logo
Trump tariffs to Houthi attacks, world has a new trade headache: The long wait for ships to dock

Trump tariffs to Houthi attacks, world has a new trade headache: The long wait for ships to dock

First Post26-05-2025

European port congestion is surging (Bremerhaven up 77%), driven by labour shortages, Rhine low water and a US-China tariff truce. Global supply chains face rising costs, Red Sea diversions and new US tariff threats. read more
Port congestion at major European hubs is intensifying, with ripple effects threatening global supply chains and shipping costs. According to a recent report by maritime consultancy Drewry, waiting times for berth space surged significantly between late March and mid-May:
Bremerhaven experienced a 77% increase, Antwerp 37%, and Hamburg 49%. Rotterdam and the UK's Felixstowe also reported extended delays. These disruptions are primarily attributed to labour shortages and low water levels on the Rhine River, which have hampered barge traffic to and from inland locations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Compounding these challenges, the temporary rollback of 145% tariffs on Chinese imports by US President Donald Trump has accelerated shipping demand between the world's largest economies. This surge is evident in the transpacific eastbound trade, which is showing signs of an early peak season, fuelled by a 90-day pause in US–China tariffs set to expire on August 14.
Similar congestion patterns are emerging in Shenzhen, China, as well as Los Angeles and New York, where the number of container ships awaiting berth has been increasing since late April.
Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hamburg-based Hapag-Lloyd AG was quoted by Bloomberg as saying that while there are recent signs of improvement at European ports, it may take another six to eight weeks before the situation is under control. He emphasised the need for a gradual restoration of regular journeys through the Suez Canal to avoid overwhelming ports with vessel traffic, suggesting that a sudden shift could create massive congestion.
In the United States, the tariff truce with China has not yet led to a significant increase in trans-Pacific shipping. Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Management, questioned whether existing 30% tariffs on China remain too high or if U.S. companies are waiting to see if tariffs will drop further before ramping up shipments.
Meanwhile, the trade landscape remains volatile. President Trump recently threatened to impose a 50% tariff on European Union goods starting June 1, a move that could severely impact transatlantic trade. However, following a conversation with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Trump agreed to delay the implementation until July 9 to allow for further negotiations. This announcement provided temporary relief to markets, with European shares and US futures experiencing gains.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Despite this delay, the threat of increased tariffs continues to create uncertainty for importers and exporters, making it difficult to plan orders and causing unseasonal swings in demand. Shipping lines are facing delays and higher costs, leading to freight rate hikes. Carriers, including MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co., have already announced general rate increases and peak season surcharges starting in June for cargo from Asia.
Adding to the complexity, cargo ships are still largely avoiding the Red Sea due to ongoing attacks by Yemen-based Houthis, opting instead to sail around southern Africa. This longer route affects goods transported between Asia, Europe, and the US, further straining global shipping networks.
As the situation evolves, stakeholders throughout the supply chain are closely monitoring developments, aware that the interaction of port congestion, labour shortages, and geopolitical tensions could have lasting impacts on global trade dynamics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India now ranks third in building general dry cargo vessels for European short sea trade: Sarbananda Sonowal
India now ranks third in building general dry cargo vessels for European short sea trade: Sarbananda Sonowal

Time of India

time23 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India now ranks third in building general dry cargo vessels for European short sea trade: Sarbananda Sonowal

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India now ranks 3rd in building general dry cargo vessels for the European short sea trade , Union Minister for Ports and Shipping Sarbananda Sonowal announced on Thursday, quoting private minister attributed this feat to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's "bold Maritime Amrit Kaal Vision 2047"."India's shipbuilding ambitions are no longer just on paper, they are taking shape in shipyards and recognised globally," the minister wrote on X, attaching an infographic of strategic reforms to skilling our workforce, every step taken by the Modi Govt is making Make in India, Make for the World a reality. Our rise proves, India means business and the world knows it," the minister supplemented in his X Maritime India Vision (MIV) 2030 provides a comprehensive framework for the holistic development of India's maritime sector, encompassing ports, shipping, and waterways. MIV 2030 outlines 150 initiatives aimed at propelling India to global maritime 10 interconnected themes such as port infrastructure development, enhancing logistics efficiency, improving Indian shipbuilding tonnage, increasing coastal and waterway traffic, fostering technology innovation and policy support, promoting sustainability and global collaboration, address every facet of the maritime ecosystem, ensuring a well-rounded approach to transforming India into a leading maritime status of MIV 2030 gets reflected through the progress made by the Indian Maritime sector over the past 3 years as outlined below:Major Port Capacity increased from 1598 MMTPA in Financial Year 2022 to 1630 MMTPA in Financial Year Vessel Turn Around Time (TAT) reduced from 53 hours in Financial Year 2022 to 48 hours in Financial Year Berth Day Output increased from 16,000 MT in Financial Year 2022 to 18,900 MT in Financial Year the past three years, there has been a 37% increase in the Capital Expenditure to Rs 7,571 crore in Financial Year 2024 (from Rs. 5527 crore in Financial Year 2022) by Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways including a 54 per cent increase in Gross Budget Support (GBS) to Rs 1,687 crore in Financial Year 2024 (from Rs 1,099 crore in Financial Year 2022) which is primarily towards the achievements of goals and targets outlined under MIV the past 3 years, around 75 port development projects have been awarded in Major Ports which includes projects for enhancement of cargo handling capacity and operational efficiency.

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

HighlightsGoogle is facing an $800 million lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California, from Android smartphone users who claim the company misappropriates their cellphone data, affecting an estimated 14 million Californians. The plaintiffs allege that Google secretly transmits data over cellular networks even when devices are turned off, which they argue improperly consumes purchased data from mobile carriers without user consent. Despite Google's history of settling class actions, the company is opting for a trial, disputing the plaintiffs' claims that they have a property interest in cellular data allowances and arguing that no actual losses were incurred. Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks "for Google's own purposes," including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said the claims "mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable," he told me. "We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation - a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called "passive" data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered "property" under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the "rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim - not wrongful conversion," defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. "The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year," plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest - 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions - more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it "must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel."

Held three meetings in 35 days with EU trade commissioner to push FTA talks: Union Minister Piyush Goyal
Held three meetings in 35 days with EU trade commissioner to push FTA talks: Union Minister Piyush Goyal

New Indian Express

time35 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Held three meetings in 35 days with EU trade commissioner to push FTA talks: Union Minister Piyush Goyal

BRESCIA (ITALY): Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal has held three meetings within a short span of 35 days with the European Commissioner for Trade Maros Sefcovic with an aim to give an impetus to the reposed negotiations for a free trade agreement. Goyal said on Thursday that India has already signed similar agreements with four-European nation bloc EFTA and the UK. The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) members are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland. Now, India is in the process of concluding the negotiations with the 27-nation bloc European Union. "We have held three meetings in 35 days. It shows our shared commitment for the FTA. We are trying to do it faster," Goyal told reporters here. The minister is here on a two-day visit. He is meeting leaders and businesses to boost trade and investments between the two countries. The first and the second meetings between Goyal and Sefcovic were held on May 1 and May 23 in Brussels, while the third meeting concluded on June 2 in Paris. India and the European Union (EU) are likely to agree upon a comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA). In June 2022, India and the 27-nation EU bloc resumed negotiations for a comprehensive FTA, an investment protection agreement and a pact on GIs after a gap of over eight years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store