Four astronauts return home from space station after splashdown
An international crew of four astronauts is back home on Earth Saturday after nearly five months aboard the International Space Station, returning safely in a SpaceX capsule.
The spacecraft carrying U.S. astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi and Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov splashed down off California's coast at 8:44 a.m. local time.
Their return marks the end of the 10th crew rotation mission to the space station under NASA's Commercial Crew Program, which was created to succeed the Space Shuttle era by partnering with private industry.
The Dragon capsule of billionaire Elon Musk's SpaceX company detached from the International Space Station (ISS) on Friday.
When these capsules reenter Earth's atmosphere, they heat up to 3,500 degrees Fahrenheit (1,925 Celsius), according to NASA.
Atmospheric reentry -- then the deployment of huge parachutes when the capsule gets closer to Earth -- slows its speed from 17,500 miles (28,100 kilometers ) per hour to just 16 miles per hour.
After the capsule splashed down, it was recovered by a SpaceX ship and hoisted aboard. Only then were the astronauts able to breathe Earth's air again, for the first time in months.
The crew will now fly to Houston to be reunited with their families.
They conducted numerous scientific experiments during their time on the space station, including studying plant growth, how cells react to gravity, and the effect of microgravity on human eyes.
NASA acting Administrator Sean Duffy praised the successful mission.
"Our crew missions are the building blocks for long-duration, human exploration pushing the boundaries of what's possible," he said in a NASA statement.
McClain said her farewell to the ISS was "bittersweet" because she may never return.
"Every day, this mission depends on people from all over the world," she wrote on X.
"It depends on government and commercial entities, it depends on all political parties, and it depends on commitment to an unchanged goal over many years and decades."
NASA said last month it would lose about 20 percent of its workforce -- around 3,900 employees -- under cuts from the U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping effort to trim the federal workforce.
Trump has meanwhile prioritized crewed missions to the Moon and Mars.
The Crew-10's launch into space in March allowed two U.S. astronauts to return home after being unexpectedly stuck aboard the space station for nine months.
When they launched in June 2024, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were only supposed to spend eight days in space on a test of the Boeing Starliner's first crewed flight.
However, the spaceship developed propulsion problems and was deemed unfit to fly back, leaving them in space for an indefinite period.
NASA announced this week that Wilmore has decided to retire after 25 years of service at the U.S. space agency.
Last week, U.S. astronauts Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, Japan's Kimiya Yui and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov boarded the ISS for a six-month mission.
© 2025 AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nikkei Asia
2 days ago
- Nikkei Asia
Russia's shrinking navy reveals its growing strategic dependence on China
A ceremony on July 31 following the arrival of Chinese naval vessels in Vladivostok, Russia, ahead of Chinese-Russian joint naval drills in the Sea of Japan. © Reuters Hao Nan is a research fellow with the Charhar Institute and a nuclear futures fellow (2025-2026) with the Ploughshares Fund & Horizon 2045.
Japan Times
4 days ago
- Japan Times
The real nuclear moonshot is here on Earth
In America in 2025 it's tough to know which we will see first, the Epstein files or a nuclear power plant on the moon. The Trump administration certainly seems more committed to the latter. Transportation Secretary and acting head of NASA Sean Duffy wants a lunar-ready reactor by 2030. This is certainly one way of pushing more federal funding toward advanced reactor research. It also magnifies, through a fantastical lens, the broader hype around new nuclear power — and the daunting challenge of getting it deployed to meet our more immediate needs for carbon-free power back here at home. Developing extraterrestrial nuclear power is a worthy research project. If we are to someday establish permanent settlements on the moon, they will require a lot of energy for melting ice, growing food, mining crypto and whatnot. Nuclear power offers the benefit of requiring relatively little fuel for high output and, unlike solar power, could keep running through the roughly two-weeklong lunar night. NASA already has an ongoing effort to develop a 40 kilowatt reactor design, the Fission Surface Power project. A typical nuclear plant is one gigawatt, or 25,000 times that, and even so-called small modular reactor, or SMR, designs usually aim for tens of megawatts. Duffy is aiming for a 100 kilowatt unit. The U.S. has certainly designed nuclear reactors for demanding environments before, like beneath the Greenland ice cap or inside submarines sailing the ocean depths. But developing one that can operate safely in the face of the moon's ultraextreme temperatures, low gravity and exposure to solar radiation, to cite a few wrinkles, is far beyond that. It would also have to be carried almost a quarter-of-a-million miles through space and deposited gently on the lunar surface. The transport cost alone would be literally astronomical. NASA has previously targeted a reactor weight of under six metric tons. Even assuming that could be met, before taking into account the cost of designing and building the thing, shipping it skyward could cost $7 billion alone — or, on a per kilowatt basis, roughly 6,000 times the estimated cost of building a regular nuclear plant on Earth. Putting dollars towards this when ordinary household power bills are taking off possibly doesn't present the best optics. Conceivably, Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, might eventually cut that shipping cost dramatically. But this rather assumes we are all happy putting fissile material on rockets that have sometimes spontaneously disassembled in spectacular fashion as well as U.S. President Donald Trump allowing such a contract to go to one of Elon Musk's companies in the first place. You don't go to the moon to save money, though. The bigger problem here is the five-year goal. True, the U.S. crushed that 1960s end-of-decade space deadline. But the U.S. nuclear power industry's track record is less inspiring. One of the main pitches for SMRs is that they offer a solution to the time and cost overruns that have plagued conventional plants. As of today, however, only one developer, NuScale Power, has received approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for its reactor, and there are no commercial reactors under construction. Trump has signed several executive orders to reinvigorate the U.S. nuclear sector by streamlining approvals and directing national laboratories and the military to pitch in, calling for 10 gigawatts of new capacity to get under way by the end of this decade. Strategic considerations mean the ambition is laudable enough and there are signs of growing interest in nuclear power, from Silicon Valley's hyperscalers to New York's governor. But interest does not a nuclear renaissance make — and certainly not one that delivers at scale this side of 2030. The inherent risks and higher costs involved in first-of-a-kind deployments of new nuclear capacity mean potential customers would rather see someone else take the plunge first. Even the hyperscalers, with their deep pockets and power-hungry AI ambitions, remain long on intent and short on binding commitments. There is much government push but less in the way of market pull, as Bloomberg NEF's Chris Gadomski summed up in a recent report. Yet you wouldn't know that from looking at the stocks of SMR startups, which have launched early. Duffy's lunar ambitions will no doubt add to the enthusiasm. But for the SMR darlings, delivering on such high-priced expectations, just for here on plain old planet Earth, is a moonshot already. Liam Denning is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering energy.
Yomiuri Shimbun
4 days ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
French Nuclear Plant Shut down by ‘Massive' Jellyfish Swarm
A major nuclear power plant in northern France temporarily shut down because of the presence of a 'massive and unforeseeable' swarm of jellyfish inside its cooling system. Électricité de France, the national electric utility company that operates the Gravelines nuclear power plant, said three reactors automatically shut down Sunday night and a fourth on Monday morning after jellyfish appeared in the filtration drums of the plant's water pumping stations, which it said are 'located in the non-nuclear part of the facilities.' This means all of the plant's reactors were nonoperational as of Tuesday, because its remaining two reactors were previously shut for maintenance. The automatic shutdown 'had no impact on the safety of the facilities, the safety of personnel, or the environment,' EDF said. The French utility said its teams were working to safely restart the reactors. Laura Mandin, a spokeswoman for EDF, said in an emailed statement Tuesday that the production units were expected to restart in the coming days, adding that it would be 'a gradual process.' Cathy Lucas, an associate professor in marine biology at the University of Southampton in Britain, said EDF's report of a 'massive' presence of jellyfish could be a reference to a jellyfish bloom – when a specific area suddenly experiences a big increase in its jellyfish population after the gelatinous invertebrates begin to reproduce more quickly or find an environment that favors their survival. Jellyfish are highly adaptable. Many species of jellyfish grow rapidly when the water is warm and in a specific range of salinity. This summer's heat wave in Europe – with temperatures exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius) in parts of the continent – has probably created ideal conditions for certain types of jellyfish to reproduce more rapidly and in higher numbers, Lucas said. Other factors promoting jellyfish blooms include overfishing, which helps eliminate many of the jellyfish's competitors and predators, leaving more food for them, said Lucas. When the weather is warm and the sea is calm, jellyfish tend to float closer to the surface of the water, Lucas added – and because they are weak swimmers, once they form a bloom, it is difficult for them to swim away. This could explain how jellyfish in the North Sea could have gotten sucked into the systems at Gravelines, she added. Jellyfish forced a shutdown at the Torness nuclear plant in Scotland in 2011 and at the Oskarshamn plant in Sweden in 2013, among other incidents. In both cases, the shutdown and cleanup lasted a few days. The Gravelines nuclear power plant is on the coast of the North Sea, about halfway between Calais and Dunkirk in northern France, and uses seawater to cool its reactors. The water is filtered through large drums designed to capture fine particles before being processed through pumping stations. Typically, the filters help stop sea life and other marine elements from getting into the pumping stations. Ronan Tanguy, a nuclear engineer at the World Nuclear Association, told the BBC that the jellyfish's gelatinous bodies may have allowed them to 'evade the first set of filters then get caught in the secondary drum system.' He said the shutdown would have been automatically triggered for safety when the blockage prevented the systems from pumping enough water. He told the BBC that the incident was a 'non-nuclear event' and more a 'nuisance' for employees to clean up. Mandin said EDF does not know the species of jellyfish involved in the incident. The Gravelines plant has six pressurized water reactors that started operating between 1980 and 1985. Together, they produced about 32.7 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2024, equivalent to 9 percent of France's nuclear power generation, according to EDF. The plant generates enough power to meet up to 70 percent of the Hauts-de-France region's electricity needs, EDF says.
