New study reveals key to unlocking the mystery surrounding Stonehenge
Aberystwyth University researchers determined that Neolithic communities were responsible for moving the 'Newall boulder' on Wiltshire's Salisbury Plain, according to the study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science.
The football-sized boulder was discovered during an early excavation at Stonehenge in 1924 by Col. William Hawley, according to a study published in June.
Advertisement
5 Figure A depicts the primary remaining portion of the Newall boulder, while Figure B illustrates the segment that was removed for scientific analysis.
R.E. Bevins/Journal of Archeoligical Sciences
The discovery resolves a long-standing scientific dispute about whether glacial movement or human transportation 5,000 years ago contributed to the presence of the stones at the prehistoric monument.
'There is no evidence to support an interpretation that it is a glacial erratic,' the study found.
Advertisement
Professor Richard Bevins and his team compared the Newall boulder with stones at Craig Rhos-y-Felin, a rocky outcrop on the north side of the Preseli Mountains in Wales, more than 125 miles away.
Their research also revealed that chemical analysis showed identical amounts of thorium and zirconium in the geology at Craig Rhos-y-Felin was found at Newall boulder and other fragments found at Stonehenge.
Researchers mentioned that the Newall boulder is a foliated rhyolite and its surface layer is rich in calcium carbonate — further supporting the idea that humans moved it to its final resting place since glaciers would have scattered similar pieces across the Stonehenge region.
5 The football-sized boulder was discovered during an early excavation at Stonehenge in 1924 by Col. William Hawley.
R.E. Bevins/Journal of Archeoligical Sciences
Advertisement
The study also unearthed a fascinating secret hidden within another of Stonehenge's buried stones — Stone 32d.
It was previously believed that Stone 32d was a rock called spotted dolerite. However, it's actually a foliated rhyolite, just like the Newall boulder.
'Part of the fascination of Stonehenge is that many of its megaliths, in contrast to the large, relatively local sarsens, can be proven to have been sourced from Wales, over 200km to the west,' the study revealed.
The study states that 'most archaeologists accept that Neolithic people achieved this remarkable feat, transporting blocks weighing up to 3.5 tonnes,' but a 'contrary view' remains that 'no human effort was involved.'
Advertisement
5 Aberystwyth University researchers determined that Neolithic communities were responsible for moving the 'Newall boulder' on Wiltshire's Salisbury Plain.
R.E. Bevins/Journal of Archeoligical Sciences
'There is, however, a contrary view, which proposes that no human effort was involved: rather, it is argued, the Welsh stones were transported by glacial ice long before Stonehenge was built,' researchers wrote.
One of the more prominent advocates for the glacier theory is Dr. Brian John, a geologist whose previous study found that the Newall boulder exhibits glacial abrasion marks.
'The boulder was reduced in size and heavily modified during glacial transport, for much of the time on the bed of a glacier,' John wrote.
'It was eventually dumped at some location on, or relatively close to, Salisbury Plain.'
5 A deserted, closed Stonehenge on March 20, 2020, in Amesbury, United Kingdom.
Getty Images
However, Bevins and his team said his finding has 'no basis in evidence.'
'To present it is as fact, rather than as hypothesis, is disingenuous,' the study stated.
Advertisement
Bevins' team argued that similar fragments would be found elsewhere on Salisbury Plain if glaciers transported the stones, but they are concentrated only at Stonehenge — strengthening the case for human movement.
5 General view of the Stonehenge stone circle, near Amesbury, Britain.
via REUTERS
'The presence of Stonehenge itself is the evidence of movement by Neolithic peoples of stones weighing up to as much as 40 tonnes,' researchers wrote. 'Unless it is argued that all the stones were just lying on the ground ready to be erected where they were to make Stonehenge, the stones must have been moved into position.'
The researchers firmly stated that 'if Neolithic people could move a stone a few tens of metres they could move it tens or hundreds of kilometres.'
Advertisement
'It may not have been easy, but it was entirely possible and moving 2–3 tonne bluestones would involve an order of magnitude less effort than moving the sarsens,' they noted.
Although the study confirms Neolithic communities moved the stones, the precise techniques they used remain unknown.
They did note that 'recent indigenous peoples have been transporting stones weighing many tonnes great distances with ropes, wooden sledges and trackways – technologies which would have been available in the Neolithic.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 days ago
- New York Post
New study reveals key to unlocking the mystery surrounding Stonehenge
A new study has revealed evidence found at a prehistoric structure could be part of the key to unlocking the centuries-old mystery surrounding Stonehenge. Aberystwyth University researchers determined that Neolithic communities were responsible for moving the 'Newall boulder' on Wiltshire's Salisbury Plain, according to the study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science. The football-sized boulder was discovered during an early excavation at Stonehenge in 1924 by Col. William Hawley, according to a study published in June. Advertisement 5 Figure A depicts the primary remaining portion of the Newall boulder, while Figure B illustrates the segment that was removed for scientific analysis. R.E. Bevins/Journal of Archeoligical Sciences The discovery resolves a long-standing scientific dispute about whether glacial movement or human transportation 5,000 years ago contributed to the presence of the stones at the prehistoric monument. 'There is no evidence to support an interpretation that it is a glacial erratic,' the study found. Advertisement Professor Richard Bevins and his team compared the Newall boulder with stones at Craig Rhos-y-Felin, a rocky outcrop on the north side of the Preseli Mountains in Wales, more than 125 miles away. Their research also revealed that chemical analysis showed identical amounts of thorium and zirconium in the geology at Craig Rhos-y-Felin was found at Newall boulder and other fragments found at Stonehenge. Researchers mentioned that the Newall boulder is a foliated rhyolite and its surface layer is rich in calcium carbonate — further supporting the idea that humans moved it to its final resting place since glaciers would have scattered similar pieces across the Stonehenge region. 5 The football-sized boulder was discovered during an early excavation at Stonehenge in 1924 by Col. William Hawley. R.E. Bevins/Journal of Archeoligical Sciences Advertisement The study also unearthed a fascinating secret hidden within another of Stonehenge's buried stones — Stone 32d. It was previously believed that Stone 32d was a rock called spotted dolerite. However, it's actually a foliated rhyolite, just like the Newall boulder. 'Part of the fascination of Stonehenge is that many of its megaliths, in contrast to the large, relatively local sarsens, can be proven to have been sourced from Wales, over 200km to the west,' the study revealed. The study states that 'most archaeologists accept that Neolithic people achieved this remarkable feat, transporting blocks weighing up to 3.5 tonnes,' but a 'contrary view' remains that 'no human effort was involved.' Advertisement 5 Aberystwyth University researchers determined that Neolithic communities were responsible for moving the 'Newall boulder' on Wiltshire's Salisbury Plain. R.E. Bevins/Journal of Archeoligical Sciences 'There is, however, a contrary view, which proposes that no human effort was involved: rather, it is argued, the Welsh stones were transported by glacial ice long before Stonehenge was built,' researchers wrote. One of the more prominent advocates for the glacier theory is Dr. Brian John, a geologist whose previous study found that the Newall boulder exhibits glacial abrasion marks. 'The boulder was reduced in size and heavily modified during glacial transport, for much of the time on the bed of a glacier,' John wrote. 'It was eventually dumped at some location on, or relatively close to, Salisbury Plain.' 5 A deserted, closed Stonehenge on March 20, 2020, in Amesbury, United Kingdom. Getty Images However, Bevins and his team said his finding has 'no basis in evidence.' 'To present it is as fact, rather than as hypothesis, is disingenuous,' the study stated. Advertisement Bevins' team argued that similar fragments would be found elsewhere on Salisbury Plain if glaciers transported the stones, but they are concentrated only at Stonehenge — strengthening the case for human movement. 5 General view of the Stonehenge stone circle, near Amesbury, Britain. via REUTERS 'The presence of Stonehenge itself is the evidence of movement by Neolithic peoples of stones weighing up to as much as 40 tonnes,' researchers wrote. 'Unless it is argued that all the stones were just lying on the ground ready to be erected where they were to make Stonehenge, the stones must have been moved into position.' The researchers firmly stated that 'if Neolithic people could move a stone a few tens of metres they could move it tens or hundreds of kilometres.' Advertisement 'It may not have been easy, but it was entirely possible and moving 2–3 tonne bluestones would involve an order of magnitude less effort than moving the sarsens,' they noted. Although the study confirms Neolithic communities moved the stones, the precise techniques they used remain unknown. They did note that 'recent indigenous peoples have been transporting stones weighing many tonnes great distances with ropes, wooden sledges and trackways – technologies which would have been available in the Neolithic.'
Yahoo
17-07-2025
- Yahoo
Nvidia and University of Bristol debut UK's fastest AI supercomputer in sovereign AI push
Nvidia (NVDA) and the University of Bristol debuted the UK's Isambard-AI supercomputer on Thursday, part of Nvidia's push into so-called sovereign AI, or AI supercomputers built for individual nations. The fastest supercomputer in the country and one of the most energy-efficient supercomputers globally, the Isambard-AI supercomputer combines 5,448 Nvidia Grace Hopper superchips through a series of liquid-cooled HPE server cabinets packed with 440 GPUs each. The system is meant to perform research on everything from materials science to drug discovery to large language models designed for UK-specific languages such as Welsh. Impressively, according to University of Bristol professor Simon McIntosh-Smith, the entire system came together in less than two years. Normally, it takes more than three years to complete similar projects, McIntosh-Smith, who also heads the Bristol Centre for Supercomputing (BriCS), told Yahoo Finance. Researchers and companies will need to apply for access to the Isambard-AI supercomputer via the UK government's Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology. Supercomputers, however, don't just run individual tasks at once. Depending on the time of day, such systems can run a host of different experiments at the same time, helping to improve overall efficiency While the Isambard-AI supercomputer is powerful as far as research computers go, it's relatively small compared to the massive datacenter-scale systems companies like Amazon (AMZN), Google (GOOG, GOOGL), Meta (META), and Microsoft (MSFT) currently run. Those warehouse-sized computers require gigawatts, or 1 billion watts, of electricity to power tens of thousands of GPUs. The Isambard-AI supercomputer, meanwhile, uses 5 megawatts, or 5 million watts. According to McIntosh-Smith, the team at BriCS chose to use a liquid cooling solution rather than traditional air cooling with fans to keep the Isambard-AI from overheating, because it allowed them to pack more GPUs into a smaller space while improving overall energy efficiency. The university is also working on a pilot program that will use the hot wastewater from the supercomputer to heat campus facilities and eventually nearby homes and businesses. While the University of Bristol officially flipped the switch on Isambard-AI on Thursday, McIntosh-Smith said some researchers have already been running experiments on a test version of the system. Those include work on vaccines for Alzheimer's disease and image recognition to help machines better identify skin cancer. The Isambard-AI supercomputer is just one example of Nvidia's push into sovereign AI, which represents a new revenue stream for the company beyond individual tech companies. In May, CEO Jensen Huang attended an event held in Saudi Arabia where President Trump announced that he would allow Nvidia to sell thousands of GPUs to companies within the country. The administration also set up a plan to sell hundreds of thousands of chips to the United Arab Emirates, but officials are holding off on moving forward with the deal over concerns China could gain access to the technology, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday. And in June, Nvidia touted its expansion in Europe, announcing that companies across France, the UK, Germany, and Italy will build out or expand on their AI infrastructure. "Every industrial revolution begins with infrastructure. AI is the essential infrastructure of our time, just as electricity and the internet once were," Huang said in a statement at the time. "With bold leadership from Europe's governments and industries, AI will drive transformative innovation and prosperity for generations to come." The US still accounts for the majority of Nvidia's sales, making up $61.2 billion of the company's $130.4 billion in total revenue in its latest fiscal year. Taiwan and China made up $20.5 billion and $17.1 billion, respectively. Singapore saw $23.6 billion in sales, but Nvidia said the majority of those shipments are simply invoiced in the country and shipped elsewhere. Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15-07-2025
- Yahoo
Archaeologists Found Trapezoidal Tombs Older Than the Egyptian Pyramids
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: Archaeologists in Poland discovered 5,500-year-old tombs dubbed 'Polish pyramids.' The oversized graves feature earthen mounds in a trapezoidal shape, some stretching 656 feet in length. The scene offers glimpses into one of Europe first agricultural societies. The new discovery of uniquely shaped 'Polish pyramids' from 5,500 years ago highlights the distinct way early European agricultural societies buried their dead. Discovered by a team from Adam Mickiewicz University using advanced remote sensing technology during routine field work, the team uncovered 'mysterious ground embankments' before confirming them as long earthen tombs constructed during the Funnelbeaker culture of the Neolithic age, according to a translated statement from the Landscape Parks Complex of the Wielkopolska Voivodeship. To locate the tombs after the initial discovery, archaeologists employed aerial laser scanning followed by on-the-ground excavation. Known as Polish pyramids—or 'beds of giants'—the tombs located at the General Dezydery Chlapowski Landscape Park form an elongated trapezoid, with some stretching as long as 656 feet. This particular style of construction has the east end wider and taller than the west, creating a triangle shape or tail-like design from the tomb. Experts believe the use of the trapezoid shape is tied to the style of houses once used by nearby Neolithic cultures, according to the Polish Press Agency. While the tombs rarely reach taller than 13 feet, the transparent size and design make them a distinct sight in Poland. The most recent find is only the second in the region, while more are known in northwestern Poland. Each tomb was typically covered with cobblestones and massive boulders were placed in front, some weighing as much as 10 tons, a show of the culture's intricate teamwork and tool know-how to make happen. 'The largest boulders that formed the entrance of the tomb are missing,' said Artur Golis, chief specialist for nature and landscape protection from the park, according to the Polish Press Agency. He believes the stones were chipped away over the centuries for use by the residents in other projects. While fields of the Polish pyramids typically offered a communal location for the region's burials, only the most prominent folks within the society would get buried within the tombs. Each oversized tomb often only contained a single skeleton of a key leader, with the body placed in an upright position and surrounded by grave gifts. The tops of the pyramids were then covered with stones. 'Each generation built its own megalith, honoring the deceased who played a vital role in their community,' said Golis. While no such skeletons were found in the most recent tomb discovery, archaeologists remain hopeful they can locate grave goods still buried nearby, most likely axes and pottery. 'These artifacts,' Golis said, 'could provide further insight into the spiritual and daily lives of the Funnelbeaker people.' You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
