Delhi HC hears Leena Maria Paul's bail plea in money laundering case
New Delhi [India], May 19 (ANI): The Delhi High Court heard arguments on behalf of Sukesh Chandrasekhar's wife Leena Maria Paul in a money laundering case on Monday.
She has sought bail on the grounds of the period of custody, parity, and provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) related to women accused.
The actor has been in custody for the last three years and seven months.
A single bench of justice Shalinder Kaur is dealing with Leena Maria Paul's bail application, which was filed last year. The court has listed the matter for hearing the prosecution's arguments on July 2.
Advocate Anant Malik, along with John Paul Edison, appeared for the petitioner, Leena. He argued that despite being in custody for around three years and seven months, charges have not been framed against her yet. At the same time, other co-accused were granted bail by the High Court and the trial court.
He further argued that the accused Jacqueline Fernandez was not arrested during the investigation. She was granted bail on the appearance on the summons issued to her
It was also argued that the twin condition under Section 45 of PMLA also has a provision related to the woman accused.
It was submitted that on December 14, 2021, a complaint was filed against the petitioner and others, 178 witnesses. The matter is still at the stage of arguements on charges on behalf of the accused persons.
Accused Pradeep Ramdani, Avtar Singh Kochar, Pinki Irani,and Jacqueline Fernandez are on bail, advocate Malik argued.
Petitioner's role is similar to that of Fernandez, he added.
Her last bail application was rejected on May 19, 2023 at which time arguments on the charge was still going on. Still arguments on charges are going on behalf of the accused and nothing had changed.
He further submitted that Avtar Singh Kochar was granted bail on grounds of delay. While granting the bail, the Supreme Court's judgment in the Manish Sisodia case was also mentioned.
A woman is entitled to special treatment while considering the bail of a woman under PMLA, the counsel said.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has opposed the bail plea by submitting that section 45 (2) is not applicable to a woman accused. The Supreme Court has already decided what is to be considered, the ED said.
The twin conditions of Section 45 are in addition to the provision of 439 CrPC. Besides, the conduct of the accused is also to be looked into while considering the bail plea. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Chhattisgarh Congress releases expenditure account after ED attaches Rajiv Bhawan
RAIPUR: After the Enforcement Directorate (ED) provisionally attached the Congress Bhawan in Sukma last Friday, the opposition in Chhattisgarh made public on what expenditures were done and how in the construction of the party's office 'Rajiv Bhawan' in the district. The Congress expressed its annoyance and cited the ED's move as part of the BJP's political conspiracy as the opposition claimed that the central agency has already been provided with the information demanded on Sukma party office in writing. 'Despite that the ED has maliciously attached the Sukma district office of Congress. The entire expenses on its construction has been borne by the state Congress party, every rupee spent has been accounted for, the payment done through cheques and got audited', claimed Sushil Anand Shukla, Congress media cell chairman. The total cost of construction of the district Congress Bhawan is Rs 65.84 lakh, he stated. The ED has provisionally attached the Congress party office building besides the properties owned by Congress MLA Kawasi Lakhma and his son Harish in connection with the alleged liquor scam in Chhattisgarh.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Police personnel in plain clothes firing upon car driver cannot be considered as official duty: SC
New Delhi, The conduct of police personnel surrounding a civilian vehicle in plain clothes and jointly firing upon its occupant cannot be considered under duties of public order or effecting lawful arrest, the Supreme Court has said, dismissing a plea of nine Punjab cops to quash murder charges against them in an alleged fake encounter case. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta also restored the destruction of evidence charge levelled on Deputy Commissioner of Police Parampal Singh for directing the removal of the number plate of the car after the firing incident in 2015 in which a driver was killed. It has been held that the cloak of official duty cannot be extended to acts intended to thwart justice, the court observed noting that prior sanction was not required to prosecute the DCP and other police personnel for their alleged actions. The bench in its April 29 order uploaded recently dismissed the appeals of nine police personnel challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order of May 20, 2019, where it refused to quash the case against them. The apex court said having gone through the material placed on record, the court is of the view that no case is made out for interference with the impugned order of the high court. The bench rejected the submission of eight police personnel that cognisance of complaint against them cannot be taken as it was barred under Section 197 of CrPC under which prior permission was needed to prosecute public servants. "Equally untenable is the submission that cognisance was barred for want of sanction under Section 197 CrPC. The petitioners stand accused of surrounding a civilian vehicle in plain clothes and jointly firing upon its occupant. "Such conduct, by its very nature, bears no reasonable nexus to the duties of maintaining public order or effecting lawful arrest," it said. The bench further said, "The availability of official firearms, or even an erroneous official objective cannot transmute acts wholly outside the colour of authority into those done while acting or purporting to act in discharge of official duty." Dealing with the case involving DCP Parampal Singh, the bench said an act that is per se directed to erasing potential evidence, if ultimately proved, cannot be regarded as reasonably connected with any bona-fide police duty. "The test consistently applied by this court is whether the impugned act bears a direct and inseparable nexus to official functions. "We believe that where the very accusation is suppression of evidence, the nexus is absent on the face of the record. In such a situation the bar of section 197 CrPC is not attracted, and sanction is not a condition precedent to cognisance," the bench said. It said this court in a verdict of 2000 while dealing with Section 197 of CrPC held that "the cloak of official duty cannot be extended to acts intended to thwart justice". The top court said the criminal complaint alleges, in clear and specific terms, that the nine policemen surrounded the Hyundai i-20 car, alighted with firearms, and fired in concert, fatally injuring the occupant. It added that the narrative was supported, at least prima facie, by two eye-witness depositions recorded under Section 200 CrPC during the preliminary inquiry. "In addition, the Special Investigation Team constituted at the behest of senior police administrators, found the self-defence version subsequently projected in FIR…to be false and recommended prosecution of eight of the petitioners for culpable homicide. "A CCTV clip recovered by the SIT depicts the three police vehicles converging on the i-20 exactly as alleged. Taken together, these materials furnish a coherent evidentiary thread sufficient, at the threshold, to justify summoning and the framing of charges," the top court said. Justice Nath, who penned the verdict on behalf of the bench said the order of the magistrate summoning the policemen and the subsequent order of the Sessions Court framing charges proceed on an appreciation that there exists prima facie evidence of concerted firearm assault. "No error of law or perversity of approach is shown," the bench said and dismissed the appeal filed by the policemen. The top court, however, allowed the appeal of complainant Princepal Singh seeking reversal of the high court's order of May 20, 2019, by which it had quashed a criminal complaint and the summoning order against DCP Parampal Singh in the destruction of evidence case against him. The bench said, "In our considered opinion, at the summoning stage, those two depositions, read with the detailed narrative in the complaint, furnish a legally sufficient basis to proceed. Their credibility is a matter for trial, not for preliminary scrutiny." As per the complaint, at 6.30 pm, on June 16, 2015, a police party, travelling in a Bolero jeep, an Innova and a Verna, intercepted a white Hyundai i-20 on the Verka-Batala Road in Amritsar of Punjab. It said nine policemen alighted in plain clothes and, after a brief exhortation, opened fire from pistols and assault rifles at close range, killing the car driver, Mukhjit Singh @ Mukha. The complainant and another witness claim to have seen the shooting and to have raised an alarm that drew local residents to the spot. They claimed shortly after the firing incident, DCP Parampal Singh arrived with additional force, cordoned off the scene and directed the removal of the car's registration plates.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Punjab governor Gulab Chand Kataria expresses grief on AI 171 plane crash, says
Chandigarh (Punjab) [India], June 15 (ANI): Punjab governor Gulab Chand Kataria on Sunday expressed grief over the recent AI 171 plane crash in Ahmedabad stating that incident has shaken the whole country and world. Kataria said that the reason for the mishap will be revealed after an investigation. 'This incident has shaken India and the entire world. How it happened will be known only after an investigation... This is the first time I have seen such a big incident', Kataria told reporters here. On June 12, the AI 171 Boeing Dreamliner flight, which was bound for London's Gatwick airport crashed soon after taking off resulting in the deaths of all but one of the 242 people onboard. The victims included former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani. Gujarat State administration has arranged for the death certificates of those who died in the recent Air India plane crash to be issued directly at the hospital, sparing grieving families the need to visit multiple offices, Ahmedabad Municipal Commissioner Banchha Nidhi Pani said today. Further, Pani said, that the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, which is probing the crash has successfully retrieved the aircraft's black box. 'The black box had to be recovered. The black box is either in the front or in the back. Fortunately, in this case, the tail end (of the plane) was not destroyed, and it was stuck in the first building. The AAIB team requested that cranes, labourers, and engineers be provided to recover the black box. After this, the Black box was recovered,' the Ahmedabad Municipal commissioner said. 'After that, we ensured that people should not go to offices for death certificates. A single-window system was created, and the death certificates were issued then and there,' he said. Authorities have begun the process of identifying the bodies of the deceased from the charred wreckage with the help of DNA and blood samples provided by relatives. Earlier today, Ahmedabad Additional Medical Superintendent of Civil Hospital Dr. Rajnish Patel said a total of 31 DNA samples have been identified and 12 bodies have been handed over to their respective family members. 'The bodies of 31 DNAs have been matched. 12 bodies have been handed over to their respective family members. We are waiting for others to come and collect the remains of their relatives', he told reporters. (ANI)
