
Want your money to have a positive impact? What to know about ESG investing
Investing in funds that align with your values such as supporting companies fighting climate change is much more accessible today, but experts say it takes research and diligence to determine if your money is actually working for a good cause.
'There's a whole cohort of young investors who have come to the realization that you can invest in a way that's consistent with the values that you have,' said John Bai, chief investment officer at NEI Investments.
The environmental, social and governance-focused investment landscape has changed and matured over the years with way more options now on the table, Bai said.
Steering away from investing in tobacco, ammunition or fossil fuel companies to those championing ESG issues can be appealing to investors but many don't know where to start — or what to look for when picking funds that support a good cause. Also, not all ESG funds are made the same.
Bai said investing with an ESG focus is not much different from regular investing. Similar to any investment decision-making process, an investor would go through a laundry list of their goals, financial plan, risk tolerance, asset allocation, and exposure to stocks and bonds.
But there's an extra step when investing responsibly.
'What you need to do as an investor is to write down the values that are most important to you,' Bai said. 'Then, what you need to do is read the disclosures of each fund.'
A low-cost, diversified portfolio can be an entry into sustainable investments, said Tim Nash, an investment coach at Good Investing, which helps people understand sustainable investing.
'These are going to be what I call 'doing-less-evil' ETFs,' he said. 'Our goal here is to earn market rates of return while getting rid of things that don't align with our values.'
Nash said it's important to see what's inside the fund and the companies it holds.
He warned some ESG-branded funds could still hold equities that aren't completely aligned with an individual's values.
For example, an ESG fund might exclude a tobacco company but keep Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. despite the retailer selling tobacco at its convenience stores, Nash said.
For a long time, many companies promoted themselves as being climate-friendly but that has changed. Companies have started to be more careful about their environmental and governance claims after the federal government tightened laws around sustainability disclosures last year.
'The key principle of regulations has been: Tell us what you do and do what you tell us,' Bai said.
He added every sustainable fund is required to tell the investor what ESG means to them and their philosophy, and explain it in their disclosures.
'The easiest way to ensure that what you're investing in aligns with your values is to read those disclosures,' Bai said.
And ask more questions. For example, question how a business that requires access to water or abundant energy approaches the issue, Bai said.
He said investors need to think and ask questions like these: Does the business want the cheapest energy possible? Do they take access to the water for granted? Are they working with the local communities to make sure there's fairness in terms of human capital? Are they paying fair wages? How are you thinking about child labour and supply chain?
The answers will give you a wider lens into how the fund managers think about risks and opportunities, Bai said.
Experts say there's a myth about ESG investments that people often have to forgo gains.
'That's not true at all,' Nash said.
'The goal is really to track the standard benchmarks … to earn the same rate of return while doing it aligned with your values.'
He said investing in ESG funds is a spectrum. A small step toward ESG-focused funds would not make an investor lose out on returns but the farther you go along the spectrum and cut more companies out of the fund, the returns could deviate — with returns a little bit higher some years while lower in others, Nash said.
But the long-term goal is to earn the same rate of return and that's still achievable, he said.
For instance, divestment from fossil fuels isn't really going to sacrifice huge gains as the industry makes up 3.8 per cent of the global market. If the energy sector outperforms though, investors are going to miss out on the high — ever so slightly, Nash said.
Political risks can also overshadow ESG funds. An example is when the Alberta government temporarily paused approvals for renewable energy projects two years ago, or the ongoing uncertainty with U.S. President Donald Trump's penchant to favour fossil fuels over renewable energy.
Nash said if investors are worried about political risk, they can opt for broader funds that focus on cleantech — a combination of energy, water, recycling and health tech, for example.
An investor can consider three main approaches to ESG investing, Bai said.
The first level is exclusion, he said.
'That means that these funds will just exclude bad actors in the way that they define bad actors — no cluster munition weapon providers, no tobacco, no nuclear are very common exclusions,' Bai said.
Then comes the integrated approach, which looks into how the company approaches ESG issues and if they're aligned with an investor's philosophy of a company creating long-term value.
A non-traditional and niche approach would include impact investments that focus on direct impacts. Those investments go into non-profits and co-ops, for instance, Nash said.
'But this is where we might be sacrificing returns, we might earn a little bit less or be taking a little more risk than we would have otherwise,' he said.
---
Ritika Dubey, The Canadian Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 24, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Three Yukon communities receive money to reduce risk of wildfire
The Yukon and federal government are spending $17 million over the next eight years to help reduce risk of wildfire in Whitehorse, Teslin and Haines Junction. The money will go toward building fire breaks and trimming trees.


Canada News.Net
2 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Quebec to 'Carefully Examine' New Proposal for Saguenay LNG Megaproject
The government of Premier Francois Legault is promising to "carefully examine" a proposal for a new gas liquefaction plant and terminal in the Saguenay-Lac St. Jean region that would be just as big as the GNL-Quebec megaproject the province rejected in 2021 after years of opposition, Le Devoir revealed in an exclusive dispatch Friday. The proposal by Marinvest Energy Canada, a subsidiary of Bergen, Norway-based Marinvest Energy, would also require a new pipeline through several hundred kilometres of wilderness to connect the plant with TC Energy's Canada-wide gas network, just as GNL-Quebec intended, Le Devoir writes. The gas would be produced by primarily by hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a methane-intensive process that is prohibited in Quebec. After squashing the previous LNG proposal, Quebec became the world's first jurisdiction to ban oil and gas exploration in 2022. "We believe there is a strong business case for an LNG [liquefied natural gas] project in Quebec aimed at exporting Canadian natural gas to international markets, particularly in Europe," Greg Cano, one of three Marinvest Energy Canada directors and the only one not based in Norway, told Le Devoir in an email. "We believe Quebec can play a key role in diversifying export options for Canadian natural gas, particularly at a time when relying solely on the U.S. market presents increasing challenges." That optimism runs counter to an analysis released just six weeks ago by Investors for Paris Compliance (IPC), which pointed to an expected 40% increase in global LNG production between 2024 and 2028 to argue that there's no business case for a new terminal in Quebec. European LNG demand was down 18% between 2022 and 2024, and the group said Canadian exporters would also have trouble competing in Asian markets, The Canadian Press reported at the time. "Investing in infrastructure that will be very expensive and likely won't be profitable will weaken our economy rather than strengthen it," economist and IPC senior advisor Renaud Gignac told the news agency. IPC warned that inflation could drive the cost of the $18-billion GNL-Quebec project above $33 billion, making it impossible to complete without taxpayer subsidies. "These are considerable investments that mobilize public capital and labour as well," Gignac said. "When you direct resources to this type of project, you make choices, and we believe there are options that could be more profitable in the long term, for both public and private investors." One of Marinvest's identified lobbying targets, Hydro-Quebec, has been going all-in on those other options, with a planned $185-billion investment in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and new transmission over the next decade. Cano also tried to position LNG as "carbon-free" energy, even though methane is a climate super-pollutant with about 84 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide over the crucial 20-year span when humanity will be scrambling to get climate change under control. The Legault rejected the notion that gas is carbon-free in its response to the GNL-Quebec bid, "emphasizing in particular that the project that was to be built in Saguenay risked 'disadvantaging the energy transition' in the countries that would purchase this liquefied natural gas," Le Devoir says. A provincial spokesperson told the paper it was too soon to say whether the project would be eligible for subsidies, and the office of Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson wouldn't say whether it would qualify as one of the "nation-building" projects the Carney government is looking for. But "the current context is disrupting several aspects of our economy," a spokesperson for provincial Economy and Energy Minister Christine Frechette told Le Devoir in a statement. "We have always said that if new projects are presented, we are ready to examine them carefully. That is what we will do with this one." The spokesperson added that "social acceptability remains an essential condition for any project, and there will have to be benefits for Quebec." In a release, Greenpeace Canada urged the Carney government to exclude the Marinvest proposal from its list of nation-building projects, while calling on Quebec to "close the door on new fossil fuel transportation and export projects so that it can focus on renewable energy." "We should be building offshore wind farms, not floating fossil fuel plants", said Greenpeace Senior Energy Strategist Keith Stewart. "There is no way that a fossil fuel project with so little consultation and such a weak business case should be on Mark Carney's list of projects that can bypass environmental laws." Marinvest has hired two lobbyists to carry its message to the provincial government, Le Devoir reports, and two in Ottawa, Greenpeace says.


Canada Standard
3 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Quebec to 'Carefully Examine' New Proposal for Saguenay LNG Megaproject
The government of Premier Francois Legault is promising to "carefully examine" a proposal for a new gas liquefaction plant and terminal in the Saguenay-Lac St. Jean region that would be just as big as the GNL-Quebec megaproject the province rejected in 2021 after years of opposition, Le Devoir revealed in an exclusive dispatch Friday. The proposal by Marinvest Energy Canada, a subsidiary of Bergen, Norway-based Marinvest Energy, would also require a new pipeline through several hundred kilometres of wilderness to connect the plant with TC Energy's Canada-wide gas network, just as GNL-Quebec intended, Le Devoir writes. The gas would be produced by primarily by hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a methane-intensive process that is prohibited in Quebec. After squashing the previous LNG proposal, Quebec became the world's first jurisdiction to ban oil and gas exploration in 2022. "We believe there is a strong business case for an LNG [liquefied natural gas] project in Quebec aimed at exporting Canadian natural gas to international markets, particularly in Europe," Greg Cano, one of three Marinvest Energy Canada directors and the only one not based in Norway, told Le Devoir in an email. "We believe Quebec can play a key role in diversifying export options for Canadian natural gas, particularly at a time when relying solely on the U.S. market presents increasing challenges." That optimism runs counter to an analysis released just six weeks ago by Investors for Paris Compliance (IPC), which pointed to an expected 40% increase in global LNG production between 2024 and 2028 to argue that there's no business case for a new terminal in Quebec. European LNG demand was down 18% between 2022 and 2024, and the group said Canadian exporters would also have trouble competing in Asian markets, The Canadian Press reported at the time. View our latest digests "Investing in infrastructure that will be very expensive and likely won't be profitable will weaken our economy rather than strengthen it," economist and IPC senior advisor Renaud Gignac told the news agency. IPC warned that inflation could drive the cost of the $18-billion GNL-Quebec project above $33 billion, making it impossible to complete without taxpayer subsidies. "These are considerable investments that mobilize public capital and labour as well," Gignac said. "When you direct resources to this type of project, you make choices, and we believe there are options that could be more profitable in the long term, for both public and private investors." One of Marinvest's identified lobbying targets, Hydro-Quebec, has been going all-in on those other options, with a planned $185-billion investment in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and new transmission over the next decade. Cano also tried to position LNG as "carbon-free" energy, even though methane is a climate super-pollutant with about 84 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide over the crucial 20-year span when humanity will be scrambling to get climate change under control. The Legault rejected the notion that gas is carbon-free in its response to the GNL-Quebec bid, "emphasizing in particular that the project that was to be built in Saguenay risked 'disadvantaging the energy transition' in the countries that would purchase this liquefied natural gas," Le Devoir says. A provincial spokesperson told the paper it was too soon to say whether the project would be eligible for subsidies, and the office of Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson wouldn't say whether it would qualify as one of the "nation-building" projects the Carney government is looking for. But "the current context is disrupting several aspects of our economy," a spokesperson for provincial Economy and Energy Minister Christine Frechette told Le Devoir in a statement. "We have always said that if new projects are presented, we are ready to examine them carefully. That is what we will do with this one." The spokesperson added that "social acceptability remains an essential condition for any project, and there will have to be benefits for Quebec." In a release, Greenpeace Canada urged the Carney government to exclude the Marinvest proposal from its list of nation-building projects, while calling on Quebec to "close the door on new fossil fuel transportation and export projects so that it can focus on renewable energy." "We should be building offshore wind farms, not floating fossil fuel plants", said Greenpeace Senior Energy Strategist Keith Stewart. "There is no way that a fossil fuel project with so little consultation and such a weak business case should be on Mark Carney's list of projects that can bypass environmental laws." Marinvest has hired two lobbyists to carry its message to the provincial government, Le Devoir reports, and two in Ottawa, Greenpeace says. Source: The Energy Mix