Nenê joins exclusive club as he turns 44, check out all the players over 40
With 1,044 matches played in his career, Juventude's number 10 is part of an increasingly short list of active forty-somethings in the world's top leagues.
This list is led by Fábio, Fluminense's goalkeeper. It started to include Cristiano Ronaldo this year. And it features ANOTHER Nenê (see details below).
Nenê has been with Papo since April 2023. His contract runs until the end of this season and includes productivity triggers and goals to be achieved.
The video confirming his stay at the club from Serra Gaúcha for 2025 "rode the wave" of longevity in football. Watch it again below:
Discovered by Paulista, Nenê is now at the 15th club of his career. Which is likely to be his last.
He holds, for example, the distinction of being the last Brazilian to be the top scorer in Ligue 1.
He was playing successfully for PSG when he achieved this feat alongside Giroud, then a Montpellier player. Both scored 21 goals in the 2011/2012 season.
He was also celebrated by another former club, Monaco.
The moment of the OTHER forty-somethings:
Fábio - 44 years old - (9/30/1980)
📸 Michael Reaves - 2025 Getty Images
The Fluminense goalkeeper has a contract until the end of next year – when he is expected to retire. In other words: he will likely play until he's 46 years old.
Fábio took for himself the record for most clean sheets as a goalkeeper against Inter Milan: 507.
And he's still chasing an even more significant one: the player with the most appearances in football history.
He currently has 1,381. The record holder is former English goalkeeper Peter Shilton, who played 1,387.
Now 76 years old, he began his career in 1966 at Leicester and ended it in 1997 playing for Leyton Orient.
Roque Santa Cruz - 43 years old - (8/16/1981)
📸 NELSON ALMEIDA - AFP or licensors
The Paraguayan striker for Libertad is "only" the last player still active who played in the 2002 World Cup in Japan and South Korea.
There were eight in 2022, at the time of the Qatar World Cup.
A product of Olimpia, he was already playing professionally in 1997 – just like Fábio.
He stood out at Bayern and played for several clubs (and countries) before returning to Decano in 2016.
He's been at Libertad since 2022. He has two goals in 22 matches this season.
nderson Miguel da Silva, known as Nenê - 41 years old (7/28/1983)
Yes. The list has TWO Nenês.
The less famous one has been in European football since 2008, when he stood out for Nacional from Madeira Island.
He had a long spell at Cagliari between 2009 and 2014. And he's been playing in Portugal since 2018.
He was the top scorer of the 2023/2024 local second division for AVS – now AFS Vila das Aves – with 23 goals in 32 matches. Leading the team to the top tier.
There was suffering in 24/25, but relegation was avoided in the playoffs.
He played less (18 league matches) and scored four goals. He remains strong at the club for what's to come.
Nenê turned professional at São Bento and caught attention with Santa Cruz in 2006.
He played for Cruzeiro the following season and also had a spell at Ipatinga before leaving the country.
José Fonte - 41 years old - (12/22/1983)
📸 FILIPE AMORIM - AFP or licensors
The defender currently playing for Casa Pia had long spells at Southampton and Lille.
He was a Portuguese national team player between 2014 and 2022. He's now at his seventh different Portuguese club since starting at Sporting B in 2002.
Dante - 41 years old - (10/18/1983)
📸 FREDERIC DIDES - AFP or licensors
He was discovered by Juventude before starting his career in European football.
Including three seasons with Bayern Munich.
He renewed his contract for the upcoming season and will complete ten years at Nice.
He is the captain of the team from the French Riviera.
Cristiano Ronaldo - 40 years old (2/5/1985)
📸 JOHN MACDOUGALL - AFP or licensors
The "Big Robot" renewed for two more seasons with Al-Nassr.
He is chasing his 1,000th goal. He currently has 938.
CR7 has already played 1,281 times in his career.
Only the aforementioned Peter Shilton and Fábio are ahead of him in this regard.
Featured photo: Reproduction/Juventude
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Crystal Palace at CAS: What could club argue as they try to win back Europa League spot?
Common sense would suggest that confirmation of John Textor's exit from Crystal Palace should resolve the issues around the Premier League club's connection to French side Lyon. After all, the American investor has now both sold his Palace stake and left all positions of authority at Lyon. Unfortunately, one person's common sense is another's opinion — fun to debate, but not the best foundations for a cross-border sports competition involving huge prizes. Advertisement To do that, you are better off with a set of written rules which are fair, proportionate, transparent and well-drafted. If they are not, well, that's why we invented lawyers. This is where Palace find themselves: denied entrance to the Europa League, the competition they qualified for by winning last season's FA Cup, and effectively demoted to the third-tier Conference League for breaching European football governing body UEFA's multi-club ownership (MCO) rules. And so Palace are taking their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), asking the so-called 'supreme court' of worldwide athletic endeavour to overturn UEFA's decision. Palace have also named Nottingham Forest and Lyon in their appeal, as their fellow Premier League side have been elevated from the Conference League to the second-tier Europa League at their expense, while their disputed stablemates from Ligue 1 have been left in the Europa League, as their higher domestic league finish of the two sides trumps winning the FA Cup. Steve Parish, Palace's chairman, will not mind which of those clubs CAS demotes, as long as what he views as the 'terrible injustice' of his team being removed from the Europa League is reversed. He believes he must take this fight on for Palace's players, staff and fans, as well as others who might find themselves in this position one day. And he clearly thinks this would not happen to a bigger, established side, so there is an 'us versus them' element to his crusade. Having said all that, how could Palace go about persuading CAS? It was then International Olympic Committee (IOC) president Juan Antonio Samaranch who first realised global sport needed an in-house method for washing dirty linen, as the regular courts are expensive, potentially embarrassing and painfully slow. With the IOC willing to pay for it all, housing it in Lausanne, the Olympic Movement's Swiss home, made sense. Advertisement CAS opened in 1984 and, initially, three-person panels picked from a small pool of experts nominated by the IOC, its president and Olympic federations made decisions about commercial and disciplinary arguments. The system worked pretty well until 1992, when the International Equestrian Federation found a German rider named Elmar Gundel guilty of doping his horse and banned him. When CAS rejected his appeal, Gundel took his fight to Switzerland's Federal Supreme Court. He did not get much joy there either, but the court did agree that the link between CAS and the IOC was too cosy. The result was the 1994 creation of the International Council of Arbitration for Sport (ICAS), an arms-length body that would run and finance CAS for all Olympic and Paralympic sports. When the World Anti-Doping Agency was created in 1999, CAS was also formally established as the last stop for doping cases. Its workload has increased each year. In 2024, more than 900 cases were submitted to CAS, with about 300 progressing to full-blown hearings. It now has 45 permanent staff, plus around 400 experts serving as visiting arbitrators, who are housed in a purpose-built office in Lausanne's poshest convention centre. The basic proposition has not changed much. Each side in a dispute chooses a member of the panel, with those two usually picking a third expert from the pool to be the panel's chair. If they can't decide, ICAS will select one. Hearings are private, with costs kept low. Verdicts typically come within six to 12 months but expedited hearings are held for matters in need of quick answers, such as doping cases during an ongoing Olympics and over Palace's predicament. The draw for the final round of Conference League qualifying is a week today (August 4), with those two-legged ties then scheduled for August 21 and 28. Palace, Forest and Lyon need to know ASAP which competition they're in. In terms of results, sports federations still tend to win the day, as Gundel discovered, but Manchester City famously beat UEFA at CAS in 2020, while Paul Pogba's doping ban was reduced from four years to 18 months last year, saving his career. Palace's starting point is likely to be that Textor, whose Eagle Football Group still contains his controlling stakes at Brazilian side Botafogo, Belgian's RWDM Brussels (rebranded from Molenbeek earlier this year) and Lyon, did not have what UEFA calls 'decisive influence' at Selhurst Park, and that they have never been part of his multi-club group. Advertisement This, you would think, is supported by the fact he has just sold his 43 per cent stake in Palace to Woody Johnson, the billionaire owner of the NFL's New York Jets and former U.S. ambassador to the UK. Furthermore, that 43 per cent stake only gave Textor one of four voting shares at Palace, with Parish and two other American investors, David Blitzer and Josh Harris, also holding one each. As Textor has previously explained to The Athletic, decisions at Palace very rarely, if ever, went to a vote, as Blitzer and Harris are silent partners who trust Parish to run things. So, Parish would always have 75 per cent of the votes, and he had no interest in Textor's plan to integrate the Londoners into the Eagle multi-club universe. Blitzer, Harris, Parish and Textor all went to UEFA's headquarters in the Swiss city of Nyon last month to make this point but the Club Financial Control Body (CFCB), the arms-length unit that decides which teams can and cannot be licensed to play in the three European competitions, wasn't buying it. Instead, it ruled that Textor's influence was decisive at Palace because he has injected more than £100million ($134m at the current rate) into the club since 2022, money that helped them finish their new-look academy facilities and sign players, and was the largest single shareholder which meant he must, at the very least, have had a say in what they could and could not do. A decisive say? Well, that is why CAS exists. Dr Antoine Duval is the head of Asser International Sports Law Centre in the Netherlands and a seasoned watcher of CAS's decision-making. He believes it's possible the CAS panel will disagree with the CFCB assessment but says the 'quality of the evidence provided by Palace about its internal management structure and the role, or lack of it, of Textor/Eagle will be crucial'. Textor's voting rights will be a key consideration for CAS, but so will his financial contributions and influence on recruitment and commercial strategy. For example, he was a strong advocate of appointing Oliver Glasner, the Austrian head coach who led Palace to their FA Cup triumph, in February last year, although he recently insisted on UK radio station Talksport that the notion he 'made the hire (at Palace) happen… that's not true at all. I tried to get him at Lyon — if he spoke French, he'd be there. I told UEFA that a suggestion is not decisive influence. Nobody tells Steve (Parish) what to do, he's as stubborn as anybody.' Palace, no doubt, will say the only player to be transferred between them and Lyon was centre-back Jake O'Brien in 2023: beyond some young players going on loan to Molenbeek (including O'Brien, earlier in his career), they had no other transactions with an Eagle Football Group club, despite Textor's frequent suggestions. Advertisement But Dr Gregory Ioannidis, an experienced campaigner at CAS and an associate professor at Sheffield Hallam University, is not sure this will be enough to sway the panel. He believes Palace will try to argue that a 'more flexible and purposeful interpretation of the regulations' should be applied, with the club's lawyers asking the panel to think about what UEFA is trying to achieve with its MCO rules, fair competition, and whether the English side pose any threat to that legitimate aim. 'But if the panel decides the rules are clear, and therefore a strict and literal approach needs to be applied, the chances for a successful appeal will be minimised,' explains Ioannidis. While each case is considered on its own merits, precedents can be helpful, and two CAS panels have recently made very quick decisions on MCO cases involving Slovakian team FC DAC 1904 and Drogheda United from the Republic of Ireland. Both were blocked from playing in the Conference League by the CFCB and then lost their appeals, DAC unanimously and Drogheda on a majority verdict. The two cases were different but both argued they simply did not have enough time to create the separation UEFA requires between them and their MCO sister clubs. As MCO groups have proliferated across Europe, UEFA has given owners two options: reduce your stake in one of the clubs that want to compete in the same competition to less than 30 per cent, step down as a director and halt whatever player-trading strategy you are pursuing with the two teams, or put one of into a blind trust, so you have no influence over day-to-day operations. Crucially, UEFA moved the deadline for doing one or the other of these workarounds from early June to March 1. DAC, Drogheda and Palace all missed this memo. However, in both the DAC and Drogheda cases, the CAS panels backed UEFA. Advertisement 'What is of immense importance here is the panels' findings that the current regulations do not require evidence of actual influence, but rather only the possibility of such influence,' says Ioannidis. 'This, in conjunction with the finding on the procedural aspect of submitting the changes in the club's ownership structure on time (or not), may cause serious difficulties for those arguing Palace's case.' Parish has explained in recent interviews that Palace were too busy playing Championship neighbours Millwall in the last 16 of the FA Cup on March 1 to be thinking about what might happen if they were to win the whole thing and play in Europe for the first time in their history, but Duval says the deadline argument is doomed. 'It seems to me that a possible argument about the new deadline has already been rejected, thus the main focus will probably be on whether Textor had decisive influence,' he says. And while Palace will come armed with evidence that shows Textor was routinely ignored, UEFA's lawyers will no doubt point to the letter CFCB chair Sunil Gulati sent to the club licensing managers at UEFA's 55 member associations last May which spells out what 'decisive influence' means. A literal reading of that document — the 30 per cent shareholding threshold, significant financial support, being a director, the ability to influence recruitment decisions and so on — would suggest Palace's legal team are going to have their work cut out. Given all that, it might make sense for Palace to make a more general argument that a strict application of the rules in this case simply make no sense, as there is obviously no threat to the integrity of the competition, which is the entire point of article 5.01 in UEFA's rulebook, the regulation that deals with MCO clubs. And there is some encouragement here, in that the concepts of fairness, integrity and sporting justice are all enshrined in Swiss law. But there are risks attached to this approach, too. 'Swiss law does protect such principles and both CAS and the Swiss Federal Tribunal (where any appeals over a CAS verdict are heard but rarely upheld) have ruled accordingly,' says Ioannidis. 'However, I wouldn't run this argument, because the panel may take the view that it is precisely for these principles that UEFA's decision may be upheld, as the other clubs in the competition acted promptly and ensured they followed the rules and deadlines.' Advertisement That said, the Drogheda case shows that one of the panel disagreed with his colleagues. The written judgment has not been published, so we do not know why they disagreed but it is possible the Irish club's plea for a more common-sense-based assessment of the rules was persuasive. Palace may think that if they can do the same, they are halfway there. 'Not everything is negative for Palace,' says Ioannidis. 'I would argue that the intention of the regulator is to ensure fair competition. As such, the fact that Palace may have realised their mistake and acted in compliance with the rules, albeit late, shows a genuine and honest approach to the legitimate aim pursued by UEFA. 'In this instance, it would be fair, just and reasonable for UEFA to allow Palace to be admitted to the Europa League.' Another possible line of attack for Palace is the apparent inconsistencies in the application of UEFA's rules — and this is where the decision to make Forest a party in this appeal is intriguing. The argument, presumably, would be that Evangelos Marinakis, owner of both Forest and Greece's Olympiacos, did not place the former in a blind trust until the end of April, a move he reversed when they eventually failed to join their cousins from Athens in next season's Champions League. It is a moot point now but Marinakis seemed to miss the UEFA deadline, too, and, if literal readings are important, you either meet it or you don't. If Palace wanted to be really mischievous, they could ask what Marinakis was doing on the pitch at the end of Forest's home draw against Leicester City on May 11. While he may well have been checking on the health of an injured Forest player, the episode suggested the Greek billionaire still exerted some influence at the City Ground despite that blind-trust move. And, just to add some further spice to the pot, Parish has suggested that Forest played a part in Palace's demotion to the Conference League. But an argument that effectively depends on the panel accepting that it is OK for a club to be confused about the regulations is unlikely to pan out. 'The rules and deadlines have always been there, and Palace had to act promptly, irrespective of what other clubs did,' says Ioannidis. 'The panel might say that a professional club, with an army of expert lawyers, ought to be more diligent and proactive. If confused, they could have asked UEFA for clarification.' And with that sensible advice, we should probably wrap this up and wait for CAS to make sense of it all. Hopefully.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
🎥 Flamengo edge Atlético in tense clash, go top in Brasileirão
It was a kind of "preview" of what is to come in the round of 16 of the Brazil Cup. And Flamengo got the better of Atlético Mineiro this Sunday (27), for the 17th round of the Brasileirão in front of 54,550 attendees. In a tense game, with a controversial move and many cards, the Rubro-Negro won 1 x 0 thanks to Léo Ortiz. And they returned to lead the Brasileirã in the 1st Half The first acute move was in favor of Galo, with Rony almost celebrating. Atlético was successful for much of the initial stage, with individual markings and long balls, managing to contain the Rubro-Negro's momentum. As the minutes passed, Flamengo was gaining more space. The controversy came after a foul by Fausto Vera on Plata. It was a penalty and turned into a foul outside the area, but without a red card. Flamengo went for the pressure before the break - and again complained about Ramon Abatti Abel. Galo, on the other hand, had a great chance on the counter-attack, but Hulk preferred to pass. Fla lethal in the air The "start" of the second half was a truncated game with little inspiration from both sides. Flamengo had more possession and volume. But continued to find difficulty against good marking. Then Luiz Araújo took a "hand" free kick and Léo Ortiz scored his fourth goal in the air this season (30'). The sequence was of unsuccessful attempts from both sides. 📊 Table and schedule 📅 With one less game, Flamengo went to 36 points. Leaving Cruzeiro (34) behind. Atlético - defeated for the third round in a row - remains with 20. It's the 13th with 15 matches played. Both will face each other again on Thursday (31) and once again at Maracanã. It will be the first leg of the round of 16 of the Brazil Cup. The return will be the following Wednesday (6) and at Arena MRV. The next commitment of the duo for BR-25 will be on Sunday (3). Rubro-Negro will visit Ceará at Castelão. While CAM will host Red Bull Bragantino. This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇧🇷 here. 📸 Wagner Meier - 2025 Getty Images
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Which Players Could Leave PSG This Summer?
It has been a busy summer for Paris Saint-Germain, which has won its first-ever UEFA Champions League title, claimed a fourth consecutive Ligue 1 championship, and added another Trophée des Champions and Coupe de France title to its growing trophy cabinet. Les Parisiens only just finished their lengthy 2024-25 season in the United States, where they made it all the way to the FIFA Club World Cup Final only to lose to Chelsea. And yet, they have just a couple of weeks to rest and relax before returning to action and facing Tottenham Hotspur in the UEFA Super Cup on August 13. Read the full article by subscribing to Ensemble PSG on Substack When it comes to transfers, however, the summer has been relatively quiet for PSG. Apart from 19-year-old goalkeeper Renato Marin, who has joined on a free transfer from Roma, PSG have failed to complete a single signing. In terms of outgoings, they've loaned out teenage talents Gabriel Moscardo, Yoram Zague, and Naoufel El Hannach to Braga, Copenhagen, and Montpellier, respectively. Whilst certain new arrivals are needed, like a center back, it's also undeniable that most of PSG's business will involve the exit door. Today, we're taking a look at which players PSG need to dispose of this summer. 💶 Randal Kolo Muani: Sale It was just two years ago that PSG signed Randal Kolo Muani to a five-year contract, paying €75 million plus €15 million in bonuses for the Eintracht Frankfurt striker. It may as well have been two decades ago: Kolo Muani never came close to fitting into Luis Enrique's possession-heavy setup, unable to fill Kylian Mbappé's void and live up to his price tag, before eventually joining Juventus on loan in January. The French striker impressed in Italy, scoring 10 goals in 22 appearances, and it seems likely that PSG will try to capitalize on his value while it is relatively high. Manchester United are keeping tabs on him, Juventus is keen on a return, while Newcastle is eyeing him as a potential replacement for the wantaway Alexander Isak. At 26, Kolo Muani is still in his prime, and he should be able to fetch a decent fee. 💶 Marco Asensio: Sale Another player who revitalized his fortunes after departing PSG midway through the 2024-25 season was Marco Asensio. Once considered one of the brightest talents in world football, the three-time Champions League winner departed Real Madrid on a free transfer and joined PSG in 2023, where he was utilized in a variety of positions across midfield and attack. However, he decided to make the move to Aston Villa on loan in February, where he helped inject fresh new blood into their team and guided them to the Champions League quarterfinals. After emerging as an impressive substitute for Villa, Asensio has garnered interest from several clubs, including Milan and Inter. However, Fenerbahce are reportedly the frontrunners to sign the Spaniard, who has one year left on his contract. 💶 Milan Škriniar: Sale After completing deals for Archie Brown, Sofyan Amrabat, Tarik Cetin, and Jhon Duran, Fenerbahçe could be set for a double-swoop with Milan Škriniar and Asensio. Having established himself as one of the top center-backs in Serie A with Inter Milan, Škriniar struggled to adapt from a back three to a back four, with his clunky approach in possession failing to convince Enrique following his arrival in 2023. The Slovakian defender left for Fenerbahçe in January, where he scored three goals and provided two assists in 23 appearances and emerged as a key figure under José Mourinho. At 30 years of age, Škriniar isn't going to be turning around his style anytime soon, but he's nevertheless a useful figure when used in the right system. With a contract until 2028, PSG will hope to sell him, but they could also settle for a loan with an option to buy if no other offer is made. Continue reading by subscribing to Ensemble PSG on Substack
