Expert offers tips for budgeting on 'roller coaster ride'
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation President Doug Howgate said he thinks it's still too early to be thinking about potential changes revenue assumptions being used to build the roughly $62 billion state budget for fiscal year 2026, which starts July 1. But he urged lawmakers at a hearing of the Joint Committee on Ways and Means to work with Gov. Maura Healey's team to coordinate a state response to the flurry of changes President Donald Trump has made or says he will make, many of which could significantly affect state spending plans.
'So much has happened. We don't know what the impacts are going to be, and we don't know what's going to happen. And so how does the state respond to that when we know that the resources available to us — whether it's financial resources, time, process — they're all limited, right? It's critically important that we create, I think, an approach across the administration, House and Senate, that allows us to collect information, assess options and coordinate a response,' he said. 'And I think it's critically important that as that exercise obviously takes into account how we listen to our communities, constituents, fellow members, but it also needs to reside pretty closely to budget decisions. At the end of the day, so much of what is going to be coming down the pike related to whatever the feds do or don't do, whatever happens to the economy, is going to be intertwined with the budget.'
Trump has moved quickly in his second term to reshape the federal government and its budget, making or planning steps that could force Massachusetts officials to rethink the state's plans. Two weeks before House Democrats are due to release their rewrite of Healey's budget (H 1), there'ss significant uncertainty around the future of Medicaid funding and other federal programs that are critical to the state budget. Medicaid reimbursements account for the majority of the $16 billion of federal dollars baked into the governor's budget.
Senate Ways and Means Chairman Sen. Michael Rodrigues, who gets about a month longer than House chairman Rep. Aaron Michlewitz before he needs to unveil his committee's proposal for fiscal 2026, asked Howgate during a hearing on spending surplus surtax revenues whether he and Michlewitz should 'be reconsidering what we had proposed for FY '26 given the actions of the president.'
Rodrigues, Michlewitz and Administration and Finance Secretary Matthew Gorzkowicz agreed in January to build the fiscal 2026 budget on a $43.614 billion consensus revenue estimate, including $2.4 billion expected from the state's surtax on high earners.
Howgate said his answer would be 'a provisional no' given where the state is in its budget development.
'The question is, if you were to make different assumptions now, what would that be based on? And would they be better than the assumptions you'll make in May or June once you see some of those numbers? And my gut is the answer to that is probably no,' he explained. 'Now, setting correct expectations for folks that this stuff may not be written in pen right now, and we may need to make some serious adjustments — just as both chairs made in 2020, when I think you took the appropriate action in terms of adjusting the budget, adjusting the timeline, in light of circumstances. We're not in that world right now, but folks need to know that when stuff changes, we have to adapt as well. I think that needs to be out there, but I don't know that you would have better information to make informed adjustments right now compared to a little later in the process.'
Responding to broad questions about Trump's economic policy from House Vice Chair Rep. Ann-Margaret Ferrante, Howgate detailed what he's watching for from D.C. He said he expects to know what the federal budget will look like and the fate of tax cut extensions by July, but that it will be harder for the state to anticipate or plan for administrative changes or shifts in economic conditions.
'You can only kind of plan for the information you have. And so that's why I do think, as you think about the actions that the House, Senate, [and] administration are taking, keying in on the Congressional budget process and the tax cuts extension, along with what's going on in the stock market and what's going on with the economy, those are the three things we can best track day to day to day, because I think we're gonna have to hedge quite a bit for federal policy uncertainty that's going to continue to be, I'm sure, quite a roller coaster ride for the next three plus years.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
Eric Swalwell rejects Michelle Obama's 'when they go low, we go high' message, vows to 'bury' Republicans
Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., dismissed former First Lady Michelle Obama's famous "when they go low, we go high" mantra on Saturday, instead threatening to "bury" Republicans "below the Capitol" during a redistricting fight. On "CNN Newsroom," host Omar Jimenez brought up Obama's old mantra after asking the congressman whether there were concerns that "fighting fire with fire" in redrawing congressional maps could backfire on the Democratic Party. "No, when they go low, we're going to bury them below the Capitol," Swalwell said. "That's what we're going to do, because this is about protecting democracy. And right now, as you see, D.C. has been militarized, and we were weak as Democrats." Swalwell called recent efforts by Texas Republicans to redraw the state's congressional districts a "grab for power" by President Donald Trump to make sure Democrats lose in the upcoming midterm elections. He argued that fighting fire with fire was the only way "to protect the most vulnerable" and defend democracy. "We have paid the price for our weakness in the past, and we can't be so weak next time we have power," Swalwell said. "Gavin Newsom is making Donald Trump react to him with the lawsuits with this new map to match what's happening in Texas. And the way I see it is, either we're on our heels, and the most vulnerable are on their heels reacting to Donald Trump, or he's on his heels reacting to us." Newsom has proposed a controversial initiative that would allow for mid-decade redistricting, aiming to eliminate five Republican-held seats in response to GOP-led map changes in Texas. However, such changes are currently prohibited by the California state constitution, which mandates nonpartisan redistricting through an independent commission. Newsom and California Democrats are pushing for a special election later this year to obtain voter approval to bypass the constitution. Swalwell didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Swalwell is the latest in a long line of Democrats who have appeared to abandon the "when they go low, we go high" mantra in favor of harsher and sometimes violent rhetoric. Michelle Obama also amended the phrase in a 2020 DNC speech. "Let's be clear: going high does not mean putting on a smile and saying nice things when confronted by viciousness and cruelty," Obama said in 2020. "Going high means taking the harder path. It means scraping and clawing our way to that mountain top. Going high means standing fierce against hatred while remembering that we are one nation under God, and if we want to survive, we've got to find a way to live together and work together across our differences."


New York Post
33 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mayor Eric Adams deserves credit for his stunning housing wins
It's odd how little credit Mayor Eric Adams gets for his relentless, steady and successful drive to get more housing, including more affordable homes, built in New York City. In under four years, he's arguably done more than his predecessors achieved in the previous two decades, winning changes that will make a huge difference in the long term rather than offering empty promises of instant miracles. The latest: The City Council just OK'd Adams' plan to rezone Midtown South, opening the door for nearly 10,000 new housing units, 2,800 of them affordable, in an area that was largely zoned for (outdated) industrial uses. Advertisement Some of those units will come from converting commercial space to residential, an obvious next step for older, vacant office buildings. All told, Adams' rezoning push starting in 2021 has cleared the way for 100,000 new units to be built across the city, with 30,000 more on the way if the City Council approves his plans for Jamaica and Long Island City. Advertisement That's more housing gained via zoning changes than added in the Bloomberg and de Blasio years combined. Another unheralded gain, from years of steady effort and deft alliances: getting the Legislature to lift the floor-area-ratio cap of 12, which arbitrarily restricted the height of residential buildings. Between the mayor's massive City of Yes package, which the council approved last year, and other efforts, including the preservation of about 134,700 existing units, City Hall counts the number of units added to or kept in the Big Apple's housing supply under Adams at about 426,000. Yes, that includes the totals from proposals that still need to go through the approval process — and a good chunk, like those enabled through rezoning, won't be fully realized for years. Advertisement It doesn't help when lefty ideologues sabotage projects like the Brooklyn Marine Terminal, which would offer 6,000 new units, because they'd rather have no new housing than let any market-rate apartments get built on public land. But the mayor's full-court press means he's already changed the city's long-term housing landscape for the better even if some plans fall through — and he could do even more in a second term. We know: 'Methodical' doesn't match the Adams' image, but perhaps that's because so little of the local media pays attention to day-in-day-out reality; it's so much easier to fawn over, say, Zohran Mamdani's flashy promises to freeze rents. Advertisement Even though the mayor's strategy, unlike Mamdani's, works. Freezing rent on rent-regulated apartments would force more landlords to abandon their buildings altogether or allow units to fall into disrepair, making the city's housing situation worse. Meanwhile, Adams is dramatically boosting supply, which will organically push rents lower over time. In a city where hysterically anti-development progressives constantly do their best to thwart common-sense housing fixes, Adams' success in ushering in lasting change is stunning. And though the fruits of his labor will take time to fully appear, generations of New Yorkers will benefit. As the mayoral race exits the summer 'silly season,' perhaps voters will start to realize who's actually delivering the housing solutions New York needs.


The Hill
33 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas state senators take first step toward redistricting
State senators in Texas launched a public hearing Sunday on a bill to redraw congressional voting districts in the state, a move that could win Republicans five more seats in the House if the GOP plan works perfectly. The public hearing is a required step before a bill can advance for a vote on the state Senate floor, Nexstar's KXAN reported. Democrats fled the state earlier this summer to prevent Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republicans from having the legislative quorum necessary to pass legislation. But Democrats are expected to attend the new special session after garnering attention with their walkout, and triggering more redistricting efforts around the country. 'We did exactly what we said we needed to do, and that is bringing a spotlight on this issue,' State Rep. Josey Garcia (D-San Antonio) said in an interview with KXAN one day before Abbott called the second special session. Most notably, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is spearheading an effort to change district lines in his state to make up for any potential losses for Democrats in Texas. Democrats released their proposed map on Friday evening. Newsom (D) is vying to hold a special election this fall on a ballot measure that would suspend the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade in an effort to keep up with Republican gerrymandering. Newsom has stressed that bypassing the commission, which Californians approved back in 2008 and 2010, would be temporary, and that redrawing the lines would only be triggered by redistricting in red states. 'They do five seats, we do five seats,' Newsom has said. KXAN reported that Texas House leaders expect that the House will have enough members present Monday to conduct legislative business. GOP State Sen. Phil King told KXAN that the new mapy would be legal and will perform better for Republicans in the state. 'We heard a lot of testimony that the current map had a number of districts that were not compact, were not close together, were not tight, in in their in their design, and in this map, listening to that testimony, we applied it, and this map also is much more compact than the current congressional redistricting map.' The proposed changes target five districts in areas around Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, creating Republican-leaning seats. The Texas push was directed by President Trump, who has also been pushing other states where Republicans are in control of government to look at redistricting to gain Republicans seats. The states considering such options include Missouri and Indiana. Trump was impeached twice in his first term after Democrats regained control of the House. Because the GOP has a very narrow majority in the House and the president's party typically loses seats in the midterm elections, the possibility of Democrats regaining the House majority is a real possibility in 2026.