
Money Problem: 'easyJet wouldn't refund a name change despite my sister-in-law's dying wish'
"My terminally-ill sister-in-law passed away days before one final trip to Scotland with my wife. One of her last wishes was for my wife to go on the trip with me instead, so I paid £120 to change her name on the ticket to mine. But when I applied for a refund, the airline told me this isn't covered in their bereavement policy. I believe this is wrong - what can I do?"
It's hard not to sympathise with Anthony's predicament here.
His wife Debra had planned to fly to Edinburgh from Gatwick with her sister Tania on 11 April. As it started to dawn on Tania that she wouldn't make it, she wanted Anthony to take her place.
She died on 21 March.
So, Anthony did what any brother-in-law would have done - respect one of her dying wishes.
Paying £120 to change the name on the plane ticket wasn't an issue for Anthony, but he had expected this outlay to be covered for one specific reason.
"If I got anything back, I would donate it to the Royal Legion, as Tania sold poppies every year," he told us.
"This isn't about the money."
So here's what the dispute hinged on...
What easyJet's policy says
"If the booker or a passenger on the booking is deceased, we can offer a full or partial refund to the original method of payment," the airline's website states.
Digging into the terms and conditions, section 5.3.2 has this to say:
"If you need to cancel due to a family bereavement: please contact our Customer Services Team as soon as you can. Our team will review your case and if your circumstances qualify we may, in our discretion, offer you a refund, fee waiver to change your flight or flight voucher towards the value of a subsequent flight, to be used within twelve months. You may be asked to provide proof of these special circumstances."
Notice there is no mention here of changing names - more on this shortly.
Anthony went ahead and changed the name for £60 per flight, amounting to £120. He then requested a refund via the website.
Three days later, he got a response - seen by the Money team - telling him: "Regrettably, I must inform you that the name change fee is not covered under our bereavement policy. Therefore, we are unable to process a refund for this fee."
Conflicting accounts
That's when Anthony reached out to us, and, naturally, we approached easyJet to find out more.
The airline said it advised Anthony of two options: a refund on the flight or a voucher for the full value of the booking.
These are set out on easyJet's website - as we outlined above - but these weren't options Anthony was ever likely to choose, given Tania's wish.
Moreover, Anthony insists he was not informed of these options.
So we went back to easyJet.
What did easyJet say?
The airline maintains it explained to Anthony what his options were.
"We understand that our customers' plans may change due to bereavement and so we strive to make the process as easy as possible during this difficult time," it said.
"We offer the option to request a refund or voucher for the full value of the booking, which would allow them to rebook the same or different flight with different passengers if they still wished to travel.
"We advised Mr Worthington of these options when he contacted us explaining that a name change fee would not be refundable, and provided a link to request a refund or voucher."
But there was, ultimately, good news for Anthony.
"However, on this occasion we have refunded the change fee as a gesture of goodwill," the airline added.
Anthony was, of course, happy with that "amazing news", but he did have one final thought.
"I did take them to task, though, when they said the refund was as a gesture of goodwill, which suggested a mistake or misunderstanding on my part," he said.
"I Googled easyJet bereavement, and it clearly says easyJet will try and assist to make whatever changes are needed in the case of bereavement."
On the airline's website here, it does state this: "In the unfortunate event that you're cancelling or have missed your flight because of bereavement, we'll do our best to help you with cancelling or making any necessary changes to your flight."
Hopefully, this at least gave Anthony, Debra and their family more space to grieve.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Why late Queen refused to attend venue's official opening
Lord Ivar Mountbatten, a relative of the late Queen Elizabeth, was prevented from taking his shotguns on a flight from Bristol to Aberdeen. The incident occurred as he was travelling to Balmoral to join the Queen for a shooting weekend. Airport staff deemed the plane's hold insecure for the firearms, despite Lord Ivar explaining his royal destination. Upon hearing the account, Queen Elizabeth became 'rather irritated' and dispatched her equerry to arrange for the guns' transportation. The Queen then quipped that she would refuse to open the airport's new terminal, which was subsequently opened by the Princess Royal.

The Independent
11 hours ago
- The Independent
Why does British Airways want to charge £652 for switching one domestic flight?
Many transatlantic flights overfly the Outer Hebrides; my British Airways flight last week from London to Denver did just that. But for the residents of Scotland's wonderful Western Isles, reaching America proves a palaver. Dolina MacLeod and her husband face a long journey in October when they travel from the Outer Hebrides to visit their daughter in New York. 'We booked some time ago on British Airways from Edinburgh to New York via London Heathrow, both ways,' she says. 'Since then, flight schedules have updated.' Many people like to book flights months ahead. You have a fair chance of getting a better fare. But one downside is that airlines may tweak their schedules. A one-hour shift earlier or later is not much of a problem for straightforward point-to-point flights. But for connecting flights, it can mean an extended wait and a much longer journey overall. 'I enquired with British Airways to change the last leg of our journey – from Heathrow to Edinburgh – to an Inverness flight,' says Ms MacLeod. 'This provides easier transportation links to return home to the Outer Hebrides.' The extra distance is 112 miles. The extra cost? 'I was incredibly shocked to be quoted £652 as the charge to make this change,' she says. 'I accept that there will always be amendment charges but the charges being quoted are more than the original fare for the entire trip from Edinburgh to NYC and back for one person.' Ms MacLeod also spotted that the very Heathrow-Inverness flight she wished to fly on is being sold for just £56 one way, including a checked bag. So how could this bizarre state of affairs come about: that so small an amendment could trigger such a surge in cost? And is there anything to stop the couple from simply buying London-Inverness tickets? Let me explain. Passengers rationally want to book at the lowest possible fare. Airlines are prepared to sell cheap tickets – but always with strings attached. If changes are permitted at all, they will come with an amendment fee plus any increase when the fare is recalculated. Edinburgh-London-New York and back, booked months ahead, is a different beast from an outbound flight to JFK from the Scottish capital, but returning to Inverness, two months out. Computer doesn't say 'no', but it does say '£652'. Unreasonable? It might appear so, but the dark art of airline revenue management makes that sort of figure inevitable. Connecting flights such as Ms MacLeod's, going New York-London-Edinburgh tend to be cheaper than non-stop JFK-Heathrow tickets, because other airlines are offering enticingly priced routings via Dublin, Reykjavik or Amsterdam. So what's to stop them from forfeiting the Heathrow-Edinburgh leg and just buying those new flights? Plenty. First, as soon as you 'no-show' for a segment of a multi-stop journey, you are technically in breach of contract and the airline could pursue you for the difference in cost between what you paid for and what you actually flew. Ending the journey at Heathrow without taking the onward flight could easily trigger an additional fare of hundreds of pounds. In practice, carriers do not chase passengers for the difference in fare unless there is clear evidence of repeated 'tariff abuse' – which, of course, does not apply to the Hebridean couple. I confess I once booked an Orlando-Manchester-Dublin ticket with no intention of using the leg to the Irish capital, thereby saving £500. I self-justified this episode of tariff abuse on the grounds that Virgin Atlantic would not have got my business at the price it wanted to charge for the non-stop flight from Florida alone. On that premeditated occasion, I made sure to carry cabin baggage only. If your ticket says Dublin via Manchester, that is where your checked luggage will be going. In my experience, airlines will not countenance requests for your bag to be checked for only part of the journey. Some might take advantage of BA's mighty cabin baggage allowance – two bags weighing up to 23kg each. But I fear Ms MacLeod and her husband will simply need to stick with the flight to Edinburgh, and perhaps vow to book closer to departure next time. Meanwhile, they can gaze at all the transatlantic traffic six miles overhead. Simon Calder, also known as The Man Who Pays His Way, has been writing about travel for The Independent since 1994. In his weekly opinion column, he explores a key travel issue – and what it means for you.

Glasgow Times
12 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Major airline announced brand-new route from Glasgow Airport
easyJet has announced the launch of a new winter route from Glasgow to Rome Fiumicino in Italy. The airline said the brand-new route will begin on February 2, 2026, with flights on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Revealing the new flights, the popular airline said tickets are now on sale from just £39.99. READ MORE: Major airline announced two new routes from Glasgow Airport Kevin Doyle, easyJet's Country Manager, said: 'It's fantastic to be able to offer our customers another exciting route from Glasgow to Rome – whether heading off to explore the Eternal City's rich history and iconic landmarks or simply looking to enjoy world-class cuisine and vibrant Italian culture. 'By expanding our network in Scotland, we're continuing to enhance connectivity for our customers who choose easyJet for our unrivalled route network, great value fares, and friendly service. "We look forward to welcoming them on board.' (Image: Supplied) READ MORE: Major airline announces new Glasgow Airport route READ MORE: Major airline with Glasgow flights announced huge change Chris Tibbett, Airline Director at AGS Airports, said: 'It's encouraging to see easyJet investing in city connectivity and seeing the opportunities that Glasgow Airport provides. "Rome is a fantastic destination, and we're confident that this increased capacity will be well-received by passengers. "We'll continue to support our airline partners in making these routes a success.'



