Why US U-turn on climate goals could be India's moment for clean-tech leap
The global climate economy, into which India has been steadily integrating, is already feeling the tremors. But amidst the churn, India stands out as one of the few nations poised to gain.The retreat of the United States from its clean energy commitments has the potential to reshape global supply chains, redirect hundreds of billions of dollars in green capital and shift geopolitical influence over climate action. For India, which has been investing heavily in solar manufacturing, EVs, battery storage and green hydrogen, this unexpected vacuum in American leadership presents a strategic opportunity: to step into the role of a manufacturing base, innovation hub and investment magnet in the emerging green order. But whether India can truly seize the moment will depend on how quickly and decisively its government and industry move.The scale of the rollback in the US is staggering. The Senate bill—officially a sweeping tax and immigration package—includes provisions that render the IRA practically toothless. It ends federal tax credits for clean energy, electric vehicles, rooftop solar, home efficiency and clean manufacturing. It terminates the commercial clean vehicle credit and the consumer EV rebate. It phases out the clean energy manufacturing production credit beginning 2031. Simultaneously, the bill extends permanent credits for coal used in steel production and delays by a decade the implementation of a fee on methane leaks from oil and gas facilities. As a final blow, it rescinds funding for environmental justice, endangered species protection and low-carbon infrastructure in underserved communities.advertisementThe implications are as economic as they are environmental. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the Senate bill would add $3.9 trillion to the US deficit over a decade. According to Energy Innovation, a clean energy support entity, power generation capacity will fall by 300 GW by 2035, the US economy will lose $960 billion in cumulative GDP and more than half a million jobs will vanish.Others warn of graver consequences still. 'If the Senate reconciliation bill passes,' says Advait Arun, senior associate for energy finance at the Center for Public Enterprise, New York, 'the GOP has all but guaranteed that Americans will face blackouts and grid failures in the coming years This bill forcibly deindustrialises the country and severely reduces our shared standard of living.'For India, that collapse of confidence in American clean-tech policy opens three big doors: the redirection of climate capital, relocation of manufacturing capacity and repositioning of leadership in multilateral green platforms. First, the capital. Over $370 billion had been unlocked by the IRA, and vast pools of private equity, pension funds and climate-focused institutional investors had coalesced around the US clean energy story.advertisementWith tax credits repealed and grid modernisation shelved, much of that capital is now seeking stable, policy-backed alternatives. India, with its green bond framework, sovereign climate finance architecture and expanding production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes, fits the bill provided it can absorb the flows.Second, manufacturing. India's ambitions to build a self-reliant clean-tech manufacturing base—bolstered by the Rs 24,000 crore PLI (Production Linked Incentive) for solar and batteries, the Rs 19,744 crore Green Hydrogen Mission and state-level industrial parks—now appear more globally competitive than ever.Chinese dominance of the green manufacturing chain has long been acknowledged, but India has quietly emerged as a fast-follower, especially in areas like electric two-wheelers, distributed solar, and electrolyser manufacturing. With the US effectively sidelining itself, India is in prime position to become the supplier of choice for the Global South—and increasingly for Europe, Japan and Australia, all of whom are seeking diversified, democratic alternatives to Chinese green goods.It is here that the comparison with China becomes critical. China today controls over 80 per cent of the world's solar wafer and module production, dominates global battery supply chains and has unmatched scale in electrolyser manufacturing. Its mineral refining ecosystem for lithium, cobalt and rare earths is unrivalled.advertisementChinese firms have vertically integrated—from mining to manufacturing to deployment—giving them a cost advantage that few can compete with. However, this dominance has also created geopolitical unease. Western nations worry about overdependence on a single country for critical energy components. Supply chain disruptions during Covid-19 and rising trade frictions have only intensified those concerns.India, by contrast, is late to the scale game but arguably better positioned to serve as a diversified, democratic alternative. It lacks China's vertical integration, but offers political alignment with the West, cost-effective labour and a fast-improving logistics and manufacturing ecosystem.Crucially, India is not yet seen as a hegemon. It can position itself as a partner, not a replacement. Richard Black, director of policy and strategy at global energy think-tank Ember, captured this realignment well. 'Chinese factories are still going to be producing the clean energy goods in increasing demand around the world, with Indian companies in fast pursuit; and while the US government has just decided that it won't be a customer, it's also decided not to be a competitor,' he said.The third opportunity is diplomatic. India's credibility as a climate voice rose during its G20 presidency. Its leadership of the International Solar Alliance (ISA), the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) and the newly-formed Global Biofuels Alliance shows it can knit together broad coalitions around energy and sustainability. With the US retreating, India can step up as the principal advocate for an inclusive, just energy transition—one that prioritises affordability, access and employment, not just net-zero metrics.advertisementThe question is whether India is ready. Some parts of the answer are encouraging. The Indian clean-tech ecosystem is no longer in its infancy. Adani Green, ReNew Power and Tata Power Solar are among the world's largest renewable asset owners. Vikram Solar and Waaree Energies have ramped up module exports. Ola Electric, Mahindra and Tata Motors are pushing EV adoption deeper into Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities.Reliance New Energy and L&T are investing billions into green hydrogen and battery storage. Infosys, TCS and emerging players like Grid Edge are building AI-based smart grid solutions and energy management systems that can be exported to other developing countries.But India is not yet firing on all cylinders. Supply chains for critical minerals remain thin. EV penetration is still uneven. Financing for early-stage clean start-ups is sluggish compared to China or the US. Power evacuation infrastructure lags in key solar-rich states. Besides, the overall scale of capital needed to convert this opportunity is significant: industry estimates suggest India will need to mobilise Rs 2.5 lakh crore to Rs 3 lakh crore (roughly $30-35 billion) over the next five years to scale up manufacturing, build export zones and underwrite risk in frontier clean technologies. Much of that will need to come from global green capital—through sovereign funds, blended finance vehicles, and ESG (environmental, social and governance)-focused infrastructure trusts.It is here that policy must step in. A new Green Investment Platform, combining the balance sheets of IREDA, NIIF, SBI, and REC, can act as a one-stop shop for investors looking for certainty in Indian climate infrastructure. PLI 2.0 should be rolled out to include energy software, smart grids, carbon tracking systems, and AI-based energy optimisation—areas where India has a comparative advantage.Green SEZs, with fast-track clearances and export corridors, can be established in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Odisha and Maharashtra. And perhaps most urgently, a 'Clean Innovation Migration Visa' could invite displaced US clean-tech entrepreneurs, engineers and researchers to set up in India's innovation clusters, including Hyderabad, Pune and Bengaluru.This is not idle speculation. American stakeholders themselves acknowledge what the bill has unleashed. 'This bill gives up on the present and future of American manufacturing,' said Mike Williams of the Center for American Progress, an independent policy institute. 'It kills investments in clean industries that have been driving domestic manufacturing growth This is a gift to other nations who are furiously working towards beefing up their clean-tech capacities.'Manish Bapna of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NDRC) added: 'This measure props up the dirty and expensive technologies of the past while strangling the clean energy investments creating millions of jobs Republicans are punishing the plentiful wind and solar power that can be quickly added to the grid.'India must remember that this opportunity, while monumental, is also fragile. The same global investors now fleeing US policy volatility are watching India's actions closely. Delay, fragmentation or over-centralisation could spook capital. Likewise, any backsliding on India's own climate targets, or politicisation of the clean energy transition, could blunt its credibility.But if India can maintain focus, scale up rapidly and speak with one voice on the global stage, it stands to gain not just market share but narrative power. In the 20th century, India missed the hardware revolution and caught up only late to the telecom boom. Clean-tech could be different. It could be the first global industrial transformation that India shapes from the front—technologically, economically and diplomatically.The US decision to gut its climate law may have dire consequences for the planet. But it has inadvertently thrown down the gauntlet. India must now decide whether it wants to lead this century's green industrial revolution or watch from the sidelines.Subscribe to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
34 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Mines, magnets and Mao: How China built its global rare earth dominance
Rare earth metals were an afterthought for most world leaders until China temporarily suspended most exports of them a couple of months ago. But for almost half a century, they have received attention from the very top of the Chinese government. During his 27-year rule in China, Mao Zedong focused often on increasing how much iron and steel China produced, but seldom on its quality. The result was high production of weak iron and steel that could not meet the needs of the industry. In the late 1940s, metallurgists in Britain and the United States had developed a fairly low-tech way to improve the quality of ductile iron, which is widely used for pipelines, car parts and other applications. The secret? Add a dash of the rare earth cerium to the metal while it is still molten. It was one of the early industrial uses of rare earths. And unlike most kinds of rare earths, cerium was fairly easy to chemically separate from ore. When Deng Xiaoping emerged as China's paramount leader in 1978, he moved quickly to fix the country's iron and steel industry. Deng named a top technocrat, Fang Yi, as a vice premier and also as the director of the powerful State Science and Technology Commission. Fang immediately took top geologists and scientists to Baotou, a city in China's Inner Mongolia that had vast steel mills and the country's largest iron ore mine nearby. Baotou had already made much of the iron and steel for China's tanks and artillery under Mao, but Fang's team made an important decision to extract more than iron from the mine. The city's iron ore deposit was laced with large quantities of so-called light rare earths. These included not just cerium, for ductile iron and for glass manufacturing, but also lanthanum, used in refining oil. The iron ore deposit also held medium rare earths, like samarium. The United States had started using samarium in the 1970s to make the heat-resistant magnets needed for electric motors inside supersonic fighter jets and missiles. 'Rare earths have important application value in steel, ductile iron, glass and ceramics, military industry, electronics and new materials,' Fang declared during his visit to Baotou in 1978, according to an exhibit at the city's museum. At the time, Sino-American relations were improving. Soon after his Baotou visit, Fang took top Chinese engineers to visit America's most advanced factories, including Lockheed Martin and McDonnell Douglas assembly plants near Los Angeles. Rare earth metals are tightly bound together in nature. Prying them apart, particularly the heavier rare earths, requires many rounds of chemical processes and huge quantities of acid. During the 1950s and 1960s, the United States and the Soviet Union had each developed similar ways to separate rare earths. But their techniques were costly, requiring stainless steel vats and piping as well as expensive nitric acid. China ordered government research institutes to devise a cheaper approach, said Constantine Karayannopoulos, a chemical engineer and former chief executive of several of the largest North American rare earth companies. The Chinese engineers figured out how to separate rare earths using inexpensive plastic and hydrochloric acid instead. The cost advantage, together with weak enforcement of environmental standards, allowed China's rare earth refineries to undercut competitors in the West. Facing increasingly stiff environmental regulations, almost all of the West's refineries closed. Separately, China's geologists discovered that their country held nearly half the world's deposits of rare earths, including rich deposits of heavy rare earths in south-central China, valuable for magnets in cars as well as for medical imaging and other applications. In the 1990s and 2000s, Chinese refinery engineers mastered the task of prying apart heavy rare earths. That gave China an almost total monopoly on heavy rare earth production. 'The Middle East has oil,' Deng said in 1992. 'China has rare earths.' By then, he and Fang had already trained the next leader to guide the country's rare earth industry: a geologist named Wen Jiabao. He had earned a master's degree in rare earth sciences in the late 1960s at the Beijing Institute of Geology, when most of the rest of China was paralyzed during the upheaval of the Cultural Revolution. Wen went on to become a vice premier in 1998 and then China's premier from 2003 to 2013. During a visit to Europe in 2010, he declared that little happened on rare earth policy in China without his personal involvement.
The Print
36 minutes ago
- The Print
Nirav Modi's brother Nehal held in US on CBI, ED extradition requests; Justice Dept to oppose bail
Nehal, a Belgian national, has been named as an accused in charge sheets filed by both CBI and ED in the bank loan fraud, amounting to an excess of Rs 13,000 crore, which was borrowed fraudulently from the Punjab National Bank. His elder brother Nirav Modi and uncle Mehul Choksi have been named as the prime accused in the case. The Indian agencies have been informed by their American counterparts about the arrest, as well as given assurances from the US Justice Department that his bail plea will be opposed during the next date of hearing in the extradition proceedings. The next hearing is scheduled for 7 July, sources privy to the developments told ThePrint. New Delhi: Authorities in the United States Friday arrested Nehal Modi, brother and alleged co-conspirator of fugitive diamond businessman Nirav Modi, on the request for extradition submitted by India's agencies, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which have been probing the 2018 PNB loan fraud case. Notably, Nirav Modi has been in custody in the United Kingdom since March 2019, on account of pending extradition proceedings, while Mehul Choksi was detained by authorities in Belgium, where his extradition is also pending. Indian agencies managed to obtain a Red Corner Notice against Nehal in July 2019, based on which Interpol requested all its 192 member states to arrest or detain him upon spotting him in their countries, after which extradition or deportation proceedings could begin. In its charge sheet, the CBI has alleged that Nehal Modi attended a meeting with senior managers of the Punjab National Bank on 26 January, 2018, days before the CBI booked Nirav Modi, his family, Choksi, and retired deputy manager of the bank Gokulnath Shetty. Additionally, the agency found in the probe, through statements from individuals associated with Modis' firms, that after the registration of the CBI's case, Nehal Modi took overall control of the various companies' affairs. In the probe, agencies also allegedly found that Nehal Modi directed and facilitated the movement of funds and dummy directors of the firms of Nirav Modi from Dubai to Cairo, in an attempt to avoid arrest or criminal proceedings. He also allegedly instructed those directors to make false statements in the event of arrest by agencies, including claiming that they did not work for Nirav Modi. The ED also highlighted that Nehal allegedly took around 50 kg of gold and AED 3.5 million from a Dubai-based firm, Firestar Diamond FZE, as well as 150 boxes of pearls worth USD 6 million from Hong Kong, following investigations in India. Additionally, the agency alleged he was personally overseeing attempts to erase accounts and records that established the money trail of firms established by his brother, Nirav Modi, and his associates. 'He intimidated witnesses and sent them to Cairo, where their passports were taken over, and they were forced to sign some false papers. He offered a witness Rs 20 lakh for tendering false testimony before the judicial authorities of Europe,' the agency has alleged. (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: Rs 22,280 cr black & laundered money recovered, including from Mallya & Nirav Modi, says Sitharaman
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump underwater in every key swing state, and now he's slipping in Texas too
US President Donald Trump 's approval ratings are going down again. Apparently, the ratings plummeted even beyond swing states . As the Fourth of July comes and goes, a new poll shows he's now underwater in more than half the country. The president's stronghold, Texas, is starting to look shaky, too. Donald Trump's approval rating is low in 29 U.S. states. Polls show that many people are worried about the economy, tariffs, and immigration policies, which are all hurting his support across the country. What do the polls show? Civiqs' polling, which included 35,929 responses, indicates that while Trump's support rating is positive in some states, it is declining in others. Overall, net positive approval ratings are found in 21 of the 50 states that were studied, while net negative ratings are found in 29. ALSO READ: Mass layoffs in 2025: Microsoft, Meta, and more big names slash jobs — is yours next? Live Events His approval rating is below average in other states. In Maryland, his approval rating is -41, and in Hawaii, it is -47. Trump's approval rating has likewise stayed in the negative range on a national level. Trump had a net approval rating of -14 points, with 40 percent of respondents approving and 54 percent disapproving, according to a YouGov/Economist poll of 1,590 adults taken between June 20 and June 23, as per a report by Newsweek. This was a slight decrease from -13 last week. The margin of error for the survey was +/- 3.5 percent. In the meantime, a Tyson Group survey of 1,027 American adults conducted between June 25 and June 26 revealed that Trump's net approval rating was 6 points lower, with 45 percent of respondents approving and 51 percent disapproving. Where is Donald Trump still popular? Wyoming has the highest approval rating for Trump, with a net rating of +44 percent. With an approval rating of +36 in West Virginia, he is also well-liked there. What's driving his approval ratings down? Trump's first few months in office have seen a range in his popularity. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is in charge of overseeing the cuts that have sparked demonstrations. Trump's immigration policies have been the subject of other rallies, and his tariffs and strikes on Iran have also drawn criticism. On the other hand, the Fourth of July, also known as Independence Day in the United States, honours the Declaration of Independence. Given that it is a day of celebration and patriotism, any decline in Trump's popularity during the festivities would be devastating, as per a report by Newsweek. Protests against the Trump administration have taken place nationwide over the weekend of Independence Day, including rallies and demonstrations. The impact of Trump's policies and national and international events is likely to cause fluctuations in his approval rating. How are experts interpreting the polls? Since April, Donald Trump's approval rating has remained consistent in the mid-40s, indicating a high level of support, according to Richard Johnson, a senior lecturer in U.S. politics and policy at Queen Mary University of London. The economy has had a major impact on Trump's approval ratings, especially since the imposition of tariffs, which has caused a decline in ratings and is anticipated to be the main factor determining his future, an expert weighed in. FAQs In how many states is Trump's approval rating negative? According to Civiqs polling, Trump is losing support in 29 of 50 states, including some key swing states and even Republican stronghold Texas. What is causing the greatest drop in Trump's popularity? Economic uncertainty, tariffs, and controversial immigration and foreign affairs policies are cited as major reasons for the drop in his public support.
