logo
Violence Against Women: An Overlooked Economic Barrie

Violence Against Women: An Overlooked Economic Barrie

Scoop3 days ago
One in three women worldwide have suffered physical or sexual violence at least once in their lifetime, a staggering statistic that underscores a persistent, global crisis. Violence is not just a social issue; it is a profound economic barrier.
Despite notable gains in education, access to finance, and digital inclusion, violence against women—both online and offline—continues to severely limit their economic potential, productivity, and participation across APEC economies. This violence is rooted in social norms and often reinforced by weak legal enforcement. It limits women's ability to lead, earn and innovate, and it holds back inclusive growth for everyone.
The Hidden Price Tag of Violence
Violence against women is a crisis that ripples through every aspect of society. It is a public health emergency, a governance failure and an economic issue. UN Women estimates that 736 million women worldwide, nearly 1 in 3 women globally, have ever suffered physical and/or sexual violence. Yet, many never report it; less than 40 percent of women seek help, and fewer than 10 percent go to the police.
Why? Because trust in institutions is low, services are limited, social stigma is high, and the fear of retaliation is real.
The 2025 Dashboard shows that even though more than 80 percent of APEC economies have laws against domestic violence and workplace harassment , enforcement remains weak. Without consistent implementation, these laws risk becoming symbolic gestures rather than offering real protection to those they are meant to serve.
The economic toll of violence is staggering. Women who face violence are more likely to miss work, underperform, or leave the workforce entirely. They are less likely to start a business, speak up in public forums, engage in leadership roles, or pursue technical fields. That is a massive loss on talent and productivity.
Some estimates indicate that intimate partner violence alone can cost an economy up to 2 percent of its GDP. And even this figure is likely an underestimate given widespread underreporting and significant data gaps masking the full cost.
Yet progress is possible. Economies with domestic violence legislation report significantly lower rates of intimate partner violence—9.5 percent compared to 16.1 percent in those without such laws—demonstrating that when laws are enacted and enforced, they save lives.
Missed Potential: How Violence Curtails Progress
The 2025 Dashboard reveals a persistent gap. Despite near gender parity in education and literacy, women remain significantly underrepresented in technical and vocational training, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields, and leadership roles.
Labor force participation among women remains below 60 percent, with only minimal recovery since the COVID-19 pandemic.
What's holding progress back? Because women's time, safety and confidence to participate in the economy are continually eroded by the unequal burden of unpaid care and the threat of violence.
Deep-rooted social norms and weak enforcement of laws discourage women from reporting abuse, while underinvestment in care infrastructure pushes women further into unpaid labor, limiting their ability to advance professionally.
Leadership statistics tells a similar story. For instance, women hold just 22 percent of ministerial positions and 27.5 percent of parliamentary seats in the APEC region, highlighting the interplay of violence and discrimination that keeps women from positions of power and influence.
Violence is a key driver of exclusion. A global study found that 82 percent of women parliamentarians experienced psychological violence during their term. Nearly half received threats of any kind—often via social media—and 65 percent suffered sexist remarks from male colleagues.
Any form of abuse endangers individuals and silences them. And in institutions where women remain underrepresented, especially in politics, policing and the judiciary, laws protecting against violence are often poorly enforced, if enacted at all
Research shows that female legislators are more likely to propose and champion laws on gender-based violence, sexual and reproductive health, and equal rights. When women are not at the table, vital perspectives on safety, justice, and caregiving are left out of policymaking.
Increasing women's political leadership is not just a matter of representation—it is essential for effective and inclusive governance. It leads to stronger legal protections, better enforcement, and greater accountability in the fight to end violence against women.
Online Violence: The New Barrier to Economic Inclusion
As more economic activity shifts online, digital safety has become a prerequisite for participation. Unfortunately, technology-facilitated violence, abuse and harassment is escalating at an alarming rate.
Globally, about 85 percent of women have encountered some form of online violence. Younger women are particularly vulnerable, with nearly half having experienced it personally. Common tactics include misinformation and defamation, cyber-harassment, hate speech, impersonation, stalking, and hacking. Despite its prevalence, only nine APEC economies have laws specifically addressing online violence as of 2024 (Figure 2).
The economic implications are profound. If women cannot safely engage in digital spaces, their ability to access e-commerce, remote work, digital banking, or startup ecosystems is curtailed—undermining their inclusion in the very sectors shaping future growth.
The Way Forward: Turning Commitments into Action
The APEC region has laid important groundwork, most notably through the La Serena Roadmap for Women and Inclusive Growth, which remains a cornerstone of APEC's gender inclusion strategy. However, progress demands immediate action. Breaking the cycle of violence and unleashing women's full economic power necessitate bold, coordinated action across several fronts:
Strengthen legal protections: Enforce laws against all forms of violence, including online harassment, and close legal gaps in employment discrimination and workplace safety.
Invest in care infrastructure: Reduce the unpaid burden on women by expanding access to childcare, eldercare, and social safety nets.
Build leadership pipelines: Scale-up mentorship, networking, and training programs that prepare women for decision-making roles.
Close the data gap: Collect disaggregated data on violence, unpaid work, and women's participation in STEM and entrepreneurship to drive evidence-based policymaking.
Combat harmful norms: Engage communities, educators, and media to reshape social attitudes that normalize gender-based violence and limit women's potential.
A Collective Opportunity for Growth
Violence against women is not an isolated issue. It is a systemic barrier to growth, interconnected with wage inequality, leadership disparities, and underrepresentation in innovation. It prevents economies from tapping into half of their talent pool, translating into significant productivity losses and economic costs.
Ending violence against women is not just about justice—it is about unlocking opportunities. A safe woman is an educated woman, a productive worker, a confident entrepreneur, and a transformative leader.
For APEC economies to achieve inclusive growth, they must treat safety as an economic priority. This includes dismantling the structures that allow violence to persist. Indeed, when half of the population is unsafe, no one's potential is truly protected.
Rhea Crisologo Hernando is analyst and Eldo Malba Simanjuntak is researcher at the APEC Policy Support Unit.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Public Hearing For ‘Decision-Makers' Will No Longer Proceed: Inquiry Chair
Public Hearing For ‘Decision-Makers' Will No Longer Proceed: Inquiry Chair

Scoop

timean hour ago

  • Scoop

Public Hearing For ‘Decision-Makers' Will No Longer Proceed: Inquiry Chair

Proceeding with a second week of public hearings is no longer justified, and won't go ahead in August 2025 as originally planned, says COVID-19 Inquiry Chair Grant Illingworth, KC. The decision by the Inquiry follows former Ministers declining an invitation to participate in the hearing. The detail of the Inquiry's decision, including concerns that the former Ministers raised about the hearing, is set out in a procedural Minute that can be accessed on the Inquiry website: A primary purpose of the Inquiry is to develop carefully considered findings and practical recommendations based on lessons learned. Mr Illingworth says the hearings were intended to enhance public confidence in the Inquiry's processes by enabling the public to see former Ministers – who have critical insights into the pandemic response – questioned in public. 'The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant event that affected every New Zealander. The government at the time, through its ministers, made decisions about how we as a nation responded to that pandemic, which had implications for all of us. 'We have been tasked with reviewing those decisions, and we thought it was important that the public see and hear for themselves important evidence about why some key decisions about the response to COVID-19 were made and for what reason.' Advertisement - scroll to continue reading The Inquiry has not changed its view that a public hearing would enhance public confidence in its processes, but there were a number of factors that contributed to the decision to no longer proceed, says Mr Illingworth. This includes that former Ministers and senior officials have provided a significant amount of information via private interviews, and all have offered to provide further information if requested; the need to use efficient processes and to avoid unnecessary cost and delay; the impact on public confidence of a 'decision-makers' hearing proceeding without the attendance of key decision-makers; and the fact that the Inquiry has other mechanisms available to obtain necessary evidence and also to increase transparency and public confidence. 'We are confident that the former Ministers declining to attend the hearing does not hamper us in our ability to obtain the information we need to be able to properly complete our task. Public hearings are only one mechanism of obtaining evidence, and their use is restricted under our terms of reference,' says Mr Illingworth. The Inquiry has given careful consideration to whether to issue a summons to the former Ministers but has decided not to proceed with that course of action. 'On balance we are of the view that a summons is undesirable given that the former Ministers continue to co-operate with the evidence-gathering of the Inquiry. It is our opinion that the use of summonses to achieve their participation at a public hearing would be legalistic and adversarial, which our terms of reference prohibit,' says Mr Illingworth. The Inquiry is giving further consideration to how it will collect evidence going forward and will provide more information about this as part of its regular communication. The Inquiry is due to report back to the Governor General at the end of February 2026. The decision not to proceed with a hearing will not impact on the Inquiry's timelines.

Covid inquiry: Second week of public hearings cancelled
Covid inquiry: Second week of public hearings cancelled

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Covid inquiry: Second week of public hearings cancelled

Chair Grant Illingworth KC says the second week of public hearings will not go ahead. Photo: Screengrab / Covid-19 Inquiry The Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid-19 pandemic response will not proceed with its second week of public hearings, with its chair saying it is no longer justified. Chair Grant Illingworth KC said the decision came after former ministers declined an invitation to participate in the hearing. The inquiry aimed to look at lessons learned from the government response, in order to prepare for future pandemics. A week of hearings was held in Auckland last month, with a second week due to continue in Wellington this week. The hearings were designed to gather evidence from key decision-makers who led and informed the government's response to the pandemic.

Former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern and other ministers refuse to appear in public before Royal Commission, but continue to co-operate
Former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern and other ministers refuse to appear in public before Royal Commission, but continue to co-operate

NZ Herald

time2 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern and other ministers refuse to appear in public before Royal Commission, but continue to co-operate

The second set of public hearings for the Covid-19 Royal Commission has been axed, following the refusal of key witnesses, including former Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern, to appear. Those witnesses, including Labour Leader Chris Hipkins and former ministers Grant Robertson and Ayesha Verrall, continue to co-operate with the inquiry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store