Karnataka HC lifts media gag in Dharmasthala mass burials case, calls it unconstitutional
Justice M Nagaprasanna, who delivered the ruling, held that the public's right to know cannot be curtailed, especially in a matter involving allegations of serious institutional failure and the possibility of criminal wrongdoing, India Today reported.
The High Court's order came in response to a petition filed by the YouTube channel Kudle Rampage, which was one of 338 respondents barred from publishing any content related to the case.
(Also Read: Prajwal Revanna convicted: A look back at the high-profile rape case that shook Karnataka)
According to the publication, the lower court had earlier issued an ex-parte injunction prohibiting all reporting or commentary on the ongoing investigation, drawing criticism from press freedom advocates.
In his judgment, Justice Nagaprasanna ruled that the trial court's order had the effect of creating a 'chilling effect' on journalism and public accountability.
Advocate A Velan, who represented the petitioners, welcomed the verdict and issued a statement soon after the ruling.
Velan emphasised that the verdict restored media freedom in a case that had raised disturbing questions about illegal mass burials, long-term institutional lapses, and the role of law enforcement.
While the matter has been remanded back to the trial court for reconsideration, the High Court has laid down a clear framework that upholds the principles of natural justice and freedom of expression.
Dharmasthala mass burial case: Updates
Meanwhile, the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the alleged mass graves in Dharmasthala has intensified security and forensic protocols at a newly identified burial site, after the recovery of skeletal remains suspected to be part of a larger ossuary.
The remains were discovered during an excavation at 'Point Number 6', the sixth site identified so far in the ongoing investigation. The location was flagged by the primary complainant in the case, which centres on allegations of hundreds of undocumented burials in and around the temple town.
Officials said the latest discovery marked a significant development, lending further weight to claims of widespread irregularities in burials across the region.
(With agency inputs)
(Also Read: RPF intercepts trafficking operation, saves 56 girls bound for Bengaluru: Report)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BCA graduate who learned snatching from YouTube, his MSc accomplice held; gold chains recovered: Police
The Chandigarh Police has arrested a BCA graduate and former HR executive of a multinational company in Mohali, who reportedly confessed to learning how to snatch gold chains by watching YouTube videos. His associate, an MSc postgraduate employed at a courier company, has also been arrested. The duo is linked to a series of snatchings across Chandigarh, Mohali, and Panchkula, with gold jewellery worth lakhs recovered during the probe. Five gold chains, a gold mangalsutra, and two gold pendants, have been recovered from the accused, police said. The team, led by Inspector Rajiv Kumar, SHO of the police station 31, arrested the accused Abhishek Ojha (30), a native of Agra currently residing in Panchkula. His associate, Ashok Kumar (28) also from Agra, was also arrested during a follow-up raid in Uttar Pradesh (UP). The accused were arrested in connection with a FIR on July 24, registered at the police station 31, Chandigarh, on the complaint of a local resident, Preeti. She reported that on July 23, at around 8.30 pm, she was returning home when an unidentified bike rider snatched her gold mangalsutra near the AFFWA Complex in Sector 31. She informed police that she would be able to identify the accused if confronted. Following her complaint, the police arrested Ojha on August 1 and recovered a knife from his possession. During the interrogation, he confessed to multiple snatchings in different areas of Chandigarh, including Sectors 31, 34, 36, 39, and 19, as well as in Mohali and Panchkula. He also admitted to sending the snatched jewellery to his associate Ashok in Agra, through courier services. Police obtained a five-day remand for Abhishek and launched raids in Agra and Aligarh, leading to the arrest of Ashok on August 3. Ashok was found in possession of the mangalsutra that had been snatched in the Sector-31 case. He was produced before court and sent to three-day police remand. A subsequent raid conducted in Panchkula on August 4 led to the recovery of three gold chains, two gold pendants, and a pair of number plates. The Bajaj Pulsar N-250 motorcycle used in the crimes, which had no number plate, was also seized. Police also recovered a DTDC courier slip, confirming that the stolen jewellery had been sent to Ashok by Abhishek. Police said that during investigation, it was revealed that Abhishek, a BCA graduate, previously worked as an HR professional at a multinational company in Mohali. He told police he learned how to commit snatching by watching YouTube videos and initially carried out crimes in Agra, where three snatching cases are already registered against him. He later moved to Panchkula in March 2025 and began targeting women across the Tricity areas. He often removed his motorcycle's number plate to evade identification and committed crimes for 'pleasure and easy money'. His associate, Ashok, is an MSc graduate and works in a courier company. While he has no previous criminal record, he played a key role in concealing and storing stolen items on behalf of Abhishek, a police official added. Both accused are currently in police remand, and further investigation is underway to trace more stolen property and examine any additional accomplices involved in the snatching racket, police said.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Elgar Parishad case: Court junks Navlakhas plea seeking to live in Delhi
Mumbai, Aug 5 (PTI) A special NIA court here has refused permission to activist Gautam Navlakha, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case, to live in Delhi for a brief period while rebuking him for seeking the same relief repeatedly. In the order passed on August 1, judge C S Baviskar said Navlakha, ordered to stay in Mumbai as part of his bail condition, had ingeniously found the trick to file multiple applications seeking same reliefs. The order copy became available on Tuesday. In November 2024, the special court for National Investigation Agency cases had granted him permission to stay in Delhi for two months. In his latest application, Navlakha relied on this order while seeking permission to live in Delhi again for 45 days. 'It is not at all expected. I recapitulate, the thing you shall not do directly, cannot do even indirectly," the court said in the order. While rejecting the application, it was restraining itself from imposing cost on Navlakha, it added. The earlier permission to live in Delhi for two months did not give him the license to claim the same liberty repeatedly, the court said. The Bombay High Court, while granting Navlakha bail, had laid down that he shall remain in Mumbai considering the seriousness of the offences in this case, the special court said. 'The applicant/accused may show total disregard towards the expectations of the High Court in its order that he should reside within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court. However, the directions of the High Court are happily binding on this Court and this Court has to follow it scrupulously," the order said. Navlakha (72), a permanent resident of Delhi, was arrested in the case in April 2020. He was granted bail in 2024. The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches made at the Elgar Parishad conclave held in Pune on December 31, 2017, which police claimed triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial near Pune. Sixteen activists were arrested in the case. PTI SP KRK view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Can't give nod ‘every now and then': Court rejects Navlakha's plea to travel to Delhi
A special court rejected a plea filed by activist Gautam Navlakha, arrested in the Elgaar Parishad case, to stay in Delhi for 45 days to visit his 86-year-old sister and for other purposes. In his plea, Navlakha sought permission to stay in Delhi from July 15 to August 30, citing that he had been similarly permitted in November 2024 and had abided with all conditions. Rejecting the plea, the court stated that being allowed to travel and stay once in Delhi, does not mean that 'every now and then', he will be granted permission. Navlakha, a Delhi resident, was granted bail by the Bombay High Court in December 2023, with one of the conditions being that he cannot leave the jurisdiction of the trial court in Mumbai without its permission. In April this year, the 72-year-old Navlakha cited living expenses and increasing finances in Mumbai to seek permission to shift to Delhi, pending trial, which the special court had rejected, stating that the high court set conditions did not permit it. The trial in the case is yet to begin, seven years after the first arrests in 2018. In the latest plea, he submitted that he wants to travel as his sister cannot come to Mumbai due to her health condition. He also submitted that he wants to meet his partner's children and grandchildren who are visiting in August, whom he has not met since his arrest in 2020. He also submitted that he wants to visit his doctor and take care of domestic affairs. Special judge C S Baviskar said that the High Court had in its 'magnanimous humanity', granted permission to Navlakha to travel but with the permission of the trial court. 'While imposing such conditions, the Hon'ble High Court axiomatically expected the accused not to go beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, save for exceptional and extraordinary circumstance and that too, only after prior permission of the trial court ie. this court,' the court said, in its order on July 30, made available this week. The special court said that Navlakha in moving a plea previously rejected, to shift to Delhi had shown 'utter disregard towards intention and objective of the Hon'ble High Court' and called his plea to seek permission now to stay in Delhi for 45 days, a 'trick'. 'Now, perhaps to give go by to the intention and directions of the Hon'ble High Court as above, the applicant/accused ingeniously has found out the trick of moving such application after application with the same prayer on the same grounds to facilitate him to reside at Delhi. It is not at all expected,' the court said.
