logo
Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California

Kamala Harris announces she will not run for governor of California

Irish Times4 days ago
Kamala Harris
, the former vice-president and 2024 Democratic presidential nominee, announced on Wednesday that she will not run for governor of
California
– a highly anticipated decision that leaves the contest to lead the country's largest blue state wide open.
'For now, my leadership – and public service – will not be in elected office,' Harris said in a statement, ending months of speculation about her political future after losing the
2024 US presidential election
to
Donald Trump
.
'I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly, and sharing more details in the months ahead about my own plans,' she added.
Harris (60) who previously served as California's attorney general and US senator, had been exploring a run for the state's top job since leaving the White House in January.
[
Tariffs: as new regime kicks in, what does it mean for Europe and for Ireland?
Opens in new window
]
But, she said in the statement, 'after deep reflection, I've decided that I will not run for governor in this election'. The decision does not rule out a future run for public office, including a third bid for the White House, after unsuccessful campaigns in 2020 and 2024.
Her looming decision had in effect paralyzed the race to replace the term-limited Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, with early polling suggesting she was Californians' top choice.
The Harris-less race to lead California will now take place in a political landscape dramatically reshaped by her loss to Trump in November, which plunged the party into a period of paralysis and soul-searching.
In the months since, the Democratic base has grown increasingly furious with its old guard, demanding fresh leadership and a more combative approach to what they view as Trump's increasingly authoritarian agenda.
In a nod to the discontent roiling her party, and the country, Harris said: 'We must recognize that our politics, our government, and our institutions have too often failed the American people, culminating in this moment of crisis. As we look ahead, we must be willing to pursue change through new methods and fresh thinking – committed to our same values and principles, but not bound by the same playbook.'
While the decision was disappointing to supporters eager to see Harris square off again with Trump during the final years of his term, Harris had given few signals that she was deeply excited by the prospect of leading the state from the governor's perch in Sacramento. The months-long slog to next year's contest would have forced Harris to grapple with her role in Democrats' losses in November, which has already drawn criticism from corners of the party eager for leaders to step aside and make space for a new generation of candidates.
The crowded field of Democrats running for governor in California is so far made up of long-serving or well-known political leaders, including Xavier Becerra, the former attorney general of California who served with Harris in Biden's cabinet as the secretary of health and human services; Antonio Villaraigosa, the former Democratic mayor of Los Angeles; the state's lieutenant governor, Eleni Kounalakis, who is close friends with Harris; and the former representative Katie Porter.
The most prominent Republicans in the race are Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside county, and Steve Hilton, the former Fox host and former adviser to then UK prime minister David Cameron. Ric Grenell, a longtime Trump ally, has also toyed with the idea of running.
In a statement, Villaraigosa commended Harris's leadership and said her decision 'reflects her continued commitment to serving at the highest levels of government'.
'We face critical challenges in California – and we need a proven problem solver to tackle our affordability crisis,' he said.
Republicans – some of whom had been eager to elevate Harris as the face of the Democratic party – nevertheless touted her decision as a political victory for the president.
'Kamala Harris's political career is over thanks to President Trump,' said Kollin Crompton, a spokesperson for the Republican Governors Association, adding, perhaps prematurely: 'Americans across the country can sigh in relief that they won't have to see or hear from Kamala Harris any longer.'
Harris had maintained a relatively low profile since she returned home to Los Angeles, offering few clues about her political future. She remained most out of view as protests erupted in response to the Trump administration's immigration raids in Los Angeles earlier this summer. In a statement issued after Trump ordered national guard troops deployed Los Angeles, she said that protest was 'a powerful tool' and said she supported the 'millions of Americans who are standing up to protect our most fundamental rights and freedoms'.
She has been selective about when to weigh in against the Trump administration's actions. Earlier this year, Harris delivered a sharp speech in which she warned that the US was witnessing a 'wholesale abandonment of America's highest ideals' by the US president.
On Wednesday, Harris vowed to remain politically engaged.
'We, the People must use our power to fight for freedom, opportunity, fairness, and the dignity of all,' she said. 'I will remain in that fight.' - The Guardian
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop
The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish Times view on Trump and Putin: the dangerous nuclear backdrop

When Donald Trump ordered two US nuclear submarines to move closer to Russia over the weekend in response to online nuclear threats from Russia's former president, Dmitri Medvedev, a global, collective frisson of fear was understandable. The US President's move came as part of a verbal exchange with Moscow over a new 10-day deadline to Vladimir Putin to commit to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face 'secondary sanctions' against countries that buy Russian oil. And yet, the strategic significance of the deployment is unclear – Trump did not clarify whether the submarines were nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed, and, even if the latter, how their redeployment would enhance the ability they already have, wherever they are, to deliver their deadly payloads against Russia. This symbolic act is thus largely a rhetorical reminder to the Russian President of the US president's newfound, belated determination to pursue some form of peace in Ukraine and his expectation that Putin will fall into line. So far the Russian president has shown no intention whatsoever to do so. READ MORE The respective nuclear postures, however, remain an important and dangerous backdrop to the confrontation between the superpowers. Both Russian and US thresholds for the use of nuclear weapons, particularly their first-use, have long been deliberately ambiguous – a very Trump-like ambiguity. Unlike a no-first-use policy, which commits a country only to retaliate in response to a nuclear attack, ambiguity, it is argued, forces adversaries to consider the possibility that any aggression could provoke a devastating nuclear response, even in a non-nuclear conflict. A first-use option, it is said, deters conventional aggressors who may believe that their superior non-nuclear forces could succeed. Both the US's and Russia's nuclear doctrines, the latter revised as recently as last year, do not limit their options to responses to nuclear attack by others .The US doctrine allows considerable latitude. It says: 'The US would only consider the use of nuclear weapons in extreme circumstances to defend the vital interests of the US or its Allies and partners.' The Russians reserve the right to employ nuclear arms 'in the event of aggression against the Russian Federation involving the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is under threat.' Russia is also reported to have in place a automatic system to launch nuclear missiles if the country's leaders have been killed by a strike from another state. And both leave the ultimate decision to press the nuclear button not to parliaments, but to their two presidents , Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin.

Trump ally Jeanine Pirro confirmed as top federal prosecutor for Washington DC
Trump ally Jeanine Pirro confirmed as top federal prosecutor for Washington DC

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Trump ally Jeanine Pirro confirmed as top federal prosecutor for Washington DC

The US Senate has confirmed Jeanine Pirro – a former Fox News host and staunch Donald Trump ally who boosted lies that he lost the 2020 presidential race because of electoral fraudsters – as the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital. Ms Pirro – a former New York state district attorney and county judge who joined Fox News in 2011 – was confirmed on Saturday in a 50-45 vote along party lines. In a statement issued by Ms Pirro after the vote, the Republican said she was 'blessed' to have been confirmed as the US attorney for Washington DC. 'Get ready for a real crime fighter,' said Ms Pirro's statement, which called the US attorney's office she had been confirmed to lead the largest in the country. Before her media career, Ms Pirro spent more than a decade as a Republican district attorney in Westchester county, New York, and also served as a county judge. She hosted her own Fox show Justice with Judge Jeanine. More recently, she became a co-host on the Fox show The Five. Ms Pirro used her time at Fox News in part to publicly support the baseless claims that Mr Trump lost his first presidency to Joe Biden in 2020 because of voter fraud. In 2021 she was among several Fox News hosts named in the defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems, which accused the network of knowingly airing false claims about the company's voting machines after the previous year's election. Fox ultimately settled the lawsuit for $787.5 million and has acknowledged that the fraud claims were false. Ms Pirro has been serving as the interim US attorney since May, when Mr Trump nominated her to the post months into his second presidency. She was nominated after Mr Trump withdrew the nomination of conservative activist Ed Martin, his first choice for the role. A key Republican senator, North Carolina's Thom Tillis, had said he would not support Mr Martin's nomination. In announcing Ms Pirro's nomination in May, Mr Trump praised her record, and said she was a 'powerful crusader for victims of crime' and someone who 'excelled in all ways'. 'Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position,' the president said. The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, on Saturday published a statement exalting Ms Pirro as 'a warrior for law and order'. At the end of his first presidency, Mr Trump pardoned Ms Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro Jr, after he had been convicted in 2000 on federal charges of fraud and tax evasion. Ms Pirro is one of a number of Trump loyalists with ties to Fox who have joined the president's administration. Other prominent names include her fellow ex-Fox News host Pete Hegseth, the embattled defence secretary, and the former Fox Business personality Sean Duffy, the embattled transportation secretary. In June US senator Adam Schiff said Ms Pirro's 'blind obedience to Donald Trump is nearly unrivalled among his ardent supporters'. 'For an important prosecutorial position like this one, the country has a right to demand a serious and principled public servant,' Mr Schiff said. 'Jeanine Pirro is not it.' Despite Ms Pirro's confirmation, the US Senate left Washington DC on Saturday night for its month-long August recess without a deal to advance dozens of Trump nominees despite days of contentious, bipartisan negotiations. An irate Mr Trump went on social media and told Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to 'GO TO HELL!'

Trump hits Brazil and India with hefty tariffs over decisions he doesn't like
Trump hits Brazil and India with hefty tariffs over decisions he doesn't like

The Journal

time4 hours ago

  • The Journal

Trump hits Brazil and India with hefty tariffs over decisions he doesn't like

LAST UPDATE | 30 Jul THE US PRESIDENT has issued massive blanket tariffs on India and Brazil as Donald Trump falls out with the leaders of two of the largest global economies. Trump this evening announced a 25% tariff and an as-yet unspecified 'penalty' against India in retaliation against it purchasing weapons and energy from Russia. The tariff rate is lower than previously announced, but higher when compared to other Asian countries. India, the world's most populous country, was one of the first major economies to engage the White House in broader trade talks, but negotiations have now collapsed after India's reluctance to fully open its agricultural and other sectors. Speaking this evening, Trump said that while India is a 'friend' of the US, its current tariffs on US exports are 'too high'. He also accused the country of continuing to purchase weapons from Russia, which is continuing its brutal invasion of Ukraine. Advertisement Trump has signalled he intends to tighten US pressure on Moscow to halt fighting in Ukraine and negotiate a peace deal. Yesterday, he gave Russian President Vladimir Putin ten days to change course in Ukraine or face new tariffs. Despite the tariff threat, India said it was committed to continuing negotiations on 'a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement'. Tariffs on Brazil and sanctions on judge Elsewhere today, Trump imposed Brazil with 50% tariffs to pressure the country to stop the trial of far-right former president Jair Bolsonaro, who is accused of coup charges. Trump has termed the trial a 'witch hunt'. The US this morning also announced sanctions on a judge overseeing the case against Bolsonaro. The Brazillian government said the American decision was 'arbitrary and unjustifiable'. With reporting by AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store