JetBlue Airways Stock: Bull vs. Bear
But JetBlue is at a crossroads today. The airline enjoyed a period of overwhelming demand following the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the shares are down nearly 80% from their 2021 highs as investor concerns about the economy grow.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
JetBlue's plan for growth, a $3.8 billion acquisition of what is now Spirit Aviation Holdings, was blocked by regulators. A separate partnership with American Airlines Group to feed traffic to JetBlue was also shot down due to antitrust concerns.
If you are wondering if now is the time to buy into JetBlue, read on for a look at the bull and bear cases from two Motley Fool contributors.
Bull: Deep value opportunity
Lee Samaha: JetBlue is not a stock that will suit most investors, so if you are most investors, read no further! However, it might fit a specific speculative investor with a penchant for deep value stocks. The airline is loss-making, cash outflowing, and flying into the turbulence of an uncertain trading environment.
That said, there is a case for buying the stock. The downside is protected by the fact that the stock trades at a discount to its tangible book value, and there's potential upside from a possible takeover of the company.
As of the end of the first quarter, JetBlue had $17.1 billion in total assets. Stripping out intangible assets of $399 million leaves $16.7 billion. Taking out the $14.7 billion in total liabilities leaves about $2.05 billion in net tangible assets. Its market cap at the time of writing is $1.58 billion, so it trades at a significant discount to its net tangible assets, which include ownership of 254 Airbus planes (including 47 newer neo airplanes) and 10 Embraer airplanes.
Given Airbus and Boeing 's difficulty in ramping up deliveries, those assets might prove extra attractive in the current environment. In addition, JetBlue's loyalty programs and co-branded credit cards could be integrated into a potential acquirer's portfolio.
After JetBlue's intended partnership with American collapsed after an antitrust lawsuit under the Biden administration, JetBlue is widely reported to be looking at a partnership with United Airlines Holdings, and JetBlue's management expects to make an announcement "regarding a domestic airline partnership" (without naming United Airlines) within the second quarter of 2025.
While that partnership doesn't mean a merger can or will occur anytime soon, it could help JetBlue improve its operations and work toward a possible merger. That might make sense for JetBlue's intended partner.
Bear: No easy way through this turbulence
Lou Whiteman: JetBlue is stuck between a rock and a hard place. If airline industry history is any guide, there is no easy way out of that jam.
JetBlue lacks the route network to compete with the giants who control nearly 80% of the domestic market, but its costs are too high to compete with scrappy discounters. Excluding fuel, JetBlue spent $0.1145 per seat per mile in the first quarter. By comparison, discounter Frontier Group Holdings spent $0.07.
Management is doing what it can to bring down costs but bridging that divide will not be easy. And with the Spirit deal now off the table and an industrywide shortage of pilots and aircraft, there is no obvious path for the company to grow its way out of its predicament.
JetBlue's debt is nearly 5 times the value of its equity. That's the highest ratio in the industry, and American is the only other airline with more than 1.2 times debt to equity. The airline was not profitable in its most recent quarter, and the whole industry could be flying into headwinds from here if inflation accelerates and the economy slows.
JetBlue appears to be circling in the same pattern as one-time industry stalwarts like TWA and Eastern Airlines. Although there is no immediate threat of bankruptcy, there is also no obvious catalyst to get the stock moving upward. The rumored partnership or merger with United would take years to play out, and a deal would likely only happen on terms very favorable to United.
Until JetBlue can articulate a clear path toward sustained profitability, investors would be wise to avoid boarding this airline stock.
Should you invest $1,000 in JetBlue Airways right now?
Before you buy stock in JetBlue Airways, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and JetBlue Airways wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $614,911!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $714,958!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is907% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to163%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 5, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
25 minutes ago
- National Post
Acuity Knowledge Partners Appoints Emma Crabtree as Chief Revenue Officer
Article content LONDON & NEW YORK — Acuity Knowledge Partners (Acuity), a leading provider of bespoke research, analytics, staffing and technology solutions to the financial services sector, has appointed Emma Crabtree as Chief Revenue Officer (CRO). Article content Crabtree has more than 25 years of leadership experience in client engagement and commercial strategy, having held senior roles at global financial institutions including BNP Paribas Securities Services, and RBC Investor & Treasury Services. Most recently, she served as Group Chief Commercial Officer at IQ-EQ, where she led the firm's commercial, segment strategy and marketing efforts across a broad suite of investor services and played a central role in strong organic growth and expanding client relationships. Article content Crabtree will join Acuity's Executive Committee and lead global sales, client engagement and marketing. She will work closely with Acuity's leadership to shape and execute the firm's growth agenda, including expansion and go-to-market of Acuity's research, data, analytics, and a wide set of bespoke technology and agentic AI solutions into existing and new client segments, geographies and product offerings. Article content 'Emma is a commercial leader with a deep understanding of how data and technology platforms support global financial services firms,' said Robert King, Chief Executive Officer, Acuity Knowledge Partners. 'She brings with her a track record of building high-performing teams, delivering sales growth, and deepening strategic client partnerships. As Acuity continues its growth trajectory, her experience and insight will be invaluable in helping us deepen client impact and sharpen our commercial focus.' Article content 'I'm truly excited to join Acuity at such a pivotal point in its growth journey. The company has built a strong reputation for delivering exceptional value to its clients through deep domain expertise, technology-led solutions, and a culture of innovation. Article content 'I look forward to working with our talented teams to drive commercial excellence, opening new avenues for growth, and continuing positioning Acuity as a trusted partner to our clients worldwide. Together, we'll look forward to building on the strong foundations already in place and helping to unlock the next phase of growth,' said Emma Crabtree. Article content At BNP Paribas, Crabtree held several senior sales leadership roles, including Global Head of Sales for Asset Managers and Alternatives, and Head of Sales for EMEA and Continental Europe. Prior to that, she spent nearly two decades at RBC, where she served as Managing Director, Global Client Coverage, focused on institutional client growth. Article content About Acuity Knowledge Partners Article content Acuity Knowledge Partners (Acuity) is a leading provider of bespoke research, data management, analytics, talent, and technology solutions to the financial services industry, including asset managers, corporate and investment banks, private equity and venture capital firms, hedge funds and consulting firms. Its global network of over 6,500 analysts and industry experts, combined with proprietary technology, supports more than 650 financial institutions and consulting companies to operate more efficiently and unlock their human capital and transforming operations. Acuity is headquartered in London and operates from 16 locations worldwide. Article content Acuity was established as a separate business from Moody's Corporation in 2019, following its acquisition by Equistone Partners Europe (Equistone). In January 2023, funds advised by global private equity firm Permira acquired a majority stake in the business from Equistone, which remains invested as a minority shareholder. Article content Article content Article content Article content Article content Contacts Article content Media contact: Article content
CBC
26 minutes ago
- CBC
Canada is running out of runway for its F-35 review
Social Sharing There was an interesting — albeit brief — recent eruption of clarity in the ongoing saga of whether Canada intends to proceed with the full order of American-made F-35 fighters. It was courtesy of the U.S. ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, who perhaps spoke the quiet part out loud last week in an interview with Canadian independent podcaster Jasmin Laine. Hoekstra, a no-nonsense Republican from Michigan, was asked about the Liberal government's review of the $27.7-billion purchase of stealth fighters and the possibility that after delivery of the first tranche of jets, Canada could decide to fill the rest of its order with another type of aircraft. "You can't afford two fighters, two different fighter jet programs," said Hoekstra. "Canada should just decide what they want. Do they want F-35s? Do they want some other product? That's your decision to make, but you can't afford both of them." But then, he added that the ongoing review is "an irritant that makes it harder to get to a [trade] agreement." It's not much of a stretch to suggest that few Canadian tears would be shed over the notion that the Trump administration is irritated by the uncertainty. But the fact he's said so publicly is significant and it represents an interesting escalation from earlier remarks that suggested not buying the F-35s would endanger NORAD, the binational defence pact with the United States. What's even more potentially entertaining is the lengths to which everyone on the Canadian side has twisted themselves into pretzels to downplay the notion that the fighter jet program is being used as a significant piece of leverage in negotiations with Washington. Speaking on CBC Radio's The House last weekend, the country's top military commander, Gen. Jennie Carignan portrayed the review as a prudent, business-as-usual, due diligence exercise. "With the new government coming into place, it's perfectly normal," Carignan said. "There's a request to ensure that our processes are still valid, that we are getting what we need." With any other major defence purchase, that might be a reasonable argument. But the F-35 has been — over 15 years of political drama — the subject of enormous study. Parliamentary watchdogs, an independent panel and a legion of experts have lined up to analyze, slice, dice and dissect the plan. One wonders what more can be said that couldn't be found in a ministerial transition briefing book. The review has been going on since the early spring and with so much information already at their fingertips, the question of what the political impact might be only gets larger as time goes on. Retired vice-admiral Mark Norman, also speaking on The House last weekend, said there's obvious "trepidation" and consideration of "what kind of blowback reaction" there could be in Washington should Canada opt to shop elsewhere. Others argue that the tantrums of Trump and the irritation of his administration shouldn't dictate Canadian defence policy. "I think the Trump administration will decide if they wish to punish us or not based on whatever current thought of the moment is in the heads of the president and his key advisers," said Wendy Gilmour, a Canadian former assistant secretary general for defence investment at NATO. "I think Canada needs to make the best decisions it can for our own interests." And that's what makes the specifics of what, precisely, the Department of National Defence has been told to review so crucial. When you ask for the terms of reference or even the obstacles and costs of running two fleets of fighters, more often than not, you get boilerplate responses about spending wisely and the scope of the enormous investment. "The nature of aerial combat, the nature of warfare, the nature of our responsibilities, the scale of our investment — all of those elements have changed over the course of recent years," Prime Minister Mark Carney said a couple of weeks ago, while announcing a military pay increase. "We also need the appropriate air capabilities for the Arctic, for the runways in the Arctic, for the threats that we're faced in the Arctic … is the F-35 best suited for that?" The security risks for Canada The contract to buy the F-35 was announced in January 2023 and one would hope the debate about Arctic operations would have been long settled before that. It's important considering, as the Ottawa Citizen reported last month, construction of new hangar and infrastructure facilities to house the F-35s is about to get underway at the military's principal fighter bases in Cold Lake, Alta., and Bagotville, Que. Interestingly, the one non-political aspect of the F-35 deal that would provide an important, logical rationale for a review is the one nobody wants to discuss publicly: the potential national security risks to Canada. Buying the F-35 makes the Canadian air force dependent on the U.S. for software and repair, which has the potential to create delays in deployment and affect operational readiness. It was an issue that raised its head briefly after U.S. President Donald Trump returned to office last winter and suggested allies could end up with less capable versions of the aircraft. It could also be argued that the escalating costs (with the purchase estimate for 88 aircraft, including weapons and training, going from $19 billion to $27 billion), would justify an urgent review. Defence Minister David McGuinty, however, suggested last week the government would take its "lead from the experts that performed the review, both in the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces." WATCH | Cost of F-35 program balloons: F-35 costs skyrocketing, not enough pilots to fly them: AG report 2 months ago A new Auditor General's report finds the cost of buying U.S.-made F-35 stealth fighter jets has ballooned almost 50 per cent from an estimated $19 billion to $27.7 billion — and that's without the additional cost of weapons and infrastructure. The program is also facing a shortage of trained pilots. As if there was any doubt about where the military stands, there was a pretty clear indication with a recent report by Reuters, based upon sources, which said the air force was recommending sticking with the F-35. Carney was clear that no decision had been made and that it would be sometime in the late summer or early fall before the review would be considered. Playing politics with defence purchases is nothing new in Canada, but Norman argues that given the state of the world, the military can't afford games and uncertainty, especially with the current CF-18s rapidly approaching the end of their useful life. "What we need to be careful of is that we don't inadvertently — or perhaps for superficial political reasons — make what I would characterize as dumb decision," Norman said.
Globe and Mail
29 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Japan's SoftBank to take $2 billion stake in computer chip maker Intel
BANGKOK (AP) — Japanese technology giant SoftBank Group plans to take a $2 billion stake in computer chip maker Intel as it deepens its involvement in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and other advanced technology in the United States, the companies said Monday. Shares in both companies fell Tuesday after the announcement, which coincided with unconfirmed reports that President Donald Trump is considering having the U.S. government buy a stake in the chip maker. SoftBank invests in an array of companies that it sees as holding long-term potential. It has been stepping up investments in the United States since Trump returned to the White House. In February, its chairman Masayoshi Son joined Trump, Sam Altman of OpenAI and Larry Ellison of Oracle in announcing a major investment of up to $500 billion in a project to develop artificial intelligence called Stargate. SoftBank plans to buy $2 billion of Intel's common stock, paying $23 per share. 'Semiconductors are the foundation of every industry, Son said in a statement. 'This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role." Intel helped launch Silicon Valley but has fallen behind rivals like Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. and is shedding thousands of workers and slashing costs under its new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan. Intel plans to end the year with 75,000 'core' workers excluding subsidiaries, through layoffs and attrition, down from 99,500 core employees at the end of 2024. The company previously announced a 15% workforce reduction. Trump recently said Tan, who was made CEO in March, should resign but after meeting with him last week said he had an 'amazing story.'
