Israel releases Palestinian prisoners linked to suicide bombings, attempted murders
Thirty-six of the detainees were serving out life sentences in Israeli prisons, but only 12 of them were allowed to return to their homes in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The other 24 are being sent to exile.
Those released Saturday were wearing white sweatshirts given to them by the Israeli Prison Service upon their release, emblazoned with a Star of David, the Prison Service logo and the phrase "Never forgive, never forget" written in Arabic on the front and back, according to the Associated Press. A video later posted on X purportedly showed those sweatshirts being burned.
Among those that returned to the West Bank were Ibrahim and Musa Sarahneh, who served more than 22 years in prison for their involvement in suicide bombings that killed a number of Israelis during the second intifada, a Palestinian uprising against Israel in the early 2000s.
American-israeli Hostage Released By Hamas Embraces His Wife, Family After Being Apart For Nearly 500 Days
Their other brother, Khalil Sarahneh, who was convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to life in 2002, was sent to Egypt.
Read On The Fox News App
Hassan Aweis, who also was sentenced to life in 2002 on charges of voluntary manslaughter, planting an explosive device and attempted murder, according to Israel's Justice Ministry, was among the few released prisoners welcomed by joyous crowds in Ramallah.
He was involved in planning attacks during the second intifada for the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, the AP reported.
The group, which is designated by the U.S. as a foreign terrorist organization, was "formed in late 2000 during the second intifada as a militant wing of the West Bank's Fatah political faction" and "seeks to drive Israeli military forces and settlers from Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip and establish a Palestinian state," according to the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
Hamas Frees 3 More Hostages In Exchange For More Than 300 Prisoners
Hassan Aweis's brother, Abdel Karim Aweis, whom Israel's Justice Ministry said was sentenced to the equivalent of six life sentences for charges including throwing an explosive device, attempted murder and assault, was transferred to Egypt.
Ahmed Barghouti was also sent to Egypt on Saturday. Barghouti, who once was a commander in the Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, was given a life sentence for dispatching assailants and suicide bombers to carry out attacks that killed Israeli civilians during the second intifada.
Barghouti is a close aide of Marwan Barghouti, a popular Fatah leader who remains in Israeli custody.
Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has described Marwan Barghouti as "one of the leaders of the Second Intifada" who was "convicted in a criminal suit in Israeli district court on five separate counts of murder of innocent civilians."
"He was acquitted of 21 counts of murder in 33 other attacks, due to lack of sufficient evidence," it added, noting that "during his trials, Barghouti showed no remorse for the murders he committed."
The Associated Press contributed to this report. Original article source: Israel releases Palestinian prisoners linked to suicide bombings, attempted murders
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Americans split on whether Trump support of Israel has gone too far: Poll
Americans are split on whether President Trump's support for Israel has gone too far or is just about right, according to a survey released on Tuesday. The Economist/YouGov poll found that 36 percent of U.S. adults think that the president's backing of Israel has gone too far, while another 32 percent stated the commander-in-chief's support for the Jewish state is about right. Only seven percent of respondents said Trump is not supportive enough of Jerusalem. The large majority of Americans, 71 percent, including 87 percent of Democratic Party voters and 54 percent of Republicans, think there is a hunger crisis in the Gaza Strip, according to the survey. Just over four-in-10 respondents, 43 percent, think that Israel is committing 'genocide' on the war-torn enclave against Palestinians. Around 65 percent of Democrats and 19 percent of GOP voters agreed. In the same survey from January 2024, 35 percent of U.S. adults said Israel was committing 'genocide.' More Americans, 41, in the survey said that Israeli military attacks on 'Gaza are unjustified and harm too many innocent Palestinians' compared to 32 percent of those who argued that 'Israel is justified in its attacks on Gaza as a response to threats' from the Palestinian militant group Hamas. Over four-in-10 respondents, 42 percent, are supportive of decreasing military aid to Israel, compared to those who are supportive, 13 percent, of increasing it. More Americans are in favor, 38 percent, of increasing humanitarian aid to the Palestinians than tamping it down, 18 percent, according to the survey. The majority of U.S. adults, 78 percent, are 'strongly or somewhat' supportive of reaching a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government. Nearly half of Americans, 49 percent, including 70 percent of Democrats and 23 percent of Republicans, argued that Palestinians should have their own state. Some 17 percent do not agree. The survey was conducted from Aug. 1-4 among 1,702 Americans. The poll had a margin of error of around 3.5 percent.
New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Israel has every right to finish the job in Gaza — by obliterating Hamas
After Hamas' repeated rejections of cease-free deals and recently released videos of emaciated Israeli hostages, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sees only one choice: a full military occupation of Gaza. That's logical — with the possible serious weakness being . . . politics, both abroad and in Israel. The Israeli security cabinet meets Thursday, reportedly to greenlight either a full occupation or at least plans for the IDF to move into or surround new territory, such as in Deir al-Balah and Gaza City. The IDF already occupies 75% of Gaza, but has avoided areas where it believes action might endanger the lives of hostages. But video evidence now shows Hamas abusing the hostages to death anyway. To have any hope of saving them, Israel must either 1) accept the only deal the terrorists will consider — essentially, surrender and let them keep power — or 2) move in to finish the terrorists off. Israel would be nuts to surrender: Hamas still vows to repeat its massive Oct. 7 killing spree and continue massacring Jews until Israel is destroyed. Finishing the job on the ground will be a huge task, but the IDF has pulled off difficult feats before. What can seriously threaten the mission is anti-Israel political meddling by the outside world and internal pressure from hostages' families and Netanyahu's foes. In Israel, some fear stepped up operations are a death warrant for the hostages. Elsewhere, lefty ruling parties in France, the United Kingdom and Canada have already turned up the heat on Israel, with plans to reward the terrorists' slaughter of Jews by recognizing a Palestinian state. A top UN official calls plans to fully occupy Gaza 'deeply alarming.' Happily, the critics don't include President Donald Trump, who says Israel's plans are 'up to Israel' to decide. Hear, hear. Trump is concerned about hunger in Gaza and plans to expand US operations there to distribute food and supplies — a noble sentiment, but we can't help but recall how similar relief work in Somalia in 1992 quickly led to the Black Hawk Down incident that saw 18 Americans killed. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The war in Gaza is every bit as risky. But it could end tomorrow if Hamas stepped down, freed the hostages and left the strip. Israel has every right to do what it must to eliminate Hamas once and for all — and anyone with any moral sense should back it to the hilt.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Stanford student newspaper sues Trump officials over immigration law that's led to chilling of free speech
Stanford University's student newspaper on Wednesday sued the Trump administration over two provisions in federal immigration law that they say the officials have wielded against those with pro-Palestinian views. The Stanford Daily, in addition to two former college students, filed the lawsuit against Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, accusing the administration of using the provisions to threaten deportation and the revocation of visas. They say it's led to censorship and violations of free speech rights. The paper's staff members who are on visas have self-censored and declined assignments related to the war in Gaza, fearful that their reporting could jeopardize their lawful immigration status, the lawsuit said. 'In the United States of America, no one should fear a midnight knock on the door for voicing the wrong opinion,' said Conor Fitzpatrick, attorney at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a group that is helping to represent the plaintiffs, in a statement. 'Free speech isn't a privilege the government hands out. Under our Constitution it is the inalienable right of every man, woman, and child.' A senior State Department official declined to comment on the ongoing litigation, but directed NBC News to comments Rubio previously made about visa holders and complying with U.S. law. In April, Rubio wrote in an opinion piece published on Fox News that he would be taking a 'zero-tolerance approach to foreign nationals who abet terrorist organizations.' 'The Supreme Court has made clear for decades that visa holders or other aliens cannot use the First Amendment to shield otherwise impermissible actions taken to support designated foreign terrorist organizations like Hamas, Hizballah, or the Houthis, or violate other U.S. laws,' Rubio said. Tricia McLaughlin, spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, described the lawsuit as 'baseless.' 'There is no room in the United States for the rest of the world's terrorist sympathizers, and we are under no obligation to admit them or let them stay here,' McLaughlin said in a statement. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs take aim at the Deportation Provision and Revocation Provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act. The first provision allows the secretary of state to deport noncitizens if the secretary 'personally determines that the alien's admission would compromise a compelling United States foreign policy interest.' The second gives the secretary the power to revoke a visa or documentation at their discretion. As the lawsuit points out, the Trump administration has cited the Deportation Provision as the basis for attempting to deport Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil, who was arrested and detained for more than three months. Similarly, the administration used the Revocation Provision to detain Tufts student Rumeysa Ozturk, who's also since been released. Due to the administration's use of the statutes, the lawsuit said, the Stanford Daily has received a number of requests from lawfully present noncitizens to have their names, quotes or photos removed from articles. Many international students have stopped speaking to the paper's journalists, and current and former writers have asked for their opinion editorials to be taken down, the lawsuit said. 'The First Amendment cements America's promise that the government may not subject a speaker to disfavored treatment because those in power do not like his or her message,' the lawsuit said. 'And when a federal statute collides with First Amendment rights, the Constitution prevails.' One of the unnamed plaintiffs appeared on the Canary Mission, the suit said. The website, run by an anonymous group, has published a detailed database of students, professors and others who it says have shared anti-Israel and antisemitic viewpoints. It's been accused of doxxing and harassment, in addition to launching personal attacks that depict pro-Palestinian activists as being in 'support of terrorism,' the Middle East Studies Association of North America said. The plaintiff has stopped publishing and 'voicing her true opinions' on Palestine and Israel, the suit said. Canary Mission previously told NBC News that it documents people and groups who 'promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews' across the political spectrum, but it did not respond to criticisms of its work. The plaintiffs are asking the court to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions that block the officials from using the provisions against them based on engaging in what they consider protected speech. 'There's real fear on campus and it reaches into the newsroom,' said Greta Reich, editor-in-chief of The Stanford Daily, in a statement. 'The Daily is losing the voices of a significant portion of our student population.'
