Why value investing has worked better outside the US
I was intrigued by this observation. So, I looked at Morningstar's indexes. Sure enough, value investing has prospered beyond American shores—this year, as well as over the past three-, five-, and 10-year periods.
'Magnificent Seven' vs. 'Granolas'
US stocks of all styles have beaten international stocks for years, due to a strengthening dollar, superior returns on invested capital, and expanding price multiples.
Morningstar's US growth index is dominated by the ' Magnificent Seven.' But internationally, the scale is far smaller. There is not a single public company outside the US currently worth $1 trillion.
There was a time when the ' Granolas ' stocks were being promoted as Europe's answer to the Magnificent Seven (names like GSK, Roche, Nestle, L'Oreal and AstraZeneca). But don't blame yourself if you haven't heard of the Granolas. They never really rivaled the Magnificent Seven from a performance perspective.
So, what has boosted value investing internationally? Largely, the financial-services sector (which was lifted by higher interest rates) and energy stocks.
Looking beyond Europe with style
While value has outperformed growth in Europe over the past five years, Europe now represents less than half of equity market capitalization outside the US.
Rather, value stocks in emerging markets (like China, India, and Brazil) and developed Asia have outperformed by an even larger margin than in Europe.
The decline of Chinese internet companies, which were once big growth stocks, helps explain why value investing has triumphed over growth investing in emerging markets in recent years.
On the developed-markets side, Japan has seen rising interest rates and improved economic and investment conditions disproportionately benefit financial-services stocks, which tend to reside on the value side of the market.
Value's underperformance in the US: Is it macro or micro?
While I have mentioned some macroeconomic factors above, I am generally skeptical of attempts to explain style leadership from the top down. Back in 2022, when sticky inflation prompted the largest interest-rate hikes in a generation, US growth stocks fell much further than value. A popular narrative arose: Growth stocks are more sensitive to interest rates.
But then growth bounced back in 2023 despite high rates. The Magnificent Seven and others rode a wave of enthusiasm for AI. Growth stocks' thriving amid higher rates is hardly unprecedented. Between 2015 and 2018, the US Federal Reserve hiked rates several times, yet growth beat value by a wide margin.
Ultimately, I agree with Rasmussen that the triumph of growth over value in the US has more to do with 'historically unique and rare circumstances.'
I've been following markets long enough to know that style leadership can be cyclical. Right now, it's value investing that's being fundamentally questioned.
Value stocks have been called 'structurally challenged,' in 'secular decline,' and 'value traps.' But the value side of the market has always been home to troubled companies. Value investing is about stocks that under promise and overdeliver.
Perhaps the long-term cycle will turn again in value's favor. AI could be revolutionary, but, like the internet, ahead of itself from an investment perspective. We could look back at 2025 as a historical inflection point, as marking a new market regime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
India's IT layoffs spark fears that AI is hurting jobs in a sector critical to its economy
India's IT sector is facing job cuts, and analysts are wary about what the impact of artificial intelligence might mean for an industry critical to the country's broader economy. The country's largest private sector employer, Tata Consultancy Services, which employs over half a million IT workers, announced last month that it would cut more than 12,000 jobs from mostly the middle and senior management levels, equating to 2% of its global workforce — in what will be its biggest layoff so far. The company's CEO and managing director K Krithivasan attributed the move to "limited deployment opportunities and skill-mismatch" rather than AI. But that did not quell growing unease within the country, as many viewed the layoffs as a sign of broader and disruptive changes underway in the IT sector, amplified by the growing influence of AI. TCS and its peers have long relied on India's vast pool of low-cost, skilled labor to produce software services, a model now coming under pressure as AI is set to automate repetitive tasks and as global clients demand higher levels of innovation. The IT sector has long been highly sought after among India's large pool of engineering graduates, meaning any slowdown will have ripple effects across the economy. India produces over 1.5 million engineering graduates annually, according to local media reports. The sector contributed roughly 7.5% to India's gross domestic product in fiscal year 2023. "AI adoption is a major challenge for India. Entry level routine jobs are being displaced, and mid-level jobs are transforming," said Sonal Varma, chief economist of India and Asia ex-Japan at Nomura. "This creates the challenge for job creation for India, since the country needs to create about 8 [million] jobs annually," she added. Recent earnings also painted a sobering picture of the sector's performance, with IT majors such as TCS, Infosys and Wipro reporting muted year-on-year growth. Although that was largely attributed to uncertainty around U.S. tariffs, which weighed on American clients' budgeting confidence, the recent signs of slowdown in India's IT sector may be merely a "cyclical change," as services exports to the U.S. have eased, said Dhiraj Nim, economist and foreign exchange strategist at ANZ Research. AI, however, will be "a trend to reckon with in the years to come," Nim added. New Delhi has been striving to incentivize growth in labor-intensive manufacturing sectors such as electronics, textiles, footwear and toys as part of its supply chain relocation strategy. The layoffs also add to an already strained labor market as the country's unemployment rate continued to rise. India's urban unemployment rate rose to 7.1% in June from 6.9% in May and 6.5% in April. The youth unemployment rate in urban areas, among those aged 15 to 29 years, also spiked to nearly 19% from 17.9% in May, and 17.2% in April, according to the statistics ministry. The labor market problem could persist for a few years, said Anubhuti Sahay, head of South Asia economic research at Standard Chartered, urging New Delhi to ramp up efforts in creating more salaried jobs. She pointed out that the bulk of job creation has so far come from self-employed sectors where wages tend to remain lower than in salaried ones. Economists have urged New Delhi to accelerate its efforts in upskilling its labor force and bridge the skill gap to lower the risk of job displacement. One in five young adults in India have participated in an AI-skilling program, according to a report supported by and Asian Development Bank. AI will replace some jobs but also transform the nature of existing jobs through "constant skilling," Nomura's Varma said. The government has rolled out an internship program aimed up skilling younger adults with actual working experience. Nim acknowledged that AI could be a threat to jobs, but suggested that whether it will lead to increasing job displacement will depend on skilling and labor movement up the skill chain. New Delhi also must pivot to higher value-added services and innovation rather than focusing on low-end routine work, economists said. "If the economy is unable to adapt, this could lead to job losses, lower services exports, moderate urban consumption," said Varma, with ripple effects across real estate, retail and ancillary services. "It could risk India getting stuck in the middle-income trap," Varma added.
CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: That's not how revisions to jobs numbers work
After U.S. jobs figures for May and June were revised significantly downward by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — slashing a combined 258,000 from previous figures — President Donald Trump, imputing political bias and data manipulation to BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, revised her employment status to "terminated." Government officials from both sides of the political aisle had plenty to say about that. "Bottom line, Trump wants to cook the books," said Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee. Meanwhile, Republican Senator Rand Paul told NBC News that "you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting." The move, indeed, does have a whiff of the Chinese government, in August 2023, stopping the release of youth unemployment rates because they were spiking to record highs. (Beijing resumed disseminating the data in January 2024.) A falling tree makes a sound, regardless of whether there's anyone around to hear it. Terminating the person who reports that noise won't suck sound waves back into a vacuum either. Markets, too, were vocal in their response to Trump's firing of McEntarfer as well as the dismal jobs report. On Friday, the three major U.S. indexes had their worst day in months, a sharp turn from the week prior, which saw consecutive days of record highs for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite. This changes the calculus. With new tariffs due to take effect Aug. 7 — which could further slow hiring in the U.S. because of increased costs and uncertainties for companies — both the economy and markets might weaken further. Then it becomes a matter of whether the "TACO trade" — "Trump Always Chickens Out" — will, in the words of The Terminator, be appear in the U.S. jobs market. Nonfarm payrolls in July grew 73,000, lower than the Dow Jones estimate of a 100,000 gain. Unemployment edged up 10 basis points to 4.2%. June and May's jobs numbers were revised dramatically lower. Trump fires commissioner of labor statistics after jobs report. In a Truth Social post, the U.S. president accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer of being a political appointee who "faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election" and providing inaccurate data. BYD posts its first monthly delivery decline in 2025. China's largest EV maker shipped 341,030 units in July, a 9.7% drop from the previous month. Other domestic competitors, such as Li Auto and Nio, also recorded a month-on-month decline in July deliveries. U.S. stocks suffer their worst day in months. On Friday, the S&P 500 lost 1.6%, its worst day since May 21, breaking a 26-day streak when the index's moves remained within a 1% range. Asia-Pacific markets traded mixed Monday, while oil prices dipped on an output increase. [PRO] Robotaxis are becoming a reality. Waymo is, in the U.S., the market leader thus far, while Pony AI, WeRide and Baidu have been operating rides in China's larger cities. Analysts give their assessment on which company is likely to win the robotaxi race. Singapore's stock market is soaring. And the bull run is just getting started, experts say Once seen as a small, "unexciting" market for income-seeking investors, Singapore equities have taken a sharp turn upwards, surging to record highs. Major banks and market watchers signaling that the rally is just getting started. Building on its strong gains from last year, the benchmark Straits Times Index has advanced nearly 10% so far in 2025, outperforming the U.S. benchmark S&P 500 and several regional peers.
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Myth Or Reality: Will AI Replace Computer Programmers?
Have computer programmers innovated themselves out of a job? That's the fear driving theories that AI will remove the need for humans who can write computer code. Today's most sophisticated large language models like GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet are just as fantastically efficient at coding as they are at drafting emails and essays in human languages. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently said he believes AI will soon be writing 90 percent of all code. And Amazon CEO and President Andy Jassy said his company will hire fewer software engineers thanks to AI. So does this mean that learning to program—since the start of the computer age, an accessible gateway to a lucrative career for many—is pointless now? Regardless of the capabilities of today's AI, is there any way that someone setting out to learn software development now can hope to be able to compete with the AI coders of five years in the future? With 30 percent of coders saying they believe that AI will replace them, there's fear and uncertainty in the air, but how does this affect the reality of the situation? Let's take a look: Why Are Programmers Worried They Will Be Replaced? Evidence certainly seems to be growing that generative AI tools can carry out many of the tasks associated with coding and programming. Commonly cited use cases include creating new code, optimizing existing code, detecting bugs, explaining code, maintaining documentation and detecting security vulnerabilities. Although quantitative research is limited at this point, one study found that programmers assisted by Microsoft's AI coding assistant, GitHub Copilot, have been able to complete tasks 55 percent faster than those without. It's frequently speculated that entry-level programming roles are the most likely to be affected because their work is more easily automated. Senior roles such as team leaders and lead engineers, requiring a broader skillset and the ability to deal with strategic challenges, may be less exposed. But there's still the question of where the next generation of human software development leadership will come from if there are no jobs for beginners! According to the Washington Post, computer programmer jobs have declined by almost 30% compared to the previous two years. It's important to note that this isn't reflected in the figures for software development as a whole, which has declined by only around 3%. Jobs with the title of "programmer", however, are more likely to be entry-level roles that can more easily be replaced by automation. This does point towards the possibility of major shifts in the labor landscape. But it also gives anyone who programs computers for a living useful clues about what they need to do to stay relevant. Evolving Roles The truth is that the role of the programmer, in line with just about every other professional role, will change. Routine, low-level tasks such as customizing boilerplate code and checking for coding errors will increasingly be done by machines. But that doesn't mean basic coding skills won't still be important. Even if humans are using AI to create code, it's critical that we can understand it and step in when it makes mistakes or does something dangerous. This shows that humans with coding skills will still be needed to meet the requirement of having a 'human-in-the-loop'. This is essential for safe and ethical AI, even if its use is restricted to very basic tasks. This means entry-level coding jobs don't vanish, but instead transition into roles where the ability to automate routine work and augment our skills with AI becomes the bigger factor in the success or failure of a newbie programmer. Alongside this, entirely new development roles will also emerge, including AI project management, specialists in connecting AI and legacy infrastructure, prompt engineers and model trainers. We're also seeing the emergence of entirely new methods of developing software, using generative AI prompts alone. Recently, this has been named "vibe coding" because of the perceived lack of stress and technical complexity in relation to traditional coding. In truth, these are really just new methodologies that require developers to focus on more strategic tasks like project management and program architecture, rather than the nuts and bolts of getting code to do what we want it to do. The term is sometimes used by traditional coders in a derogatory way to imply that those coding with AI are scared of getting their hands dirty with 'real' coding. However, the practice also serves as an indicator of how software development is likely to change, and what skills coders and engineers should be developing now if they want to remain relevant. A glimpse of one potential future is provided in this quote from Adjrej Karpathy, director of AI at Tesla: 'A large portion of programmers of tomorrow do not maintain complex software repositories, write intricate programs, or analyze their running times. They collect, clean, manipulate, label, analyze and visualize data that feed neural networks.' Myth Or Reality? Software development and programming jobs are not going to disappear, in the short term at least. But the role will change immeasurably, and there are firm clues in place as to the direction of that change. What's the key learning here? I'd say it's that the ability to learn new skills and continuously stay ahead of change is the one skill everyone involved in programming, software engineering and development needs to develop if they don't want to be left behind. Creativity, innovation and real-world problem-solving skills are vital to ensuring AI can be used to improve people's lives. While I believe emerging and future generations of AI technology will deliver wonders, humans will still be at the heart of the process. Partly this is down to the ethical responsibility to ensure there is always human oversight. But also because it will be some time (if ever) before AI has the strategy-focused, people-centric skills needed to replace programmers.
