logo
Amr Moussa to Asharq Al-Awsat: Gaddafi Initially Treated Me as an American Spy, Then Things Changed

Amr Moussa to Asharq Al-Awsat: Gaddafi Initially Treated Me as an American Spy, Then Things Changed

Asharq Al-Awsat12-05-2025

In the third installment of his interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, former Egyptian Foreign Minister and ex-Secretary-General of the Arab League Amr Moussa discusses various experiences with Arab leaders, emphasizing the nuances of diplomacy in a turbulent region.
Moussa recalled that former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak 'was neither bloodthirsty nor a pharaoh, nor did he try to be one.' He points to a famous remark by President Anwar Sadat, who once said: 'Gamal (Abdel Nasser) and I are the last of the pharaohs.'
The Gaddafi encounter
Reflecting on his complex interactions with Libyan leader Moammar al-Gaddafi, Moussa admitted that the beginning was anything but smooth. 'When I first met Gaddafi, he treated me as if I were an American spy. He wouldn't look at me directly, only speaking while facing another direction. It was very theatrical,' Moussa said. He recalled this behavior with a certain amusement, treating it almost like a game: 'I would wager with myself before our meetings—will he speak to me directly this time, or not?'
Initially, rumors had reached Gaddafi that Moussa had been sent with a US agenda, though he had actually been Egypt's ambassador to the UN in New York, not Washington. 'But once he observed how I performed in my role, he began to change his mind. Eventually, he would ask President Mubarak if I could join their private discussions.'
Moussa recalled a specific instance in Tobruk, where he was invited by Gaddafi to sit at a table with him and Mubarak to discuss a matter of importance. He knew this would stir unease among others present, but the conversation went ahead regardless. This type of scene, he noted, happened several times.
Hosni Mubarak, Moammar al-Gaddafi and Amr Moussa at the Arab summit in Sirte in 2010. (AFP)
Diplomatic drama in a tent
When Gaddafi visited Cairo during Moussa's tenure as foreign minister, the Libyan leader insisted on setting up his trademark tent in the gardens of the Qubba Palace. Though the palace was fully equipped, Gaddafi would receive guests only in the tent. 'At that time, he still saw me as a US spy,' Moussa said, 'so he avoided looking at me during our meeting. He inspected every corner of the tent—except the one where I was sitting.'
Despite Gaddafi's sometimes abrasive behavior, Moussa conceded that the Libyan leader was intelligent and unique. 'He was eccentric, yes, but he had a cleverness about him. His actions often carried a deeper rationale, even if misguided.'
Gaddafi's erratic rule extended to his own ministers. Moussa noted how even highly regarded officials like Abdul Rahman Shalgham and Ali Treki were subject to his whims. 'If Gaddafi was displeased with something, he might simply tell you to stay home—and that could mean house arrest for years. Yet, your salary would still arrive at your door.'
A moment of humor
One incident stood out. Libya was scheduled to host the Arab summit and had failed to pay its dues to the Arab League, and as Secretary-General, Moussa received an envoy from Gaddafi carrying a list of demands. Moussa didn't even read the letter; he simply locked it in a drawer. 'When the envoy asked what to report back, I told him exactly that,' Moussa laughed.
Soon after, Gaddafi summoned him to Sirte. As Moussa waited in the tent, Gaddafi's secretary, Bashir Saleh, walked by singing an old Arabic poem: 'You seem tearless, and patience is your nature.' Moussa quipped: 'Tell the leader he's not tearless—he's payment-less!' Saleh shared the joke with Gaddafi, who burst into laughter and finally paid Libya's dues.
Later, during an Arab summit in Libya, Gaddafi displayed a surprising sense of responsibility. Moussa recalled a heated moment when Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh demanded immediate action on forming a pan-Arab army. Gaddafi gently interrupted: 'Take it easy, Ali.' That phrase—'Take it easy, Ali'—spoke volumes, according to Moussa. 'It revealed Gaddafi's desire to manage tension even among volatile leaders.'
On Hosni Mubarak and the 'pharaoh' myth
Asked if Mubarak ever resembled the authoritarian archetype of a 'pharaoh' as Russians view their 'czars,' Moussa was firm: 'No, not Mubarak. Maybe Sadat had some traits—he liked symbolism. But Mubarak? He wasn't violent, nor bloodthirsty. Yes, he could be firm, but he didn't revel in bloodshed.'
Moussa clarified that while Mubarak might have approved harsh punishments as president, it never escalated to a murderous level. 'Perhaps there were isolated incidents, especially within the prison system, but it wasn't part of Mubarak's character to govern through violence. He wasn't built that way.'
Saddam Hussein meets with Amr Moussa in Iraq in January 2002. (AFP)
The song that stirred controversy
When the Egyptian folk singer Shaaban Abdel Rahim sang 'I hate Israel, and I love Amr Moussa,' it caused a stir. Moussa downplayed the drama. 'I don't think Mubarak himself was offended. He was the president; no foreign minister would rival him in popularity. But some people in the surrounding circles—not necessarily his inner circle—were irked.'
Eventually, another version of the song emerged, replacing Moussa's name with Mubarak's. 'But it was the original that made waves. Even a diplomat from Latin America once told me, 'We're dancing to this song here!''
A difficult meeting with Saddam Hussein
One of the most tense encounters Moussa ever had was with Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. After being elected Secretary-General of the Arab League in 2001, Moussa set out to visit all Arab leaders. He deliberately left Saddam until the end, knowing the sensitivities involved.
In January 2002, Moussa visited Saddam at a small palace. He carried a message from UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan regarding weapons inspections. 'I told Saddam that Annan was open to negotiations, and that continued confrontation with the US would lead nowhere. At some point, no one would stand by him.'
Moussa asked Saddam directly: 'Do you possess nuclear weapons?' Saddam answered, 'No.' Moussa pressed him again: 'Are you absolutely sure?' Saddam repeated, 'No.' This made Moussa's deputy, Ahmed Ben Helli, visibly nervous. 'He probably thought we weren't going to walk out of there.'
Moussa then asked why Iraq objected to the UN inspectors. Saddam responded: 'These people don't just inspect nuclear sites. They ask civilians about food supplies, their opinions on the government. What business is that of theirs?'
Moussa promised to report this to Annan, which he did. Negotiations resumed between Iraq and the UN, but history took its course and the US-led invasion followed.
Asked if he felt fortunate never to have served directly under a figure like Gaddafi, Moussa answered without hesitation: 'Absolutely. I saw how respected men like Shalgham and Treki were sidelined. You could be a top official one day and under house arrest the next.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meeting Change and Missed Opportunities
Meeting Change and Missed Opportunities

Asharq Al-Awsat

time3 hours ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

Meeting Change and Missed Opportunities

The fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime and the rise of Ahmed al-Sharaa to the Syrian presidency is the foundational episode of the regional transformation that is currently underway. It may well be one of the most consequential outcomes of the Al-Aqsa Flood Operation and its aftermath or even the most consequential strategic shift the region has witnessed since the 1967 defeat. We did not merely see a change at the top of the Syrian regime. The entire regional order that had been built around an Iranian-Syrian-Lebanese axis, whose influence stretched into Iraq and Palestine, has collapsed. A new phase has begun, and the door to the Levant has now been closed to Iranian expansion. The United States has returned to the region through the front door, with its role bolstered by a rare moment of Arab consensus regarding the need to curb the non-Arab spheres of influence that had crystalized over the past two decades. This turning point has drawn unprecedented Arab and international attention, led by Saudi Arabia and crowned by President Donald Trump's meeting with al-Sharaa. Global powers then raced to Damascus as they sought a role in reshaping Syria's regional role and strategic posture. This surge of attention has come as a surprise to Lebanon. The frustration of the Lebanese has raised legitimate questions about the gulf in Arab and international engagement with Syria when compared to Lebanon. Indeed, a change in leadership has also emerged in Beirut, which has now also exited the Syrian and Iranian spheres of influence. How could the spotlight shift away from a country long seen as the 'Arab world's concern' and the 'laboratory of international settlements'? Has the world made up its mind about Beirut? Lebanon, which has sustained Arab and international attention since the 1969 Palestinian crisis, is now squandering opportunity after opportunity, gradually losing what remains of international confidence in the country. Neither limited resources nor Lebanon's fragile political system explain this failure alone; the absence of a unified national vision, political will, and commitment to reform are also crucial factors. At the same time, most Arab states and international powers had been expecting a clear stance on the key question of sovereignty in the wake of regional and domestic changes. The authorities were expected to consolidate the state's monopoly over arms, fight corruption, and affirm judicial independence. Instead, Lebanon chose ambiguity, seemingly unaware of the significance of what has happened in Syria, Iran's retreat from the Levant, and Hezbollah's waning power. The result, three months into the new government's tenure, has been stagnation, kicking the can down the road, and petty deals. Hesitation continues to prevail, fueled by a fear of the specter of civil war and the daunting task of dismantling Hezbollah's deep entrenchment in the public sector, Lebanon's security apparatus and other state institutions The authorities are also reluctant to embark on the complex and delicate process of disentangling the Shiite community from Hezbollah. It seems that Lebanon is being steadily pushed to the margins, while Syria has been granted a historic opportunity backed by broad Arab and international support. Lebanon has received little more than initiatives that lack meaningful political backing, despite the formation of a new government that signals a desire for change. Rather than deliberate neglect, this state of affairs is a reflection of deepening despair over Lebanon's ability to seize the moment and engage with clear messages. Chief among them is the demand for a clear political decision on ending all forms of armed resistance, deeming Hezbollah's weapons as illegitimate, setting a timeframe for its disarmament and pursuing a permanent truce with Israel similar to that of the 1949 armistice. These steps would strip Israel of its pretexts, though it is nonetheless unlikely to play a constructive role in either Lebanon or Syria. The current ultra-right Israeli government is gripped by paranoia. It sees every political shift in an Arab country as a direct threat, demanding everything while offering no political concessions and favoring military solutions over political compromise. The successes it has achieved in its latest war have only hardened this disposition and deepened its delusion that force alone can dictate realities on the ground, even if this comes at the cost of regional stability and risks straining Israel's relations with the Trump administration, which seeks to broaden the Abraham Accords. In the end, the difference between Syria and Lebanon lies not in the scale of their respective crises, but in each country's ability to respond to those crises. The collapse of the Syrian regime has triggered a structural and strategic metamorphosis that has drawn in international and Arab actors eager to fill the vacuum and redraw the regional map. Syria finds itself at a moment that mirrors the post-Cold War era. This is a moment of reckoning, reshuffling, and opening up to new possibilities. Lebanon, by contrast, remains caught in a grey zone. It is neither fully collapsing nor genuinely recovering, content to manage its crises without resolving them. As Damascus transforms into the foundation of a new regional order in which it plays an active role, Beirut is fading from the world's view. The bell of transformation has rung, and opportunities do not wait for those who squander them. In a world ruled by hard reality rather than good intentions, hedging and delay no longer convince anyone.

Information obtained by Iran ‘seem to refer' to Israeli nuclear research site: Grossi
Information obtained by Iran ‘seem to refer' to Israeli nuclear research site: Grossi

Al Arabiya

time3 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Information obtained by Iran ‘seem to refer' to Israeli nuclear research site: Grossi

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said Monday that the information Iran claimed it seized regarding Israel's nuclear program 'seems to refer' to the country's Soreq Nuclear Research Center, the first acknowledgment outside of Tehran of the theft. The office of Israel's prime minister had no immediate response on the remarks by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, who spoke during a news conference in Vienna. The alleged theft comes at a time of renewed tensions over Iran's nuclear program, which enriches uranium a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels and looks poised to reject a US proposal over a possible deal on its atomic program. 'We have seen some reports in the press. We haven't had any official communication about this,' Grossi told reporters. 'In any case, this seems to refer to Soreq, which is a research facility which we inspect by the way. We don't inspect other strategic parts of the program, but this part of the program we do inspect.' He did not elaborate on where he received his information, though the IAEA maintains a confidential reporting system for nations to report security incidents involving their nuclear programs. Soreq, located 20 kilometers (12 miles) south of Tel Aviv, is a national laboratory for nuclear science established in Israel in 1958, engaged in nuclear science, radiation safety and applied physics. The IAEA has so-called 'item-specific safeguards agreements' with Israel, Pakistan and India, all countries that are not party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Under Israel's agreement, the IAEA monitors Soreq but has no access to Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona, believed to provide the fuel for Israel's undeclared nuclear weapons program. Over the weekend, Iranian state television and later the country's intelligence minister claimed without offering evidence that Tehran seized an 'important treasury' of information regarding Israel's nuclear program. Israel, whose undeclared atomic weapons program makes it the only country in the Middle East with nuclear bombs, has not acknowledged any such Iranian operation targeting it – though there have been arrests of Israelis allegedly spying for Tehran amid the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. Iranian Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib claimed thousands of pages of documents had been obtained which would be made public soon. Among them were documents related to the US, Europe and other countries which, he claimed, had been obtained through 'infiltration' and 'access to the sources.' He did not elaborate on the methods used. However, Khatib was sanctioned by the US Treasury in 2022 over directing 'cyber espionage and ransomware attacks in support of Iran's political goals.' For Iran, the claim may be designed to show the public that the theocracy was able to respond to a 2018 Israeli operation that spirited out what Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described as a 'half ton' of documents related to Iran's program. That Israeli announcement came just before President Donald Trump in his first term unilaterally withdrew America from Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, which greatly limited its program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. This week, Western nations are expect to go before the IAEA's Board of Governors with a proposal to find Iran in noncompliance with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. It could be the first time in decades – and likely would kick the issue to the UN Security Council. That could see one of the Western countries involved in the 2015 nuclear deal invoke the so-called 'snapback' of UN sanctions on the Islamic Republic. The authority to restore those sanctions by the complaint of any member of the original 2015 nuclear deal expires in October – putting the West on a clock to exert pressure on Tehran over its program before losing that power.

Tunisia activists launch Gaza-bound convoy in ‘symbolic act'
Tunisia activists launch Gaza-bound convoy in ‘symbolic act'

Al Arabiya

time3 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Tunisia activists launch Gaza-bound convoy in ‘symbolic act'

Hundreds of people, mainly Tunisians, launched on Monday a land convoy bound for Gaza, seeking to 'break the siege' on the Palestinian territory, activists said. Organizers said the nine-bus convoy was not bringing aid into Gaza, but rather aimed at carrying out a 'symbolic act' by breaking the blockade on the territory described by the United Nations as 'the hungriest place on Earth.' The 'Soumoud' convoy, meaning 'steadfastness' in Arabic, includes doctors and aims to arrive in Rafah, in southern Gaza, 'by the end of the week,' activist Jawaher Channa told AFP. It is set to pass through Libya and Egypt, although Cairo has yet to provide passage permits, she added. 'We are about a thousand people, and we will have more join us along the way,' said Channa, spokeswoman of the Tunisian Coordination of Joint Action for Palestine, the group organizing the caravan. 'Egypt has not yet given us permission to cross its borders, but we will see what happens when we get there,' she said. Channa said the convoy was not set to face issues crossing Libya, 'whose people have historically supported the Palestinian cause,' despite recent deadly clashes in the country that remains divided between two governments. Algerian, Mauretanian, Moroccan and Libyan activists were also among the group, which is set to travel along the Tunisian and Libyan coasts, before continuing on to Rafah through Egypt. After 21 months of war, Israel is facing mounting international pressure to allow more aid into Gaza to alleviate widespread shortages of food and basic supplies. On June 1, the Madleen aid boat, boarded by activists including Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg and European parliament member Franco-Palestinian Rima Hassan, set sail for Gaza from Italy. But on Monday morning Israel intercepted it, preventing it from reaching the Palestinian territory. The UN has warned that the Palestinian territory's entire population is at risk of famine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store