logo
Budget 2025: The Growth Budget

Budget 2025: The Growth Budget

Scoop28-04-2025
Press Release – New Zealand Government
Having considered everything happening around the world, the Treasury is continuing to forecast accelerating growth in the New Zealand economy over the coming year, with falling unemployment forecast to follow in the second half of the year.
Minister of Finance
Tēna koutou kātoa. Greetings everyone. Can I thank you Mark for that kind introduction and thank everyone who has taken the time to be here today. My special thanks go to our hosts Metco Engineering and the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce.
Let me also acknowledge my colleagues who join us today – your local MP and my Associate Minister of Finance the Hon Chris Bishop, together with the Minister of Education the Hon Erica Stanford.
This factory is a bit of a different setting than the conference centre or ballroom Ministers typically use for a pre-Budget speech. Why?
Because places like this are the engine room of the New Zealand economy.
Our Government knows that to speed up the economic recovery New Zealanders need we have to get this growth engine cranking.
I appreciate that economic growth can be a bit of an abstract concept: the work that happens on this factory floor is what it's all about.
The workers at Metco solve problems, coming up with new products and manufacturing processes for a range of industries. They design and create clever components for customers around the world – producing everything from window stays through to bus stops.
Metco has grown successfully by making investments in its own machinery and technology and by hiring and up-skilling great people who come up with innovative ideas and then make them happen.
The growth of businesses like MetCo, and indeed of all the businesses represented in this room today, has created good jobs and livelihoods for the people of the Hutt Valley community.
It's also allowed your businesses to make healthy tax contributions, which helps fund the Government's investment in health services, schools, vital infrastructure and other important public spending.
Thank you for that contribution, we don't take it for granted.
New Zealand needs more success stories like MetCo: Your growth is what's needed to deliver the kind of country we all want: with better living standards, better job opportunities and more financially secure families.
That's why our Government is going for growth.
Earlier this year we released a snapshot of the work we have underway to support this growth agenda. Going for Growth sets out 87 specific actions we are taking under five key themes:
Developing talent
Competitive business settings
Innovation, technology and science
Overseas investment and trade
Infrastructure for growth
I encourage you to check out the plan and the work underway. There's more to come.
For today though, I'm going to switch out of my Economic Growth hat and into my Minister of Finance hat and focus my remarks on this year's Budget.
The Context for Budget 2025
The Government's growth ambition has been front and centre as we've put the Budget together.
We know that global uncertainty is challenging for many of you and we're determined our Budget will play a role in giving you confidence for the future.
But let me be blunt: it's not the easiest time to be putting together a Budget.
New Zealand is still recovering from the economic damage inflicted during the Covid period and we're now facing the headwinds of further global instability.
There is a pressing need for greater investments in our health system, our education system, our defence force and other areas, and very little money to pay for those investments.
Our Government is also acutely conscious of the challenging economic circumstances many New Zealanders have experienced in the past few years as we've emerged from a period of very high inflation and rapidly rising interest rates.
The pain is still rippling through our communities. Kiwis feel it in the higher prices they still pay for almost everything, in higher levels of unemployment and in struggling local businesses. The cost of living remains a top-of-mind concern.
The good news is that, despite significant global challenges, a steady economic recovery is now taking place here, with export-led growth gathering strength, business confidence coming off its lows and the primary sector benefiting from higher commodity prices and mostly favourable growing conditions.
Having considered everything happening around the world, the Treasury is continuing to forecast accelerating growth in the New Zealand economy over the coming year, with falling unemployment forecast to follow in the second half of the year.
There's no magic wand to wish away the price rises baked in over recent years, but getting inflation and interest rates under control has been essential to achieving this economic recovery.
That's why I always take pause to celebrate that since our Government came to office inflation has returned to normal levels, resulting in a 200 basis point reduction in interest rates.
We must not take this progress for granted.
While some pretend we can fix all the post-Covid damage with yet more extravagant government spending, the economic truth is that they are wrong.
The only way to sustainably overcome cost of living pressures is through successive years of stable inflation, careful investment and sustained economic growth.
Our Government is committed to the responsible fiscal management and growth supporting policies needed to make that happen.
Debt, deficit and the path out
An important part of that effort is getting our own books in order. That's a big task.
The previous Government's spending decisions during and after Covid have left New Zealand with a sea of debt and red-ink in the government finances.
Government debt leapt up by almost $120 billion between 2019 and 2024, soaring from under $58 billion to $175 billion.
Those are big numbers, almost too big to comprehend, so let me explain it this way: That amounts to $22,000 more in debt for every New Zealander.
You may well ask: what do we have to show for all that debt?
To give you some further historical context, New Zealand's net core Crown debt, which once hovered between five and 25 per cent of GDP, rose to around 42 per cent last year. That's the highest level of government debt New Zealand has shouldered since the mid-1990s.
Servicing that debt is expensive.
The interest bill on government debt has soared from $3.6 billion in 2014 to $8.9 billion last year. That sum is more than annual core Crown expenses for the Police, Corrections, the Ministry of Justice, Customs and the Defence Force combined.
Our Government's goal is to put net core Crown debt on a downward trajectory towards 40 per cent of GDP and in the longer term keep it below that percentage.
Why? Because allowing debt to keep spiralling would threaten the livelihood of every New Zealander.
We must ensure our country is financially strong and resilient enough to effectively respond to whatever the future may throw: be it earthquakes, extreme climatic events, biosecurity incursions or whatever. We need the world to keep seeing us as a good country to invest in and lend to. Manageable debt levels are an essential foundation for a strong economy and for your financial future.
Achieving lower debt levels isn't easy: especially because the government books remain out of balance.
The post-Covid 'structural deficit' has left a big gap between what the country needs to fund to deliver on the spending commitments previous Budgets have made and what we need to earn to pay for that spending.
The Government is currently borrowing billions to bridge the gap.
Every Thursday afternoon, New Zealand Debt Management issues around $500 million of Government bonds. Some of this is to that roll over existing bonds that have expired, but large chunks of it are for new borrowing.
That level of borrowing obviously can't go on forever, or else our kids and grandkids will be left with unsustainable debt and considerable economic uncertainty.
Most of you can probably relate to this if you think about your own household budget: sure, sensible borrowing has its place, but no overdraft can be extended forever, and while you can keep giving the credit card a hammering, left unpaid, it does, eventually, get declined.
It's worth bearing this in mind next time somebody tries to suggest to you that the New Zealand Government needs to spend more on something.
The second question always needs to be: but how will we pay for it?
Our Government's strategy is to reduce the deficit over time, through a gradual programme of consolidation and careful spending choices.
We are committed to maintaining stability for New Zealanders, by continuing to invest in essential frontline services, infrastructure for growth and social supports like superannuation.
But delivering those things requires us to make careful choices about what we spend elsewhere.
That's why we've committed ourselves to ongoing reprioritisation and fiscal restraint. It isn't easy, but it is essential.
Believe me, I'd rather we were in clover, with money to spend on all the good ideas we hear. But the reality is that we are governing in tighter times.
Economic growth is essential to our fiscal repair job. It's simply the most effective way to raise government revenue, and to give us better choices for the future.
Some have suggested a different approach. They say New Zealand should seek to close the deficit by simply adding more and higher rates of taxes to Kiwis' wages, savings, wealth or capital.
We reject that approach.
Punishing Kiwis with higher taxes right now would undermine our recovery, strangle growth and threaten the economic stability New Zealand needs.
It would pull the rug out from all those businesses and industries who are already just hanging on. And it would send an exodus of Kiwi talent and wealth to Australia and beyond.
It would be exactly the wrong recipe for a country whose future prospects depend on investment and growth.
Changes in the economic and fiscal outlook since HYEFU
The Treasury's last set of economic forecasts was presented at the Half Year Update in December.
As you know, the global economic outlook has worsened considerably since that update.
Tarriff announcements by the US government, countervailing tariffs being imposed by China and an uncertain path for future tariffs and exemptions have created volatile global economic conditions with forecasters around the world agreeing that global growth will be lower this year and next year than they were previously predicting.
New Zealand can't escape the fallout.
Accordingly, Treasury has adjusted the forecasts it presented in December, reducing their assumptions of real GDP growth in New Zealand in 2025 and 2026.
New Zealand's economy will still be growing, but not as fast as forecast a few months ago.
That lower growth trajectory has an inevitable impact on the government books, reducing revenue and threatening our already difficult return to surplus and debt reduction.
At the same time, it's clear that the country's need for investment has not lessened: whether it be in the infrastructure we need for a more productive future, the funding needed to meet pressures in our health service and education system; or the need to rebuild our defence capability to meet the challenges of a less stable world.
On top of all of that, it's also the case that New Zealand's long-term productivity and savings challenges haven't gone away.
So there's a huge amount to juggle in this year's Budget.
How has the Government managed these challenges?
We started with that question that I suggested to you earlier: How do we pay for the things we need now without putting our future economic stability at risk?
Our approach has been threefold.
First, there has been a very high bar for new initiatives in the Budget. I can confirm today that there will be no lolly scramble in Budget 2025. New spending initiatives are strictly limited to the most important priorities: our focus has been on health, education, law and order, defence, and a small number of critical social investments. We have also found room for modest measures to support business growth and to provide some carefully targeted cost of living relief.
Second, beyond a small number of exceptions, government departments are not receiving additional funding in the Budget. We expect government agencies to adjust themselves to New Zealand's limited fiscal means. This will require restraint in public sector wage increases and an ongoing commitment to getting more impact out of every dollar spent.
Third, we have undertaken a significant savings drive.
That effort has involved Ministers identifying areas of previously committed spending that can no longer be justified in light of the challenging circumstances New Zealand now faces.
We've analysed spending decisions made by previous governments and re-evaluated them in the context of today's constraints. This has involved a line-by-line review of previous funding commitments, including money put aside in contingency.
This reprioritisation exercise has required careful consideration and some tough, but necessary, choices.
At every step, we've asked ourselves two questions:
Can these dollars be justified when we are borrowing to pay for them?
Can we be sure these dollars will do more good in this area than if invested in our most pressing priorities – like funding essential health services, better educating our kids, defending New Zealand's security or ensuring our future growth?
Taken together, the Government's savings drive has freed-up billions of dollars. Those savings will now be re-deployed to fund New Zealand's most pressing priorities.
Sticking to the fiscal strategy
In this year's Budget we've also had to carefully consider whether, in light of major global economic events, our fiscal strategy still remains achievable.
The strategy is focused on two key goals: putting net debt on a downward trajectory and returning the books to an OBEGALx surplus by 2028.
This strategy matters, it matters for getting the books back in order and that's about more than a set of numbers. It's about keeping interest rates lower and providing a solid platform for future growth. It's about ensuring New Zealand continues to be seen as a stable, reliable place to invest in and lend to. It's about making sure we don't leave our kids and grandkids with debts they just can't repay.
At our last update in December – well before President Trump's 'Liberation Day' – we were expecting a small surplus in 2029, and it remained our intention to returning it a year earlier if possible.
I can confirm that our Government remains committed to those goals.
Sticking to them has required some careful adjustments in this year's Budget.
The key change we have made is to the size of this year's 'operating allowance' – that is the amount of money put aside for new spending.
At the Half Year Update, the Treasury forecast that the 'allowance' in Budget 2025 would be $2.4 billion.
That was always a small envelope. However, as I outlined earlier, our approach has been to supplement our new spending by reprioritising funds from elsewhere.
I am confirming today that the Government has reduced the size of our Budget 2025 operating allowance to $1.3 billion.
This means we will be spending billions less over the forecast period than would have otherwise been the case. This will reduce the amount of extra borrowing our country needs to do over the next few years and it will keep us on track towards balanced books and debt reduction.
The fiscal forecasts will not be finalised until later this week, but according to the latest numbers I have seen, this smaller operating allowance means we will continue to forecast a surplus in 2029.
The reality of global economic events is that if we'd pushed on with a larger operating allowance then we would be staring down the barrel of even bigger deficits and debt.
Let me emphasise once again: our Budget will still deliver increased investment in the things that really matter to Kiwis: like health, education, law and order, the defence force, business growth and targeted cost of living relief. Those things are important to you and they're important to our Government.
Our careful reprioritisation approach means we can continue to make progress on today's priorities while ensuring we are better positioned to face the challenges tomorrow will bring.
Yes, those challenges loom large.
But let's get real: global instability may not be a passing trend. New Zealand can't expect to keep borrowing as much as we are now. The world doesn't owe us any favours.
This is not the time to kick the can down the road.
We must act now to secure our financial future.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Budget 2025 takes place against a difficult global backdrop.
We can't wish that away. What we can do is focus on the things in our control.
Our Government is doing just that, by providing a predictable, steady approach to economic and fiscal management.
In an unstable world we are staying the course with responsible policies that provide stability, support investment and make New Zealand an attractive place for the world to trade and do business with.
These sensible policy approaches are the base from which we will deliver better choices and investments in the years ahead.
With those basics in place, there is much for Kiwi businesses to feel optimistic about.
New Zealand has enormous economic growth potential.
We are a safe, secure country with a growing constellation of free trade agreements and a global reputation as a good place to do business.
We are blessed with abundant natural resources – everything from ocean to freshwater, fertile land and temperate weather to abundant minerals.
In a world worried about food security, we feed more than 40 million people with levels of efficiency and sustainability that are the envy of many.
We have a long history of stable democracy, strong institutions and rule of law.
We've delivered scientific breakthroughs and global success stories and we will continue to do so. As I stand here today, we are world leaders in sending rocket to space – rockets that include components made right here in this factory.
Fundamentally, I'm optimistic about New Zealand's economic future because I have faith in you: the New Zealanders who get out of bed each morning and go and make things happen.
I'm optimistic because I see how hard Kiwis work. I see how much effort Kiwi parents go to for their kids. I see how much employers and workers care about their communities. We are a smart, innovative, resilient people.
The next decade can be our decade. That requires good and steady government and careful spending choices. This year's Budget will not be a lolly scramble. What this Budget will be is a responsible Budget that secures New Zealand's future.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt accepts 'Price it Right' petition
Govt accepts 'Price it Right' petition

Otago Daily Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Govt accepts 'Price it Right' petition

By Anneke Smith of RNZ Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis has accepted Consumer New Zealand's 'Price It Right' petition for accurate supermarket pricing. The petition, signed by 25,000 people, was presented to Willis on the steps of Parliament this morning. Willis wrote to the major supermarkets in June this year, warning them against misleading promotional practices and pricing errors. Consumer NZ chief executive John Duffy said supermarkets have had plenty of opportunity to sort it out for themselves. "It's time for the government to step in and make supermarkets price it right, and tens of thousands of New Zealanders agree. "People want clear pricing rules, automatic compensation and stronger penalties when supermarkets get it wrong." In 2024, the Commerce Commission estimated pricing errors were likely costing shoppers tens of millions of dollars a year. "If supermarkets can't get their pricing right, they - rather than shoppers - should face the consequences," Duffy said. Consumer NZ's petition asked the government to introduce a mandatory supermarket pricing accuracy code: • With clear pricing rules. • Requiring supermarkets to automatically compensate consumers when pricing errors occur. • Requiring shoppers' right to be clearly disclosed both in store and online. • Infringement notice powers and much higher penalties for misleading pricing and promotions. "We know that all the problems in the supermarket sector won't be fixed overnight, but new rules like those in our proposed code will help put money back in the pockets of New Zealanders," Duffy said. 'Time supermarkets pulled up their socks' Willis told RNZ she had received assurances new processes were in place after putting major supermarkets on notice in June. "They then wrote back to me and pledged that they are going to have refund policies in place from now on; in the case of Foodstuffs that hadn't previously been the case. "Now, if a pricing error is found, you get your money back and you keep to you get to keep the goods. "They've also pledged that they will advertise these refund policies and they have pledged that they are investing significant sums and better training for their staff and better systems to stop these errors happening in the first place." They were important commitments and the government would hold major supermarkets accountable to them, Willis said. "I have been consulting on strengthening the infringement regime in the Fair Trading Act, strengthening penalties and potentially introducing civil proceedings so that it is easier to prosecute supermarkets when they do the wrong thing. "I will consider the submissions on that consultation before taking recommendations to Cabinet." Asked if it was fair the onus was still on consumers to notice price discrepancies, the minister said it wasn't. "I do worry that for every person who's noticed it, there are other New Zealanders who've been ripped off and haven't had the opportunity to get redress. "So that's why we are strengthening our approach in this area. We think it's time that the supermarkets pulled up their socks."

'Price it Right' petition accepted
'Price it Right' petition accepted

Otago Daily Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Otago Daily Times

'Price it Right' petition accepted

By Anneke Smith of RNZ Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis has accepted Consumer New Zealand's 'Price It Right' petition for accurate supermarket pricing. The petition, signed by 25,000 people, was presented to Willis on the steps of Parliament this morning. Willis wrote to the major supermarkets in June this year, warning them against misleading promotional practices and pricing errors. Consumer NZ chief executive John Duffy said supermarkets have had plenty of opportunity to sort it out for themselves. "It's time for the government to step in and make supermarkets price it right, and tens of thousands of New Zealanders agree. "People want clear pricing rules, automatic compensation and stronger penalties when supermarkets get it wrong." In 2024, the Commerce Commission estimated pricing errors were likely costing shoppers tens of millions of dollars a year. "If supermarkets can't get their pricing right, they - rather than shoppers - should face the consequences," Duffy said. Consumer NZ's petition asked the government to introduce a mandatory supermarket pricing accuracy code: • With clear pricing rules. • Requiring supermarkets to automatically compensate consumers when pricing errors occur. • Requiring shoppers' right to be clearly disclosed both in store and online. • Infringement notice powers and much higher penalties for misleading pricing and promotions. "We know that all the problems in the supermarket sector won't be fixed overnight, but new rules like those in our proposed code will help put money back in the pockets of New Zealanders," Duffy said. 'Time supermarkets pulled up their socks' Willis told RNZ she had received assurances new processes were in place after putting major supermarkets on notice in June. "They then wrote back to me and pledged that they are going to have refund policies in place from now on; in the case of Foodstuffs that hadn't previously been the case. "Now, if a pricing error is found, you get your money back and you keep to you get to keep the goods. "They've also pledged that they will advertise these refund policies and they have pledged that they are investing significant sums and better training for their staff and better systems to stop these errors happening in the first place." They were important commitments and the government would hold major supermarkets accountable to them, Willis said. "I have been consulting on strengthening the infringement regime in the Fair Trading Act, strengthening penalties and potentially introducing civil proceedings so that it is easier to prosecute supermarkets when they do the wrong thing. "I will consider the submissions on that consultation before taking recommendations to Cabinet." Asked if it was fair the onus was still on consumers to notice price discrepancies, the minister said it wasn't. "I do worry that for every person who's noticed it, there are other New Zealanders who've been ripped off and haven't had the opportunity to get redress. "So that's why we are strengthening our approach in this area. We think it's time that the supermarkets pulled up their socks."

Almighty debt fight in Parliament, as Nicola Willis accuses Chris Hipkins and Chlöe Swarbrick of fiscal vandalism
Almighty debt fight in Parliament, as Nicola Willis accuses Chris Hipkins and Chlöe Swarbrick of fiscal vandalism

NZ Herald

time9 minutes ago

  • NZ Herald

Almighty debt fight in Parliament, as Nicola Willis accuses Chris Hipkins and Chlöe Swarbrick of fiscal vandalism

'That is Fitch telling us that borrowing a lot more, as Opposition parties are proposing, would lead to a credit downgrade. 'That would increase the cost of government debt and also have a flow-on effect to the cost of household and business borrowing, as New Zealand would be seen as a more risky country to lend to,' Willis said. Labour has not released a fiscal plan, which would detail how much taxing, spending, and borrowing the party plans if it wins the next election. Hipkins has previously spoken about the need to borrow to invest in infrastructure. On Tuesday, he said, when asked by the Herald, that his party's fiscal plan would chart a path back to surplus. The Green Party has released a fiscal plan that includes $99.1 billion in additional revenue made up of about $89b in new taxation and the rest in climate taxes. The plan also includes additional borrowing for capital investment and a higher deficit in the last year of the forecast period. Finance Minister Nicola Willis during her standup at the Prime Minister's usual spot, hit out at Labour and the Greens. Photo / Mark Mitchell Under their plan, net debt would be about $44b higher at the end of the forecast period, a sum equivalent to just under 10% of GDP. Fitch's commentary, calling for a return to surplus and a reduction in debt levels to keep the current credit rating, is inconsistent with the Greens' plan, which ends up with more debt and a larger deficit. However, Swarbrick said Fitch's broader social and growth analysis might be more aligned with the Greens'. In general, Fitch noted that both National and Labour Governments had brought the books back into balance after an economic shock. The agency, warned, however, that recent experience had seen surpluses delayed and this could be a problem. 'Evidence of a weakening in the culture of fiscal responsibility would affect creditworthiness,' the commentary said. Willis said Hipkins had laid his 'stake in the ground' and that Labour was 'prepared to walk away' from a 'culture of fiscal responsibility'. 'Every New Zealander will pay the price if a Labour-Greens Government puts our fiscal reputation at risk,' Willis said. 'Team of vandals' - Willis Willis said Hipkins had departed from the 'orthodoxy' of previous Labour finance ministers like Michael Cullen. 'This is an altogether different path in which he seems to be walking a lot closer to Chlöe Swarbrick and her team of vandals, who want to gaslight New Zealanders into believing that if we just spent more and borrow more, everything would be better,' Willis said. 'Michael Cullen would never allow for the fiscally reckless approach that Chris Hipkins has been signalling,' Willis said. Hipkins, heading into his own caucus meeting, said Willis's attack had more to do with the Government wanting to divert attention from a sluggish economy. He said it was 'important that the Government balances its budget'. 'I notice that Nicola Willis has yet to do that. She'll be on to her third budget next year and there's not a surplus in sight,' Hipkins said. Hipkins promised that Labour would set its own fiscal rules in its pre-election fiscal plan, but he confirmed that these would include a return to surplus. 'We do need to get the books back into surplus. No government should be aiming to indefinitely run deficits,' Hipkins said. When asked whether one of the rules would be returning to surplus at some time, he said: 'Get the books back into surplus – yes.' Fiscal plans, which function like a draft budget for a political party, are not typically released until much closer to an election. Labour says its tax policy is coming later this year. Labour's last Budget included a primary fiscal rule 'returning the operating balance before gains and losses (OBEGAL) to a surplus and aiming for small surpluses thereafter'. 'This is vintage National Party, when they're in a hole, and they're in a very big hole at the moment, start throwing mud at the Labour Party, but the reality is their hole is getting deeper, they need to work out how to get themselves out of a hole without worrying about other political parties.' New Zealand's AA+ rating with Fitch dates back to 2022. Photo / Mark Mitchell Swarbrick hit back at Willis saying that 'when these made-up economic metrics, the likes of GDP, are superseding our focus on the wellbeing of people and planet, we've kind of lost the plot'. Swarbrick said that ratings agencies actually took a 'more sophisticated approach' in assessing the Government's finances than the Treasury. Swarbrick said, 'Luxon and Willis' decisions have seen productivity growth flatline, skilled workers deserting the country and deteriorating infrastructure placed under ever more pressure. 'Ironically, financial markets have a clearer grasp of fiscal responsibility than the Minister of Finance. They reward countries that successfully build economic resilience and punish those weakened by the chronic underinvestment favoured by Willis,' she said. Pointing to Fitch's concerns about the housing market and unemployment, Swarbrick said, 'The Government's decisions to withdraw public investment, in turn generating higher household debt and simultaneously increasing unemployment, is very bad for financial stability and debt-servicing.' New Zealand is one of just 12 countries to have a AA+ or AAA rating from Fitch. The current rating was obtained in 2022, under the last Labour Government and Finance Minister Grant Robertson. New Zealand had been downgraded to AA after the financial crisis and the Christchurch Earthquake In its commentary on that decision, and subsequent reviews, Fitch has stressed that forecasts show a 'fiscal consolidation', in which the Government runs a surplus and debt declines as a percentage of the GDP. National misses election surplus promise, Labour won't say it would have cut spending had it won election At the 2023 election, both National and Labour ran on fiscal plans that showed a surplus in 2027. National promised to reduce the amount of new spending each year by a cumulative $3.3b, meaning its 2027 surplus and subsequent surpluses were slightly larger than Labour's. Beginning in 2022, the Treasury began slashing its economic growth and tax revenue forecasts. This continued in the months after the election, when new forecasts showed the surplus shrinking, and has persisted to 2025. The result of this has been lower revenue than expected, pushing the forecast surplus out into the future. This has meant that despite Willis reducing spending growth, on balance, by far more than her fiscal plan promised in 2023, the deficit and overall borrowing levels are far higher. The Treasury reckons this year's deficit will be $15.6 billion, more than 10 times larger than the $1b deficit National promised on the campaign trial. Labour promised an even larger deficit of $1.5b. Given changes to GDP and revenue projections, that deficit would have increased too. On current forecasts, a surplus, by the traditional measure, is not forecast until the early 2030s. National and Labour are scrapping over how to fix the mess. Willis, noting the Government's large deficit, refuses to spend even more on stimulus, which some hope would speed an economic recovery, ultimately restoring the books in the process. Hipkins, on the other hand, refused to say he would have cut spending to keep to his fiscal promises, had he won the election. Willis rebuffed calls for more spending to stimulate the economy, saying that this spending would be 'the end of interest rate reductions'. 'Treasury has affirmed the best way to stimulate an economy in a downturn is through monetary policy ... I am concerned that without dropping interest rates we won't see the revival we all wish to see in the construction sector, our business sector, all of the private industries that rely on being able to borrow to generate the growth that New Zealanders want to see,' Willis said. Meanwhile Hipkins, would not say whether he would have dropped his spending and borrowing commitments had he won the election. Labour's 2023 plan included just over $3b more borrowing than National's. Hipkins did not definitively say he would have made cuts in light of the deteriorating finances. 'What I indicated before the election would have been our priorities, which was looking at how you get more effective spending. 'Take health, more money on preventative healthcare, like free prescriptions and making doctors' visits more accessible has the potential to save money, because you end up with fewer people in emergency departments,' he said. Asked whether Labour would have cut its cloth had it won in 2023, Hipkins said, 'We need to accept Nicola Willis has made this worse. Increasing unemployment is at least in part because of the decisions that this Government has taken. 'If I look at areas where I wouldn't have wanted to spend extra money, I wouldn't have wanted to spend extra money on Jobseeker benefits. I would have rather kept Kiwis in work.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store