PH plans to negotiate with US to lower tariffs — Ambassador Romualdez
The Philippines is planning to negotiate with Washington to lower tariffs after the United States moved to impose higher 20% duties on goods imported from Manila, its ambassador to the United States said Thursday.
"We are still planning to negotiate that down," Jose Manuel Romualdez said in a phone message.
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday issued August 1 tariff notices to several trading partners including the Philippines, which he slapped with a 20% duty, higher than the previously announced 17%.
Asked what rate the Philippines is looking at, he said: "Will see."
US goods trade with the Philippines reached an estimated $23.5 billion in 2024, according to data from the Office of the United States Trade Representative.
US exports to the Philippines stood at $9.3 billion, a 0.4% increase from 2023, while imports from the Philippines totaled $14.2 billion, up 6.9% year-over-year.
The resulting US goods trade deficit with the Philippines widened to $4.9 billion in 2024, marking a 21.8% increase from the previous year.
There was no immediate comment from the office of the Philippine president. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
2 hours ago
- GMA Network
PH asserts 2016 arbitral ruling during forum hosted by Chinese think tank
The Philippine Embassy in Beijing has strongly reaffirmed the country's sovereign rights in the West Philippine Sea, citing the landmark 2016 arbitral award, during a forum hosted by a Chinese think tank just days before the ruling's ninth anniversary. The forum, which gathered legal scholars, policy experts, and regional analysts, was predominantly critical of the arbitral ruling and the Philippines' actions in the disputed waters. In a press statement, the embassy said the Philippine delegation used the opportunity to assert the ruling's legal weight and continuing relevance under international law. 'The Award, along with its annexes, proves the validity and legality of Philippine claims, and they are available for everyone to study and read,' the Embassy's representative said during a plenary intervention. The ruling, handed down by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2016, invalidated China's sweeping claims in the South China Sea—particularly those within the so-called 'nine-dash line'—and affirmed that such claims had no legal basis under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Responding to accusations made during the forum that the Philippines was acting as a "troublemaker" in the region, the Philippine representative pushed back firmly, emphasizing Manila's commitment to diplomacy and constructive engagement. 'We disagree with the notion that the Philippines is not willing to engage with China. In fact, even with the Arbitral Award, the Philippines has continued to make efforts to keep lines of communication open, maintain proper dialogue, and engage positively with China as well as other claimant States, both bilaterally and regionally, within the context of our legally settled claims in accordance with UNCLOS and international law,' the official said. The Embassy added: 'We hope China's actions demonstrate genuine willingness to engage and to produce constructive and positive outcomes.' The forum took place amid heightened regional tensions and increasing international attention on the South China Sea. This year marks the ninth year since the 2016 ruling, which has been backed by several countries including the United States, Japan, Australia, and members of the European Union. However, China has repeatedly rejected the ruling, continuing to assert its expansive maritime claims and build artificial islands and outposts in contested areas. On Sunday, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) said it monitored two vessels of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLA) of China in the waters off Occidental Mindoro. Tensions continue as Beijing claims almost all of the South China Sea, including parts claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei. In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague ruled in favor of the Philippinesover China's claims in the South China Sea, but the latter refused to recognize the decision. —Sherylin Untalan/AOL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
7 hours ago
- GMA Network
Trump's tariffs: What's in effect and what could be in store?
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump has launched a global trade war with an array of tariffs that target individual products and countries. Trump has set a baseline tariff of 10% on all imports to the United States, as well as additional duties on certain products or countries. Here is a list of targeted tariffs he has implemented or threatened to put in place. Product tariffs in effect Steel and aluminum - 50% Autos and auto parts - 25% Product tariffs - threatened Copper - 50% to take effect Aug. 1 Pharmaceuticals - up to 200% Semiconductors - 25% or higher Movies - 100% Timber and lumber Critical minerals Aircraft, engines and parts Country tariffs in effect Canada - 10% on energy products, 25% for other products not covered by the U.S.-Canada-Mexico Agreement Mexico - 25% for products not covered by USMCA China - 30%, with additional tariffs on some products United Kingdom - 10%, with some auto and metal imports exempt from higher global rates Vietnam - 20% for some products, 40% on transshipments from third countries Country tariffs threatened to take effect August 1 Algeria 30% Bangladesh 35% Bosnia and Herzegovina 30% Brazil 50% Brunei 25% Canada 35% Cambodia 36% European Union 30% Indonesia 32% Iraq 30% Japan 25% Kazakhstan 25% Laos 40% Libya 30% Malaysia 25% Mexico 30% Moldova 25% Myanmar 40% Philippines 20% Serbia 35% Sri Lanka 30% South Africa 30% South Korea 25% Thailand 36% Tunisia 25% —Reuters
GMA Network
10 hours ago
- GMA Network
Israeli plan to move Gazans into closed zone triggers backlash
A Palestinian man from the Katoo family, with his son, mourns beside the body of his other son, who was killed by Israeli fire while seeking aid near a distribution point in Rafah, according to medics, at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, July 12, 2025. REUTERS/ Ramadan Abed JERUSALEM, Undefined — An Israeli proposal to move Gazans into a so-called "humanitarian city" has come under intense fire, slammed by critics as a costly distraction at best, and at worst a potential step towards forcing Palestinians off of their land. Defense Minister Israel Katz first unveiled the plan during a briefing with reporters last Monday. It envisions building from scratch a closed zone in southern Gaza during a potential 60-day ceasefire in Israel's war with Hamas, currently under negotiation in Qatar. According to Katz, the area would initially house around 600,000 displaced people from southern Gaza and include four aid distribution sites managed by international organizations. The entire civilian population of Gaza—more than two million people—would eventually be relocated there. Critics, however, have questioned both the feasibility and ethics of the plan, with Israel's opposition leader citing its astronomical cost, and one expert pointing to lack of infrastructure in the area necessary to accommodate so many people. The UN agency for Palestinian refugees has described the proposed facility as a "concentration camp," while Britain's minister for the Middle East and North Africa has said he is "appalled" by the idea "Palestinian territory must not be reduced," the UK's Hamish Falconer said on X. "Civilians must be able to return to their communities." 'Extremist delusions' Nearly 21 months of war have devastated much of the Gaza Strip, displacing most of its population, creating dire shortages of food and other essentials, and killing 58,026 people, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry. The October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel that sparked the war led to 1,219 deaths, also mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures New arrivals to the proposed facility would undergo security screening to ensure they are not affiliated with Hamas, and once admitted, they would not be permitted to leave. The Israeli military would provide security "from a distance," Katz has said. However, the criticism of the plan reportedly extends even to Israel's own security establishment. Local media reported that army chief Eyal Zamir lambasted the proposal at a cabinet meeting, arguing it would divert focus from the military's two core objectives: defeating Hamas and securing the return of hostages taken on October 7. The broadcaster Channel 12 reported that unnamed security officials viewed the plan as little more than a "gigantic tent city," and warned it could pave the way for a return to Israeli military rule in Gaza. Such a move aligns with the long-standing goals of far-right Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir, key coalition partners of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both Smotrich and Ben Gvir advocate the re-establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, from which Israel unilaterally withdrew in 2005, and have repeatedly called for the voluntary expatriation of Palestinians from Gaza. The projected expense of the initiative—estimated between 10 and 20 billion shekels ($3–6 billion)—has further fuelled domestic outrage as the cost of nearly two years of war mounts. "That money is not coming back," opposition leader Yair Lapid said on X on Sunday. "Netanyahu is letting Smotrich and Ben Gvir run wild with extremist delusions just to preserve his coalition. Instead of plundering the middle class's money, end the war and bring back the hostages." 'Fantasies' The Palestinian Authority was scathing in appraisal of the proposed facility, with its foreign ministry saying: "The humanitarian city has nothing to do with humanity." That view was echoed by UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, which said the "plan would de-facto create massive concentration camps at the border with Egypt." A Palestinian official with knowledge of the ongoing ceasefire talks in Qatar told AFP that Hamas rejected plans to concentrate Palestinians in a small part of the south, viewing it as "preparation for forcibly displacing them to Egypt or other countries." Amnesty International, which has accused Israel of genocide, warned that relocating Gazans within the territory or "deporting them outside against their will would amount to the war crime of unlawful transfer." On Friday, 16 Israeli scholars of international law sent a letter to Katz and Zamir also warning the scheme could amount to a war crime. Michael Milshtein, an Israeli former military intelligence officer, called the plan one of many "fantasies" floated by Israel's leadership amid mounting public frustration with the war's trajectory and lack of a political solution. He also noted there was no existing infrastructure in the proposed zone, raising questions about provision of electricity and water. "There is only sand and fields, nothing," said Milshtein, who heads the Palestinian studies programme at Tel Aviv University. "Nobody tells the Israeli public what is the price and what are the consequences of reoccupying Gaza, from the economic, political and security points of view," he told AFP. "I really think that if people understand that the purpose of the war is the reoccupation of Gaza, there is going to be a lot of social unrest in Israel." — AFP
