North Yorkshire farmers 'go to vets for advice on their health'
The study found that many farmers struggled to take time off work due to the demands of looking after livestock and crops, and prioritised work over their health and wellbeing.Some farmers also told researchers they were worried about confidentiality in small rural communities if they sought help, particularly for mental health issues.
'Many barriers'
Others said they worried that disclosing mental health issues to a doctor could lead to their gun licence being revoked, which was essential for their work and social life.The report noted that farmers often had strong relationships with their vets and may feel more comfortable discussing health concerns with them rather than with a doctor.The report also said there were "many barriers" preventing the farming community from seeking help for health and wellbeing issues.According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, these included time constraints, logistical challenges, lack of awareness, geographical isolation and stigma.The report, compiled after speaking to farmers at shows in Nidderdale, Masham, Leyburn, Skipton and Thirsk, recommended providing health promotion and prevention services at auction marts and rural pubs, and organising a mobile health unit in rural areas of the county.Other ideas included encouraging rural professionals working with the farming community, such as vets, to undertake training to help them identify potential health issues and signpost farmers to the right resources.The report said that it was best to avoid clinical language with farmers and instead use "terminology and humour that resonates with the farming community".The study is due to be discussed by members of North Yorkshire Council's health scrutiny committee next week.
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
New study reveals US children have only been getting unhealthier
A new study reveals a significant decline in the health of children in the United States over the past 17 years, encompassing increased rates of obesity, chronic diseases, and mental health issues. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found that obesity rates for US children aged 2-19 rose from 17 per cent in 2007-2008 to approximately 21 per cent in 2021-2023. US children in 2023 were 15 to 20 per cent more likely to have a chronic condition like anxiety or depression compared to 2011, with the annual prevalence of 97 chronic conditions increasing from 40 per cent to 46 per cent. Alarmingly, American children were around 1.8 times more likely to die than children in other high-income countries between 2007 and 2022, with higher mortality from premature birth, sudden unexpected death, firearm incidents, and motor vehicle crashes. Experts suggest that current policies, including cuts to federal health agencies and programmes, are unlikely to reverse this trend, with one author noting that the decline reflects broader societal issues.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The Salt Path author dropped by charity amid embezzlement row
The author of The Salt Path has been dropped by a leading charity after she was accused of embezzling £64,000. Raynor Winn's best-selling memoir tells the story of the author and her husband Moth, who decided to walk the 630-mile South West Coast Path after their home was repossessed and Moth was diagnosed with a degenerative disease. But concerns have been raised about the veracity of Winn's account, following the book's film adaption, starring Jason Isaacs and Gillian Anderson. The loss of their home has been allegedly linked to legal troubles following the embezzlement of money, and doubt has been cast over Moth's 2013 diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Now, PSPA, a charity dedicated to helping sufferers of CBD, has cut ties with the Winns. The couple had previously raised funds for the charity, including a 2024 walk of the London Marathon route. A spokesman for the PSPA said: 'We were shocked and disappointed to learn of the allegations made about Raynor and Moth Winn. 'Raynor and Moth worked with many individuals and organisations since their first book was published, including PSPA. 'We received the family's need for support, and desire to raise awareness of PSP and CBD in good faith.' They added: 'Whilst we are thankful for the awareness opportunities their story has provided; too many questions currently remain unanswered. 'Therefore, we have made the decision to terminate our relationship with the family.' The charity said that sufferers of CBD in particular would 'feel angry, let down and eager for clarity'. CBD causes difficulties with movement, speech, memory and swallowing, symptoms that worsen as the disease progresses. Those with the disease have a typical life expectancy of six to eight years following the first onset of symptoms. Neurologists have shared doubts about Moth's CBD diagnosis with the Observer, which first published the allegations, questioning both how long he has lived with the disease and his ability to engage in long-distance walks. Sources also claimed the loss of the farmhouse followed financial difficulty caused by Winn embezzling funds of her employer. Ros Hemmings accused Winn of taking money while she worked part-time as a bookkeeper for an estate agency and property surveyor in Pwllheli, North Wales, in the 2000s. Ms Hemmings told the Observer that £64,000 was taken. It has been claimed that, to avoid criminal prosecution, Winn allegedly borrowed £100,000, secured against their house, and repaid the money to Ms Hemmings and her husband. This loan was later called in and their house was repossessed, it has been claimed. The Observer investigation also claimed that the Winns are actually called Sally and Tim Walker. Winn has branded the claims as 'highly misleading' and is considering legal action. 'We are taking legal advice and won't be making any further comment at this time,' she said. 'The Salt Path lays bare the physical and spiritual journey Moth and I shared, an experience that transformed us completely and altered the course of our lives. 'This is the true story of our journey.' The author has been forced to cancel a planned tour of a show called Saltlines, a music and prose collaboration between Winn and The Gigspanner Big Band. Winn's team said: 'She is deeply sorry to let down those who were planning to attend the Saltlines tour, but while this process is ongoing, she will be unable to take part. We appreciate your understanding and support during this time.'
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Charity won't give parents of dying girl, 2, £100k in donations
A couple whose nine-year-old son died of cancer and whose daughter is terminally ill claim that a charity refused to hand over £100,000 of donations. Kyle Morrison was diagnosed in 2019 with an incurable brain cancer. Before his death, supporters donated thousands to pay for potential treatment in the US and 'memory making' experiences for the family. However, the Covid pandemic meant that the family could not travel before the boy died a year later. His parents, Craig Evison and Victoria Morrison, went on to have a daughter, Ruby-Rose, now two, but she too is seriously ill with a genetic metabolic disease and is said to be unlikely to live beyond this summer. The couple launched a GoFundMe page — under the name 'Ruby-Rose's Making Memories Fund' — in an attempt to take her to Disney World. But when they tried to claim almost £100,000 left from the money donated for their deceased son, the parents were told it would not be paid because Ruby-Rose was not suffering from cancer. The parents have now launched a High Court claim against Gold Geese, the charity that holds the money, claiming it should fund their daughter's trip to see her beloved Minnie Mouse. However, officials at the charity have told the court that the money cannot be paid out because the donations were made for Kyle when he was a cancer patient. They argue that the funds can be spent only on medical trials or another child in a 'similar' situation to the couple's son. The judge, Marc Glover, was told that Kyle was diagnosed with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, a rare form of cancer, when he was eight. A significant amount was raised through Golden Geese, which is based in Essex, and Kyle was scheduled to travel to the US for treatment in late 2020. By the time that pandemic restrictions were eased, the boy was too ill and he died in October of that year. The parents, who also have another son, went on to have their daughter, Ruby-Rose, in 2022, but she was diagnosed with Megdel syndrome, a genetic metabolic condition characterised by high levels of acid in the body, which is usually fatal in early infanthood. Representing themselves in court, the couple have told the judge that their daughter was unlikely to live beyond this summer. They said that the money raised for Kyle should now go to their daughter. Morrison told the court: 'We just want the money to make as many memories as we can.' But William Moffett, a barrister representing the charity, responded that the fund raised for their son could be used only for children with cancer, not other diseases. The lawyer referred to a contract agreed by the parents stating that if the money were not spent on their son's treatment before he died, it would go to a trial or the cause of a child in a 'similar' position. Moffett said that it would have been impossible for donors to the son's cause to have meant for the money to benefit Ruby-Rose, as she had not been born at the time that it was pledged. The barrister reminded the court that 'Gold Geese is a cancer charity, it's on its logo', before adding: 'There are other charities whose objects would include assisting someone with Ruby-Rose's condition, but it wouldn't be proper for Gold Geese to stray outside the illness of child cancer.' The charity's position is that it was behaving as it was 'legally obliged to do within the ambit of their purpose'. However, the couple insisted that the contract allows money to be spent for Ruby-Rose's benefit, as they maintained that their daughter fell into the definition of a 'similar' case, as stated in the agreement. The judge will rule at a later date.
