logo
Michigan House appropriations chair says its budget will be done as soon as next week

Michigan House appropriations chair says its budget will be done as soon as next week

Yahooa day ago
Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Sarah Anthony (D-Lansing) and House Appropriations Commitee Chair Ann Bollin (R-Brighton). Feb. 5, 2025 | Photo by Kyle Davidson/Michigan Advance
After months of infighting and barbs thrown at the opposite respective chambers of the Michigan Legislature, the state's House of Representatives appears poised to release the rest of its budget plan as soon as next week.
The announcement came Tuesday from state Rep. Ann Bollin (R-Brighton), chair of the House Appropriations Committee, who said the lower chamber's plan would be 'responsible' and embrace national Republican talking points like eliminating waste and reallocating resources – likely through cuts that legislative Democrats would outright oppose.
'As we wrap up our review of the state's finances, one thing has become clear: Michigan taxpayers deserve better than the wasteful habits that have taken root in state government,' Bollin said in a statement. 'Departments are sitting on slush funds created by phantom jobs that never get filled, and they're rolling over hundreds of millions of dollars in work projects year after year. These dollars were meant to serve the people, not to be stashed away by bureaucrats. We're putting a stop to that.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The budget negotiations this year hit a brick wall due to inaction from the House on its full budget, releasing and passing only a K-12 and higher education funding plan, and the Senate's unwillingness to release a fully fleshed out road funding plan, although the Senate did pass a full government budget, including education funding, in May.
Congressional Republicans and President Donald Trump also did the Michigan Legislature no favors when they passed and Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which will likely blow a $1 billion hole in the state's budget.
Lawmakers had a July 1 deadline to get their respective – and complete – plans passed and moved to the negotiating table with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, but the chambers blew past that deadline and have been pointing fingers on which chamber was to blame.
Some of the House's logic on waiting was to see what fallout the federal budget might create for Michgian, although members of the Democratic-led Senate said their plan accounted for the steep cuts that were likely under Trump this year.
'I can't punch air': budget chasm continues as Michigan Legislature fails to hold session
The war of words between the two chambers worsened last week without any real sign of movement on the full House budget, but Bollin on Tuesday signaled that the first phase of the process may conclude soon.
Bollin noted the House Republican belief that Senate Democrats rushed their budget, coming up with a plan to spend $86 billion, which Bollin claimed was far more than the state can afford without raising taxes. The forthcoming House budget, Bollin said, took months to 'carefully review every line of the budget.'
'We did the hard work of going through this budget line by line,' Bollin said. 'That extra time allowed us to root out waste, fraud, and abuse, and to make smarter investments in the things that matter most to people across Michigan.'
Bollin said the House plan prioritizes $3.1 billion annually to repair the local roads in the worst condition, while also creating the Public Safety and Violence Prevention Trust Fund to send state dollars directly to local communities for public safety programs.
'It ends unfair taxes on tips, overtime pay, and retirement income,' she added. 'We're boosting education funding with more flexibility so schools can shrink class sizes, strengthen mental health services, and invest in the programs their kids need most. And we are making the necessary adjustments to ensure Medicaid remains available for every qualified Michigan resident who needs it.'
Bollin said the House's approach would make a difference to tax payers in the long run.
'Every dollar we cut from bureaucracy and waste is a dollar we can put toward the real priorities of Michigan families,' she said. 'You're going to see a budget that respects taxpayers and focuses on fixing roads, keeping our communities safe, making life more affordable, and ensuring every child has the opportunity to succeed.'
In response to Bollin's announcement, Tracy Wimmer, spokesperson for the House Democratic Caucus, said, 'we would have loved to have read this in June.'
Messages seeking comment from Senate Democrats were not immediately returned.
Communication breakdown: No end to budget impasse in sight as leaders spend day throwing jabs
The mention of the roads plan was a signal that the House may be ready to move on with its budget plan without seeing the Senate's roads plan first, as the upper chamber has yet to release its approach to funding roads in the coming fiscal year and beyond. Senate Majority Leader Winnie Brinks said last week that the Senate needed to see the House's full budget before it could start nailing down a funding fix to the looming road repair cliff. The House moving its plan forward could mean the Senate's roads plan might be imminent, as well.
Meanwhile, Whitmer has been playing harder ball to get both sides to an agreement on roads, noting in a recent press conference that no state budget plan was complete without funding for roads.
On Tuesday, the governor's office released the results of a constituent survey on roads, which showed residents wanted a comprehensive and bipartisan plan. The continued kicks in the rear from the executive office could also help break the gridlock.
'A majority of Michiganders want safe, reliable roads so they can go to work, drop their kids off at school, and run errands without blowing a tire or cracking an axle,' Whitmer said in a statement. 'While people acknowledged the progress we've made over the last five years, they also shared hundreds of stories about how much poor road conditions cost them and how much safer they would feel if we kept our foot on the accelerator. We've fixed a lot of major roads since I took office, but our work is not over.'
Among several questions, the one geared toward the Legislature's role in moving a roads plan forward saw 72% of participants say a bipartisan deal was very important to them, while 17% said it was somewhat important and another 3% saying it was not important at all.
Whitmer's office did not immediately respond to questions from Michigan Advance on the number of residents polled in the governor's survey and in what areas of the state residents were polled.
In another new poll conducted by Glengariff Group, Michigan residents of all political strips were frustrated that the Legislature failed to pass and complete a negotiated schools budget by the July 1 deadline.
Of the participants in the Glengariff poll, 83% said they support the Legislature's self-imposed July 1 statutory deadline and 89% said that a budget must be completed now before school starts after Labor Day. Another 74% of participants said voters would choose to have public school funding fleshed out before a roads funding plan, and 89% of participants ranked school funding as their top priority for the Legislature.
While the blame game continues, nearly two-thirds of participants in the Glengariff poll said they would blame everyone – the House, the Senate and the governor – if the crisis veers into a government shutdown.
A total of 600 likely Michigan voters were polled by Glengariff on behalf of The K-12 Alliance of Michigan, with a relatively equal number of Democrats and Republicans but fewer independent voters. The poll had a 4% margin of error with 95% confidence level.
Robert McCann, the alliance's executive director, said the voters' message to the Legislature was clear.
'Do your job and pass a school budget immediately that puts every single dollar where it belongs – investing in our K-12 classrooms and kids,' McCann said in a statement. 'This stalemate exists because too many in Lansing still view the School Aid Fund as a piggy bank to raid for other projects. Voters could not disagree more. Public school funding must be treated as the top priority inside the Capitol – just as it clearly is for families across Michigan. Anything less ignores the clear will of Michigan voters.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vance slams Newsom's efforts to ‘mimic' Trump — and touts DC crackdown: ‘You don't have to live with lawlessness'
Vance slams Newsom's efforts to ‘mimic' Trump — and touts DC crackdown: ‘You don't have to live with lawlessness'

New York Post

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Post

Vance slams Newsom's efforts to ‘mimic' Trump — and touts DC crackdown: ‘You don't have to live with lawlessness'

Vice President JD Vance blasted California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's attempts to 'mimic' President Trump as inauthentic on Wednesday and touted new data suggesting the federal crackdown on crime in Washington, DC, is working. Vance's criticism of Newsom – a potential 2028 presidential candidate – comes as the Golden State governor's press office X account has been aping Trump's distinctive social media style and penchant for nicknaming political opponents. The vice president was asked about his thoughts on Newsom's bizarre strategy, and whether it might be a good idea for Democrats to copy Trump's tone, in an interview with Fox News host Laura Ingraham. Advertisement Vance suggested that Newsom was being inauthentic by copying Trump's style. Getty Images 'This idea that Gavin Newsom is somehow going to mimic Donald Trump's style – I think that ignores the fundamental genius of President Trump's political success, which is that he's authentic,' Vance argued. 'He just is who he is,' the vice president said of Trump, during his appearance on 'The Ingraham Angle.' 'You've got to be yourself. You've got, actually, to talk to people honestly about the issues.' Advertisement 'Gavin Newsom can mimic Donald Trump all that he wants to, they're still going to lose unless they get better policies that actually serve the American people,' he argued. His advice to Democrats? 'I don't think it's that complicated – Don't be a crazy person. Be authentic,' Vance said. 'If the Democrats did that, they'd do a hell of a lot better.' However, Vance argued that 'Democrats really can't help themselves' – citing the Democratic Party uproar over Trump's decision to federalize DC's police force, and deploy thousands of federal law enforcement officers and National Guard troops into the district to take on crime. Advertisement 'If you look at the crime issue, they're calling Donald Trump a fascist for taking action,' the vice president said. 'So part of sounding less crazy is being less crazy,' the veep argued. Vance said new data shows 'violent crime has dropped in DC, 35% in nine days' and 'robberies in DC have dropped 55% in nine days.' Fox News Vance had earlier revealed a 'crazy statistic' about Trump's crime crackdown showing that 'violent crime has dropped in DC, 35% in nine days' and 'robberies in DC have dropped 55% in nine days.' Advertisement Trump signed his executive order declaring a crime 'emergency' in the nation's capital on Aug. 11. The stats 'highlight the fact that living with lawlessness and disorder' is 'fundamentally a question of political will,' Vance told Ingraham. 'If you've got the political will to enforce the law, you can make even cities like DC safe again, and that's what we're demonstrating,' he continued. 'I hope the American people just recognize that you don't have to live with lawlessness,' the vice president added. 'You don't have to live with third-world murder rates.' 'If you just take control of these cities, you can make them safe places to live in.'

California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom's redistricting plan

CBS News

timea minute ago

  • CBS News

California Supreme Court declines to stop Newsom's redistricting plan

Washington — The California Supreme Court will not prevent Democrats from moving forward Thursday with a plan to redraw congressional districts. Republicans in the Golden State had asked the state's high court to step in and temporarily block the redistricting efforts, arguing that Democrats — who are racing to put the plan on the ballot later this year — had skirted a rule requiring state lawmakers to wait at least 30 days before passing newly introduced legislation. But in a ruling late Wednesday, the court declined to act, writing that the Republican state lawmakers who filed the suit had "failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time." The California legislature is set to vote on the redistricting plan on Thursday, which would send the bill to California Gov. Gavin Newsom's desk for approval. Democratic state lawmakers in California introduced a set of bills to create new district boundaries in a way they hope would flip five congressional seats, a move made in response to President Trump and Texas Republicans' push to reshape five congressional districts in Texas to favor the GOP. Democratic state lawmakers in California, who have a supermajority in the legislature, want to pass the bills immediately so they can place the proposal in front of voters in a Nov. 4 special election Democrats' proposal in California would try to flip five of the state's nine districts currently held by Republicans and make them more friendly for Democrats. California has 52 congressional districts. The changes may require an amendment to California's state Constitution to override the independent commission that's currently responsible for the state's redistricting process. The battle over district lines may influence the midterm elections next year. Republicans hold only a slim majority in the House of Representatives, and they want to hold onto it, while Democrats are aiming to take back the House. Newsom, a potential 2028 contender, has been leading the charge. "Look, what we're doing neuters, neutralizes what's happening in Texas," Newsom told reporters Wednesday. "People have this chance with this ballot — Nov. 4 — is stand up to the rule of law, stand up for coequal branches of government, stand up to, yes, Donald Trump, but also stand up in the spirit that defines this moment to people being bullied and people being intimidated." In a statement to CBS News, the GOP state lawmakers who sued over the redistricting plan said the Supreme Court's ruling is "not the end of this fight." "We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box. Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians," the statement read.

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

time30 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store