logo
Trump wants to talk business with Africa in hopes of countering China. But a US summit excluded Africa's big players

Trump wants to talk business with Africa in hopes of countering China. But a US summit excluded Africa's big players

CNN7 days ago
The White House hosted an 'African leaders' summit of sorts this week. But only five countries from the continent of more than 50 nations were welcome to join.
US President Donald Trump hosted a working lunch in Washington, DC, on Wednesday, bringing together the presidents of Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Senegal, and Gabon for a discussion focused on 'commercial opportunities,' a White House official told CNN.
'This discussion and lunch dialog with African heads of state was arranged because President Trump believes that African countries offer incredible commercial opportunities which benefit both the American people and our African partners,' the White House official said. The multilateral lunch is scheduled for noon in the State Dining Room of the White House.
Going into the meeting, Liberia said that the 'high-level summit' intends 'to deepen diplomatic ties, advance shared economic goals, and enhance security cooperation' between Washington and 'select African nations.'
However, none of Africa's big players, such as its largest economies South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt and Ethiopia, were asked to attend. These nations are allied to BRICS, a group of emerging economies founded by Brazil, India, and America's adversaries, Russia and China. BRICS members face the threat of being hit with new tariffs from Trump for supporting 'anti-American' policies.
During the meeting, the five African leaders heaped praise on Trump as they encouraged him to invest in their countries and develop their plentiful natural resources.
The leaders joined the US president for lunch in the State Dining Room, where each leader went around the table thanking Trump for his invitation.
'I didn't know I'd be treated this nicely. This is great. We could do this all day long,' Trump said in response to the flattery.
Christopher Afoke Isike, a professor of African politics and international relations at the University of Pretoria, South Africa, describes Trump's handpicked guests for his US summit as 'low-hanging fruit' in his quest to counter Chinese and Russian influence in Africa.
'On one hand, Trump is desperate for some deal to show to his base that he is getting results for America. But some of these also align with his focus on countering Chinese influence in Africa and malign Russian activity which undermines US interests on the continent,' he told CNN.
'Most of the regional powers in Africa are either in BRICS as key members or are aspiring to join as key partners,' Isike said, adding that 'these five countries (attending the US summit) do not fall into that category and as such are a kind of low-hanging fruit.'
China is Africa's largest bilateral trading partner while its ally Russia has expanded its footprint on the continent, emerging as a major supplier of military hardware.
This is not the first time Trump has hosted a small group of African leaders in the US, deviating from the approach of Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who hosted fuller gatherings of African heads of government while in the White House.
During his first term in office — viewed by some as 'dismissive toward Africa' — Trump hosted a 'working lunch' in 2017 with nine African heads of state, whom he described as 'partners for promoting prosperity and peace on a range of economic, humanitarian, and security issues.'
'Africa has tremendous business potential,' Trump said in that meeting, which included the leaders of Nigeria, Ethiopia, and South Africa.
Now in his second term, Trump has kept an eye on Africa's mineral wealth, with the US keen to challenge China's access to critical minerals in the region. However, he advocates a transactional policy that swaps charity for strategic US investment.
When a peace deal brokered by Trump was signed last month by Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, which harbors large deposits of minerals critical to the production of electronics, Trump told reporters that the accord allows the US to get 'a lot of the mineral rights from the Congo.'
While the signed peace agreement does not specifically forfeit any mineral rights to the US, the document includes a framework 'to expand foreign trade and investment derived from regional critical mineral supply chains,' specifically to 'link both countries, in partnership, as appropriate, with the US government and US investors.'
In a statement July 1, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio hailed the end of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which delivered US humanitarian aid overseas, saying that 'the countries that benefit the most from our generosity usually fail to reciprocate' and that future US aid and investment 'must be in furtherance of an America First foreign policy.'
The Trump administration had previously canceled more than 80% of programs at USAID and has imposed 'reciprocal' tariffs on several countries, including many in Africa which Trump said had trade deficits with the US. South Africa has described the 'reciprocal' tariff which is due to take effect on August 1 as not based on 'an accurate representation of available trade data.'
Trump has also banned travel for 12 mostly African and Middle Eastern nations – citing security risks – amid an aggressive clampdown on immigration by his administration. A mooted expansion of the travel restrictions would halt travel to the US for swathes of West Africa, if implemented.
China, meanwhile, is softening the impact of US tariffs on Africa, announcing last month it would halt charges on imports for nearly all its African partners, except Eswatini (formerly Swaziland) which is friendly toward Taiwan — which China's ruling Communist Party claims as its own, despite never having controlled it.
Although small economies, Gabon, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal and Liberia are rich in mineral resources including oil and gas, gold, iron ore, and rare earth elements.
At the White House meeting, Gabon's President Brice Oligui Nguema underscored the mineral wealth of their countries and encouraged the US to partner with them to develop their resources.
'We are not poor countries. We are rich countries when it comes to raw materials. But we need partners to support us and help us develop those resources with win-win partnerships,' he said.
Nguema also pushed Trump to purchase from Gabon rather than through companies.
'I'm sure that it's more expensive compared to when you can come and buy directly from us,' he said.
Discussions at the Trump-hosted summit extended beyond commerce.
Nguema addressed his country's efforts to curb piracy in the Gulf of Guinea.
'We can't do it alone. We need a reliable and strong partner that is committed and that takes real action,' he added.
The West and Central African nations are also a common departure point for would-be migrants to the US.
'There may be other stakes: migratory trends from West Africa to Nicaragua and then the US,' as well as 'security, as all of those (five) countries have an opening on the Atlantic Ocean,' Ousmane Sene, who heads the Senegal-based research organization, the West African Research Center (WARC), told CNN.
Last year, the New York Times reported, citing government data, that the US was seeing an increasing number of African migrants at its southern border — rising from just over 13,000 in 2022 to 58,462 in 2023. Nationals from Mauritania and Senegal were top of the list, the report said.
For Dakar-based journalist and political analyst Mamadou Thior, who covered the first US–Africa Leaders' Summit hosted by Obama in 2014, the leaders of the five African nations must 'be as clever as Donald Trump' in talks with the White House.
'Trump is a businessman. So only the interests of America interest him,' Thior said. 'The USAID, which was a key partner for countries like Senegal, no longer exists. It's up to them to talk to Trump, to see what new cooperation they can put forward.'
In Isike's view, 'this meeting is going to inaugurate a new US diplomatic model — one that is transactionally tied to economic reform (and) trade outcomes for the US.'
Nonetheless, the five African nations 'can expect to leverage private sector partnerships, investment, infrastructural development, and security cooperation with the US,' he said.
These nations are not new to high-stakes relations with global powers. They have each been courted by China, which has boosted trade volumes between them and funded infrastructure in Gabon and Senegal.
When Guinea-Bissau President Umaro Sissoco Embaló met his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping in Beijing in September, the former had kind words for the host nation.
'For Africa,' Embaló said, according to a statement by Chinese foreign ministry, 'China represents the future and is a brother.'
'Guinea-Bissau is willing to be a trustworthy friend and partner of China,' he added.
Last month, Senegalese Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko was also full of praise for China, thanking it for awarding dozens 'of preparation scholarships' to his nation's athletes and coaches ahead of next year's Summer Youth Olympics.
In the same statement, Sonko expressed frustration with the US decision to deny visas to 'several members of the Senegal women's national basketball team' — a leading force in African women's basketball — forcing them to cancel a training camp they had scheduled in the US.
With a wider African leaders' summit mooted by the White House for later in the year, Trump has made one thing clear, according to Isike: an urgent shift 'from traditional aid to strategic commerce-driven engagement.'
However, the shift is 'a high-stakes gamble that aligns with America's goal to reset its influence in Africa through investment but also to counter China and foster economically self-reliant African partners,' Isike added.
'Enabling Africa to be self-reliant is not because he (Trump) loves Africa, but because he doesn't have patience with countries that only want handouts from the US,' Isike said, adding that 'these trade deals and the meeting (this week) aligns with the US' priority to favor countries that are able to help themselves.'
CNN's Alejandra Jaramillo contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Sen. Ruben Gallego tours Iowa State Fair but dodges talk of 2028 run for president
US Sen. Ruben Gallego tours Iowa State Fair but dodges talk of 2028 run for president

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Sen. Ruben Gallego tours Iowa State Fair but dodges talk of 2028 run for president

U.S. Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona toured the Iowa State Fairgrounds on Aug. 8, speaking to Democrats about winning back seats in the 2026 midterms and drawing a crowd of national reporters curious about his 2028 presidential prospects. Gallego's message for Iowa Democrats, in between visits to the butter cow and flipping pork burgers at the Iowa Pork Producers Tent, was to focus on working-class issues, "stop going for the easy votes" and reach out to Republicans. "We have to get out to these rural areas or suburban areas, wherever it is where we're maybe not winning Republicans, and we have to actually start having conversations with them," he said in an interview with the Des Moines Register. "And focus on what they want to talk about. Not what makes us comfortable to talk about." Gallego defeated Republican Kari Lake in 2024 to win his seat in the U.S. Senate, becoming the first Latino senator to represent Arizona. Before that, he served five terms in the U.S. House of Representatives. "The reason we got Trump-Gallego voters in Arizona is because we talked about border security," he said. "And we talked about the cost of living and how things were going bad and we needed to work on it instead of being in denial and hoping that we would win." 'Too early' to talk about running for president, Gallego says Gallego's visit to Iowa comes amid a string of his visits around the country that have sparked speculation about a potential bid for president in 2028. More: Why Arizona's Sen. Ruben Gallego is 2028 presidential longshot as he heads to Iowa Gallego will travel to New Hampshire, the traditional leadoff presidential primary state, on Aug. 22. His stops will include the Politics & Eggs breakfast, a staple for presidential candidates, as well as a town hall and a fundraiser, according to WMUR. In May, he held a town hall in Pennsylvania, a key swing state. In his interview with the Register, Gallego acknowledged that, "yes, I've been prepped" to be asked about whether he'll run for president in 2028. "Too early," he said. "Right now, the most important thing is, I need some help in the House and in the Senate. I know how to help Democrats win in really hard states. That's what we're here to do." Gallego also noted that he has a 7-week-old son, his third child, and "that's going to be the focus for the next couple of years." Asked if that meant he was ruling out a presidential bid in 2028, Gallego deflected the question with a joke about U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst's viral town hall comments about Medicaid. "I mean, like, who knows what the hell is going to happen in the next couple of years, right?" he said. "As Joni Ernst said, we could all be dead, too." Past tweet disparaging Iowa Caucuses 'not my finest moment,' Gallego says But his visit to the fair was also dogged by conservative activists from Turning Point USA seeking to draw attention to past social media posts Gallego made disparaging the Iowa Caucuses. "F--- caucuses," he posted on Feb. 4, 2020. "Iowa failed time to move on. #IowaCaucuses." "Love my friends in Iowa and New Hampshire, but time to move on," he wrote in another post on Feb. 14, 2021. "South Carolina and Nevada should start the primaries." Gallego said he made the post because he was frustrated by the fact that the results of the caucuses were not known for weeks after the app failed that the Iowa Democratic Party was using to report precinct results. "The tweet was definitely not my finest moment," he said. "However, you know, it was mostly focusing on the results of that day." National Democrats stripped Iowa of its first-in-the-nation status following the 2020 election, although the party may revisit the presidential nominating calendar before the 2028 election. More: Iowa House Democratic Leader Brian Meyer calls for his party to hold caucuses first in 2028 Gallego said Democrats' presidential nominating calendar will be determined by the Democratic National Committee. "Look, the DNC's got to figure out the calendar. If Iowa is back in front, then it's Iowa," he said. "But overall, fighting for people like here in Iowa or Arizona or anywhere else, you know, we have shared needs, and we have some shared threats," he added. "Like, right now, what's the threat? People are getting kicked off of Medicaid. People are going to get kicked off food stamps." Iowa Democratic Party Chair Rita Hart said voters will decide whether Gallego's past comments about the caucuses are a dealbreaker if he decides to run for higher office. "It's up to the voters," she said. "But I would tell you that I talked to him about that. And, you know, I think he recognizes that he was running his mouth, right? And that's one reason why it's really great that he's here in Iowa, because maybe this will give him a different attitude going forward." She said she's "thrilled" candidates such as Gallego are interested in coming to Iowa. "We've had a lot of conversation about Iowa's place in the big picture of first-in-the-nation, etc.," she said. "And candidates get it. They know that Iowa is the place to come. We have a such a strong reputation of being the place where you come to be vetted by honest to goodness ordinary citizens who are smart and savvy and are paying attention, and it gives you an idea of what the pulse of the nation is." Republican Party of Iowa Chair Jeff Kaufmann issued a statement calling Iowa Democrats "out of touch" for welcoming Gallego and saying Iowans "don't need lectures" from him. "Ruben Gallego trashed the Iowa Caucuses, mocked our farmers, and then voted against tax cuts on tips, bigger paychecks and financial relief for seniors," Kaufmann said. "Now he wants a photo‑op at the State Fair? Iowans know better, he's out of touch and out of his depth." Gallego rounds out Iowa State Fair with butter cow visit, pork burger flipping Despite his deflections, Gallego's day at the fair had all the hallmarks of a presidential condender's visit. Des Moines Mayor Connie Boesen took Gallego to try an apple eggroll at her Applishus stand before he kicked off his official schedule by answering questions from reporters. Gallego walked around the fairgrounds with Hart and state Sen. Matt Blake, D-Urbandale. As he strolled, he and Blake chatted about their kids and their military service, and Gallego got some advice about the "science" behind where to stand to get the best picture with the butter cow. "There's a science?" he asked. After seeing the butter cow, Gallego tried an egg on a stick — another Iowa State Fair staple. "Needs a little salsa," he said, before dipping it in some Cookies BBQ seasoning that a volunteer offered him. He stopped to take selfies with several Democratic volunteers at the party's booth in the Varied Industries Building. And he completed his fair tour with a visit to the Iowa Pork Producers Tent to flip pork burgers. At the end of the day, he hinted that it might not be his last visit to Iowa. "You're going to have competitive races no matter what," he said. "I think you're going to have competitive Senate candidates and House candidates and governors. And if they ask me to come back again, yeah, I'll come back again." Stephen Gruber-Miller covers the Iowa Statehouse and politics for the Register. He can be reached by email at sgrubermil@ or by phone at 515-284-8169. Follow him on X at @sgrubermiller. This article originally appeared on Des Moines Register: Ruben Gallego visits the Iowa State Fair, raising questions about 2028

Chicago Bears call on state legislature to pass bill and provide momentum for suburban stadium
Chicago Bears call on state legislature to pass bill and provide momentum for suburban stadium

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Chicago Bears call on state legislature to pass bill and provide momentum for suburban stadium

LAKE FOREST, Ill. (AP) — Chicago Bears president Kevin Warren said Friday the team requires a big push from the state legislature to reach its goal of digging for a new stadium in Arlington Heights sometime this year. The Bears have the plans drawn up for the indoor stadium but need a mega bill to pass in Springfield in October to supply momentum for the construction. 'The biggest item that remains, that has remained, is the fact that this mega project build that was on the docket in the spring but was not put forth for a vote, but it is very, very important that it passes,' Warren said. 'Because without that legislation, we are not able to proceed forward. 'We stand ready. The stadium is designed.' Warren said team officials have been meeting with Arlington Heights village Mayor Jim Tinaglia on the project, which is their only target site. Over three years they fluctuated from Arlington Heights to Chicago and now back to Arlington Heights. The bill the Bears want to see passed would freeze property taxes for large-scale construction projects like the stadium. Warren maintains the bill could create 56,000 jobs during construction and 9,000 permanent jobs. 'So, if that bill passes in October there are items we have to work on and obviously there is a process you have to follow with the village of Arlington Heights from an approval process,' Warren said. 'But obviously they are committed. 'The goal would still be to be in a position to move dirt this year. There's still work, some initial work that needs to be done to get the site ready, but to hopefully break ground next year formally but to actually move dirt this year.' Warren has said it would take three years for the stadium to be built once ground is broken. The Bears are devoting about $2.7 billion to the project on their own property at the old Arlington International Racecourse. Bears owner George McCaskey said he hasn't become frustrated with the political process of getting the stadium built. 'These things take time,' McCaskey said. 'It's on us to convince the governor and the state legislators that this is a good idea for the people of Illinois and we need to do a better job at that.' ___ AP NFL:

Texas Democrats fight back in court against Abbott's bid to remove them
Texas Democrats fight back in court against Abbott's bid to remove them

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Democrats fight back in court against Abbott's bid to remove them

Texas House Democrats unveiled their legal counterattack Friday against Gov. Greg Abbott's bid to oust them from office, saying the governor's emergency bid is riddled with fatal flaws. Rep. Gene Wu, the leader of the Texas House Democratic caucus, argued in court papers filed with the state Supreme Court that Abbott's plan would violate the Texas Constitution, which leaves it to the legislature to discipline its own members. The Democrats fled the state to try to derail Abbott's ultra-partisan redistricting proposal. Abbott has asked the state Supreme Court to eject them from office, saying their decision to leave the state amounted to a legal 'abandonment' of their posts. Wu argued that the effort by Democrats to 'break quorum' and deprive Republicans of the ability to conduct legislative business is not an abdication of their duty but an affirmation of it. 'When in the course of legislative proceedings, the act of the majority is so shocking of the conscience, it is the duty of the legislator to not, with ease, render his body a means to the end,' Wu's attorneys wrote. The lawyers emphasized that there is a 'long history' of quorum breaking in Texas and that it is contemplated in the state's constitution. Wu also flicked at a simmering tension between Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton, who argued in his own letter to the court earlier this week that Abbott may not have the legal authority to take action against the legislators. Underscoring the point, Paxton filed his own separate actions Friday afternoon in the Texas Supreme Court to remove 13 Democrats — including Wu —from the legislature. Paxton, inhis letter, said that while he appreciates Abbott's 'passion,' only the attorney general has the legal authority to seek the lawmakers' removal. Wu's filing is the latest volley in a deepening crisis that has extraordinary national implications for the future of both political parties. Fifty-one members of the Texas Democratic caucus fled the state earlier this week to prevent Abbott and Republicans from adopting new congressional district boundaries expected to net Republicans five seats in the U.S. House. The quorum-breaking gambit has drawn support from national Democrats, including several governors who have welcomed the fleeing lawmakers to their states and vowed to protect them. Meanwhile, Texas' battle to redraw political boundaries has inspired both Republican and Democratic governors to consider corresponding efforts that could remake the parties' fortunes in the 2026 midterm elections, as President Donald Trump fights to maintain his grip on Congress. Abbott sued on Tuesday, claiming that Wu — as well as the other Democratic quorum-breakers — had legally 'abandoned' their offices, which would permit the court to declare their seats vacant. But Wu contended that he and his colleagues were in fact fulfilling their roles as legislators by refusing to give their GOP counterparts a quorum. Wu also argued that Abbott erred by filing his suit directly to the Supreme Court, evading review by the lower courts that would typically consider Abbott's bid first. He also said that only the legislature can remove its own members, which the constitution provides for by a two-thirds majority, a far greater hurdle than Abbott's bid to corral five Supreme Court justices. And Wu added that the governor's petition relies on allegations about the lawmakers' subjective 'intent' that aren't grounded in facts and evidence. He said he plans to invoke his right to a jury trial, which would require a more complete record of evidence than Abbott has offered. 'If Representative Wu is to stand trial, he should do so on evidence, yet the Governor bases his petition on hearsay,' Wu's lawyers wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store