At 1.5%, industrial growth slows to 10-mth low in June
Data released by the National Statistics Office (NSO) on Monday showed the index of industrial production (IIP) rose an annual 1.5% in June, slower than the upwardly revised 1.9% in May and below the 4.9% recorded in June last year.
The mining sector contracted 8.7% in June compared with a growth of 10.3% in June last year, and the electricity sector fell 2.6% during the month compared to a growth of 8.6% in June last year.
The manufacturing sector remained resilient, rising 3.9% during June compared to a growth of 3.5% in June last year.
Experts attributed the slowdown to excess rains which had weighed on mining and electricity sectors.
"Excess rains in the second half of June 2025 are likely to have weighed on mining output, while also leading to a contraction in electricity generation, although the extent of the same narrowed compared to the previous month.
Encouragingly, the growth in manufacturing output improved to 3.9% in June 2025 from 3.2% in May 2025," said Aditi Nayar, chief economist at ratings agency Icra.
The data also showed weakness in other segments of the industrial sector. The capital goods sector, a key gauge of industrial activity, remained sluggish during the month, rising by 3.5% in June compared to a growth of 3.6% in June last year.
The consumer durables sector slowed in June, rising by 2.9% compared to a growth of 8.8% in June last year while the consumer non-durables sector contracted by 0.4% during the month compared to a decline of 1% in June last year.
"On the demand side, signals remain mixed. Output of consumer non-durables goods continued to remain weak, staying in the contractionary zone for five consecutive months, while output of consumer durable goods improved. Urban consumption, in particular, remains lagging," said Rajani Sinha, chief economist at ratings agency CareEdge.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
WhatsApp takes down 6.8 million accounts linked to criminal scam centers, Meta says
AP Updated 6 Aug 2025, 07:58 PM IST NEW YORK (AP) — WhatsApp has taken down 6.8 million accounts that were 'linked to criminal scam centers' targeting people online around that world, its parent company Meta said this week. The account deletions, which Meta said took place over the first six months of the year, arrive as part of wider company efforts to crack down on scams. In a Tuesday announcement, Meta said it was also rolling new tools on WhatsApp to help people spot scams — including a new safety overview that the platform will show when someone who is not in a user's contacts adds them to a group, as well as ongoing test alerts to pause before responding. Scams are becoming all too common and increasingly sophisticated in today's digital world — with too-good-to-be-true offers and unsolicited messages attempting to steal consumers' information or money filling our phones, social media and other corners of the internet each day. Meta noted that 'some of the most prolific' sources of scams are criminal scam centers, which often span from forced labor operated by organized crime — and warned that such efforts often target people on many platforms at once, in attempts to evade detection. That means that a scam campaign may start with messages over text or a dating app, for example, and then move to social media and payment platforms, the California-based company said. Meta, which also owns Facebook and Instagram, pointed to recent scam efforts that it said attempted to use its own apps — as well as TikTok, Telegram and AI-generated messages made using ChatGPT — to offer payments for fake likes, enlist people into a pyramid scheme and/or lure others into cryptocurrency investments. Meta linked these scams to a criminal scam center in Cambodia — and said it disrupted the campaign in partnership with ChatGPT maker OpenAI.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Forget jobs, AI is taking away much more: Creativity, memory and critical thinking are at risk. New studies sound alarm
Synopsis Artificial intelligence tools are becoming more common. Studies show over-reliance on AI may weaken human skills. Critical thinking and emotional intelligence are important. Businesses invest in AI but not human skills. MIT research shows ChatGPT use reduces memory retention. Users become passive and trust AI answers too much. Independent thinking is crucial for the future. iStock A new study reveals that over-reliance on AI tools may diminish essential human skills like critical thinking and memory. Businesses investing heavily in AI risk undermining their effectiveness by neglecting the development of crucial human capabilities. (Image: iStock) In a world racing toward artificial intelligence-driven efficiency, the question is no longer just about automation stealing jobs, it's about AI gradually chipping away at our most essential human abilities. From creativity to memory, critical thinking to ethical judgment, new research shows that our increasing dependence on AI tools may be making us less capable of using them major studies, one by UK-based learning platform Multiverse and another from the prestigious MIT Media Lab, paint a concerning picture: the more we lean on AI, the more we risk weakening the very cognitive and emotional muscles that differentiate us from the machines we're building. According to a recent report by Multiverse, businesses are pouring millions into AI tools with the promise of higher productivity and faster decision-making. Yet very few are investing in the development of the human skills required to work alongside AI effectively."Leaders are spending millions on AI tools, but their investment focus isn't going to succeed," said Gary Eimerman, Chief Learning Officer at Multiverse. "They think it's a technology problem when it's really a human and technology problem."The research reveals that real AI proficiency doesn't come from mastering prompts — it comes from critical thinking, analytical reasoning, creative problem-solving, and emotional intelligence. These are the abilities that allow humans to make meaning from what AI outputs and to question what it cannot understand. Without these, users risk becoming passive consumers of AI-generated content rather than active interpreters and decision-makers. The Multiverse study identified thirteen human capabilities that differentiate a casual AI user from a so-called 'power user.' These include resilience, curiosity, ethical oversight, adaptability, and the ability to verify and refine AI output.'It's not just about writing prompts,' added Imogen Stanley, a Senior Learning Scientist at Multiverse. 'The real differentiators are things like output verification and creative experimentation. AI is a co-pilot, but we still need a pilot.'Unfortunately, as AI becomes more accessible, these skills are being underutilized and in some cases, lost this warning, a separate study from the MIT Media Lab examined the cognitive cost of relying on large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. Over a four-month period, 54 students were divided into three groups: one used ChatGPT, another used Google, and a third relied on their own knowledge alone. The results were sobering. Participants who frequently used ChatGPT not only showed reduced memory retention and lower scores, but also diminished brain activity when attempting to complete tasks without AI assistance. According to the researchers, the AI users performed worse 'at all levels: neural, linguistic, and scoring.'Google users fared somewhat better, but the 'Brain-only' group, those who engaged with material independently, consistently outperformed the others in depth of thought, originality, and neural ChatGPT and similar tools offer quick answers and seemingly flawless prose, the MIT study warns of a hidden toll: mental passivity. As convenience increases, users become less inclined to question or evaluate the accuracy and nuance of AI responses.'This convenience came at a cognitive cost,' the MIT researchers wrote. 'Diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions'.'This passivity can lead to over-trusting AI-generated answers, even when they're factually incorrect or ethically biased, a concern that grows with each advancement in generative the numbers and neural scans lies a deeper question: what kind of future are we building if we lose the ability to think, question, and create independently?
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Google commits $1 billion for AI training at US universities
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Alphabet's Google on Wednesday announced a three-year, $1 billion commitment to provide artificial intelligence training and tools to US higher education institutions and than 100 universities have signed on to the initiative so far, including some of the nation's largest public university systems such as Texas A&M and the University of North schools may receive cash funding and resources, such as cloud computing credits towards AI training for students as well as research on AI-related billion-dollar figure also includes the value of paid AI tools, such as an advanced version of the Gemini chatbot , which Google will give to college students for free. Google hopes to expand the program to every accredited nonprofit college in the US and is discussing similar plans in other countries, senior vice president James Manyika said in an declined to specify how much Google is earmarking in direct funds to external institutions relative to footing its own cloud and subscription bills. The announcement comes as rivals like OpenAI, Anthropic and Amazon have made similar pushes around AI in education as the technology pervades society. Microsoft in July pledged $4 billion to bolster AI in education evangelising their products to students, tech firms further stand to win business deals once those users enter the workforce.A growing body of research has mapped concerns around AI's role in education, from enabling cheating to eroding critical thinking, prompting some schools to consider bans. Manyika said Google had not faced resistance from administrators since it began to plot its education initiative earlier this year, but "many more questions" about AI-related concerns remain."We're hoping to learn together with these institutions about how best to use these tools," he said, adding that the insights could help shape future product decisions.
