christianity are open to debate. Doug Morrison, Tenterden, Kent Write to The Scotsman
Reuters
9 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russia strikes on Kharkiv kill three, injure 17, Ukraine says
KHARKIV, Aug 18 (Reuters) - A Russian air attack overnight on a residential area in Kharkiv killed three people, including a toddler, and injured 17, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday, as the United States presses Kyiv to take a quick deal to end a war Moscow started. A drone attack killed the two-year-old boy in Ukraine's second-largest city early on Monday, after a ballistic missile strike the previous night, Oleh Synehubov, the governor of the wider Kharkiv region, said on messaging app Telegram. The number of the injured from the Kharkiv attack was "continuously increasing", Synehubov added. Also on Telegram, Mayor Ihor Terekhov said two more were killed and 17 injured in both attacks, among them six children aged from six to 17. "A woman has just been rescued from under the rubble: she is alive," Terekhov said in a post early on Monday, warning that more might be trapped under the rubble. Kharkiv, in northeastern Ukraine near the border with Russia, has been the target of regular Russian drone and missile attacks since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. The earlier ballistic missile strike on the city shattered about 1,000 windows, Synehubov said. Some residents had to be evacuated, Ukraine's state emergency service said on Telegram. Reuters witnesses saw medics attending to residents on a street and rescuers inspecting damage in residential buildings. Two people were injured in Russia's strikes on the adjacent region of Sumy that also damaged at least a dozen homes and an educational institution, authorities said. "The enemy continues to deliberately target civilian infrastructure in the Sumy region — treacherously, at night," Oleh Hryhorov, the head of the regional administration, said on Telegram. Reuters could not independently verify the weapons used by Russia. There was no immediate comment from Moscow. Both sides deny targeting civilians in their strikes, but thousands of people have died, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. President Donald Trump, who hosted President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday for talks aimed at ending the war, has urged Kyiv to make a deal with Moscow, stating, "Russia is a very big power, and they're not."
