Iran says no plan for new US nuclear talks, plays down impact of strikes
[TEHRAN] Iran on Thursday denied it is set to resume nuclear talks with the United States after the end of a 12-day war with Israel, and accused Washington of exaggerating the impact of US strikes.
The most serious conflict yet between Israel and Iran derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, yet President Donald Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope 'for a comprehensive peace agreement'.
But Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi shut down what he said was 'speculation' that Tehran would come to the table and said it 'should not be taken seriously'.
'I would like to state clearly that no agreement, arrangement or conversation has been made to start new negotiations,' he said on state television. 'No plan has been set yet to start negotiations.'
Araghchi's denial came as Iranian lawmakers passed a 'binding' bill suspending cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog and after supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Trump of exaggerating the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.
In a televised speech - his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel - Khamenei hailed what he described as Iran's 'victory' over Israel, vowed never to yield to US pressure and insisted Washington had been dealt a humiliating 'slap'.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration,' Khamenei said, rejecting US claims Iran's nuclear programme had been set back by decades.
The strikes, he insisted, had done 'nothing significant' to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Araghchi, for his part, called the damage 'serious' and said a detailed assessment was under way.
Trump said key facilities, including the underground Fordo uranium enrichment site, had been 'obliterated' by American B-2 bombers.
Posting on his Truth Social platform, he dismissed speculation Iran might have removed enriched uranium prior to the raid, saying: 'Nothing was taken out... too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!'
He added that satellite images showed trucks at the site only because Iranian crews were attempting to shield the facility with concrete.
Khamenei dismissed such claims, saying 'the Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America'.
Both sides have claimed victory: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a 'historic win', while Khamenei said Iran's missile retaliation had brought Israel to the brink of collapse.
US defence
In Washington, the true impact of the strikes has sparked sharp political and intelligence debates.
A leaked classified assessment suggested the damage to Iran's nuclear programme may be less severe than initially claimed - possibly delaying progress by only a few months.
That contrasts with statements from senior US officials.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe said several facilities would need to be 'rebuilt over the course of years'.
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth accused the media of misrepresenting the operation.
He said the United States used massive GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs on Fordo and another underground site, while submarine-launched Tomahawk missiles targeted a third facility.
'President Trump created the conditions to end the war, decimating - choose your word - obliterating, destroying Iran's nuclear capabilities,' Hegseth said.
Doubts remain about whether Iran quietly removed some 400 kg of enriched uranium from its most sensitive sites before the strikes - potentially hiding nuclear material elsewhere in the country.
Netanyahu says Iran 'thwarted'
Following waves of Israeli attacks on nuclear and military sites and retaliatory missile fire from Iran since mid-June - the deadliest between the two countries to date - the US bombed three key Iranian atomic facilities.
Initial intelligence reports, first revealed by CNN, suggested the strikes did not destroy critical components and delayed Iran's nuclear programme only by months.
Experts questioned if Iran had pre-emptively moved enriched uranium to protect it. The US administration has forcefully rejected such suggestions.
The Israeli military said Iran's nuclear sites had taken a 'significant' blow, but cautioned it was 'still early' to fully assess the damage.
Netanyahu said Israel had 'thwarted Iran's nuclear project', warning any attempt by Iran to rebuild it would be met with the same determination and intensity.
Iran has consistently denied seeking a nuclear weapon while defending its 'legitimate rights' to the peaceful use of atomic energy.
It has also said it is willing to return to nuclear negotiations with Washington.
The Israeli strikes on Iran killed at least 627 civilians, Tehran's health ministry said.
Iran's attacks on Israel killed 28 people, according to Israeli figures. AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
23 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Pope Leo laments 'diabolical intensity' of Middle East conflicts, World News
VATICAN CITY — Pope Leo said on Thursday (June 26) that conflicts in the Middle East were raging with an unprecedented "diabolical intensity" and appealed for greater respect for international law, in comments to Catholic bishops and aid agencies operating in the region. At a meeting in the Vatican, the pontiff said countries in the region were being "devastated by wars, plundered by special interests, and covered by a cloud of hatred that renders the air unbreathable and toxic." "Today, violent conflict seems to be raging... with a diabolical intensity previously unknown," he said, adding that the humanitarian situation in the Palestinian enclave of Gaza was "tragic and inhumane". Leo, elected on May 8 to replace the late Pope Francis, appealed last month for Israel to allow more humanitarian aid to enter Gaza. He did not name Israel in his remarks on Thursday. The US-born pope also did not directly address the recent 12-day war between Israel and Iran that also saw the United States bomb suspected Iranian nuclear facilities but he called for countries to show better respect for international law. "It is truly distressing to see the principle of 'might makes right' prevailing in so many situations today, all for the sake of legitimising the pursuit of self-interest," he said. "It is troubling to see that the force of international law and humanitarian law seems no longer to be binding, replaced by the alleged right to coerce others," Leo added. [[nid:719343]]
AsiaOne
23 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
White House wants deep cut in US funding for war crimes investigations, sources say, World News
WASHINGTON/THE HAGUE - The White House has recommended terminating US funding for nearly two dozen programmes that conduct war crimes and accountability work globally, including in Myanmar, Syria and on alleged Russian atrocities in Ukraine, according to three US sources familiar with the matter and internal government documents reviewed by Reuters. The recommendation from the Office of Management and Budget, which was made on Wednesday (June 25) and has not been previously reported, is not the final decision to end the programmes since it gives the State Department the option to appeal. But it sets up a potential back-and-forth between the OMB and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his aides, who will reply to OMB with their suggestions on which programmes deserve to continue. The programmes also include work in Iraq, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Colombia, Belarus, Sudan, South Sudan, Afghanistan and the Gambia, according to the sources and a list seen by Reuters. The State Department declined to comment. OMB did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The expectation that Rubio would argue for many of the programmes to be continued is slim, according to three US officials. However, the top US diplomat could make a case to keep crucial programmes, such as aiding potential war crimes prosecutions in Ukraine, according to one source familiar with the matter. Several of the programmes earmarked for termination operate war crimes accountability projects in Ukraine, three sources familiar with the matter said, including Global Rights Compliance, which is helping to collect evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity across Ukraine, such as sexual violence and torture. Another is Legal Action Worldwide, a legal aid group which supports local efforts to bring cases against Russian suspects of war crimes in Ukraine, the sources said. Requests seeking comment from the groups were not immediately answered. State Department bureaus that would like to preserve any war crimes and accountability programmes should send their justifications by close of business day on July 11, said an internal State Department email seen by Reuters. Changing priorities Many of the programmes recommended for termination are dedicated to empowering local organisations seeking to advance justice in societies that have faced atrocities, one of the sources said, adding that some programmes have been going on for decades across Democratic and Republican administrations. "Even if Secretary Rubio intervenes to save these programmes, many of which he supported as a senator, there will be no one left to manage these programmes," the source said. The administration of President Donald Trump has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office on Jan 20 to ensure American-taxpayer money funds programmes that are aligned with his "America First" policies. The unprecedented cutbacks have effectively shut down its premier aid arm US Agency for International Development, jeopardised the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos. The OMB recommendation is yet another sign that the administration is increasingly de-prioritizing advocacy for human rights and rule of law globally, an objective that previous US administrations have pursued. While US foreign aid freezes had already started hampering an international effort to hold Russia responsible for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, Wednesday's recommendations raise the risk of US completely abandoning those efforts. Among the programmes that are recommended for termination is a US$18 million (S$23 million) State Department grant for Ukraine's Prosecutor General's Office that is implemented by Georgetown University's International Criminal Justice Initiative, two sources said. An official at Georgetown declined to comment. While the programmes do not directly impact Ukraine's frontline efforts to fend off Russia's invasion, supporters say they represent the best chance of extensively documenting reported battlefield atrocities in Europe's biggest conflict since World War Two, now grinding toward a fourth year. Ukraine has opened more than 140,000 war crime cases since Moscow's February 2022 invasion, which has killed tens of thousands, ravaged vast swathes of the country and left behind mental and physical scars from occupation. Russia consistently denies war crimes have been committed by its forces in the conflict. Path to appeal Other programmes include one that does accountability work on Myanmar army's atrocities against Rohingya minorities as well as on the persecution of Christians and other minorities by Syria's ousted former president Bashar al-Assad, two sources said. While the OMB recommendations could face State Department push-back, the criteria to appeal are set very strictly. In an internal State Department email, the administration cautioned that any effort to preserve programmes that were recommended to be terminated should be thoroughly argued and directly aligned with Washington's priorities. "Bureaus must clearly and succinctly identify direct alignment to administration priorities," the email, reviewed by Reuters said. [[nid:719500]]
Straits Times
27 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Amid attacks, Iran's exiled opposition remained divided but who are they?
Overthrowing the government in Iran has been a goal of some in the Iranian diaspora too. PHOTO: REUTERS TEHRAN - After 12 days of devastating Israeli attacks, the stability of Iran's government is a subject of intense debate. And some in Israel and the United States have pressed not just for the destruction of Iran's nuclear program but for 'regime change'. Overthrowing the government in Iran has been a goal of some in the Iranian diaspora too, ever since the 1979 revolution that deposed the shah and replaced the monarchy with a theocratic Islamic Republic. The war has amplified a range of voices in the opposition abroad, which has a history of infighting as well as organised online harassment of journalists, academics and others that has escalated at times into threats of physical violence. Here are a few of the overseas voices opposed to the Islamic Republic – and how they have responded to the conflict. Decentralised activist groups Iranians in the diaspora who oppose the Islamic Republic include exiled leftists, nationalists, secular democrats, former prisoners, journalists, human rights advocates and artists. This loose network lacks organisational structure, according to Mr Taghi Rahmani, a prominent dissident who lives in Paris. But he said it has been effective in calling attention to human rights abuses in Iran with protests around the world, and voicing the demands of ordinary Iranians seeking change. These activists typically have connections to dissident groups and unions in Iran, as well as women's rights activists, teachers, lawyers, workers and students, and often take cues from them. Most have condemned the Israeli attacks on Iran, and were especially suspicious of Israel's campaign because of the high civilian death toll in the Gaza Strip, said Ms Sahar Delijani, an author who was born in Tehran's notorious Evin Prison in 1983, while both of her parents were imprisoned as political activists. 'If people are claiming that war would bring regime change, they're not interested in democracy,' she said. 'There are so many people in Iran who have been fighting for a long time. War only undermines their efforts.' Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's deposed shah Mr Pahlavi, whose father was the country's last shah, has been among the most visible opposition figures over the past two weeks. In a flurry of media appearances and social media posts, Mr Pahlavi, 64, who lives in the United States, has called Israel's strikes on Iran 'an opportunity' to topple Iran's supreme leader and institute a 'secular democracy.' Calling himself Iran's 'crown prince,' he presents himself as a candidate to lead that transition. 'This is our Berlin Wall moment,' Mr Pahlavi said at a news conference he organised in Paris on Monday. Mr Pahlavi's remarks during the war, including that 'anything that weakens the regime' would be 'welcome,' have provoked a backlash even among some supporters of his late father, who say he is out of touch with the reality inside Iran. Some experts question Mr Pahlavi's claims to legitimacy, the degree of support for him in Iran and the feasibility of his vision. 'I have not seen any evidence of what he claims of his organisational capability inside Iran,' said Professor Mohsen Milani, a political scientist at the University of Florida. 'Nor have I seen any evidence that when he calls for people to demonstrate, people actually take to the streets and follow his guidance.' Mr Pahlavi does have some support in places such as Los Angeles, where many exiled Iranians moved during and after the 1979 revolution, said Mr Nader Hashemi, a professor of Middle East and Islamic politics at Georgetown University. Some of his supporters have targeted those who raise questions about his agenda, including journalists, with online harassment campaigns and threats of violence. 'I think the goal is to control the narrative,' said Ms Negar Mortazavi, an Iranian American journalist who said she had received threats over her coverage. Representatives for Mr Pahlavi did not respond to a request for comment. The Mujahedeen Khalq The Mujahedeen Khalq, a group that was once a US-designated terrorist organisation and accused by former members of operating like a cult, has sought to rehabilitate its reputation in recent years. Founded in 1965 inside Iran as an armed dissident group, the Mujahedeen Khalq helped overthrow the shah. But after the revolution, it broke with Iran's new clerical leaders, who suppressed the group in a sweeping campaign of arrests and executions. Much of what remained of the organisation fled to Iraq, where they sided with Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, a move many Iranians saw as treason. By then, the group's ideology, which began by blending Islamism and Marxism, had begun to center on its leaders, Massoud and Maryam Rajavi. Former members have said they were told to renounce marriage and divorce their spouses to prove their devotion to them. The group, also known as the MEK, has denied such claims and says many of its critics are Iranian spies. Massoud Rajavi has not been seen since 2003. Representatives for the group, mostly based in Albania, and Maryam Rajavi did not respond to an interview request. She said this month that Israel's attack on Iran 'represents the beginning of a critical new chapter, both in Iran's internal crisis and the broader dynamics of the region'. The US State Department designated the MEK a terrorist organisation in 1997, five years after the group staged coordinated attacks on Iranian diplomatic posts in multiple countries, including the Iranian mission to the United Nations. But the MEK renounced violence some time after the US invasion of Iraq, and the designation was lifted in 2012. Maryam Rajavi's official platform now calls for a 'secular republic,' gender equality and a nonnuclear Iran. Prominent US politicians have received tens of thousands of dollars for speaking at the group's conferences. But Prof Hashemi said: 'The MEK has next-to-zero popularity in Iran. In my scholarly judgment, the MEK has more supporters in Washington DC, than in Iran.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
