Charlie Munger Snubbed Paramount And Hollywood: 'I Don't Like The Unions, Agents, Lawyers, Or The Crazy Movie Stars —Always Gives Me The Willies'
lived near Paramount Studios—and never once took the bait. While others got starstruck by Hollywood, he stayed unimpressed and uninvested. At the 2023 Daily Journal meeting, months before his passing, Munger didn't just dodge questions. He dropped truth bombs.
By then, he'd seen it all: the Great Depression, tech booms, dot-com busts, and Bitcoin hype. But nothing rattled him quite like showbiz.
So when CNBC's Becky Quick asked him about Disney, she got the kind of answer only Munger could give.
"Practically every business that Disney has has gotten tougher than it used to be," he said. "Again, welcome to human life."
Don't Miss:
'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones.
Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —
That's how he opened. No dramatic buildup. Just a clear, cold observation: nothing stays easy forever—not even for a company that once "owned the world," as Munger put it. He recalled Disney's era of dominance—"The Lion King" conquering Broadway, content triumphs stacking up, victory after victory.
"They went from triumph to triumph, marching, marching, marching," he said. "All of a sudden, on practically every front, it's more difficult. This is what happens."
Munger wasn't writing Disney off. He noted the company still had real assets. But he didn't sugarcoat what they're up against. "How would you like running the sports, ESPN, now at Disney compared to its heyday?" he asked. "It's going to be way harder for them."
Even the movie business, he warned, looked grim. "Movies look, to me, like it's going to be a bloodbath, too. It's not a bit easy."
Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: .
That wasn't nostalgia talking. It was analysis. "In the heyday of ESPN, Disney made nothing but money out of ESPN. It was a total goldmine," he said.
When the conversation shifted to Paramount—a large Berkshire holding at the time—Munger distanced himself fast. "I live within a few blocks from Paramount Studios and I don't even know anybody at Paramount," he said. "I have avoided the movies like the plague as an investor all my life."
He was just getting started.
"I've never made an investment in the movie business in any way, shape, or form. It always gives me the willies," he said. Then came the Munger rundown: "I don't like the unions, I don't like the crazy agents, I don't like the goddamn crazy lawyers, I don't like the crazy movie stars."
Even after his passing, his instincts seemed to echo. At the 2024 Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting, Warren Buffett revealed he had finally pulled the plug on Paramount —and paid the price.
"I was 100% responsible for the Paramount decision," Buffett admitted. "It was 100% my decision, and we've sold it all and we lost quite a bit of money."While Munger had taken a lifelong stance against Hollywood, Buffett took a position—then an exit.
For Munger, it wasn't just the numbers—it was the culture. "Everything about it is not my culture," he said. "I liked those old English actors when they came over. I grew up with them. But, basically, movies are not my scene, so I've avoided it."
He wasn't against performers or artists making a living. "It may be a very good place to make a living as an actor or a writer or a musician," he allowed. "But it's a hard place to make money if you're an investor."
Munger never had time for chaos, hype, or industries run on personalities and promises. He wanted a margin of safety, cash flow, and predictability—and for him, the movie business had none of it.
Even in his final year, he kept doing what made him a legend: stripping things down to what they really were—and walking away when they didn't make sense.
Read Next:
Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.
Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target –
Image: Shutterstock
Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market.
Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga?
APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report
TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report
This article Charlie Munger Snubbed Paramount And Hollywood: 'I Don't Like The Unions, Agents, Lawyers, Or The Crazy Movie Stars —Always Gives Me The Willies' originally appeared on Benzinga.com
© 2025 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
37 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Lilo & Stitch' dominates box office to become second-highest grossing film of 2025
'Lilo & Stich' and 'Mission: Impossible—The Final Reckoning' dominated the box office charts again after fueling a record-breaking Memorial Day weekend. Theaters in the US and Canada had several new films to offer this weekend as well, including Sony's family friendly 'Karate Kid: Legends' and the A24 horror movie 'Bring Her Back. ' According to studio estimates Sunday, it added up to a robust $149 million post-holiday weekend that's up over 120% from the same timeframe last year. 3 A scene from Disney's live-action 'Lilo & Stitch' movie. Disney Disney's live-action hybrid 'Lilo & Stitch' took first place again with $63 million from 4,410 locations in North America. It was enough to pass 'Sinners' to become the second-highest grossing movie of the year with $280.1 million in domestic ticket sales. Globally, its running total is $610.8 million. 'Sinners,' meanwhile, is still going strong in its seventh weekend with another $5.2 million, bumping it to $267.1 million domestically and $350.1 million globally. The eighth 'Mission: Impossible' movie also repeated in second place, with $27.3 million from 3,861 locations. As with 'Lilo & Stitch,' that's down 57% from its opening. With $122.6 million in domestic tickets sold, it's performing in line with the two previous installments. But with a reported production budget of $400 million, profitability is a ways off. Internationally, it added $76.1 million (including $25.2 million from China where it just opened), bringing its global total to $353.8 million. 'This is the year of longterm playability,' said Paul Dergarabedian, Comscore's senior media analyst. 'The currency of word of mouth and the strong hold is more important than opening weekend dollars.' 3 Tom Cruise in a scene from 'Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning.' Paramount Pictures via AP Leading the newcomers was Sony's 'Karate Kid: Legends,' with an estimated $21 million from 3,809 locations. The movie brings Jackie Chan and Ralph Macchio together to train a new kid, the kung fu prodigy Li Fong (Ben Wang). Chan starred in a 2010 reboot of the 1984 original, while Macchio has found a new generation of fans in the series 'Cobra Kai,' which just concluded a six-season run. Reviews might have been mixed, but opening weekend audiences gave the PG-13 rated film a strong A- CinemaScore and 4.5 stars on PostTrak. It also only cost a reported $45 million to produce and has several weeks until a new family-friendly film arrives. 'Karate Kid: Legends' opened earlier internationally and has a worldwide total of $47 million. Fourth place went 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' which earned $10.8 million in its third weekend. The movie is the highest-grossing in the franchise, not accounting for inflation, with $229.3 million globally. The weekend's other big newcomer, 'Bring Her Back' rounded out the top five with $7.1 million from 2,449 screens. 3 Ralph Macchio, Ben Wang and Jackie Chan in a scene from 'Karate Kid: Legends.' ©Columbia Pictures/Courtesy Everett Collection Starring Sally Hawkins as a foster mother with some disturbing plans, the film is the sophomore feature of twin filmmakers Danny and Michael Philippou, who made the 2023 horror breakout 'Talk to Me.' It earned a rare-for-horror B+ CinemaScore and is essentially the only new film in the genre until '28 Years Later' opens on June 20. A new Wes Anderson movie, 'The Phoenician Scheme,' also debuted in New York and Los Angeles this weekend, where it made $270,000. It expands nationwide next weekend. The summer box office forecast remains promising, though there's a long way to go to get to the $4 billion target (a pre-pandemic norm that only the 'Barbenheimer' summer has surpassed). The month of May is expected to close out with $973 million – up 75% from May 2024, according to data from Comscore. Top 10 movies by domestic box office With final domestic figures being released Monday, this list factors in the estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at US and Canadian theaters, according to Comscore: 1. 'Lilo & Stitch,' $63 million. 2. 'Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,' $27.3 million. 3. 'Karate Kid: Legends,' 21 million. 4. 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' $10.8 million. 5. 'Bring Her Back,' $7.1 million. 6. 'Sinners,' $5.2 million. 7. 'Thunderbolts,' $4.8 million. 8. 'Friendship,' $2.6 million. 9. 'The Last Rodeo,' $2.1 million. 10. 'j-hope Tour 'HOPE ON THE STAGE' in JAPAN: LIVE VIEWING,' $939,173.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump tariffs face threat at Supreme Court — over rulings that blocked Biden
(Bloomberg) — A legal argument that the US Supreme Court used to foil Joe Biden on climate change and student debt now looms as a threat to President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months During Biden's presidency, the court's conservative majority ruled that federal agencies can't decide sweeping political and economic matters without clear congressional authorization. That blocked the Environmental Protection Agency from setting deep limits on power-plant pollution and the Education Department from slashing student loans for 40 million people. The concept — known as the 'major questions doctrine' — is now playing a central role in the case against Trump's unilateral imposition of worldwide import taxes. With Supreme Court review all but inevitable, the justices' willingness to employ the doctrine against Trump may determine the fate of his signature economic initiative. The US Court of International Trade cited the Biden-era rulings and the major questions doctrine when it ruled 3-0 last week that many of Trump's import taxes exceeded the authority Congress had given him. The challenged tariffs would total an estimated $1.4 trillion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. Critics say the administration's tariffs would have an even bigger impact than the estimated $400 billion Biden student-loan package, which Chief Justice John Roberts described as having 'staggering' significance in his 2023 opinion invalidating the plan. 'If this is not a major question, then I don't know what is,' said Ilya Somin, a professor at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School and one of the lawyers challenging the tariffs. 'We're talking about the biggest trade war since the Great Depression.' Until they were partly suspended, Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariffs marked the biggest increase in import taxes pushed by the US since the 1930 Smoot-Hawley tariffs and took the US's average applied tariff rate to its highest level in more than a century. The prospect of that massive tax increase and the resulting economic shock roiled financial markets and prompted fears of imminent recessions in the US and other major global economies. The administration contends the major questions doctrine doesn't apply when Congress gives authority directly to the president, rather than to an administrative agency. The government also says the doctrine is inapt when the subject is national security and foreign affairs – policy areas where the president has long been recognized to have broad powers. 'No one doubts the significance of the challenged tariffs, but significance alone does not implicate the major questions doctrine, otherwise, it would apply to countless government actions, including every emergency statute,' the Justice Department said in a filing at the Court of International Trade. The legal clash centers on Trump's power under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which says the president may 'regulate' the 'importation' of property to address an emergency situation. The Court of International Trade said those words weren't clear enough to legally justify Trump's taxes given that the Constitution gives the tariff power to Congress. In addition to major questions, the panel also invoked the nondelegation doctrine, a related conservative-backed legal theory that says lawmakers can't give away their constitutional legislative and taxing powers. The two doctrines together 'provide useful tools for the court to interpret statutes so as to avoid constitutional problems,' the trade court said. 'These tools indicate that an unlimited delegation of tariff authority would constitute an improper abdication of legislative power to another branch of government.' The ruling is now on temporary hold while a federal appeals court considers whether to keep the tariffs in force as the legal fight continues. So far, the major questions doctrine has divided the Supreme Court cleanly along ideological lines. The six conservative justices were united when the court first used the phrase in a 2022 ruling that said the EPA overstepped its authority with an ambitious emissions-reduction program during Barack Obama's presidency. The majority said it was doing nothing new by subjecting the plan to extra-tough scrutiny. 'We 'typically greet' assertions of 'extravagant statutory power over the national economy' with 'skepticism,'' Roberts wrote, borrowing words from a 2014 ruling. Roberts said the court used similar reasoning, though without the 'major questions' label, when it blocked Biden's pandemic eviction moratorium and his vaccine-or-test mandate for workers. The court's liberals accused their conservative colleagues of creating a convenient exception to their usual laserlike focus on statutory text. 'The current court is textualist only when being so suits it,' Justice Elena Kagan said in dissent in the climate case. 'When that method would frustrate broader goals, special canons like the 'major questions doctrine' magically appear as get-out-of-text-free cards.' The sharp ideological divide masks a more subtle split among the court's conservatives about the purpose of the major questions doctrine. Justice Amy Coney Barrett has described it as a tool for ascertaining the most natural reading of a statute, while Justice Neil Gorsuch has cast it as a means of keeping Congress and the president in their proper constitutional lanes. The key question now is what the court will do with the major questions doctrine when it comes in the context of tariffs and a Republican president who appointed three of the justices. 'The court has not been at all transparent about the grounds on which it will invoke this doctrine,' said Ronald Levin, an administrative law professor at Washington University in St. Louis. 'It's left its options completely open.' —With assistance from Shawn Donnan. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce How Coach Handbags Became a Gen Z Status Symbol Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
BlackRock Reportedly To Take 10% Of Circle IPO: Major Asset Manager Doubles Down on Stablecoin Strategy
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. BlackRock (NYSE:BLK), the world's largest asset manager, is planning to acquire approximately 10% of Circle Internet Group's initial public offering, representing a significant vote of confidence in the stablecoin sector, according to Bloomberg. Circle, the issuer of USDC (USD Coin), is seeking to raise up to $624 million in what appears to be an oversubscribed offering set to price on June 4. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Offering Size and Demand: Target raise: Up to $624 million BlackRock stake: ~10% of shares offered Ark Investment Management: Up to $150 million interest Existing Business Relationship: BlackRock manages Circle's government money market fund The Circle Reserve Fund holds $30 billion in net assets as of April 2024 This fund backs 90% of USDC stablecoin reserves For BlackRock: This investment represents more than financial returns—it's a strategic positioning move. BlackRock already manages the reserves backing USDC, making this equity stake a natural extension of their existing relationship. The investment aligns with BlackRock's broader crypto strategy, including their successful Bitcoin ETF launch. For Circle: The backing from both BlackRock and Ark Investment provides institutional credibility crucial for a crypto company going public. Having established asset managers as cornerstone investors should help stabilize the stock post-IPO and attract additional institutional interest. The timing appears opportune for crypto companies seeking public market access. The current political environment under President Donald Trump has created a more favorable regulatory landscape for digital assets. Proposed legislation requiring stablecoins to be backed by cash and safe assets—exactly Circle's model—could provide competitive advantages over less regulated competitors. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. Regulatory Evolution: While the current environment appears favorable, crypto regulations remain in flux. Future policy changes could impact stablecoin operations and profitability. Market Volatility: Crypto-related stocks typically exhibit higher volatility than traditional financial services companies. Investors should expect significant price swings. Competition Intensifying: The stablecoin market faces increasing competition from both crypto-native companies and traditional financial institutions exploring central bank digital currencies. This deal represents the continued convergence of traditional finance and cryptocurrency. For retail investors, Circle's IPO offers exposure to the growing stablecoin market through a regulated, public company structure. However, investors should carefully consider their risk tolerance and the speculative nature of crypto-adjacent investments. The strong institutional backing suggests professional investors see long-term value in Circle's business model, but past performance in crypto markets demonstrates that institutional interest doesn't guarantee steady returns. BlackRock's planned investment in Circle reflects the asset manager's conviction that stablecoins will play an increasingly important role in the financial system. For the broader market, this deal signals continued institutional adoption of crypto infrastructure, potentially paving the way for more traditional finance companies to deepen their cryptocurrency exposure through regulated, public market vehicles. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock Send To MSN: 0 This article BlackRock Reportedly To Take 10% Of Circle IPO: Major Asset Manager Doubles Down on Stablecoin Strategy originally appeared on
