logo
Councillors Gough And Keown Have Short Memories About Lyttelton Port Issues, Says Alliance Council Candidate

Councillors Gough And Keown Have Short Memories About Lyttelton Port Issues, Says Alliance Council Candidate

Scoop24-07-2025
Tom Roud, Alliance Party candidate for central ward in this year's Christchurch council elections, says some councillors have 'conveniently short memories' when it comes to the port of Lyttelton.
'Whilst the Council may have set up a structure through Christchurch City Holdings Limited that maintains an 'arm's length' relationship with port management, that doesn't mean our elected representatives shouldn't be able to step in on our behalf if things are going awry,' he said.
Mr Roud continued: 'there are precedents for this – during the very disruptive and acrimonious industrial dispute of 2018, I know councillors were talking to unions and I don't doubt they were talking to management. After that dispute was settled both unions and management got a very clear signal that industrial relations had to change and under the previous CEO they did'.
'Going back further, the last time the idea of selling off the port was floated our elected representatives engaged with unions and were led to understand the level of resistance such a move would generate. This was, in part, driven by concerns about the disastrous consequences privatisation would have for health and safety. Councillors were under no illusions an already questionable health and safety performance would arguably get worse,' said Mr Roud.
'More recently, during COVID the value of public ownership of such a strategic asset was demonstrated. Port management and the workforce were really clear that keeping goods moving safely across the waterfront was the priority, not short-term profitability. That view didn't just fall out of the sky. Public ownership means accountability to us, the voters and ratepayers, let's keep it that way,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour Leader Chris Hipkins Dismisses Criticism Of Covid-19 Overspending As 'Treasury Spin'
Labour Leader Chris Hipkins Dismisses Criticism Of Covid-19 Overspending As 'Treasury Spin'

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Labour Leader Chris Hipkins Dismisses Criticism Of Covid-19 Overspending As 'Treasury Spin'

, Acting Political Editor Labour leader Chris Hipkins is dismissing what he calls "Treasury spin" after its analysts said the last government overspent during the Covid-19 pandemic against official advice. Treasury's 2025 Long Term Insights Briefing, released this week, calculated the total cost of the pandemic at about $66 billion, or roughly 20.4 percent of GDP. The report said Treasury advocated for more targeted support in late 2020 into 2021 and explicitly warned "against any further stimulus" by Budget 2022. But responding to questions from RNZ on Friday, Hipkins was unapologetic about his party's economic response to Covid-19. "We prioritised keeping people alive and keeping people in jobs," he said. "I'm never going to claim that we got everything perfect... but prioritising jobs and prioritising lives was the right thing to do." Hipkins claimed other countries also spent up large with the same objectives, but Treasury said New Zealand was near the top of the chart when considering spending as a percentage of GDP. "If you listen to the Treasury spin, then you're going to get one view," Hipkins told RNZ. "If you speak to other economists, you'll get a different view. "Our job was to support New Zealanders through the global pandemic, making sure that we saved lives and kept people's jobs, and we were very successful in doing that: one of the lowest death rates in the world, one of the lowest rates of unemployment in the world, and one of the fastest rates of economic growth in the world." About half of the total Covid-19 response cost was directly tied to the pandemic, such as the wage subsidy scheme, or health initiatives like vaccination, contact tracing and quarantine. The remainder went to a wide range of initiatives like: "tax changes, training schemes, housing construction, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, increases to welfare benefits, the Small Business Cashflow Scheme, Jobs for Nature, additional public housing places and school lunches". Treasury said that had "a lagged impact on the economy and proved difficult to unwind in later years". But Hipkins said Treasury had mischaracterised some of that spending, such as the provision of distance-learning for school students. "Making sure that kids could keep learning while they were at home during lockdown was an essential Covid-19 expense," Hipkins said. The report comes during a prolonged economic downturn, with both the government and opposition parties trading blame over its cause. Finance Minister Nicola Willis was quick on Thursday to wield Treasury's findings as evidence that Labour had been undisciplined in its spending, driving up inflation, and fuelling a cost-of-living crisis. "Treasury's language is spare and polite, but its conclusions are damning," she said. "New Zealanders are still paying the price of the previous government extending a big-spending approach initially intended for a pandemic response. "The lesson from Labour's mishandling of the Covid response is that while there are times when governments have to increase spending in response to major events the fiscal guardrails should be restored as soon as possible." To that, Hipkins scoffed: "By comparison to this government's track record, I'll take our one any day". Hipkins said Willis should stop blaming others and instead accept the consequences of her government's spending cuts. "The wreckage that she is leaving in her wake at the moment is obvious for all New Zealanders to see. Unemployment is going up," he said. "Economic growth has collapsed. Essential services that the public rely on a daily basis are falling into disarray, and this is all on Nicola Willis' watch."

Violence Against Women: An Overlooked Economic Barrie
Violence Against Women: An Overlooked Economic Barrie

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

Violence Against Women: An Overlooked Economic Barrie

One in three women worldwide have suffered physical or sexual violence at least once in their lifetime, a staggering statistic that underscores a persistent, global crisis. Violence is not just a social issue; it is a profound economic barrier. Despite notable gains in education, access to finance, and digital inclusion, violence against women—both online and offline—continues to severely limit their economic potential, productivity, and participation across APEC economies. This violence is rooted in social norms and often reinforced by weak legal enforcement. It limits women's ability to lead, earn and innovate, and it holds back inclusive growth for everyone. The Hidden Price Tag of Violence Violence against women is a crisis that ripples through every aspect of society. It is a public health emergency, a governance failure and an economic issue. UN Women estimates that 736 million women worldwide, nearly 1 in 3 women globally, have ever suffered physical and/or sexual violence. Yet, many never report it; less than 40 percent of women seek help, and fewer than 10 percent go to the police. Why? Because trust in institutions is low, services are limited, social stigma is high, and the fear of retaliation is real. The 2025 Dashboard shows that even though more than 80 percent of APEC economies have laws against domestic violence and workplace harassment , enforcement remains weak. Without consistent implementation, these laws risk becoming symbolic gestures rather than offering real protection to those they are meant to serve. The economic toll of violence is staggering. Women who face violence are more likely to miss work, underperform, or leave the workforce entirely. They are less likely to start a business, speak up in public forums, engage in leadership roles, or pursue technical fields. That is a massive loss on talent and productivity. Some estimates indicate that intimate partner violence alone can cost an economy up to 2 percent of its GDP. And even this figure is likely an underestimate given widespread underreporting and significant data gaps masking the full cost. Yet progress is possible. Economies with domestic violence legislation report significantly lower rates of intimate partner violence—9.5 percent compared to 16.1 percent in those without such laws—demonstrating that when laws are enacted and enforced, they save lives. Missed Potential: How Violence Curtails Progress The 2025 Dashboard reveals a persistent gap. Despite near gender parity in education and literacy, women remain significantly underrepresented in technical and vocational training, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields, and leadership roles. Labor force participation among women remains below 60 percent, with only minimal recovery since the COVID-19 pandemic. What's holding progress back? Because women's time, safety and confidence to participate in the economy are continually eroded by the unequal burden of unpaid care and the threat of violence. Deep-rooted social norms and weak enforcement of laws discourage women from reporting abuse, while underinvestment in care infrastructure pushes women further into unpaid labor, limiting their ability to advance professionally. Leadership statistics tells a similar story. For instance, women hold just 22 percent of ministerial positions and 27.5 percent of parliamentary seats in the APEC region, highlighting the interplay of violence and discrimination that keeps women from positions of power and influence. Violence is a key driver of exclusion. A global study found that 82 percent of women parliamentarians experienced psychological violence during their term. Nearly half received threats of any kind—often via social media—and 65 percent suffered sexist remarks from male colleagues. Any form of abuse endangers individuals and silences them. And in institutions where women remain underrepresented, especially in politics, policing and the judiciary, laws protecting against violence are often poorly enforced, if enacted at all Research shows that female legislators are more likely to propose and champion laws on gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health, and equal rights. When women are not at the table, vital perspectives on safety, justice, and caregiving are left out of policymaking. Increasing women's political leadership is not just a matter of representation—it is essential for effective and inclusive governance. It leads to stronger legal protections, better enforcement, and greater accountability in the fight to end violence against women. Online Violence: The New Barrier to Economic Inclusion As more economic activity shifts online, digital safety has become a prerequisite for participation. Unfortunately, technology-facilitated violence, abuse and harassment is escalating at an alarming rate. Globally, about 85 percent of women have encountered some form of online violence. Younger women are particularly vulnerable, with nearly half having experienced it personally. Common tactics include misinformation and defamation, cyber-harassment, hate speech, impersonation, stalking, and hacking. Despite its prevalence, only nine APEC economies have laws specifically addressing online violence as of 2024 (Figure 2). The economic implications are profound. If women cannot safely engage in digital spaces, their ability to access e-commerce, remote work, digital banking, or startup ecosystems is curtailed—undermining their inclusion in the very sectors shaping future growth. The Way Forward: Turning Commitments into Action The APEC region has laid important groundwork, most notably through the La Serena Roadmap for Women and Inclusive Growth, which remains a cornerstone of APEC's gender inclusion strategy. However, progress demands immediate action. Breaking the cycle of violence and unleashing women's full economic power necessitate bold, coordinated action across several fronts: Strengthen legal protections: Enforce laws against all forms of violence, including online harassment, and close legal gaps in employment discrimination and workplace safety. Invest in care infrastructure: Reduce the unpaid burden on women by expanding access to childcare, eldercare, and social safety nets. Build leadership pipelines: Scale-up mentorship, networking, and training programs that prepare women for decision-making roles. Close the data gap: Collect disaggregated data on violence, unpaid work, and women's participation in STEM and entrepreneurship to drive evidence-based policymaking. Combat harmful norms: Engage communities, educators, and media to reshape social attitudes that normalize gender-based violence and limit women's potential. A Collective Opportunity for Growth Violence against women is not an isolated issue. It is a systemic barrier to growth, interconnected with wage inequality, leadership disparities, and underrepresentation in innovation. It prevents economies from tapping into half of their talent pool, translating into significant productivity losses and economic costs. Ending violence against women is not just about justice—it is about unlocking opportunities. A safe woman is an educated woman, a productive worker, a confident entrepreneur, and a transformative leader. For APEC economies to achieve inclusive growth, they must treat safety as an economic priority. This includes dismantling the structures that allow violence to persist. Indeed, when half of the population is unsafe, no one's potential is truly protected. Rhea Crisologo Hernando is analyst and Eldo Malba Simanjuntak is researcher at the APEC Policy Support Unit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store