Russia and Global South shaping multipolar digital future
Russia and the Global South have been strengthening ties and expanding digital cooperation in light of new opportunities opened by Western sanctions, according to delegates attending the country's first Global Digital Forum this week.
The two-day event, which kicked off on Thursday in Nizhny Novgorod, brought together government officials, business leaders, and experts from more than 100 countries, including China, India, and some African nations. Some of them shared their views with RT on the sidelines of the forum, highlighting prospects for collaboration in areas such as trade, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and technology transfer.
'China and Russia are strategic partners and good neighbors,' said Zhou Liqun, chairman of the Chinese Entrepreneurs' Union in Russia.
He noted that bilateral trade reached $240 billion last year, with China remaining Russia's top food product partner for 15 consecutive years. 'Even under sanctions, the number of Chinese companies in Russia is growing,' Zhou said, adding 'We see the trend of promising cooperation.'
Sun Tianshu, founder of the China-Russian Platform, pointed out that 'many opportunities in the (Russian) market [were] freed up' following the introduction of Western restrictions, allowing Chinese firms to step in. 'Trade between our countries has one tendency – growth,' he said, stressing that past challenges, including payment issues, had been resolved. 'Even if new problems appear, we will be able to solve them,' he argued.
Indian cybersecurity expert Sunny Vaghela called for closer cooperation in the AI and cyber fields. 'Russia is technologically advanced, and India is a hub of tech talent. Why not join hands to make AI and cyber a boom for both countries?' asked the CEO of Techdefence Labs. He added that some Russian companies were ready to come to India to collaborate.
African delegates voiced similar interest in digital partnerships, especially in sectors like agriculture, education, and information management.
'We came to learn how to bring AI and robotics home to help our people,' said Tanzanian expert Henry Nkya. 'Russia is using AI to boost productivity – we want to do the same.'
His colleague Mawazo Mataje emphasized the importance of knowledge exchange. 'We're looking at sharing skills, experiences, and cultural understanding between Russia and the Global South,' he said.
Bangladeshi entrepreneur Mohammad Saber Shah described the event as 'a truly encouraging experience,' saying he had the chance to meet IT professionals 'from around the globe.'
'This forum acts as a bridge between us,' helping identify gaps that can be filled through partnerships.
'Russia has long been a friend to Bangladesh – there's now real opportunity for digital collaboration,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
37 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Russia publishes names of fallen Ukrainian soldiers disowned by Kiev
Russian officials have unveiled the identities of nearly 100 slain Ukrainian soldiers, part of over 6,000 bodies Moscow has offered to return to Kiev in a unilateral humanitarian gesture during the latest round of direct talks in Istanbul on Monday. The governor of Russia's Zaporozhye Region, Evgeny Balitsky, published the first six pages containing 97 names, identification documents, and places of death on Saturday evening, after Ukraine reportedly refused to receive the remains of thousands of its fallen troops. 'We are beginning to publish lists of identified bodies so that relatives can find their dead,' he wrote. 'We understand that Kiev has this data, but they are deliberately hiding it from the public.' The Istanbul talks resulted in an agreement to exchange at least 1,000 prisoners on both sides, including critically ill and younger detainees. Russia also offered to return over 6,000 fallen Ukrainian soldiers for proper burial as part of a unilateral humanitarian initiative. The first convoy, carrying the remains of 1,212 troops, arrived at the designated exchange point on Saturday – but the Ukrainian side failed to appear, according to Lieutenant General Alexander Zorin, a member of the Russian negotiating team. 'The Ukrainian side unexpectedly postponed both the acceptance of bodies and the exchange of prisoners of war for an indefinite period,' Zorin said. Russia's lead negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, confirmed that Kiev had been handed a list of 640 wounded and young prisoners but did not show up at the exchange site. 'The reasons provided were various and rather strange,' he said, urging Kiev to 'adhere strictly to the schedule and agreements' and ensure the dead receive a proper burial. Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters has denied the accusations, claiming that both sides have been preparing for the prisoner and body exchanges. Ukrainian media later reported that the process had been postponed until next week, though no official new date has been confirmed. Balitsky accused Kiev of deliberately obstructing the return of the bodies, alleging that Ukrainian authorities are trying to conceal the scale of their military losses and avoid paying compensation to the families of the dead. 'As long as a Ukrainian soldier is listed as missing, his family will not receive a single hryvnia in aid,' the governor said. 'This is a calculated attempt to hide the losses and save money.' The refusal to retrieve the bodies is part of a broader pattern of violations by Ukraine, Balitsky argued, claiming Kiev 'does not even attempt to honor agreements.' He also blamed Western countries for 'derailing peaceful resolution efforts' by continuing to arm Kiev and escalate the conflict.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Mission: Regrettable – Ukraine's drone strike blows up in its face
For most people, June 1st is a cheerful date – the start of summer, a celebration of children. But from 2025 onward, it may also be remembered as the day Ukraine launched its largest covert operation in Russia since the start of the conflict. While the full impact of the operation is still unclear, estimates suggest anywhere from a handful to several dozen Russian aircraft were damaged or destroyed. The precise details will likely remain shrouded in speculation. What is certain, however, is that the Russian military must rethink how it defends strategic facilities. The traditional approach – based on intercepting missiles and deploying advanced air-defense systems – has proven inadequate against cheap drones that can be assembled from off-the-shelf parts and launched from almost anywhere. That lesson is now painfully clear. But the military will draw its own conclusions. Our focus should be on the political meaning of what happened. Make no mistake – this was not just a military act. Like much of what Ukraine does, this was political theater, staged for a very specific audience: Donald Trump. Kiev's objective was simple. Derail the Istanbul negotiations and paint Russia as the intransigent party. How? By provoking a furious response – one that would make headlines, stir outrage inside Russia, and force Moscow to walk away from the table. The idea was to provoke a reaction that Ukraine could then parade before Washington. The message? 'See? We told you they don't want peace. Arm us more!' It's not the first time they've tried this tactic. From the attack on the Kursk Bridge to the shelling of Donbass civilians, Ukraine has repeatedly used provocation as a diplomatic weapon – seeking to engineer Russia's diplomatic isolation by sabotaging any steps toward negotiation. And yet, once again, it didn't work. Despite outrage from parts of Russian society, Moscow did not take the bait. Our delegation flew to Istanbul as planned. There, negotiators presented Ukraine with a memorandum reiterating the same terms previously offered. Not a step back. At the same time, humanitarian agreements were reached – including a new exchange of prisoners and the return of fallen fighters' remains. So did Russia 'turn the other cheek'? Hardly. Moscow has adopted a strategy one might call an 'Italian strike' – doing the bare minimum to deny our enemies a propaganda victory, while withholding the kind of breakthroughs that would reward bad-faith behavior. Yes, the humanitarian measures agreed upon in Istanbul are important. But let's not kid ourselves – they are not steps toward a peace settlement. Politically, the situation is unchanged. However, there is a deeper issue now at play – one with far more serious implications. On June 1st, Ukrainian forces didn't just target military bases. They targeted components of Russia's nuclear deterrent. Under our official doctrine, an attack on the strategic nuclear infrastructure is grounds for the use of nuclear weapons. Now, no one is suggesting we nuke Kiev over a few aircraft, no matter how advanced or expensive. That would be disproportionate. But here lies the paradox: If Russia does nothing, it risks undermining the credibility of its own deterrence posture, and that sends a dangerous message. In the Western capitals and among Ukrainian hawks, there are already whispers: 'If they didn't respond to this, maybe they'll tolerate even more.' That may sound absurd – but that's how these people think. Their fantasies become policy more often than one would like. So what is the answer? Let's be honest: repeating slogans like 'our response will be success on the battlefield' won't cut it here. Ukraine's leadership isn't acting out of military logic, but emotional desperation. Their calculation is political. So Russia's response must be political, too – emotionally resonant, unmistakably firm, and, above all, creative. This doesn't mean rash escalation, but we can't rely on the old playbook. Hitting the same military targets again and again achieves little. Striking Ukraine's energy infrastructure? Done. Launching another missile as a 'demonstration'? Predictable. Escalating to mass casualties? Unnecessary and, frankly, counterproductive. So what's left? Innovation. Russia must now think asymmetrically. That might mean a covert action so unexpected that it catches Ukraine completely off guard. Or it could involve striking symbolic targets that shift the psychological balance. The key is to remind Kiev – and its patrons – that nothing they do goes unanswered, and that the cost of provocation will always outweigh the benefit. In truth, Russia has spent too long responding conventionally to a conflict that is anything but conventional. Our adversaries deal in optics, symbols, and theater. To counter that effectively, we must speak the same language – without abandoning our principles or resorting to theatrics of our own. The June 1st attack was not a turning point. But it was a warning. Not just about drones or airfields, but about perception and power. The next move, as always, is Russia's to make. And this time, it must be something they don't article was first published by the online newspaper and was translated and edited by the RT team
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia indicated readiness to prioritize POW swap with Ukraine
The Russian delegation made it clear to the Ukrainian team during the latest round of direct talks in Istanbul that Moscow was willing to prioritize and expedite a prisoner exchange, as well as the repatriation of the dead, Deputy Defense Minister Aleksandr Fomin has revealed. His comment came shortly after Russia on Saturday accused Ukraine of refusing to accept the return of its own POWs and the remains of its fallen troops on 'strange' pretexts. A major prisoner exchange, focusing on those heavily wounded and those under 25, was among the key points agreed upon by Moscow and Kiev during the negotiations in Türkiye on June 2. Additionally, Russia unilaterally offered to repatriate the bodies of over 6,000 slain Ukrainian military personnel as a humanitarian gesture. Speaking later on Saturday, Fomin stated that 'while discussing this topic with the Ukrainian delegation [in Istanbul], we specifically emphasized our readiness to address these issues on a priority basis and as swiftly as possible.' He added that on returning to Moscow, Russian officials immediately began preparing for the swap. Fomin characterized the discussions on the matter earlier this month as 'productive' and yielding 'concrete agreements.' He stressed that Russian officials had relayed their proposals to the Ukrainians in advance and that Moscow had been ready to conduct the swap this week, having dispatched its technical team to the Belarus-Ukraine border to work out the specifics. 'Yet, we still have not received Kiev's agreement to conduct humanitarian operations,' the deputy defense minister explained, adding that Ukrainian officials did not show up at the meeting point. Fomin said that Kiev has yet to provide a reason for the delay in the swap. He expressed hope that Ukrainian authorities would soon act on Moscow's proposal, emphasizing Russia's readiness to honor the agreement reached in Istanbul on Monday. Following the first round of direct talks in Istanbul last month, Moscow and Kiev successfully conducted a large prisoner exchange.
